Elite x2 1012

vs.
Surface Pro 4
Performance Test
Intel Core M vs. Core I Configurations

© Copyright 2016 HP Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. This presentation cannot be used with customers in: Philippines, Vietnam, CIS countries, East & West Africa, Israel, Turkey.
It should not be used without local counsel approval in: Japan, Taiwan, Thailand.
Executive Summary

• Elite x2 demonstrates on par or better

performance than Surface Pro 4 for
office productivity tasks

• Elite x2 battery lasts 1.5 hours longer

than Surface Pro 4 in a typical work day

• Fanless design means 100% silent

operation and improved long term
reliability

© Copyright 2016 HP Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. This presentation cannot be used with customers in: Philippines, Vietnam, CIS countries, East & West Africa, Israel, Turkey.
It should not be used without local counsel approval in: Japan, Taiwan, Thailand.
Performance Test with PC Mark 8
Office Productivity | Web Applications | Operating Noise

PCMark08 Benchmarks:
Work – Conventional
Work – Accelerated
Home – Conventional
Home – Accelerated
Storage
© Copyright 2016 HP Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. This presentation cannot be used with customers in: Philippines, Vietnam, CIS countries, East & West Africa, Israel, Turkey.
It should not be used without local counsel approval in: Japan, Taiwan, Thailand.
System Setup (m5 vs i5)
HP Elite x2 1012 – Core m5 Microsoft Surface Pro 4 – Core i5

Win10 Pro 64-bit Win10 Pro 64-bit

Samsung 512 SSD Samsung NVMe 256 SSD
Core-m5 6Y57@1.1Ghz Core-i5 6300U @2.4Ghz
4GB RAM 8GB RAM
Intel HD Graphics 515 (UMA) Intel HD Graphics 520 (UMA)

© Copyright 2016 HP Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. This presentation cannot be used with customers in: Philippines, Vietnam, CIS countries, East & West Africa, Israel, Turkey.
It should not be used without local counsel approval in: Japan, Taiwan, Thailand.
Elite x2 Core m5 Productivity Highlights
Up to Up to Virtually

8.2%
than Surface Pro 4
faster 1.5hrs
battery life than Surface Pro 4
longer 100% silent
operation. No moving parts means
when running PCMark Benchmark in a typical work day better long term reliability

For many common tasks such as Office productivity, Email,

and Web Applications, the Intel Core M has similar
performance to Core I at 30% of the power consumption

© Copyright 2016 HP Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. This presentation cannot be used with customers in: Philippines, Vietnam, CIS countries, East & West Africa, Israel, Turkey.
It should not be used without local counsel approval in: Japan, Taiwan, Thailand.
Test Results vs. SP4 - Complete
PCMark08 Test* Elite x2 1012 Core-m5 Surface Pro 4 Core-i5 % difference
Work – Conventional 2766 2605 6.2% better
Work – Accelerated 3917 3621 Virtually
8.2% better
Home – Conventional 2477 2394 3.5% better
Home – Accelerated 2898 2792 3.8% better
Storage 4920 4967 On Par
*Higher Score is Better

Cinebench Test* Elite x2 1012 Core-m5 Surface Pro 4 Core-i5 % difference

Open GL (Graphics) 37. 11 fps 39.54 fps 6.1% worse
CPU 225 303 25.7% slower
*Pure CPU / GPU Benchmark
Battery Life Test Elite x2 1012 Core-m5 Surface Pro 4 Core-i5 % difference
Battery Size 40whr 38.2whr 4.7% larger
Video Playback 9hr 20min 8hr 44min 6.8% longer
Mobile Mark 2014 10hr 23min 8hrs 40min 19.8% longer

Noise and Temp. Test Elite x2 1012 Core-m5 Surface Pro 4 Core-i5 % difference
Steady State TDP* 5.5W 10.5W 47.6% less
A-Cover Temp 44.5C 44.8C On Par
Glass Temp 41.7C 44.0C 5.2% cooler
Fan Noise 0db (silent) 37.5db 100% quieter
*Thermal Design Power
© Copyright 2016 HP Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. This presentation cannot be used with customers in: Philippines, Vietnam, CIS countries, East & West Africa, Israel, Turkey.
It should not be used without local counsel approval in: Japan, Taiwan, Thailand.
System Setup (m7 vs. i5)
HP Elite x2 1012 – Core m7 Microsoft Surface Pro 4 – Core i5

Win10 Pro 64-bit Win10 Pro 64-bit

Samsung 512 SSD Samsung NVMe 256 SSD
Core-m7 6Y75@1.2Ghz Core-i5 6300U @2.4Ghz
8GB RAM 8GB RAM
Intel HD Graphics 515 (UMA) Intel HD Graphics 520 (UMA)

© Copyright 2016 HP Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. This presentation cannot be used with customers in: Philippines, Vietnam, CIS countries, East & West Africa, Israel, Turkey.
It should not be used without local counsel approval in: Japan, Taiwan, Thailand.
Elite x2 Core m7 Productivity Highlights
Up to Up to Virtually

14%
than Surface Pro 4
faster 1.5hrs
battery life than Surface Pro 4
longer 100% silent
operation. No moving parts means
when running PCMark Benchmark in a typical work day better long term reliability

For many common tasks such as Office productivity, Email,

and Web Applications, the Intel Core M has similar
performance to Core I at 30% of the power consumption

© Copyright 2016 HP Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. This presentation cannot be used with customers in: Philippines, Vietnam, CIS countries, East & West Africa, Israel, Turkey.
It should not be used without local counsel approval in: Japan, Taiwan, Thailand.
Test Results vs. SP4 - Complete
PCMark08 Test* Elite x2 1012 Core-m7 Surface Pro 4 Core-i5 % difference
Work – Conventional 2953 2605 13.4% better
Work – Accelerated 4150 3621 Virtually
14.6% better
Home – Conventional 2615 2394 9.2% better
Home – Accelerated 2888 2792 3.4% better
Storage 4975 4967 On Par
*Higher Score is Better

Cinebench Test* Elite x2 1012 Core-m7 Surface Pro 4 Core-i5 % difference

Open GL (Graphics) 34.99 fps 39.54 fps 11.5% worse
CPU 256 303 15.5% slower
*Pure CPU / GPU Benchmark
Battery Life Test Elite x2 1012 Core-m7 Surface Pro 4 Core-i5 % difference
Battery Size 40whr 38.2whr 4.7% larger
Video Playback 9hr 20min 8hr 44min 6.8% longer
Mobile Mark 2014 10hr 23min 8hrs 40min 19.8% longer

Noise and Temp. Test Elite x2 1012 Core-m7 Surface Pro 4 Core-i5 % difference
Steady State TDP* 5.5W 10.5W 47.6% less
A-Cover Temp 44.5C 44.8C On Par
Glass Temp 41.7C 44.0C 5.2% cooler
Fan Noise 0db (silent) 37.5db 100% quieter
*Thermal Design Power
© Copyright 2016 HP Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. This presentation cannot be used with customers in: Philippines, Vietnam, CIS countries, East & West Africa, Israel, Turkey.
It should not be used without local counsel approval in: Japan, Taiwan, Thailand.
System Setup (m7 vs. i7)
HP Elite x2 1012 – Core m7 Microsoft Surface Pro 4 – Core i7

Win10 Pro 64-bit Win10 Pro 64-bit

Samsung 512 SSD Samsung NVMe 256 SSD
Core-m7 6Y75@1.2Ghz Core-i7 6650U @2.2Ghz
8GB RAM 8GB RAM
Intel HD Graphics 515 (UMA) Intel Iris Graphics 540

© Copyright 2016 HP Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. This presentation cannot be used with customers in: Philippines, Vietnam, CIS countries, East & West Africa, Israel, Turkey.
It should not be used without local counsel approval in: Japan, Taiwan, Thailand.
Elite x2 Core m7 Productivity Highlights
Up to Up to Virtually

7%
than Surface Pro 4
faster 2.5hrs
battery life than Surface Pro 4
longer 100% silent
operation. No moving parts means
when running PCMark Benchmark in a typical work day better long term reliability

For many common tasks such as Office productivity, Email,

and Web Applications, the Intel Core M has similar
performance to Core I at 30% of the power consumption

© Copyright 2016 HP Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. This presentation cannot be used with customers in: Philippines, Vietnam, CIS countries, East & West Africa, Israel, Turkey.
It should not be used without local counsel approval in: Japan, Taiwan, Thailand.
Test Results vs. SP4 - Complete
PCMark08 Test* Elite x2 1012 Core-m7 Surface Pro 4 Core-i7 % difference
Work – Conventional 2953 2759 7.0% better
Work – Accelerated 4150 3913 Virtually
6.1% better
Home – Conventional 2615 2625 On Par
Home – Accelerated 2888 3228 10% worse
Storage 4975 4966 On Par
*Higher Score is Better

Cinebench Test* Elite x2 1012 Core-m7 Surface Pro 4 Core-i7 % difference

Open GL (Graphics) 34.99 fps 56.23 fps 37.8% worse
CPU 256 314 18.5% slower
*Pure CPU / GPU Benchmark
Battery Life Test Elite x2 1012 Core-m7 Surface Pro 4 Core-i7 % difference
Battery Size 40whr 38.2whr 4.7% larger
Video Playback 9hr 20min 6hr 36min 41.4% longer
Mobile Mark 2014 10hr 23min 7hr 27min 39.4% longer

Noise and Temp. Test Elite x2 1012 Core-m7 Surface Pro 4 Core-i7 % difference
Steady State TDP* 5.5W 15W 63.3% less
A-Cover Temp 44.5C 46C 3.2%cooler
Glass Temp 41.7C 44.3C 5.9% cooler
Fan Noise 0db (silent) 35db 100% quieter
*Thermal Design Power
© Copyright 2016 HP Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. This presentation cannot be used with customers in: Philippines, Vietnam, CIS countries, East & West Africa, Israel, Turkey.
It should not be used without local counsel approval in: Japan, Taiwan, Thailand.
Beyond Numbers
noise air flow dust

8.45mm

Processor Fan Processor Thermal openings

8.05mm

Fanless Design = Reliability

no thermal openings. no moving parts. zero noise

© Copyright 2016 HP Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. This presentation cannot be used with customers in: Philippines, Vietnam, CIS countries, East & West Africa, Israel, Turkey.
It should not be used without local counsel approval in: Japan, Taiwan, Thailand.
Durability for Enterprise
Tested to premium industry standards. Tested to HP’s own exacting standards.

MIL-STD 810G Tests* HP Total Test Process

1. Humidity 1. 115,000 hours of testing
2. High Temperature 2. 50,000 test steps
Machined Aluminum
3. Low Temperature 3. Layered Testing Approach
Kickstand tested for
4. Altitude reliability and
• Connector fatigue
5. Temperature Shock durability in HP’s • Flexural Resistance
6. Dust total test process • System Acoustics
• Electrostatic Discharge
7. Sand
• Electro Magnetic Interference
8. Freeze/Thaw
• Keyboard system test
9. Explosive Atmosphere • Mechanical Shock
10. Drop • Post-test Evaluation
11. Vibration • Operational Vibration
12. Shock • Package Vibration
4. End of Line Testing

* MIL STD 810G is not intended to demonstrate fitness for U.S. Department of Defense contract requirements or for military use. Test results are not a guarantee of future performance under these test conditions. Damage under the MIL
STD test conditions or any accidental damage requires an optional HP Accidental Damage Protection Care Pack

© Copyright 2016 HP Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. This presentation cannot be used with customers in: Philippines, Vietnam, CIS countries, East & West Africa, Israel, Turkey.
It should not be used without local counsel approval in: Japan, Taiwan, Thailand.
Serviceability
HP Business Tablets offer the security and convenience of IT serviceability for key components for customers enrolled in
the HP Self-Maintainer program

Serviceable Components Include:

1. WLAN
2. WWAN
3. Storage
4. System Board
5. Battery
6. LCD/Touch Module
7. Kickstand
8. Chassis and other components*
*Subject to change. Serviceable by HP Support, HP Certified Technicians, HP Authorized Service Providers or
participants in the HP Self-Maintainer Program. See hp.com/partners/SMprogram for more details.

© Copyright 2016 HP Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. This presentation cannot be used with customers in: Philippines, Vietnam, CIS countries, East & West Africa, Israel, Turkey.
It should not be used without local counsel approval in: Japan, Taiwan, Thailand.