Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Paz Garcia Vda de Mapa Et.,al Vs CA
Paz Garcia Vda de Mapa Et.,al Vs CA
Facts
In disposing the case, the lower court ruled that a trust was created and
the denial order of the petitioner's motion to intervene did not deprive them to
institute a separate civil action to recover what pertains to them in their own
right. The respondents moved for reconsideration but the same was denied
prompting them to file an appeal before the Court of Appeals. Their appeal to
the appellate court proved fruitful as the Court of Appeals reversed the decision
of the lower court and ruled that there is no trust nor
fideicommissarysubstition created in the will of Concepcion Mapa de Hidrosollo
ISSUE:
Whether or not a trust was created
HELD
The Supreme Court ruled that there was a trust created. Although the
word "trust" itself does not appear in the will, the testatrix intent to create one
is nonetheless demonstrated by the stipulations in her will.
In designating her husband Ludovico Hidrosollo as a sole and universal
heir with the obligation to deliver the properties to the petitioners and private
respondents, she intended that the legal title should vest in him and in
significantly referring to petitioners and private respondents as beneficiarios,
she intended that the beneficial or equitable interest over the properties should
repose in them.
Article 1443 of the Civil Code also provides that No particular words are
required for the creation of an express trust, it being sufficient that a trust is
clearly intended.