Professional Documents
Culture Documents
International Jornal of Emerging Electric Power Systems 2008
International Jornal of Emerging Electric Power Systems 2008
∗
Jadavpur University, biswenduc@gmail.com
†
Jadavpur University, debangshudey80@gmail.com
‡
Jadavpur University, sivaji@ee.jdvu.ac.in
∗∗
Jadavpur University, chinmoy kanti@hotmail.com
Copyright
2008
c The Berkeley Electronic Press. All rights reserved.
Experimental Investigation of the
Electromagnetic Signal Attenuation
Characteristics of the Partial Discharge
Laboratory at Jadavpur University∗
Biswendu Chatterjee, Debangshu Dey, Sivaji Chakravorti, and Chinmoy Kanti
Roy
Abstract
Electromagnetic interference is becoming an increasing concern, because of the high inten-
sity of surrounding electromagnetic waves, mainly arising from communication signals and also
due to widespread use of equipment that operates at radio frequencies. As a consequence, sensi-
tive data acquisition equipment suffers from erroneous results. Operating such instruments in a
suitable shielded environment can significantly reduce this electromagnetic interference. But to
achieve good shielding in practice, construction-related problems are to be faced, especially in
large spaces, where a single metal plate cannot cover the whole area. Unless special care is taken,
electromagnetic waves can penetrate through the gap in the joints and defects like drill holes re-
ducing the shielding effectiveness. Also, a single layer of shielding is not always effective as the
quality deteriorates drastically even due to minor constructional defects as mentioned above. This
paper describes real-life experiences, step-by-step, in the shielding of a spacious insulation diag-
nostic laboratory (with a target of at least 55 dB signal attenuation), firstly using a good conducting
material, using two different methods for joining the sheets, and ultimately constructing a second
layer of shielding using a magnetic material. To study the attenuation behavior of the laboratory
with respect to electromagnetic waves, a device for the relative measurement of surrounding elec-
tromagnetic signal strength is developed. The signal levels are measured initially outside and then
at different places inside the shielded laboratory. The results presented in this paper show (1)
the variation of attenuation characteristics inside the shielded laboratory due to different methods
adopted for joining the shielding sheets using a good conducting material, (2) the effect of a sec-
ond shielding layer in the form of a box that was constructed using a magnetic material and placed
inside the laboratory and (3) the improvement in attenuation behavior after the actual construction
of the second layer of shielding using a magnetic material.
∗
This work was supported through a grant given by the Centre for Mobile Computing and Com-
munication at Jadavpur University. The authors are with the Electrical Engineering Department,
Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, India.
Chatterjee et al.: Electromagnetic Signal Attenuation Characteristics
I. INTRODUCTION
the fields coupled between a transmitter and a receiver, which results from
interposing the shield material [9]. A straightforward method is to test the signal
strength outside and then its reduction in magnitude inside the shielded enclosure
to compute the attenuation. To measure the relative signal strength a hand-held
device was developed in the laboratory that involved a process of converting the
captured environmental electromagnetic signal tuned at a particular frequency to a
voltage corresponding to the amplitude of the signal [4]. The portable unit was
then placed at different places outside and inside the laboratory for a
comprehensive study of the shielding behavior of the laboratory from
electromagnetic waves.
The aforesaid Partial Discharge Laboratory is built with a target to achieve at
least 55 dB of environmental signal attenuation. It was initially shielded using
overlapped copper sheet joints that were screwed together. At that stage the
investigations were performed to study the variation of the attenuation of
electromagnetic waves within the copper shielded laboratory. The shielding sheet
joints and defects like drill holes were then gas-welded using a copper-alloy
solder. Experiments were again performed to study the improvement of
attenuation. Next, the attenuation was studied inside a box made up of GI sheet
placed outside and inside the laboratory to draw an inference on the effect of a
second shielding layer in the laboratory. Finally, the second shielding layer of
actual dimension was constructed and tested. The shielding effectiveness of the
laboratory was then tested by the Society of Applied Microwave Electronics
Engineering and Research under Ministry of Communication and Information
Technology, Government of India, for certification. They are authorized on behalf
of the Government of India for certification of shielding effectiveness as required
in this case. The results showed close match with the results obtained by the
experiments performed as reported in this paper proving the validity of the
experiments performed.
http://www.bepress.com/ijeeps/vol9/iss2/art4 2
Chatterjee et al.: Electromagnetic Signal Attenuation Characteristics
digital voltmeter to compute the signal strength [4]. The schematic of the
developed electromagnetic signal strength meter is shown in Fig. 1 and the actual
photograph of the developed meter is given in Fig. 2.
The unit on the right hand side of Fig. 2 is the pick up unit connected to the
main meter through a shielded wire. The meter has 20 mV, 200mV and 2000 mV
full scale reading with externally settable gain and a separate zero adjustment in
the absence of signal.
The procedure of measurement with the meter was simple. At first the
measurement was taken at a reference point outside the laboratory, tuned to a
particular frequency. Then the gain was adjusted to 1000 mV (reference). The
meter was then taken inside the laboratory at the test points and the reduction in
output voltage was measured at different places to compute the attenuation and
the shielding effect. The details of the scale, resolution, error and accuracy of the
meter are given below in Table I.
1. 20 0.01 0.015
2. 200 0.1 0.15 0.075
3. 2000 1 1.5
http://www.bepress.com/ijeeps/vol9/iss2/art4 4
Chatterjee et al.: Electromagnetic Signal Attenuation Characteristics
and roof and 1 mm were used for floor. Fig. 3 shows the layout of the plan and the
working area of the laboratory.
The plates were joined by screws to the wooden frame with 5% overlapping
and ensuring a good electrical contact throughout. After fabrication, insulating
varnish was painted over the sheets to prevent oxide formation on copper. A
comprehensive study was made on the shielding behavior of the laboratory with
respect to electromagnetic waves.
The area under experiment was the rectangular working area inside the
shielded laboratory of dimension 7.5m × 4m, as shown in Fig. 3 where all the
working components for PD measurement were placed. The frequency of the
electromagnetic wave under consideration was mainly 657 kHz and 1008 kHz
because these signals are the most prominent signals present in the surrounding
area and is expected to interfere maximum with the required signals during data
acquisition.
Fig. 3. The layout of the plan and the working area of the shielded laboratory.
For the measurement along X-axis, the experimental area was divided into
equidistant seven grid lines in the working area (Fig. 3.). The height at which
measurements were taken was kept fixed at 0.5m from the floor. This height was
chosen because most of the working components of the laboratory were kept at
this height. Measurements with the developed meter were made along the lines
Xi-Xi′, progressing from the left wall. The vertical plane on which measurements
were taken was similarly divided into seven equidistant grid lines.
The maximum height upto which measurements were taken is 2.5m, beyond
which there is no practical significance for taking readings. Measurements with
the signal strength meter were taken along the lines Zi-Zi′ progressing upward
from the floor. The vertical plane of measurement was at the central line of the
working area where the attenuation was expected to be maximum.
In all the cases the result at a particular point is taken as the average of three
readings those are obtained during measurements.
The results obtained from the measurement along Xi-Xi′ lines in the single-
layer shielded laboratory are shown in Fig. 4. The graphs are plotted in the form
of distance along the line vs. signal strength of the meter in millivolts. The results
obtained were for the sheets screwed together. In all the possible cases
frequencies of 657 kHz and 1008 kHz are placed side by side for a comparative
study.
Fig. 4. Measurements along the plan (Xi-Xi′ lines) at 657 kHz and 1008 kHz for screwed joints
before welding.
Similarly, the results obtained from the measurements along Zi-Zi' lines within
the laboratory for screwed joints are plotted as height from the floor vs. signal
strength of the meter in millivolts. Fig. 5 shows the result.
http://www.bepress.com/ijeeps/vol9/iss2/art4 6
Chatterjee et al.: Electromagnetic Signal Attenuation Characteristics
Fig. 5. Measurements along the height from floor (Zi-Zi′ lines) at 657 kHz and 1008 kHz for
screwed joints before welding.
At this stage, for further improvement, the sheet joints and screw holes were
welded by gas using a copper-alloy solder. After welding, insulating varnish was
coated over the welded parts to prevent oxide formation on copper. Experiments
were again performed at this stage to note the improvement of the attenuation.
After the sheets were welded in stage II of construction, the results along Xi-
Xi' lines and Zi-Zi' lines in the laboratory were noted and are presented in Fig. 6
and in Fig. 7 respectively.
Fig. 6. Measurements along the plan (Xi-Xi′ lines) at 657 kHz and 1008 kHz after welding the
copper sheets.
In Fig. 7, the lines Z1-Z1' & Z7-Z7', Z2-Z2' & Z6-Z6', and Z3-Z3' & Z5-Z5', are
very close to each other and are thus superimposed so that only four lines are
visible instead of seven.
Fig. 7. Measurements along the height (Zi-Zi′ lines) at 657 kHz and 1008 kHz after welding the
sheets.
TABLE II: THE EFFECT OF FREQUENCY ON THE ATTENUATION CHARACTERISTICS FOR SINGLE
LAYERED SHIELDING
Frequency Average Signal Strength at
Sl. (kHz) working area Attenuation
No. Outside Lab Inside Lab (dB)
(mV) (mV)
Before Welding 1000 200 13.98
1. 657
After Welding 1000 40 27.95
Before Welding 1000 180 14.89
2. 1008
After Welding 1000 30 30.46
http://www.bepress.com/ijeeps/vol9/iss2/art4 8
Chatterjee et al.: Electromagnetic Signal Attenuation Characteristics
Inside the aforesaid first layer of shielding in the existing structure of the PD
laboratory, a structure of dimension 3.9 m × 3.75 m × 3m was constructed using
suitable column and beam arrangement. The structure was shielded on all six
surfaces using 2.25 m × 1.05 m GI sheets of thickness 1 mm that formed the
second layer of shielding at the place of working area inside the laboratory
(Fig.3.).
Fig. 8 shows the photograph of the laboratory after construction of the second
layer of shielding. The view is taken from the main entrance.
Along the breadth of the laboratory, i.e. along the X-axis, five grid lines are
considered that are evenly spaced inside the second shielding in the experimental
area. These fictitious lines are taken as parallel to the wall of the main entrance
(Fig. 3.). On the vertical plane i.e. along the Z-axis, at the central part of the
working area five similar grid lines were considered along which measurements
were taken.
After the construction of the second shielding layer in stage III, the change in
results along Xi-Xi' lines and Zi-Zi' lines were investigated and are presented in
Fig. 9a and Fig. 9b respectively.
(a) (b)
Fig. 9. Measurements at 1008 kHz for double layer (copper and GI) shielding: (a) along the plan
(Xi-Xi′ lines); (b) along the height (Zi-Zi′ lines).
Fig 9 shows the results for 1008 kHz only because at this level of attenuation,
657 kHz produced almost similar results.
Table IV shows a comparative study of the effect of frequency on the
shielding characteristics after the construction of the second shielded layer in
stage III.
TABLE IV: THE EFFECT OF FREQUENCY ON THE ATTENUATION CHARACTERISTICS FOR DOUBLE
LAYERED SHIELDING
Frequency Average Signal Strength in the
Sl. (kHz) working area of Laboratory Attenuation
No. Outside Lab Inside Lab (dB)
(mV) (mV)
Single Layer 1000 40 27.95
1. 657
Double Layer 1000 1.4 57.07
Single Layer 1000 30 30.46
2. 1008
Double Layer 1000 1.35 57.39
The laboratory has also been tested by the Society of Applied Microwave
Electronics Engineering and Research under Ministry of Communication and
http://www.bepress.com/ijeeps/vol9/iss2/art4 10
Chatterjee et al.: Electromagnetic Signal Attenuation Characteristics
III. DISCUSSIONS
The results obtained from the experiments show that the nature of the variation of
signal strength inside the laboratory before and after welding has a significant
difference.
The study along the X-axis in Fig. 4, i.e. before welding, shows that for a
particular line Xi-Xi', as the distance along X-direction increases, the signal
strength falls gradually to a minimum near the centre and then again increases
near the walls. Such variation of the signal strength is because of the fact that the
gaps between the sheets act as the source of secondary wavelets. These secondary
wavelets superpose in different phases depending on the geometry of the
laboratory. In this typical case near the center of the laboratory the path difference
is such that the superposed secondary wavelets are almost in phase opposition. So
the field strength is low in the central region. But in Fig. 6, where the joints were
welded, the nature of the curve is opposite i.e. as the distance along X-direction
increases, the signal strength increases slowly to a maximum near the centre and
then again slowly decreases near the walls. This change in the nature of the signal
strength is because of the welding. The gaps which were the sources of the
secondary wavelets no longer exist; instead a continuous grounded metallic
shielding was obtained. So near the earthed walls the signal strength became low
compared to the central region. Similarly along the elevation of the laboratory, i.e.
along the Z-direction, the signal level slowly decreases along the height from
ground level as shown in Fig. 5, and it is opposite to that as presented in Fig. 7.
Another result shows that after welding, the variation of signal level reduced
significantly especially near the central part of the laboratory along a particular
Xi-Xi' line, e.g. along X5-X5' line. Taking Fig. 4 and Fig. 6 as example, Fig. 4
shows a variation of approx 200 mV along X5-X5' line with respect to its
minimum and maximum value and Fig. 6 shows a variation of 10mV under
similar conditions.
Results from Table II show that the reduction in signal strength is at least 5
times inside the shielded laboratory as compared to outside before welding. After
welding the reduction is about 25 times. Also, the attenuation is more at 1008 kHz
than 657 kHz.
Experiments with the GI box (Table III) shows that the signal strength
decreases drastically to less than a millivolt when taken inside the laboratory, i.e.
when the effects of the two layers of shielding are cumulated in additive nature.
After actual construction of the second shielding enclosure the results
obtained from the experiments show that the signal strength decreased
considerably due to the addition of the second layer of GI shielding inside the
laboratory. Fig. 9 shows that the addition of the second shielded layer not only
improved the attenuation characteristics, but brought more uniformity in the
signal level especially near the centre of the laboratory. From Fig. 6 we can see
that near the central position the variation in signal strength from X4-X4′ to X5-X5′
line was approx. 12 mV whereas, for the double layer shielding, near the centre,
between X2-X2′ to X3-X3′ this value was reduced to 0.04 mV (Fig. 9a). Fig. 9 also
shows a further investigation along the height in the central part of the laboratory.
Here with an increase in height above the ground level the signal strength
increases gradually. From 0.5 m to 1.5 m height, the signal strength remains more
or less same. The signal strength increases again above 1.5 m height. For a
comparative study, taking a single line Z2-Z2′ as example, Fig. 7 shows maximum
variation of about 2 mV for single layer after welding the sheets and this variation
was reduced to 0.2 mV for double layer (Fig.9b).
The effectiveness of double shielding layers was also confirmed by the
Society of Applied Microwave Electronics Engineering and Research under
Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, Government of India.
Their results in Table V showed close match with the results obtained in-
house (Table IV) thereby establishing the validity of the experiments performed
with the developed meter.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
From the results it is clear that the strength of an electromagnetic wave inside a
large shielded place decreases considerably but do not vanish completely. The
signal varies with location within the laboratory but its change is not abrupt or
discontinuous anywhere.
It may also be emphasized that after welding, not only the attenuation
properties improved, the nature of the curves also changed. Welded sheets
produced a relatively uniform attenuated signal level, with very low variation,
especially near the centre of the laboratory. The nature of the curve is opposite for
http://www.bepress.com/ijeeps/vol9/iss2/art4 12
Chatterjee et al.: Electromagnetic Signal Attenuation Characteristics
screwed and welded joints. For screwed joints the minimum signal is near the
centre. But for welded joints the minimum signal is near the walls which match
the expectation. The results also clearly show that there is a significant difference
in the signal attenuation within the laboratory before and after the welding of
shielding metal plates. It is because of the fact that when the metal plates were
screwed together, there were gaps however small it may be, between two
successive screws, through which electromagnetic waves were able to penetrate.
Gas welding of the metal plates succeeded in blocking such penetration
significantly. The attenuation obtained for a typical frequency of 1008 kHz at a
height of 0.5 m was 15 dB for screwed joints and 31dB for welded joint. The
requirement of shielding is to achieve attenuation of at least 55 dB at a height of
0.5 m where the instruments are to be placed. Though welded joint improved the
attenuation characteristics a lot, still copper shielding alone was found to be
insufficient to achieve this practical goal. In other words it may also be concluded
that for a single layer of shielding made from a good conductor like copper, the
strength of an electromagnetic wave inside a large shielded place decreases
considerably but do not go below a certain level.
The results from the experiments using the GI box show that the attenuation
inside the GI box placed within the laboratory was 59 dB. This result indicate the
necessity of construction of a second shielding layer of magnetic materials, e.g.
GI.
It is observed that the construction of the second shielding layer of actual
dimension made up of a magnetic material like GI helps in further attenuation of
signal strength which can be more than twenty times the attenuation due to the
single layer shielding as may be seen from the results in this paper.
Also, according to the results obtained, though more signal attenuation could
be obtained at places nearer to the wall and also at the floor, as said earlier the
working area will be near the central part of the laboratory with an average height
of 0.5 m above the ground where the instruments are to be placed. It may be seen
from the results that copper shield alone could not achieve the desired goal in
signal attenuation, but the addition of a second shielding layer could effectively
attenuate the signal well below the desired level.
V. REFERENCES
[3] K.F. Casey, "Electromagnetic shielding behavior of wire mesh screens," IEEE
Trans. Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 30, issue 3, part 2, pp. 298-306,
Aug. 1988.
[4] B. Chatterjee, S. Chakravorti and C.K. Roy, "Experimental Investigation on
the EM Signal Attenuation Characteristics of a Single-layer Metal Shielded
Laboratory," Proc. of the IEEE Power India Conference, New Delhi, India,
2006.
[5] S. Miyake, Y.Umezu, Y.Sagawa, T. Morita and R. Yoshino, "Investigation
related to construction method and performance of an electromagnetic
shielded enclosure," IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic
Compatibility, pp. 120-125, 1991.
[6] Y.M. Lee, "Upgrading electromagnetic shielding of a military shelter," IEEE
International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 1, pp. 464-
468, 1998.
[7] B. Chatterjee, S. Chakravorti and C.K. Roy, " Real Life Experiences in the
Construction of a Large Laboratory having High Quality Electromagnetic
Shielding," Proc. of the IEEE, First International Power and Energy
Conference, Putrajaya, Malaysia, 2006.
[8] IEEE standard method for measuring the effectiveness of electromagnetic
shielding enclosures, IEEE Standard 299-1997, Apr. 1998.
[9] P.F. Wilson, J.W. Adams and M.T. Ma, "Measurement of the electromagnetic
shielding capabilities of materials," Proc. IEEE, vol. 74, issue 1, pp. 112-115,
1986.
VI. BIOGRAPHIES
http://www.bepress.com/ijeeps/vol9/iss2/art4 14
Chatterjee et al.: Electromagnetic Signal Attenuation Characteristics