Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 s2.0 S0165232X12002030 Main PDF
1 s2.0 S0165232X12002030 Main PDF
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: A novel self-deicing road system with utilization of solar energy was proposed in this paper, this system is
Received 30 March 2012 consisted of a carbon nano-fiber polymer (CNFP) thermal source, an AlN-ceramic insulated encapsulation
Accepted 15 October 2012 layer, a multiwall carbon nanotube (MWCNT)/cement-based thermal conduction layer and a thermally insu-
lated substrate. The electric and thermo-electric properties of a CNFP, which is composed of individual carbon
Keywords:
nano-fibers (10–200 nm), were tested. The property of high thermo-electric efficiency was verified, and the
Deicing
CNFP
resistivity of the CNFP exhibited piecewise linear temperature-dependent characteristics within a certain
Thermo-electrical property temperature range (0–280 °C). The MWCNT/cement-based composite, which was filled with 3% by weight
MWCNT/cement-based composite MWCNT, was proposed as the thermal conduction layer because its thermal conduction properties are superior
Snow-melting to those of cement with other fillers and to those of common cement-based composites. To ensure the efficient
operation of the CNFP, an AlN-ceramic wafer (0.5 mm) was employed as the electro-insulated layer because of
its favorable insulating and thermo-conductive properties. The constructed system was applied in deicing and
field snow-melting studies, in which the effects of ambient temperature, heat flux density and ice thickness on
the deicing and snow-melting performance of the self-deicing system were investigated. The efficiency, repeat-
ability, cost and feasibility of the self-deicing road system in both deicing and snow-melting applications were
analyzed. Indices for evaluating the deicing or snow-melting performance of the self-deicing road system were
proposed and the optimal values for each parameter are presented.
© 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
0165-232X/$ – see front matter © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2012.10.007
H. Li et al. / Cold Regions Science and Technology 86 (2013) 22–35 23
flux density, wind speed, the surrounding temperature and the thick-
ness of the ice layer on the deicing performance of this method were
not investigated (Chang et al., 2009). Afterwards, another new method
of deicing with carbon fiber heating wire (CFHW) buried inside con-
crete slab was proposed by Zhao et al. (2010). To verify the feasibility
of the proposed deicing approach, the appropriate space of embedded
CEHW in concrete slab and the deicing/snow-melting performance of
this slab in laboratory and field environments were studied by the
experiments, which indicated that the electro-thermal method of
CFHW for bridge deck deicing is practicable (Zhao et al., 2010,
2011). Obviously, the key factor that determines the applicability of
electro-thermal-based deicing approach is the electro-thermal
efficiency.
Based on its good electro-thermal properties, the CNFP-based self-
deicing system for roads, consisting of a thermally insulated epoxy
substrate, a CNFP high-efficiency thermal source, an AlN ceramic
wafer insulated capsulation layer and a MWCNT/cement-based highly
thermo-conductive layer, was proposed in this study. The deicing and
snow-melting performance of this system in both a chilled and an
ambient environment was investigated. The high efficiency, repeatability,
low cost and feasibility of a CNFP-based road self-deicing system for both
deicing and snow-melting applications were validated through this
study.
Fig. 3. SEM image of CNFP (a) 1 mm, (b) 100 um, (c) 50 um, (d) a node, (e) fiber in node (1 μm,) and (f) fiber connection in a node (3 μm).
H. Li et al. / Cold Regions Science and Technology 86 (2013) 22–35 25
Temperature (°C)
-10 40 100°C 250 8V
150
10V
200
100
150
50
100
0 50
-50 0
0 100 200 300 0 200 400 600 800 1000
Time (sec) Time (s)
Fig. 4. The temperature versus time curves of CNFP (a) at various ambient temperatures with an applied voltage of 4 V and (b) with applied voltage of 4, 6, 8 and 10 V at room
temperature.
electrical properties of CNFP. In region 3 (above 280 °C), the resistivity composite containing MWCNT was fabricated in this study to take
of CNFP remains constant (0.6 Ω ⋅ mm) and is again independent of the advantage of the excellent thermal and electrical properties of MWCNTs
surrounding temperature. Statistically, the resistivity of CNFP is inde- (~6000 W/(m·K)).
pendent of the specimen size. MWCNTs (b 50 nm, > 95%), which were purchased from the
Based on the temperature dependence of the resistivity as shown in Chengdu Institute of Organic Chemistry Academia Sinica (Chengdu,
Fig. 5, a piecewise linear model of the resistivity of CFNP was proposed China), were mixed with cement to fabricate material for the thermal
in the following form (units are Ω ⋅ mm): conduction layer. With 0.1% by cement weight sodium dodecyl sul-
fate (SDS) as the dispersing agent, 1%, 3% and 5% by cement weight
T b 0BC MWCNTs were first dispersed in a water solution of SDS and stirred
0BC ≤ T ≤ 280 C
o
0:72 at a speed of 3,000 rpm for 1 h. An ultrasound dispersing instrument
ρCNFP ¼ ð3Þ
0:72−4:28 10−4 T T ≥ 280 C:
o
was used to disperse the MWCNTs in the water at a power of 400 W
for 2 h and to ensure the uniformity of the mixture. Then 350 g of
cement was poured into the prepared mixture of water and MWCNTs
2.2. Thermo-conductive properties of MWCNT/cement-based composite in a water-cement ratio of 0.4 and stirred mechanically at a speed
of 2,000 rpm for 10 min using an agitator to create a uniform MWCNT/
2.2.1. Materials and methods cement-based composite. Finally, the composite was poured into
As another component of a self-deicing road system, the thermal molds to form specimens with a size of 100×100×25 mm; the speci-
conduction layer embedded in the road should have high thermal mens were demoded after 24 h and then cured in a moisture room for
conductivity to achieve the expected heat transfer efficiency during 7 days.
the deicing process. Although the Portland cement concrete has
been proven to have thermal conductivity (Yang et al., 2012), for further 2.2.1.1. Results and discussion. Based on the Fourier heat conduction
improving the heat transfer efficiency of concrete, a developed concrete equation, the thermal conductivity of the MWCNT/cement-based
with much higher thermal conductivity should be developed in this composite was studied as a thermal steady-state problem with an
paper. Previous studies have indicated that the electrical properties of infinite plate (Karlekar and Desmond, 1977). The temperature was
cement-based composites can be enhanced greatly by filling them monitored using two K-type thermocouples. One was embedded at
with a highly conductive admixture, such as carbon fiber, carbon 7.5 mm above the bottom surface, and the other was at 7.5 mm
black, and steel fibers (Chen and Chung, 1995; Chung, 2001, 2004). below the upper surface of the specimen; the thermocouples were
To efficiently enhance the thermal conductivity, a cement-based 10 mm apart. DC power supplied the heat flux to the CNFP layer.
1.0 1%
0.75 10
A(0,0.72) 3%
Resistivity (Ω∗mm)
0.70 5%•
Temperature gap (°C)
slope=-4.28*10-4 8
Resistivity (Ω∗mm)
0.65 5
Expeimental Study
B(280,0.6) 6 Theory prediction
λ (Wm-1K-1)
0.8 0.60
Average resistivity 4
Piecewise Linear Fit
0.55 4 3
0 100 200 300
Temperature (°C)
1:1 2
2
1:2
1% 3% 5%
0.6 1:3 Wt. of MWCNT (%)
0
-50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Temperature (°C) Time (s)
Fig. 5. The temperature-dependent resistivity of CNFP. Outer figure: resistivity with Fig. 6. The thermal conductivity of the MWCNT/cement-based composite. Outer figure:
three n ratios equal to 1:1, 1:2 and 1:3; Inner figure: the average resistivity and linear temperature gap between two measurement points vs. time; inner figure: theoretical
curve-fit. and experimental thermal conductivity.
26 H. Li et al. / Cold Regions Science and Technology 86 (2013) 22–35
The heat flux is defined as the product of inputting a voltage and to micro-defects and weak interfaces because phonon and electrons
causing a corresponding current to flow through the CNFP layer. will frequently scatter at the locations of such defects. These negative
Then the mathematical formula for the thermal conductivity coefficient effects are caused by the aggregation of MWCNTs in the composite.
derived from the Fourier laws is given as Therefore, the enhancement of heat conduction is not only dependent
on the quantity of filled MWCNTs but is also determined by the status
Q dx of the dispersion of MWCNTs in the composite. As presented in Fig. 6,
λc ¼ − ; ð4Þ the thermal conductivity cannot be further improved by increasing
A dT
the amount of MWCNTs after the proportion of MWCNTs exceeds 3%.
where λc is the thermal conductivity coefficient of the material, Q is the Therefore, in this study, the optimal percentage of MWCNTs for im-
heat flux flowing into the bottom of the specimen, which is negative for proving the thermal conductivity of cement-based composites filled
inflow and positive for outflow, A is the bottom surface area of the ex- with MWCNTs is 3%; the thermal conductivity coefficient corresponding
perimental specimen, and dT is the temperature gradient along the to this percentage is 2.83 W/(m·K). Cement-based composites filled with
dx
height of the specimen and is given by the ratio of the stable tempera- MWCNTs would be qualified for incorporation into the CNFP-based
ture gap and the distance (10 mm) between the two measuring points. self-deicing road system.
The temperature gap converges after approximately 4000 sec, as
shown in Fig. 6. The stable temperature gap between two measurement 3. Integration of the CNFP-based self-deicing road system and its
points was extracted. The thermal conductivity coefficients of the deicing performance in a refrigerator
three types of samples are all higher than that of normal concrete
(1.58 W/ (m·K)), indicating that the thermal properties of cement- 3.1. Integration of the CNFP-based self-deicing road system
based composites containing MWCNTs are significantly improved.
Consequently, cement-based composites containing MWCNTs can be A CNFP-based self-deicing road system should include a heating
incorporated into a self-deicing road system as the thermal conduction source, a thermal transfer layer, an electro-insulated layer and a ther-
layer. mally insulated substrate. The configuration of the CNFP-based self-
It should be noted that as the amount of MWCNTs increases, it deicing road system that was designed in this study is shown in Fig. 7.
becomes more difficult to disperse the MWCNTs uniformly in the CNFP was selected as the heat source. To prevent the heat energy from
cement because of the large specific surface area. Generally, heat flowing down into the soil below the road, epoxy was chosen as the
conduction in MWCNT/cement-based composites is dominated by thermal insulation substrate and placed between the soil and the CNFP
the transportation of phonon and electrons and is extremely sensitive layer. In terms of the mechanical requirements of a road, the cement-
Fig. 8. The schematic of the integrated controllable self-deicing road system consisting of a CNFP-based road component, a DC power supply, and monitoring and control modules.
H. Li et al. / Cold Regions Science and Technology 86 (2013) 22–35 27
Temperature(°C)
Temperature(°C)
0 0 0
1800 W/m2 1800 W/m2 1800 W/m2
2 2
1400 W/m 1400 W/m 1400 W/m2
-5 -5 -5
1000 W/m2 1000 W/m2 1000 W/m2
600 W/m2 600 W/m2 600 W/m2
-10 -10 -10
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 0 3000 6000 9000 12000 15000 0 4000 8000 12000 16000
Time (sec) Time (sec) Time (sec)
Fig. 11. The temperature distribution at the interface between the ice layer and the cement-based thermal conduction layer at an ambient temperature of −10 °C and for an ice
thickness of (a) 10 mm, (b) 15 mm, and (c) 20 mm.
28 H. Li et al. / Cold Regions Science and Technology 86 (2013) 22–35
Table 1
Times of initiation and completion of deicing.
Table 2 were selected as the three critical factors to be investigated in this exper-
Energy consumption for deicing. iment. The heat flux densities used in this experiment were 600, 1000,
Temperature Ice thickness Energy / kJ 1400 and 1800 W/m2. The ice was formed in a refrigerator with sizes of
/°C /mm 100×100×10 mm, 100×100×15 mm and 100 × 100 × 20 mm. The
600 W/m2 1000 W/m2 1400 W/m2 1800 W/m2
ambient temperatures were −30, −20 and −10 °C. The temperature
−10 10 53.82 64.5 71.82 60.48 distribution in the system was monitored by the embedded K-type
15 78.12 89.7 81.48 86.94
thermocouples. The corresponding comprehensive deicing efficiency
20 99 102.3 107.1 104.76
−20 10 86.76 75 94.5 97.74 was evaluated using the proposed indices, which are described later
15 94.5 99.3 106.26 121.5 in this paper. It should be noted that the heat convection coefficient is
20 102.78 111.3 113.82 135 affected by the ambient wind speed. However, it is hard to simulate
−30 10 101.28 86.7 101.22 110.16 the wind speed in a refrigerator, so this factor is ignored in the deicing
15 120.6 112.5 127.68 147.42
20 137.52 140.1 141.12 167.4
test.
and 175 W/m·K), which ensures normal performance of the CNFP- From a practical point of view, the most important points for this
based thermal source during the deicing process. The MWCNT/cement- system are the deicing time and the energy consumption. Therefore,
based thermo-conductive layer (100×100×25 mm) was then placed the time cost and energy consumption were proposed as the relevant
over the AlN ceramic wafer layer. All of the different components were performance indices and were used to evaluate the deicing efficiency.
glued together and firmly connected to guarantee perfect thermal contact First, the temperature distribution was obtained from the embed-
and effective heat transfer. ded thermocouples. The temperature recorded at the interface of the
Fig. 9 presents the deicing system integration procedure. To monitor cement-based thermal conduction layer, and the ice is shown in
the temperature change during the deicing process, four K-type ther- Fig. 11 for an ambient temperature of − 10 °C; ice thicknesses of 10,
mocouples (Center 309 thermometer) were used in the system. Two 15 and 20 mm; and four heat flux densities. Fig. 11 shows that the
of them were embedded at the interface between the thermal conduc- temperature versus time curves can be divided into three stages,
tion layer and the ice layer; at the upper surface of the ice layer, a third i.e., an ice-specific heat stage (b 0 °C), an ice-phase change stage
one was embedded at 12.5 mm above the bottom of the thermal con- (≈0 °C) and a water-specific heat stage (>0 °C). During the ice spe-
duction layer, and the last one was placed on the side wall of the system cific heat stage, the temperature rapidly increases up to 0 °C, the
to monitor the surrounding temperature. The anemoscope and caliper phase change begins, the ice begins to melt, and the temperature is
were fixed at the experiment site for measuring the wind and the ice fixed until the completion of ice melting. The total duration of these
thickness. DC power was then applied to the specimen to supply the two stages is referred to as the time cost for ice deicing. After the
energy for the deicing system. The intelligent control equipment (PC, ice phase change is completed, the temperature at the upper surface
data acquisition system) was assembled with the other modules to of the ice layer has reached the freezing point, as the third region in
complete the system integration and was used to investigate the Fig. 11 shows.
deicing performance of the system in this study. The results show that a higher heat flux density corresponds to a
The setup for the deicing experiment in a refrigerator is shown in steeper heating gradient and a lower time cost for deicing. However,
Fig. 10. The heat flux density, ice thickness and ambient temperature for the same heat flux density and ambient temperature, thicker ice
2.3%~4.6% 5.5%~10.5%
84.81%~86.8% 73.6%~76.7% 65%~68.6%
Fig. 12. The proportion of the three effective energy components for various conditions: (a) −10 °C, (b) −20 °C, and (c) −30 °C.
H. Li et al. / Cold Regions Science and Technology 86 (2013) 22–35 29
Energy (kJ)
Energy (kJ)
Energy (kJ)
-30C° -20C° -30C° -30C°
120 120 140
-30C° 120
100 120
100 100
80 100
80 80
60 80
60 60
40 60
10 15 20 10 15 20 10 15 20 10 15 20
Thickness of ice (mm) Thickness of ice (mm) Thickness of ice (mm) Thickness of ice (mm)
-10C° -20C°
11 -10C° -20C° -10C° -20C°
-10C° -20C° 14 10
25
Time(sec*103)
Time(sec*103)
Time(sec*103)
Time(sec*103)
10
-30C° 12 -30C° 9 -30C° -30C°
20 8
8
10 6
15 7
8 6 4
10 6 5
4 2
10 15 20 10 15 20 10 15 20 10 15 20
Thickness of ice (mm) Thickness of ice (mm) Thickness of ice (mm) Thickness of ice (mm)
Fig. 13. The effect of ice thickness on the energy and time required to deice a certain amount of ice under specified conditions (heat flux density and ambient temperature): (a) 600 W/m2,
(b) 1000 W/m2, (c) 1400 W/m2, and (d) 1800 W/m2.
requires more time for deicing. The first stage of the curve represents 3.3.1. The effect of ice thickness
many of the characteristics associated with the heat flux density, The total input energy can be categorized as either the effective energy
such as the start of deicing and the speed of the temperature rise. or the waste energy, which is dissipated to the surroundings. The effective
The time consumption and energy expenditure related to the latent energy is defined as the energy used for the phase change of ice (L-H-I),
heat of the ice (335 kJ/kg) for deicing can be obtained from the second for ice heating (S-H-I) and for system heating (S-H-S):
stage.
For the other ambient temperatures of − 20 and − 30 °C, the Eeffective ¼ Eice þ Esystem ¼ L⋅mice þ cice mice ΔT þ Esystem
times of the initiation and completion of deicing in the temperature ¼ ðL þ cice ΔT Þ⋅A⋅ρice ⋅d þ Esystem ; ð5Þ
curves are listed in Table 1. The energy consumption was calculated
by multiplying the heat flux density qw (W/m 2) by the time required where Eeffective is defined as the effective energy used for deicing, Eice is the
to finish the deicing process (E = qwt); the results are listed in Table 2. energy consumed by ice heating and phase change, Esystem is the energy
The effect of the heat flux density and ice thickness on the deicing time used for system heating, cice is the specific heat of ice (2.1 kJ/ (kg·°C)),
is the same as for an ambient temperature of −10 °C. Additionally, a ΔT is the temperature difference between the ice and the surround-
lower ambient temperature corresponds to a longer deicing time. Of ings up to 0 °C, L is the latent heat of the phase change of ice to
most interest is that, for most of the cases listed in Table 1, the energy water (335 kJ/ kg), ρice is the density of ice (970 kg/m 3), A is the
consumption for deicing is lower with a smaller heat flux density, cross-sectional area of heat flow (100× 100 mm), and d is the thickness
whereas the time for deicing is longer. of the ice.
10mm
Time (sec*10 )
10
3
14 10
15mm 15mm 15mm 15mm
Time (sec)
20
Time (sec)
15mm 15mm
Energy (kJ)
15mm 15mm
Energy (kJ)
Energy (kJ)
120 140
20mm 120 20mm 120 20mm 20mm
100 120
100 100 100
80
80 80
60 80
60 60
-30 -20 -10 -30 -20 -10 -30 -20 -10 -30 -20 -10
Ambient temperature (oC) Ambient temperature (oC) Ambient temperature (oC) Ambient temperature (oC)
Fig. 14. The effect of ambient temperature on the energy and time required to deice a certain amount of ice with applied heat flux densities of (a) 600 W/m2, (b) 1000 W/m2, (c) 1400 W/m2,
and (d) 1800 W/m2.
30 H. Li et al. / Cold Regions Science and Technology 86 (2013) 22–35
Time (sec*103)
20mm 20
20mm 20mm
Time (sec)
12 12
16
9 9
12
6
6
8
3
3
600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
Heat flux density (W/m2) Heat flux density (W/m2) Heat flux density (W/m2)
Energy (kJ)
Energy (kJ) 20mm 20mm
100 140
100
120
80
80 100
60 80
60
600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
Heat flux density (W/m2) Heat flux density (W/m2) Heat flux density (W/m2)
Fig. 15. The effect of heat flux density on the energy and time required to deice a certain amount of ice at ambient temperatures of (a) −10 °C, (b) −20 °C, and (c) −30 °C.
Table 3 The data in Tables 1 and 2 are depicted in Fig. 13. At a specific
Comprehensive index of time-energy for the evaluation of deicing efficiency. ambient temperature, the energy and time required to deice a certain
Temperature, Ice thickness, 600 1000 1400 1800 amount of ice both increase approximately linearly with the ice thick-
°C mm W/m2 W/m2 W/m2 W/m2 ness for heat flux densities of 600, 1000, 1400 and 1800 W/m 2 . This
−10 10 1.749 1.617 1.572 1.217 trend occurs because the energy consumed by ice heating and phase
15 1.871 1.689 1.355 1.340 change are linear functions of ice thickness and account for more than
20 1.924 1.575 1.464 1.331 90% of the effective energy, as shown in Fig. 12. Other energy expen-
−20 10 1.888 1.286 1.434 1.376 ditures, such as dissipation and system heating, are independent of
15 1.778 1.448 1.356 1.429
20 1.761 1.474 1.318 1.438
the thickness of the ice at the same ambient temperature. Therefore,
−30 10 1.919 1.301 1.347 1.363 the approximate linear relationship between both deicing time and
15 1.818 1.323 1.320 1.407 energy consumption and ice thickness is acceptable and reasonable.
20 1.822 1.448 1.283 1.406
Time-Energy index
Fig. 16. Index of time-energy in deicing for ambient temperatures of (a) −10 °C, (b) −20 °C, and (c) −30 °C.
H. Li et al. / Cold Regions Science and Technology 86 (2013) 22–35 31
Time(sec*103)
Time(sec*103)
Time(sec*103)
8 72 12 14 108
Energy (kJ)
Energy (kJ)
Energy (kJ)
90
10 12 106
6 66
85
8 10 104
60 80
4 6 8 102
54 75 6 100
4
2 70 4 98
600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 600 800 10001200140016001800
2 2 2
Heat flux density (W/m ) Heat flux density (W/m ) Heat flux density (W/m )
Fig. 17. The evaluation of the prior options for time and energy consumption on deicing efficiency at an ambient temperature of −10 °C for ice thicknesses of (a) 10 mm, (b) 15 mm, and
(c) 20 mm.
in Harbin, China), the energy that dissipates to the environment is only and energy because the shortest time cost does not usually accompany
a small portion of the entire energy. Consequently, it is reasonable to the most economic energy requirement. Therefore, three evaluation in-
conclude that the consumptions of time and energy for deicing are dices could be used to determine the expected options for the heat flux
approximately linear functions of the ambient temperature. density for a certain amount of ice. The first choice is defined as a compre-
hensive index, β, which accounts for the optimal time and energy effi-
3.3.3. The effect of heat flux density ciency as follows (a balance between time and energy consumption):
For fixed conditions (ice thickness and ambient temperature), the
energy and time requirements for the deicing process are constant. The β ¼ ðT=T max Þ þ Ec =Ec;max ; ð6Þ
heat flux density refers to the energy input to a unit area per unit time
and essentially dictates the heating rate and temperature gradient, as where T and Ec are the time and energy used for deicing, Tmax and Ec,max
shown in Fig. 11. A higher heat flux density results in a faster heating are the longest time and maximum energy required for deicing a certain
rate and a smaller time expenditure for deicing. amount of ice with varying heat flux density under the same ambient
As shown in Fig. 15, the deicing time decreases with the increase in conditions. To minimize the confusion regarding the equation working
heat flux density, with a very fast decay at the beginning followed by a conditions, the heat flux cannot be zero and should be in a reasonable
relatively slower decay. The results indicate that increasing the heat flux range to ensure that the deicing process is finished in a finite time period.
density is effective for deicing in the range of 600–1000 W/m 2 but that The second index considers only the energy concerned, i.e., the require-
the effectiveness increases little when the heat flux density exceeds ment of minimum power consumption. The last index considers only
1000 W/m2. The energy is the product of the heat flux density and the shortest time expenditure for an emergency case.
the time used for deicing; the higher the heat flux density, the less the As shown in Table 3 and Fig. 16, at an ambient temperature of −10 °C
expenditure of time, so a minimum energy consumption value (optimal the optimal heat flux densities were 1800, 1400/1800 and 1800 W/m2 for
value) should exist, as shown in Fig. 15. For example, 1000 W/m2 is ice with thicknesses of 10, 15 and 20 mm, where the minimum
the optimal heat flux density for ice with a thickness of 10 mm at an time-energy indices are 1.217, 1.34 and 1.331, respectively. These optimal
ambient temperature of −20 °C. values were reasonable because for the heat flux density of 1800 W/m2
the time efficiency was much higher than the increase in energy con-
3.4. The evaluation of deicing efficiency based on the priority of time and sumption. At an ambient temperature of −20 °C, the most appropriate
energy options heat flux densities were 1000, 1000 and 1400 W/m 2 for ice with thick-
nesses of 10, 15 and 20 mm, where the minimum time-energy indices
Considering the time and energy consumption efficiency associated of 1.286, 1.356 and 1.318, respectively, represent the optimal balance
with deicing, the optimal heat flux density option may not coincide between the time efficiency and the energy consumption. Furthermore,
with the other parameters being specified, which require that the 1000 and 1400 W/m 2 could be the best choices for ice thicknesses of 10
least energy and the shortest time expenditure be used to deice a cer- and 20 mm. There were two acceptable heat flux densities, 1000 and
tain amount of ice. However, it is impossible to optimize both time 1400 W/m2, for deicing 15-mm-thick ice because of their similar indices
Time(sec*103)
100 14
Energy (kJ)
Energy (kJ)
Energy (kJ)
12 120 14
95 130
12
10 90 12
10 110 120
8 85 10
80 8
100 110
6 6 8
75
4 70 4 90 6 100
600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 600 800 10001200140016001800
Heat flux density (W/m2) Heat flux density (W/m2) Heat flux density (W/m2)
Fig. 18. The evaluation of the prior options for time and energy consumption on deicing efficiency at an ambient temperature of −20 °C for ice thicknesses of (a) 10 mm, (b) 15 mm, and
(c) 20 mm.
32 H. Li et al. / Cold Regions Science and Technology 86 (2013) 22–35
Time(sec*103)
Time(sec*103
Time(sec*103
18
Energy (kJ)
Energy (kJ)
Energy (kJ)
110 110
12 12 140
15
100 100 130
9 9 12
120
90 90 9
6 6 110
80 80 6 100
600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
2 2 2
Heat flux density (W/m ) Heat flux density (W/m ) Heat flux density (W/m )
Fig. 19. The evaluation of the prior options for time and energy consumption on deicing efficiency at an ambient temperature of −30 °C with ice thicknesses of (a) 10 mm, (b) 15 mm,
and (c) 20 mm.
of 1.323 and 1.320, but when the efficiency of time is also considered, 1400 W/m 2, but the time was significantly reduced. If there was no
1400 W/m2 should be the first choice. limitation for time cost, the 600, 1000 and 1400 W/m2 heat flux densities
When a single index is considered, i.e., the least energy consumption could be used, but the optimal density was 1400 W/m2 because of the
or the shortest time expenditure at an ambient temperature of −10 °C, combined efficiency of time and energy, with a minimum time-energy
as shown in Fig. 17 and Tables 1 and 2, a heat flux density of 600 W/m 2 index of 1.283 as presented in Table 3. Generally, 1400 W/m 2 was an
is the optimal choice for the 10-mm-thick ice by virtue of having the appropriate option that could be widely applied in severely harsh
lowest energy consumption (53.82 kJ). However, in an emergency situ- weather for deicing.
ation, 1800 W/m2 could be selected because it requires the least time.
For ice of thicknesses of either 15 mm or 20 mm, a heat flux density
of 600 W/m 2 is a reasonable choice if time is not a limitation because 3.5. The evaluation of economic expense
it has the lowest energy requirement. In an emergency situation,
1800 W/m2 must be applied to meet the minimum time requirement, The price for electric power in China is currently USD$ 0.083 per
although more energy is consumed. kW·h. The cost of deicing per unit area using the proposed technolo-
Fig. 18 presents the time and energy consumption for deicing a cer- gy was calculated and is listed in Table 4. For the low temperature
tain amount of ice at an ambient temperature of −20 °C. The trends in case (− 10 to 0 °C), 0.11–0.22 $/m 2 is sufficient for deicing ice in
the curves shown in Fig. 18 imply the existence of the critical phenom- the thickness range of 10–20 mm. For lower temperature conditions
enon, which is that the second optimal solution is more practical than (−20 to −10 °C), the cost is 0.15–0.28 USD$/m2, which is much lower
the absolute optimal solution. For ice with thicknesses of 10 mm, than the other current techniques listed in Table 5 (George and Charles,
15 mm and 20 mm, although the time was slightly longer when the 2011; Harnick et al., 1980; Lee et al., 2000; Litvan, 1976; Wang et al.,
heat flux density was 1000, 1400 and 1400 W/m2 than when it was 2006). The cost was calculated based on the present economic costs and
1800 W/m2, the energy consumption was much smaller at these heat the operating efficiency of various deicing methods. The estimated ex-
flux densities than at 1800 W/m2. These values are consistent with pense of each mechanical method includes the labor costs (>11.00 /h in
the time-energy index shown in Fig. 16. Therefore, the optimal solution China, http://finace.sina.com.cn/g/20100809/07058444689.shtml) and
was that the regular heat flux density (1000–1400 W/m 2) would be the work efficiency. For the chemical methods, the cost is dependent on
offered for ambient temperatures of −20 to −10 °C with the anticipated the market price (NaCl, 0.31USD$/kg; CMA, 3.1USD$/kg) and the amount
associated good energy and time efficiency. consumed (NaCl, 0.3–0.6 kg/m2; CMA, 0.56–1.13 kg/m2).
Similar to the results shown in Fig. 18, the second optimal point was As shown in Table 5, for similar situations the cost of using conductive
more practical for the ambient temperature of −30 °C, as shown in concrete to deice the same amount of ice (Yehia et al., 2000) is almost 4
Fig. 19. The optimal heat flux density for an ice thickness of 10 mm times the cost of the approach proposed in this paper. Common salt
was 1000 W/m2 (smallest energy requirement with a relatively short (sodium chloride) is not recommended due to the severe environ-
time requirement); the optimal heat flux densities for ice thicknesses mental pollution and corrosion of reinforced concrete associated
of 15 mm and 20 mm were 1000 and 1400 W/m 2. with its use, even though it is only half the cost of the approach pro-
Moreover, for 20-mm-thick ice at − 30 °C, the energy requirement posed in this study (George and Charles, 2011; Harnick et al., 1980;
increased slightly with the increase of heat flux density from 600 to Lee et al., 2000; Litvan, 1976; Wang et al., 2006). Moreover, the applica-
tion of some non-polluting chemical salts, e.g., calcium chloride and
acetic acid calcium magnesium, is also limited because of their much
Table 4
Economic expenditure per unit area for deicing a certain thickness of ice.
higher cost (0.26–0.7 USD$/m2, 1.75–3.51 USD$/m2). The proposed
deicing technique is an excellent option, especially for the extremely
Ambient Ice thickness, Economic expenditure USD$/m2
temperature, °C /mm
600 1000 1400 1800
W/m2 W/m2 W/m2 W/m2
Table 5
10 0.11 0.14 0.15 0.12 Cost of deicing using different approaches at an ambient temperature of −20 °C.
−10 15 0.15 0.18 0.17 0.18
20 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.22 Ice thickness Economic expenditure USD $/m2
10 0.18 0.15 0.20 0.20 /mm
NaCl CaCl CMA Conductive Mechanical CNFP
−20 15 0.20 0.20 0.22 0.25
concrete
20 0.22 0.23 0.23 0.28
10 0.22 0.18 0.22 0.23 10 0.09 0.26–0.35 1.75 >0.56 >0.1 0.15–0.2
−30 15 0.25 0.23 0.26 0.31 15 0.13 0.40–0.53 2.65 >0.56 >0.1 0.2–0.25
20 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.35 20 0.18 0.53–0.70 3.51 >0.73 >0.1 0.22–0.28
H. Li et al. / Cold Regions Science and Technology 86 (2013) 22–35 33
initial temperature of −12 °C, the gray line for a snow thickness of
30 mm has a steeper gradient, and snow melting began earlier. This re-
sult is the same as that of the black line and the black dashed line for the
40- and 50-mm-thick snow at an initial temperature of − 22 °C. Al-
though melting the thicker snow requires more energy, because of the
lower thermal conductivity of snow (approximately 0.1 W/(m*K) for
new snow), the thicker snow layer actually played a more active role
in heat preservation as a porous media and prevented heat loss into
the surrounding air. A similar phenomenon also presented in other
cases, as shown in Fig. 21, except for the cases with 40- and 50-
mm-thick snow at an initial temperature of − 23 °C, as shown in
Fig. 21 (b). The results for these cases are different because of the rel-
atively lower heat flux density input and the extremely low sur-
rounding temperature exceeding the heat preservation capability
of the specimen. Therefore, the time cost for melting the snow is de-
termined by a combination of the energy requirement and the heat
Fig. 20. The test setup for melting snow in a natural environment.
preservation effect.
As shown in Fig. 22, with a heat flux density of 600 W/m 2, it took
approximately 6,000, 6,500, 7,500 and 6,800 sec to melt snow with
low temperature case (−30 °C), because at a maximum cost of no more
thicknesses of 20, 30, 40 and 50 mm at a surrounding temperature
than 0.29 USD$/m 2 the deicing cost is much lower. The solar energy
of − 9.1, − 9.2, − 9.7 and − 10 °C, respectively; the corresponding en-
used as the power source in this study is an abundant source of energy,
ergy consumption for these cases is 1.0, 1.12, 1.28 and 1.10 kWh/m 2.
increasing the feasibility of this proposed deicing system for practical
In contrast with the other results, a heat flux density of 600 W/m 2 is
applications.
most efficient and profitable for 30-mm-thick snow at a normal low
Currently, the price of CNFP is relatively expensive as a new material,
temperature (−10 °C), with a minimum consumption of time and
it must decrease with the mature of manufacture process in the future,
energy that results from the joint effect of heat preservation and
then the installation cost will also accordingly significantly drop.
dissipation under similar surrounding conditions.
Similarly, because of the previously mentioned heat preservation
4. Investigation of the snow-melting capabilities of the CNFP-based effect, 800 W/m 2 is more efficient and preferable for thicker snow
self-deicing road system in a natural environment (30 mm) at extreme ambient temperature condition (−17 °C). Overall,
it makes sense that the time and energy cost increases as the snow
The performance of the CNFP-based self-deicing road system for thickness increases for similar ambient conditions.
melting snow in a natural environment was also investigated. The In contrast to the lower heat flux densities, 1000 W/m 2 is more
applied heat flux densities were 600, 800 and 1000 W/m 2 with efficient and preferable for thicker snow (40 mm) at the extreme
snow thicknesses of 20, 30, 40 and 50 mm. The surrounding tempera- ambient temperature condition (− 23 °C) because of the relatively
ture and wind speed were monitored by the Center 309 thermometer longer melting time but higher efficiency, which is also a result of the
and anemoscope. The snow-melting process was affected by multiple heat preservation effect associated with thicker snow.
factors, such as wind speed, ambient temperature, heat flux density The cost of the self-deicing technique (0.05–0.11 $/m 2) proposed in
and snow thickness. The test setup for the system is shown in Fig. 20 this study was approximately half that of the snow-melting method de-
and the temperature distribution measured in the test is shown in veloped by Hou et al. (2002) based on conductive concrete filled with
Fig. 21. CF (1.85%). The technique proposed in this study was also verified as
As shown in Fig. 21, at the beginning the temperature increased being only 1/10–1/6 of the cost calculated by Yehia et al. (2000) in the
rapidly from the initial state to the freezing point (0 °C). The snow bridge snow-melting study based on conductive concrete filled with
then absorbed enough energy to achieve its latent heat, then began to steel fiber.
melt and formed a moving interface between the melted water and In summary, the investigations of deicing and snow melting verified
the rest of the snow; the temperature at the melting interface was stable that the self-deicing/snow-melting technique proposed in this study
at 0 °C until the snow vanished. As shown in Fig. 21 (a), for the same offers the advantages of less time, lower energy consumption, feasible
0 5
0
-5
0
-10 -10
20mm 20mm 20mm
30mm -15 30mm -5 30mm
40mm 40mm 40mm
-20 -20
50mm 50mm 50mm
-25 -10
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 0 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 0 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500
Time(sec) Time (sec) Time(sec)
Fig. 21. The change in temperature with time at the interface between the thermal conductive layer and the snow layer for four different snow thicknesses and heat flux densities of
(a) 1000 W/m2, (b) 800 W/m2 and (c) 600 W/m2.
34 H. Li et al. / Cold Regions Science and Technology 86 (2013) 22–35
Energy (Kwh/m2)
Temperature (oC)
800 W/m -6 2
2 1000 W/m
7000 1000 W/m 1.2
Time (sec)
6000 -12
1.1
5000 -18
4000 600 W/m
2
1.0
-24 800 W/m
2
3000 2 0.9
1000 W/m
2000 -30
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Snow thickness (mm) Snow thickness (mm) Snow thickness (mm)
Fig. 22. Effect of multiple factors on the snow-melting process: (a) time cost, (b) the corresponding surrounding temperature and (c) energy expenditure per unit area (kWh/m2).
operation, intelligent control and environmental protection. This system potential to be widely used in bridges, highways, pavement and airport
can be widely used in roads, pavement, highways and bridges. In addition, infrastructures.
the integration of a self-energy harvesting system with this self-deicing/
snow-melting system will be competitive in the future. Acknowledgements
Peebles, L.H., 1994. Carbon Fibers: Formation, Structure, and Properties. CRC Press, Yehia, S., Tuan, C.Y., Ferdon, D., Bing, C., 2000. Conductive concrete overlay for bridge
Boca Raton, FL, US. deck deicing: mixture proportioning, optimization and properties. ACI Materials
Saito, R., Dresselhaus, G., Dresselhaus, M.S., 1998. Physical Properties of Carbon Journal 97, 172–181.
Nanotubes. Imperial College Press, London, UK. Zhao, H., Wang, S., Wu, Z., Che, G., 2010. Concrete slab installed with carbon fiber
Tanaka, O., 1981. Snow melting using heat pipes. Advances in Heat Pile Technology 25, heating wire for bridge deck deicing. Journal of Transportation Engineering 136,
2272–2284. 500–509.
Wang, K., Nelsen, D.E., Nixon, W.A., 2006. Damaging effects of deicing chemicals on Zhao, H., Wu, Z., Wang, S., Zheng, J., Che, G., 2011. Concrete pavement deicing with
concrete materials. Cement and Concrete Composites 28, 173–188. carbon fiber heating wires. Cold Regions Science and Technology 65, 413–420.
Yang, T., Yang, Z., Singla, M., Song, G., Li, Q., 2012. Experimental study on carbon fiber
tape–based deicing technology. Journal of Cold Regions Engineering 26, 55–70.