The Pio Ye
inl oftenthirword ants among the demands ofthe lca eure, the
expression of national identity, and the frequently internalized demands
For igh quai, in which quai inevtably equated wich the standards
ofthe worl center.
Yer atthe sume time, one muse not underestimate the imporance,
expecially in the nineteenth and eater tented century, but today 38
‘wel of madeenty and modernination as iberating expansion concept,
‘which opened doors, knocked down walls expanded the cramped, ote
‘conventional ols inflicted on people by tational village culture, Both
nineteenth and ewentit-centuy Beton offers ut enn visions ofthe
talented othe wnatal individ oppressed by oe languishing in resrc-
tive, sulting provincial stings, fom Madame Bary to the Tiree
Siner. The center, then-—Pais above al forthe nineeenth-centry at
ie—should be though ofa just in terms of oppresion ot domination,
but the source of ileraton and stilton 23 well In thi conic, 0
czatal othe meaning and direction of ar, and indeed, ofall cata
crestion today, Francisco Oller ands a an exemplary figure, one whose
importance extends far beyond the sland hich nourished hin with hat
allinportant sense of place
‘smn Sah ig gee ot
1c Ole tein ai ie: a
‘Reno Ren ne Deeb sent
(amie Ol 2 7 He
LINDA NOCHLIN, THE PoLs 71
(OW: ESSAYS OW
Me CENTURY ART AND SOCIETY (HE Wy
YORK: HARPER Row, 1989)
3
The Imaginary Orient
em np, fea ha 9 corp ye
‘What isthe rationale behind the recent spate of revisions or expansionist
sibs of winetoothscetury art—TBe Age of Relation. Te Second
Enpirg The Reale Tradition, Norhrn Light, Women criss, various
shows of academic at te? Is i simply to racover overlooked or
forgotten works of? Isic reevaluate che material to ereate anew and
les value laden canon? These are the kinds of questions that were raised —
ore ofl unintentonlly, one suspects—by the exibition and
‘tale Orel: The Near East im French Punting 8n-18.°
‘Alnowe all he Orientals eiition makes ws wonder whether there
ae other questions besides the “normal” ahistorical ones hat ought.
tbe asked ofthis materi. The ongunier ofthe show, Donald Rosenthal,
stggess that there are indeed important sues at stake her, but he dlib-
rately stops shor of confronting them. “The unifying characteristic of
intent century Orientalism was its tempt at documentary els.”
the declares in the introduction to the estalogue, and then goes on (0
Imsintain, quite corel, that “the flowering of Orientalt painting
‘wae closely associated with dhe apogee of European clonal expan-sion in the ninetenth century.” Yet having seerel ro Bawa Sais
trical denon of Oren in Western Hterature 3s « mode for
‘fining the presumed clara inferioity ofthe Islamie Oven par
oni, designed to asl and
perpetuate European dominance,” Rosechal immedi rejets this
analysis in his own study. “French Oriental pining will be discussed
in erm of aesthetic quality and isorial interes, adm
mode ata eealaton of ip
art historia business 5
Tike hor patos er surely
the Key notion of Oren itsf—cannot be confronted without 3
critical analyse ofthe paticula power structure in which these works
being. For instance, the depres of realism (or lick of in
individual Orient images ean hardly be dicussed without some a
se realty we are talking about
‘What age we to ake, for example, of Jesn-Léon Gézbmne' Stak
(Charmer, painted nthe ate wos (now in che Clare Ar Tosa
sisal documea of ninerenth-cenury colonials i
disilaion of the Westerne’s noon of the Oriental couched in the
Tanguage of 1 would-be erasparent atu, (No wonder Said used i
a the dus jacket for hs crite study of the phenomenon of Oriental
ism) -The tite, however, doesnt relly el he complete try the paint
ing shoud ely be elle The Soe Charmer ond His dienes, for we
are clerly meant o look at both peroomer and audience as pats ofthe
his period works like Manet's or Dega's Café Gace, for exarpl
which ae sex in Pri—invted to identi with the adence. Te watch
rs huddled against the ferociously detailed ted wal inthe background
f Gerime’s pining ae a5 resolutely alienated From us athe act hey
watch with sch chidh, tranecike concentration. Our gate meant
* picaresue
‘ekctaion
‘Clerly, chet lack and brown folk te mystified but then gai, s
are we: Indeed, the defining mood ofthe painting 6 mystery, and iis
treated bya specifi pictorial device, We are permitted only 2 beguiling
Holding the snake A fll frontal wew, which would
reveal unambiguously both his sex andthe flies of hi dangerous pe
Formnce dened us. And the insistent, sexually charged mystery tthe
craterof th painting ignifesa more pena one: the nstery of the East
isl, « sandard topos of Orenais deol
Despite oe perhaps boats of the insistent riches ofthe vse det
of the young pr
trtocks and muscular highs; the wrinkles of the venerable snake charmer
to is ight the varied dlghs oer by the pctresque crowd and the
allurngly elaborate surfaces ofthe authentic Turkish eles, carpet, and
Girdme offers the manifest
basket which serve ax décor—we are haunted by certain abet in the
Dttng. Thee absences ae so conspicuous that, once we beco
‘them, they begin o fonction as presences, in fac, signe of certain
ind of concep deprivation,
One absence ithe absence of history. Time stands sill in Gomes
painging, a it docs in all imagery quae s “picturesque,” including
hineteenh-century representations of pesunts in France itself. Géxie
‘Suggests dha his Oriental word s« word without change, # word oftimes, temporal cons anil, touched by the histori pro
Cone hat were acing” or “improving” bt at ay rte desl
Stering Westen societies atthe me. Vet theme were infact years of
‘entand conspicuous change ote Neo Ease wel changes ected
primary by Wester power_techoologksl miltay, cconoms, co
furl—at pecially By the very French present Gexbme ssp
loony avoid
Inthe very time when ad place where Germ’ pcre wa ped
te la 8s in Consannope the gnerment of Napoleon Il wat
faking an active itera (were the governments of Rosa, Aus aed
{Great Brin) in the flrs he Orman goverment to efor and
Imerie inl “Ie was seesry to change Mim abit to desoy
{hag old anatcsn which wa otc the foo of es a
Cresta mudern sear ste" ecced French historian Edosard Dr
‘La Qnotion Oren (98, “I wap necenary wo tensor. the
Cdcaton of bork compres and subject and incest in both the
known spit of wlrece- noble sk, wordy ofthe gest renown
of Franc,” he conned
Te the Ota Hak ws founded, wth he controling interest
in French hans ln sth French government vite he stan 1st
Pars and recommended to hin system of iar plc edvestion and
the underaking of great pubic works snd somimuriation rym fa
‘te una the it con af che Tasch Minar of Paige Aer
Ind the French Arbasador, the Lye of Galt Seri was opened, 2
fren secondary school open to Otomunsbjss of every ace and ereed,
‘tere Europeans taught more than sc hundred oye the Pench las
iuage—"s yb.” riled, “ofthe action of France, exeing
feel isewt the pape of the Oren in her ow language the
Clements of Western ciation Inahe sue yea, company eonssting
{tiny of French epitaiste esved » onset for lays to comet
preset day Lab and Salonice with the extng ray onthe Mi
fle Dan"
"The abenc of sense of stony, of temporal change, in Grimes
pining isintinatelyeled vo anor atrking sence the work that
fh lal presence of Westerners. Ther a ever any Europeans in
“preg views ofthe Orient ie thee. Indeed, ght be id that
coe of he deining etre f Orit puting dependence for
its very exes on apse hati says an sere the Westen
‘elo or ene re
The white man the Westerner, of couse alvays inp present
in Orewa pings He Sue Clore snc thet
ling poe, the prs which ings the Oral wari a biog, he gre
for wich lioely inde. Ard this leads us tl evother
atrece Paro the rtp of a0 Onna per ie Ge 0
ike hx viewer fp here a ny “binging i being” al
tmconvnce them hat works He thx were simply Selections” en
Cie in hi esac, of «peeing Oreilly.
In is own tne Gerbne wa eld o be dnmtngly obctiv and
scene and wae compared inspect with Rela ove, Asn
‘American ere decd ia ye
ing oe ofthe met sna and onsen
recount crn co ay ee ed
ere" He tbevs lym Chris Rea does the big
the pa athe arto be a even mate ner he pind nd
hoy work preening to sto arc Bac ro ane
Stole pney of sven tamed of ie carb rly coin
Spirent gaia ence Tay died nf it
‘heb Of Gerd ged tha sever nea pre witout he
‘ecient cen pr
‘The srtegies of “eis” (or perhaps “pseudo-reais:”“auent
<3" o “nals” would be Beer tems) mystieation go hand in hand
with those of Orienaise mystifstion. Hence, another absence which
onsiutessignfcane presence inthe paoring: the asence—that eto
say, the apparent absence—of ar As Leo Bers has pointed a in his
vce on reali andthe fer of desire, "The seriousest” of ris art
is tased om the absence of any reminder ofthe fat that ei relly 2
(question of are"? No other ats ass inexorably erated al tees of
the piture plane as Gérdme, denying us any clue t the at work a
Tie fae surfce.
If we compare a painting ike Gerdes Sivet in Algiers with is
prorotype, Delcroix’s Stet in Aebne, we iumediatly se that Gerd,Whe sof Vis
{nthe interest of atlesnes” of innocent, Oneal transparency. goes
"ich farther then Deacrx a supplyag picturesque data othe Western
‘mere and in veiling the ae tha he sage conse of pant om canvas.
‘A natural o autheniie™ aris ike Gerd ees 0 make ws Forget
‘hat his ae realy ar, both by concealing the evidence of his touch, a
tthe sume ime, by insisting on a plethora of authenticating deals
‘Specialy on whit might be ealed unnecessary ones, These include not
snerly the "ueflly executed Turkish ie patterns tha Rickard Esing
Fausen pointed out i his soya Grome catalogue: not merely the atiss
renditions of Arbc inscriptions which, stinghausen mains, can be
‘sly read? bt even the “later rept” onthe tile work, which, unetion
fing at fst sight rather like the barometer on the piano in Flaubers