The integrity of a beam-column joint is critical to the overall structure. Failure of the joint can lead to large deformations and damage. Joint shear strength often governs the size of frame columns. Design assumes beams will yield at column faces, imposing demands on the joint. Joint shear from reinforcing steel strains over yield is calculated at 1.25 times yield strength. A free body diagram is made at the joint to calculate shear demands.
The integrity of a beam-column joint is critical to the overall structure. Failure of the joint can lead to large deformations and damage. Joint shear strength often governs the size of frame columns. Design assumes beams will yield at column faces, imposing demands on the joint. Joint shear from reinforcing steel strains over yield is calculated at 1.25 times yield strength. A free body diagram is made at the joint to calculate shear demands.
The integrity of a beam-column joint is critical to the overall structure. Failure of the joint can lead to large deformations and damage. Joint shear strength often governs the size of frame columns. Design assumes beams will yield at column faces, imposing demands on the joint. Joint shear from reinforcing steel strains over yield is calculated at 1.25 times yield strength. A free body diagram is made at the joint to calculate shear demands.
dependent on the behavior of the beam-column joint
➢ Degradation of the joint can result in large
lateral deformations which can cause excessive damage or even failure
➢ Joint shear is a critical check and will often
govern the size of the moment frame columns
➢ As part of the frame design, it is assumed that
the beams framing into the column will yield and develop their probable moment strengths at the column faces
➢ This action determines the demands on the
column and the beam column joint ➢ Development of inelastic rotations at the faces of joints of reinforced concrete frames is associated with strains in the flexural reinforcement well in excess of the yield strain
➢ Joint shear force generated by the
flexural reinforcement is calculated for a stress of 1.25fy in the reinforcement
➢ Assuming the beam to have zero axial load,
the flexural compression force in the beam on one side of the joint is taken equal to the flexural tension force on the same side of the joint ➢ Use a free body diagram is made by cutting through the beam plastic hinges on both sides of the column and cutting through the column one-half story height above and below the joint
➢ In this figure, subscripts A and B refer to
beams A and B on opposite sides of the joint, and Ve2,Aand Ve1,Bare shears in the beams at the joint face corresponding to development of Mprat both ends of the beam
➢ For a typical story, the column
midheightprovides good approximation to the point of contraflexure