Professional Documents
Culture Documents
12 - Schneckenburger v. Moran, 63 Phil. 249 (1939)
12 - Schneckenburger v. Moran, 63 Phil. 249 (1939)
Issue: Whether or not the Court of First Instance of Manila has jurisdiction to try the
petitioner.
Held: The counsel for the petitioner contend that the CIF of Manila has no jurisdiction
according to Aticle III Sec. 2 of the United States Constitution which stipulated that the
Supreme Court of the United States has original jurisdiction in all cases affecting
ambassadors, public ministers, and consuls, and such jurisdiction which excludes the
courts of the Philippines and that that such jurisdiction is conferred (convened)
exclusively upon the Supreme Court of the Philippines. Although section 17 of Act
No. 136 vests in the Supreme Court the original jurisdiction to issue writs
of mandamus, certiorari, prohibition, habeas corpus, and quo warranto, such
jurisdiction was also conferred on the Courts of First Instance by the Code of Civil
Procedure. (Act No. 190, secs. 197, 217, 222, 226, and 525.)
It results that the original jurisdiction possessed and exercised by the Supreme Court of
the Philippine Islands was not exclusive of, but concurrent with, that of the Courts of
First Instance. Hence, the Court of Instance has jurisdiction over the petitioner.
3. The laws in force in the Philippines prior to the inauguration of the Commonwealth
conferred upon the Courts of the First Instance original jurisdiction in all criminal
cases to which a penalty of more than six months' imprisonment or a fine exceeding
one hundred dollars might be imposed. (Act No. 136, sec. 56.) Such jurisdiction
included the trial of criminal actions brought against consuls for, as we have already
indicated, CONSULS, not being entitled to the privileges and immunities of
ambassadors or ministers, are subject to the laws and regulations of the country where
they reside