Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/276080137
CITATIONS READS
3 7,248
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
a 4th edition of Addiction Treatment was just published and the 3rd ed. of Human Behavior and the Social Environment will be out soon. View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Katherine van wormer on 12 June 2015.
Article
Journal of Social Work
0(0) 1–17
Cultural representations ! The Author(s) 2015
Reprints and permissions:
Cindy Juby
University of Northern Iowa, USA
Abstract
Summary: This article investigates images of race, sex, ethnicity, and consumerism in
contemporary Walt Disney productions. The purpose is to discuss the reinforcement of
critical thinking skills in social work students through mutual examination of multicul-
tural images presented in Disney movies. The films selected for close critical examin-
ation – The Lion King, Pocahontas, The Princess and the Frog – are those with multicultural
themes and characters. In recognition of the fact that the one who controls the arts
controls the message, this article is informed by bell hooks’ methods of critique of
racialized and sexualized representations in children’s film.
Findings: The hidden messages in the popular Disney films should not be overlooked.
The methods of critique applied to these earlier films also have resonance for the newer
films, such as Frozen.
Applications: The case is made in this article that social work educators can enhance
the critical thinking of students concerning culturally offensive, stereotypical images
conveyed in the media.
Keywords
Social work, critical thinking, cultural competency, culturally sensitive, culture,
indigenous
Corresponding author:
Katherine van Wormer, University of Northern Iowa, 247 Sabin Hall, Cedar Falls, IA 50614, USA.
Email: Katherine.VanWormer@uni.edu
The inspiration for this article was a slide show presentation at the 2008 Council on
Social Work (CSWE) conference in Philadelphia. In the presentation, slides from
Disney films served to promote awareness of overt and latent messages (‘microag-
gressions’) contained in some of the most popular of the films from the Disney
studio. Drawing insights from critical race theory, Cindy Snyder and Janice
Chadha (2008) revealed how the social work classroom can be employed to raise
consciousness and facilitate dialogue about stereotypical concepts about diverse
racial and sexual groups conveyed in various children’s animations. A number of
us women in the audience who had grown up watching Disney films and playing
with the stuffed animals, princess dolls, and coloring books and then enjoying the
classics and recent movies with our children were astonished by the unmistakably
racist, ethnocentric, and sexist content in so many of the characterizations as
revealed in the clips presented. As a follow-up to this eye-opening experience
at the CSWE conference, we wish to delve further into an examination of the
messages that are being conveyed in these most popular of children’s films.
Because the Disney movies are such cultural icons in the western world, and
worldwide, they are ripe for cultural critique. Asking critical questions alerts us to
portrayals relevant to race and sex role behavior. Cinderella and Sleeping Beauty,
like any other Hollywood film, may be examined in terms of the messages they send
to little girls and little boys, and we can consider the ways that parents can defuse
the impact of any stereotypical messages. And given the ubiquity of Disney culture
in the industrialized and industrializing world, and its influence on family life
through its many products, it is important to question the values that Disney
teaches and hold it accountable for the ways it attempts to shape children’s
identities.
This article is written in the belief that becoming conscious of the way ethno-
centric and sexualized or romanticized images presented in the media can be
extended to culturally critical evaluations of all comparable productions. The con-
cern of this article is that children’s movies contain both multicultural and gender
role content that have the potential to influence their perceptions of minority
groups. Our major concern is that such messages may have more to do with
the promotion of consumerism, loyalty to use of a brand-name product, and the
acceptance of stereotypical images in the interests of global capitalism than with
the generation of any salutary educational values.
For this article, three contemporary movies from the Disney collection
were selected for close examination. These movies include: The Lion King (Walt
Disney Pictures, 1994), Pocahontas (Walt Disney Pictures, 1995), and The Princess
and the Frog (Walt Disney Pictures, 2009). Mulan (Walt Disney Pictures, 1998) and
Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest (Walt Disney Pictures, 2006) are also
briefly considered for their multicultural representations. The criteria we have used
for the selection of Disney films to critique are: the film’s current popularity, rep-
resentation of gender roles, and the containing of multicultural content. We wanted
to show film clips in class and therefore chose movies that contained scenes that
would make the point within several minutes or even less; for example, Cinderella’s
stepsisters struggling to get their big feet into the dainty glass slipper. Although
some of the movie selections such as The Lion King and Pocahontas that were
chosen for close examination are over 20 years old, we find that our students,
having seen these films in their childhoods, can relate to them better than the
less well known, modern productions. The Lion King, it should be mentioned, is
enjoying a well-publicized revival as a musical on Broadway and release on DVDs,
while Pocahontas is a part of the boom in the sales of Disney princess dolls.
Orenstein (2012) refers to this massive consumer spending as ‘princess mania’;
the sales of consumer products associated with Disney classics have exceeded
$4 billion worldwide. This includes dolls, doll furniture, school supplies, cosmetics,
and so on; in fact over 25,000 accessories related to these films, the majority of
which are connected to Cinderella.
The method of investigation that we have chosen begins with an understanding
of media in which the viewer – as social scientist – is an active participant rather
than through an examination of inert data ripe for content or thematic analysis.
Our focus draws in part on the teachings of Lindsay Prior (2008), who describes
basic methods of researching documents for cultural content, including the analysis
of the spoken words, accents, and visual images. Through such critical analysis we
have sought, as Prior advises, to discern how culture is represented and structured
in selected Disney films. We have also taken into consideration how political
processes impinge on the presentation of the material. Consistent with Prior’s
(2008) method of analyzing documentation, we examine these movies through
narrowing the focus to address key questions: What are the gender roles portrayed
in terms of masculinity and femininity? How do the speech patterns, accents, and
skin tones, serve to create an impression related to race and ethnicity? Is there a
relationship between moral attributes of a character and linguistic style – in other
words, do the good guys speak one way and the bad guys another? What is the
overt message and what is the covert message in the story line? What are the
potential risks to children who grow up exposed to stereotypical characterizations
of minority groups as presented in popular film? These questions we used not only
in our investigation, but they were also designed to be used later in our classrooms
to generate insights concerning the Disney film clips.
In our selection of representative slides and film clips of sequences involving
characters of various ethnicities, we sought dialogue and songs that conveyed both
positive and negative images of the characters that played key roles in the films.
(Many of the film clips are readily available on the Internet.) Our method of
drawing on relevant audio-visual material for critical analysis is consistent with
research findings on teaching effectiveness from the educational literature.
In his review of 17 journal articles on the use of film in the university classroom
setting, Renzi (2011) found unanimous support for incorporating film into the
classroom for heuristic purposes to inculcate critical thinking skills. Renzi devised
an experimental situation himself using narrative films in one class to elicit critical
analysis of the material and only reading material in the other class. Through
reinforcing the students’ media literacy in the experimental group, he found the
critical skills generalized to the analysis of written material throughout the remain-
der of the course. Their performance was consistently better than that of the con-
trol group.
For our theoretical framework, we looked to the writings of bell hooks. Her
stature as a culturally-sensitive film critic is widely recognized. In such works as
Black Looks (1992), Outlaw Culture (1994), and Reel to Real (1996b), hooks exam-
ines multicultural and gendered content in some of her favorite and least favorite
movies from the viewpoint of an African American woman. She utilizes a social
justice and anti-oppressive lens for her observations.
scholars are all highly critical and even cynical about the images conveyed – images
of Italians, Asians, Africans, American Indians, women, and so forth.
Multiculturalism and the Mouse: Race and Sex in Disney Entertainment by Brode
(2005) was the exception in its praise of the Disney industry for the multicultural-
ism contained in the films.
In contrast, the other critics bring our attention to what they see in Disney
entertainment as: latent racism (Spector, 1998); prejudice against Arabs
(Schmidt, 2006); sexism (Chyng Feng & Scharrer, 2004; Orenstein, 2012); anti-
Arab portrayals (Schmidt, 2006); and capitalist exploitation (Giroux & Pollock,
2010; Goodstein, 1998; Jackson & West, 2010; Spector, 1998). The worldwide
influence of the Disney company is widely recognized in the literature. The purpose
of the Disney films is not only to provide entertainment but also education for
children; Disney therefore holds an enormous stake in the cultural capital of the
nation – our children (Giroux, 1999; Giroux & Pollock, 2010). It is widely accepted
that Walt Disney (1901–1966), the founder, became a successful animator due to
his talent, great imagination, work ethic, and cunningness (Zipes, 1995). His ani-
mations were not designed to prompt children to read the original story in its
classical format, but rather to become consumers of the Disney rendition that
would help them recreate the pleasure the film had inspired. This merchandising
plan was extremely successful as children were much more avid consumers of
Disney books and digital products than the original stories. And because anima-
tion uniquely can cross borders and cultures, the Disney enterprise grew into a vast
empire of theme parks, movies, and merchandise (Jackson & West, 2010).
Through the use of camouflaged and highly seductive marketing methods
devised by child psychologists, children are delivered to the market with the full
support of their parents (Giroux & Pollock, 2010). For older kids, video game
products are being devised, according to Giroux and Pollock, that construct
entire cultural experiences based around iconic, often delightful Disney characters.
In its promotion of family consumerism and the relentless marketing of its com-
pany’s products, Disney is selling the illusion of stability in a rapidly changing
world. Some of this is done through the Disney amusement parks, now constructed
in France, Hong Kong, and Japan and in the planning stage in Shanghai, China.
The Disney corporation has set up language schools all over China; the schools
use a curriculum featuring Mickey Mouse, the Little Mermaid, and other Disney
characters (Garrahan & Saperstein, 2010). According to one of the company rep-
resentatives, a side benefit is broader exposure to the Chinese people of this rich
storytelling heritage. The schools, as Garrahan and Saperstein suggest, also enable
Disney to forge a bond with a new generation of consumers by making them aware
of the characters and stories. From bell hooks’ perspective, such child-focused
consumerism is objectionable, first, to the extent that it is built on exploiting so
much of the world’s resources, and second, because consumers acquire possessions
as a replacement for what is missing in their lives.
Disney’s first full length feature animations, beginning with Snow White in 1937,
were based upon European fairytales that he Americanized; they reflected
mainstream values such as the Protestant work ethic, as well as Disney’s personal
prejudices. He often slid indirect social slurs as well as racial and ethnic slights into
scenes that were so fast-paced the audience had little time to notice them (Artz,
2004). Although more sophisticated in its characterizations, the newer Disney ani-
mations continue to play ‘a substantial role in reaffirming, even constructing, an
uneven social hierarchy that privileges the status quo and subjugates marginal
populations’ (Gutierrez, 2000, p. 10). Following hooks’ urging that we be critically
vigilant about the world around us, we examine the cultural content of The Lion
King, Pocahontas, and The Princess and the Frog to determine the potential impact
they may have on the socialization of children and on the promotion of cultural
values. Before we present our analysis of these films, in order to show the perva-
siveness of prejudicial representations in Disney movies, we briefly summarize what
the critics have said from an ethnographic perspective about two films – Mulan
(Walt Disney Pictures, 1998) and Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest
(Walt Disney Pictures, 2006).
Mulan, for example, is widely criticized for its elevation of individualism (Dong,
2006), racist and cultural slurs against Chinese culture, and its negative impact on
children through encouraging such racial stereotyping (Artz, 2004). A film clip that
helps raise the consciousness of viewers is a playing of a song with the words, ‘Men
want girls. . . with good breeding and a tiny waist.’ Even more strident is the
stereotypical characterization depicted in the violent movie Pirates of the
Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest. Portraying the Caribbean island Carib Indians as
cannibals has led to global outrage by indigenous groups (see BBC, 2005). The
Caribbean Amerindian Centrelink (CAC) (2006) called for a boycott of Disney for
its portrayal of the Caribs as savages in this film.
For each of the three films selected, we ask the first four basic questions derived
from the critical analysis suggested by hooks as listed previously for critical ana-
lysis. We have omitted the fifth question concerning indigenous populations for
two of the movies as such populations are not central to the story line. We do
consider that question, however, in our discussion of Pocahontas.
shaman baboon, Rafiki, convinces Simba that his father’s spirit lives on in him and
that he must accept his responsibility. The film ends with a duel and Simba reclaim-
ing the territory and restoring the kingdom to its former glory.
The real narrative of the story is good overcoming evil, and the journey of a
youth to adulthood. The latent or underlying narrative is that men are the desig-
nated rulers of a kingdom, that society’s elites are the rightful rulers, and that these
elites are strong as well as good.
Are the messages embedded in the work really promoting a narrative that chal-
lenges the conventional structures of domination? Two major aspects of this film
stand out and lend themselves to critical reflection. The first is the depiction of
the kingdom as an organized and tightly stratified social order. The Disney studio,
as Artz (2004) informs us, is relying in this film on the viewers’ fondness for royalty
and noble beasts to the extent that the animals even worship their predators rather
than rebel or escape from them. In this way, the ideology of a social hierarchy is
seen as a natural life pattern.
A second level of domination concerns social class. The classism in The Lion
King is overlooked by the critics we consulted; yet it cannot be overemphasized. In
contradiction to the theme song which proclaims an egalitarian cultural circle of
life, race and class, for the most part, are fused. The patriarch Mufasa rules at the
top of the class hierarchy as king, and at the bottom layer of the hierarchy, one
hears voices that are reminiscent of the American ghetto.
How are sex roles conveyed in the film, especially regarding women of color? Are
these portrayals sexualized and/or racialized? In fact, there are no strong female
roles that are represented in this film, which is decidedly concerned with fathers and
sons. A further point of consideration is the fact that Scar, who rules the underclass
world, embodies evil, and is given stereotypical gay character trait. In this context,
as Benshoff and Griffin (2004) and Snyder and Chadha (2008) indicate, in the mind
of the viewer, evil is associated with homosexuality.
Next, we consider the question Are these portrayals sexualized and/or racialized?
Our attention here is drawn to the fact that, while this is the first Disney animation
to be set in Africa, the cultural traits that are portrayed have no bearing on the
reality of life in sub-Sahara Africa. Our attention was drawn to the music, for
example, which did not have the sound of authenticity. Further research revealed
that the musical scores were composed by white musicians who were hired to give
the music an African flavor (Benshoff & Griffin, 2004).
Race is clearly represented in the portion of the film that takes place in the
region that lies outside of light that Mufasa rules and into the area of darkness.
Simba is warned against visiting this area but tricked by his uncle into doing so.
This is the land, a desolate dark area, where the scavenger hyenas live. The scene
did not require close attention to bring to our minds the sounds and images of the
American inner city. In fact, we are not alone in this reflection. Critic Gooding-
Williams (1995) notes that this dark space can be taken as an allegory of the
decaying inner city populated by the U.S. underclass. The fact that the voices of
the hyenas are provided by actors with urban African American and Latino accents
completes the picture. It is true that at the ruling class level, the voice of Mufasa,
the king, is provided by the African American actor, James Earl Jones, but Jones
speaks in a cultivated but phony British accent (Snyder & Chadha, 2008). White
privilege is evidenced in this film not only through the power structure but also in
the lack of complex depictions of persons of color as well as African culture
(Cappiccie, Chadha, Lin, & Snyder, 2012; Giroux, 1999).
Although Rafiki (voiced by the African American actor Robert Guillaume) is
deeply respected as a mystical spiritual leader in Mufasa’s kingdom, he acts foolish
and at times half crazed – stereotypes that have been used historically in the popu-
lar culture to demean African Americans. Moreover, his main role in the film is to
help preserve and restore the lions’ hegemony – or the circle of life.
Our concern is that negative feelings may be elicited in marginalized children as
they view this film. One response might be the sad realization that the rest of society
does not want these people – gay people and inner city persons of color – that the
powers that be will want to contain them for their own protection. The message to
such children might even be, according to Gooding-Williams (1995), not to ques-
tion authority and to accept the social order of society. In short, the ideology
behind The Lion King thus becomes to Gutierrez (2000) more an effort to control
diversity rather than to promote it.
In response to the lack of authenticity multicultural groups receive when they
are depicted in the media, it has been suggested that one way parents and educators
can expose children to a more realistic view of African culture is to use The Lion
King as a stepping stone whereby they are introduced to genuine African stories –
such as the epic tale of Sundiata, Lion King of Mali; the Disney animation is
adapted from this story (Artz, 2004). However, given the reinforcement of negative
stereotypes as conveyed in the film, it might be best for parents to strike this one off
the list for family viewing.
how well Disney succeeded in its mission. Disney sought to immerse its film crew in
Pocahontas’s Algonquin culture by conducting extensive historical research about
the period during which she lived. Unlike the case of Mulan, Pocahontas was a real
woman rather than a legend, so the discrepancy between fact and fiction is easier
for researchers to authenticate.
The setting for this motion picture is Jamestown, Virginia, which is inhabited by a
local tribe of Powhatan Indians. The basic story line of the film is as follows: the
young Indian Pocahontas meets the English captain John Smith, and the two fall in
love. She visits her Grandmother Willow, a counseling tree spirit, because she is
uncertain about the path her life should take, and Grandmother Willow urges
Pocahontas to listen to her heart. When one of the English settlers, intent on finding
gold in the New World, kills the Indian brave Kocoum, the Indians think Smith is
responsible, so he is condemned to death. In begging her father, Chief Powhatan, to
spare Smith’s life, Pocahontas helps establish peace between the Jamestown settlers
and her tribe. Smith, however, is severely wounded by an enraged Englishman and
decides to return to England. Pocahontas and he bid farewell to each other.
We can detect the underlying message of the narrative in the discrepancy
between the true history of Pocahontas and Captain John Smith and this fictiona-
lized account. Whereas historical records recount that Pocahontas was approxi-
mately 10–12 years old when she met John Smith, who was in his late 20 s (Golden,
2006), Disney depicts an older, voluptuous Pocahontas. This depiction presumably
is so their romance can be developed. In Disney’s animation, Pocahontas defies her
father’s orders and sneaks away to meet Smith. In so doing, Pocahontas (like
Mulan) embraces a Western perspective on individual destiny – intuiting her true
path lies somewhere ‘just beyond the river bend.’ Researchers on the history would
also discover the discrepancy between truth and reality in the conclusion of the film
in which peace is established between the races, and the Englishmen, including
John Smith, abandon Jamestown as they sail back to England. In reality, the
English would remain permanently in the New World, and it was around
Jamestown that the first colony was established (Golden, 2006). Pocahontas
would later marry John Rolfe and travel back to Europe to be put on display.
Her position as the daughter of a powerful tribal chief subjected her to political
exploitation by the English within the context of their colonizing efforts.
Sadly, Pocahontas died there of pneumonia within a short time.
Are the messages embedded in the work really promoting a narrative that chal-
lenges the conventional structures of domination? The conventional structures of
domination are clearly evident in this film. We see this in the age difference between
the young Pocahontas and the older John Smith as well as in the relationship
between the Indians and the seemingly much more sophisticated settlers. In some
of the scenes, however, where Pocahontas informs her lover of her people’s cultural
values, for example, their sense of oneness with nature, the structure, at least of
male domination, would seem to be reversed.
How are sex roles conveyed in the film, especially regarding women of color? Are
these portrayals sexualized and/or racialized? In our background research on the
making of this film, we learned from Edgerton and Jackson (1996) that the figure of
Pocahontas was derived from sketches of several women. Studio animators started
with Native American faces but eventually gravitated to the more familiar look of
an Anglicized and statuesque model. Aidman and Reese (1996) noted that the
finalized image of Pocahontas, in her height and the length of her arms and legs,
large breasts and tiny waist, actually bore a striking resemblance to a Barbie doll.
In viewing this popular and entertaining movie, our attention was drawn to
Pocahontas’s dress and the way her hair is displayed. Her over-the-shoulder cos-
tume reveals much bare skin. The sexualization of her figure is further achieved in
the way the short dress is fashioned with a slit. This costume is hardly consistent
with 16th century Algonquian attire (Strong, 1996). In reality, Native American
women of the period wore long dresses with removable sleeves (Golden, 2006).
Pocahontas’s hair is frequently shown blowing in the wind, an image that brings to
mind the Eurocentric stereotype of the Indian as earth goddess or ‘noble savage’
(Pewewardy, 1996–97). This brings us to a consideration of the fifth of bell hooks’
questions for organizing our critical discussion.
If indigenous peoples are represented, are their cultural traits accurately conveyed
or is cultural exploitation and appropriation involved? In the soundtrack ‘Colors of
the Wind,’ which won an Academy Award for best musical score, Pocahontas
refers to herself twice as a savage. Although the use of the term ‘savage’ is not
necessarily negative and is probably used in the sense of ‘noble savage,’ the fact
that it is actually used throughout the film to refer to Native Americans is consist-
ent with the distortion of historical and cultural facts that pervade the film.
Given even a minimal awareness of early American history and of the cruel
treatment of Indian tribes, such as the Algonquian, the modern viewer cannot
help but be struck by the misrepresentation of the colonization of the native
people. Instead of revealing the ethnocentric values that would have been held
by the occupying settlers, the film is built on themes of romanticism and universal
love. The evil that is associated with the ‘white man’ comes across as a relic of
British civilization, as something that is foreign in character. One individual with a
strong British accent personifies the evil of colonization, while the hero,
John Smith, curiously already speaks in a contemporary American accent.
How was it that the producers of the film got the story so wrong, that they
distorted it to such an extent? Roy Disney, the nephew of Walt, explained that the
Disney producers chose to provide this version of history because they wanted to
tell a story about unity among people, because this is applicable to a lot of places in
the world today (Pocahontas press kit, 1995). The focus thus was on mutual inter-
racial and cross-cultural acceptance, however much this focus distorted the histor-
ical truth concerning the plunder and exploitation of the Indians.
This fictitious depiction of history lends itself to an exploration of the ways in
which such myths and legends play a role in the public’s construction of reality. We
can also consider the impact of such depictions in U.S. popular culture on the
marginalized populations involved. Sometimes members of the indigenous popu-
lations vehemently protest such harmful characterizations. This is what happened
with regard to the Pirates of the Caribbean as we mentioned earlier in this article.
A more promising development is found in the next of our Disney selections.
woman ultimately captures the love of the prince. The heroine of this modern fairy
tale, Tiana, comes from a poor but hard-working and close-knit family. (Oprah
Winfrey provides the voice of the loving mother.) Tiana’s image is not overly
sexualized, and this young woman is shown to be resourceful and highly independ-
ent. Students in our Iowa human behavior class generally responded favorably to
Disney’s attempt to avoid racial stereotyping in this film and to the appealing
qualities of the first black princess. What many of them did find objectionable,
however, was the fact that Tiana appears as a frog for a large part of the film, or
even that she had to be turned into a frog at all.
As far as racism is concerned, the vilification of evil in the African tradition
of voodooism does not adequately represent this tradition and promotes a negative
image of African culture. Additionally, the movie includes ‘a trio of toothless
hillbillies’ (Foundas, 2009, n.p.) who are a source of ridicule – and as Foundas
(2009) points out, the lightning bug with the exaggerated Cajun accent is offen-
sive to the Louisiana Cajun community. Some of the music can be considered
offensive as well, for example, the song sung by the evil voodoo master of
magic, Dr. Facilier, and the Cajun Love Song crooned in an exaggerated southern
accent.
Returning to the portrayal of race in The Princess and the Frog, we need to
examine the choice of an apparently Hispanic male in the role of the prince. It is
hard to know what the significance was of the absence of a black male to play this
role. We can perhaps find a meaning from bell hooks who, in her critical analysis of
the film industry, examined interracial love relationships. What she concluded was
that black womanhood is often subtly devalued, in that the black female presence is
rendered meaningful only to the extent that she serves another, generally white
male. However, we suggest another possibility for the choice of a Hispanic male as
prince. Initially, a young white woman tells her father of her excitement in getting
to meet this prince in hopes that he might be her prince charming. The producers of
the film probably thought this sentiment might be farfetched for a white woman to
say in the time and place in which the movie takes place (the Jim Crow South). So a
light brown-skinned prince more easily fitted the bill of who could be a possible
love match for both the rich white girl and the poor black girl. An alternative
explanation is that this represents a belated recognition of Latinos who today
are the largest minority presence in the United States and who have in the past
been relatively ignored in children’s films.
audiences of people in the categories represented would help build on the insights
offered here and carry a higher level of empirical validity.
in the media, even in the much loved, iconic Disney films? Buijzen and Valkenburg
(2005) recommend what they call ‘parental mediation’ as an effective tool in mana-
ging undesirable influences from popular culture. By parental mediation, these
authors are saying that since children usually view such movies in the company
of adults, the adults can help counteract the effect of undesirable images by provid-
ing comments regarding stereotyping, and they can reinforce the more positive
images. Research reported by Buijzen and Valkenburg has shown that such
family discussions that encourage a critical response to the commercial aspects
of mass communication is the most effective way to insulate children from being
taken in by them. Parents can be made aware of the exploitation of children
because of their value as consumers and their ability to influence spending. In
their family counseling sessions, social workers can introduce the subject of com-
mercial exploitation as well as of harmful media influences on children, most of
which is far more corrupting and far more violence-filled than the Disney
animations.
At the societal level, as advocates for social justice, social workers can expose
media messages that are ideologically offensive toward certain multicultural
groups. We and our students can learn from bell hooks what to look for in the
popular arts and the kinds of questions we need to ask in order to be critically
vigilant concerning cultural representations in contemporary film.
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial,
or not-for-profit sectors.
References
Aidman, A., & Reese, D. (1996, May). Pocahontas: Problematizing the pro-social. Paper
presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communications Association,
Chicago, IL.
Artz, L. (2004). The righteousness of self-centered royals: The world according to Disney
animation. Critical Arts, 18(1), 116–145. doi: 10.1080/02560240485310071
Barnes, B. (2009, May 29). Her prince has come, critics, too. New York Times. Retrieved
from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/31/fashion/31disney.html?pagewanted¼all&_r¼0
Benshoff, H. M., & Griffin, S. (2004). America on film: Representing race, class, gender, and
sexuality at the movies. Malden: Blackwell.
British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). (2005, February 14). Film row over pirates ‘can-
nibals’. BBC News. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/
4263227.stm
Brode, D. (2005). Multiculturalism and the mouse: Race and sex in Disney entertainment.
Austin: University of Texas Press.
Buijzen, M., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2005). Parental mediation of undesired advertising
effects. Journal of Electronic Media, 49(2), 157–165.
Cappiccie, A., Chadha, J., Lin, M. B., & Snyder, F. (2012). Using critical race theory to
analyze how Disney constructs diversity: A construct for the baccalaureate human
behavior in the social environment curriculum. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 32,
46–61. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2012.640252
Caribbean Amerindian Centrelink (CAC). (2006, June 17). Boycott Disney, Pirates of the
Caribbean. The CAC Review. Retrieved from http://cacreview.blogspot.com/2006/06/
boycott-disney-pirates-of-caribbean.html
Chyng Feng, S., & Scharrer, E. (2010). Staying true to Disney: College students’ resistance to
criticism of The Little Mermaid. The Communication Review, 7(1), 35–55. doi: 10.1080/
10714420490280189
Dominelli, L. (2002). Anti-oppressive social work theory and practice. Basingstoke, England:
Palgrave Macmillan.
Dong, L. (2006). Writing Chinese America into words and images: Storytelling and retelling
of The Song of Mulan. The Lion and the Unicorn, 30, 218–233. doi: http://dx.doi.org/
10.1353/uni.2006.0020
Edgerton, G., & Jackson, K. M. (1996). Redesigning Pocahontas. The Journal of
Popular Film and Television, 24(2), 90–98. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/
01956051.1996.9943718
Foundas, S. (2009, November 24). Disney’s Princess and the Frog can’t escape the ghetto.
Village Voice. Retrieved from http://www.villagevoice.com/2009-11-24/film/disney-s-
princess-and-the-frog-can-t-escape-the-ghetto/
Garrahan, M., & Saperstein, A. (2010, July 6). Disney to expand language schools in China.
Financial Times. Retrieved from http://www.ft.com
Giroux, H. A. (1999). The mouse that roared: Disney and the end of innocence. Boulder, CO:
Rowman & Littlefield.
Giroux, H. A. & Pollock, G. (2010, August 4). How Disney magic and the corporate media
shape youth identity in the digital age. Truthout. Retrieved from http://www.truth-
out.org/archive/item/91087-how-disney-magic-and-the-corporate-media-shape-youth-
identity-in-the-digital-age
Golden, M. (2006). Pocahontas: Comparing the Disney image with historical evidence.
Social Studies and the Young Learner, 18(4), 19–23. Retrieved from http://www.social-
studies.org/system/files/publications/yl/1804/180419.pdf
Gooding-Williams, R. (1995). Disney in Africa and the inner city: On race and space in The Lion
King. Social Identities, 1(2), 373–379. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504630.1995.9959442
Goodstein, E. S. (1998). Southern outposts in the Magic Kingdom: The South as a regional
sub-text in Disney’s American spectacle. Visual Resources, 14(3), 307–319.
Gutierrez, G. (2000). Deconstructing Disney: Chicano/a children and critical race theory.
Aztlain, 25, 7–46.
hooks, b. (1992). Black looks. Boston, MA: South End Press.
hooks, b. (1994). Outlaw culture: Resisting representations. New York, NY: Routledge.
hooks, b. (1996a). Cultural criticism and transformation [Video]. Northampton, MA: Media
Education Foundation.
hooks, b. (1996b). Reel to real: Race, sex, and class at the movies. New York, NY: Routledge.
Jackson, K. M., & West, M. (2010). Disneyland and culture: Essays on the parks and their
influence. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Co.
Orenstein, P. (2012). Cinderella ate my daughter. New York, NY: Harper Paperbacks.
Pewewardy, C. (1996–97). The Pocahontas paradox: A cautionary tale for educators.
Journal of Navajo Education, 14(1–2), 20–25. Retrieved from http://www.hanksvil-
le.org/storytellers/pewe/writing/Pocahontas.html