You are on page 1of 8

Biochemical Engineering Journal 76 (2013) 17–24

Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect

Biochemical Engineering Journal


journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/bej

Regular article

␤-Galactosidase over-production by a mig1 mutant of Kluyveromyces


marxianus KM for efficient hydrolysis of lactose
Hai-Xiang Zhou, Jin-Li Xu, Zhe Chi, Guang-Lei Liu, Zhen-Ming Chi ∗
UNESCO Chinese Center of Marine Biotechnology, Ocean University of China, Yushan Road, No. 5, Qingdao, China

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: In this study, the MIG1 gene in the industrial yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus KM was disrupted by inte-
Received 3 July 2012 grating the HPT gene (encoding hygromycin B phosphotransferase) into ORF (Open Reading Frame)
Received in revised form 2 April 2013 of the MIG1 gene. The disruptant (mig1 mutant) KM-15 obtained could grow in the media containing
Accepted 5 April 2013
hygromycin or 2-deoxy-d-glucose, respectively. ␤-Galactosidase production and expression of its gene in
Available online 13 April 2013
the disruptant KM-15 were significantly enhanced compared to those in K. marxianus KM. This confirmed
that Mig1, the transcriptional repressor, indeed regulated expression of the gene and biosynthesis of the
Keywords:
enzyme in K. marxianus KM. Under the optimal conditions, the ␤-galactosidase activity of 121.0 U/mL
MIG1 gene
Kluyveromyces marxianus
was produced by the disruptant KM-15 within 60 h during 2-L fermentation. 99.2% of lactose in 9.0% of
␤-Galactosidase lactose solution, 99.0% of lactose in 12.0% of whey powder suspension and 99.3% of lactose in the milk
Biocatalysis were hydrolyzed by the crude ␤-galactosidase within 3 h, 4 h and 3 h, respectively. The end products of
Metabolic engineering the lactose hydrolysis were only glucose and galactose.
Biomass © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction play an important role in glucose repression [10]. Mig1, the main
effector in glucose repression, is a C2 H2 zinc finger protein that is
Kluyveromyces marxianus is phylogenetically related to Saccha- able to bind the promoters of a variety of genes repressed by glu-
romyces cerevisiae, and is a sister species to Kluyveromyces lactis cose. Snf1 complex encoded by SNF1 gene is a protein kinase [10].
[1,2]. The important feature of K. marxianus is the capacity to assimi- When the glucose concentration in the medium is very low or there
late lactose and inulin and to use these two sugars as carbon sources is no glucose in the growth medium, the Snf1 complex is phos-
[3]. As K. marxianus has the capacity to assimilate lactose and inulin; phorylated by another unknown kinase in yeast cells. In this case,
an extremely rapid growth rate, short generation time, thermo- the Snf1 complex is active and can catalyze the phosphorylation
tolerance, and a high secretory capacity, it has been widely used of Mig1. The phosphorylated Mig1 complex fails in binding to the
in biotechnology [4]. The yeast also has achieved GRAS (gener- promoters of the genes repressed by glucose and is translocated to
ally regarded as safe) and QPS (qualified presumption of safety) cytoplasm, leading to the active transcription of the genes. There-
[3], meaning that it can be safely used in the biotechnology. ␤- fore, the Mig1 protein is a central component for glucose repression
Galactosidase (EC 3.2.1.23), commonly known as lactase, catalyzes in yeasts. When the glucose concentration in the medium is very
the hydrolysis of lactose, producing a mixture of glucose and galac- high, the Snf1 complex is dephosphorylated and inactive. So Mig1
tose [5]. The ␤-galactosidase produced by K. marxianus has been complex cannot be phosphorylated and bind to the promoters of
purified and characterized and the gene encoding ␤-galactosidase the genes repressed by glucose [10,11]. So far, the genes similar to
in K. marxianus has been cloned and characterized [6,7]. It was MIG1 have been cloned in the yeast K. marxianus and other yeasts
found that the ␤-galactosidase produced by K. marxianus is intracel- and in some filamentous fungi [12]. A number of mutants with
lular [8]. The ␤-galactosidase produced can be used for hydrolysis mutations which act synergistically with mig1 to relieve glucose
and removal of lactose in milk and whey, for treatment for alleviat- repression of invertase gene SUC2 and to suppress the effect of a
ing symptoms of lactose intolerance in human. It also can be utilized snf1 mutation on invertase expression or on the growth on glu-
for production of ethanol, galacto-oligosaccharides and galactose coneogenic carbon sources have been isolated from S. cerevisiae
[9]. However, it has been well known that glucose repression occurs [10]. In our previous study [13], it has been confirmed that Mig1,
in this yeast and Mig1, the transcriptional repressor is found to the transcriptional repressor, indeed regulates expression of the
genes and production of the extracellular enzymes in Saccharomy-
copsis fibuligera A11. K. marxianus KM is an industrial yeast, can
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 532 82032266; fax: +86 532 82032266. produce 4140 U/g of ␤-galactosidase and has been widely used
E-mail address: zhenming@sdu.edu.cn (Z.-M. Chi). for ␤-galactosidase production on a large scale in China [14]. In

1369-703X/$ – see front matter © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2013.04.010
18 H.-X. Zhou et al. / Biochemical Engineering Journal 76 (2013) 17–24

this study, in order to know if Mig1, the transcriptional repres- 40 s, extension at 72 ◦ C for 40 s, final extension at 72 ◦ C for 5 min.
sor regulates expression of the gene encoding ␤-galactosidase and PCR was run for 30 cycles and the PCR cycler was GeneAmp PCR
production of the enzyme, the MIG1 gene in K. marxianus KM was System 2400 (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The PCR products
disrupted and effects of the disruption of the MIG1 gene on the from the three PCR amplifications were mixed, denatured, allowed
enzyme production, gene expression, and glucose repression were to anneal using the shared sequence of the primers and subjected
examined. Finally, ␤-galactosidase produced by the disruptant was to a fusion PCR amplification, using the flanking primers H1 (5 ) and
used to effectively hydrolyze lactose from different sources. H6 (3 ) as described above. The amplification products were sep-
arated by electrophoresis on a 0.8% agarose gel and the expected
2. Materials and methods 1377 kb (the promoter of the MIG1 gene::HPT gene::the terminator
of the MIG1 gene) fragments were extracted using TaKaRa Agarose
2.1. The strains and media Gel DNA Fragment Recovery Kit Ver.2.0 (Invitrogen), and sequenced
to verify the correct assembly of the insert (Fig. 1). The recov-
K. marxianus KM, which is being widely used for ␤-galactosidase ered fragments were ligated into the plasmid pMD19-T simple and
production on large scale in China [14] was used in this study. As the resulting plasmid carrying the fragments was designated as
described below, the disruptant KM-15 was obtained by disrup- pMD19/kmMIG1-HPT (Fig. 1).
tion of the MIG1 gene in K. marxianus KM. The cultivation medium
for the yeast growth was YPD medium containing 20 g/L glucose, 2.5. Transformation and selection
20 g/L polypeptone, 10 g/L yeast extract. The lactose medium for
␤-galactosidase production was as follows: 40 g/L lactose, 20 g/L The plasmid pMD19/kmMIG1-HPT obtained was digested with
polypeptone, 10 g/L yeast extract, 10.0 mM of MnCl2 , pH 7.0. The the enzyme XhoI. The recovered fragments carrying the promoter
whey medium for ␤-galactosidase production was as follows: of the MIG1 gene::HPT gene::the terminator of the MIG1 gene were
100 g/L whey powder, 10 g/L polypeptone, 15 g/L yeast extract, transformed into the cells of K. marxianus KM by lithium acetate
10 mM of MnCl2 , pH 7.0. The Escherichia coli strain used in this methods [18]. The transformants were spread on the YPD plates
study was DH5a [F− endA1 hsdR17 (rK− /mK+ 110) supE44 thi−k− supplemented with 100 ␮g/mL of hygromycin and X-gal and grown
recA1 gyrlacU(80-lacZM15)] and was grown in 5.0 ml of Luria broth at 28 ◦ C for 96 h. The untransformed K. marxianus KM was used as
(LB) at 37 ◦ C overnight [15]. YNB medium contained 6.7 g/L yeast a control. The blue transformant colonies, which could grow on
nitrogen base without amino acids, 10 g/L (NH4 )2 SO4 , pH 7.0. the YPD plates supplemented with 100 ␮g/mL of hygromycin were
regarded as the positive transformants. One of the blue transfor-
2.2. Plasmids mant (disruptant) colonies was named disruptant KM-15 and used
in the subsequent investigation.
The plasmid pCAMBIA 1381 carrying the bacterial hygromycin
B phosphotransferase (HPT) gene was kindly supplied by Dr. Lining 2.6. Confirmation of the glucose-derepression
Zhang in Canada [16]. pMD19-T simple for cloning of PCR products
was purchased from TaKaRa Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Dalian, China). In order to confirm that the disruptant KM-15 is a glucose-
derepression mutant, K. marxianus KM and the disruptant KM-15
2.3. Whey powder were grown on the YPD plates supplemented with 2-deoxy-d-
glucose or X-gal at 28 ◦ C for three days.
The whey powder (lactose content was 77 g/L) used in this study
was purchased at Jinan Biotechnology Company, China. 2.7. Confirmation of the disrupted MIG1 gene

2.4. Construction of the knock-out vector for disruption of the The genomic DNAs isolated from the yeast strain K. marxianus
MIG1 gene KM and the positive disruptant KM-15 were used as the tem-
plate for PCR. The DNA fragments (600 bp) containing the whole
Construction of the knock-out vector was described as follows sequence of the promoter of the MIG1 gene and the partial sequence
(Fig. 1) [17]. The promoter of the MIG1 gene was PCR amplified of 5 -end of the HPT gene were PCR amplified using the primers H1
from the genomic DNA of K. marxianus KM using primers H1 which and HY1 (Table 1 and Fig. 1) and the DNA fragments (585 bp) con-
added a 5 XhoI site, and H2 which shared the 5 -sequence with the taining the whole sequence of the terminator of the MIG1 gene and
HPT gene specific primer H3 used in the subsequent PCR amplifica- the partial sequence of 3 -end of the HPT gene were PCR amplified
tion (Table 1). The terminator of the MIG1 gene was PCR amplified using the primers H6 and HY2 (Table 1 and Fig. 1). PCR reactions
from the genomic DNA of K. marxianus KM, using the primers H6, and conditions were performed as described above and the PCR
which added a 5 XhoI site, and H5, which shared the 3 -sequence products obtained were separated in agarose gel. The sizes of the
with the HPT gene specific primer H4 used in the subsequent PCR PCR products were estimated using the Automated Documentation
amplification (Table 1). The primers H1 and H2 and H5 and H6 were and Analysis System (Gene-Genius, USA). The PCR products were
designed according to the MIG1 gene sequence (accession number: sequenced by Shanghai Sangon Company (Shanghai, China).
Z50018). The HPT gene (1026 bp) was amplified from the plasmid
pCAMBIA 1381 carrying the HPT gene using the primers H3, which 2.8. Preparation of the enzyme
shared the 3 -sequence with the primer H2, and H4, which shared
the 5 -sequence with the primer H5. The primers H3 and H4 were One loop of the cells of the yeast strain K. marxianus KM and
designed according to the HPT gene sequence (accession number: the disruptant KM-15 was transferred to 50 mL of YPD medium in
AF234302) (Table 1). The PCR reaction was performed in a total vol- 250-mL flask and the culture was aerobically cultivated for 24 h.
ume of 50 ␮L PCR mixture containing 5 ␮L of 10× La PCR buffer II One milliliter of the cell culture (at 600 nm absorbance = 3.0) was
(Mg2+ Plus), 8 ␮L of 2.5 mM dNTPs, 1 ␮L of 20 ␮M each primer, 2 ␮L transferred to the lactose medium for ␤-galactosidase production
of 10 ng/mL of the genomic DNA, 22.5 ␮L of sterile deionized water and the culture was grown aerobically at 28 ◦ C and 180 rpm for 2
and 0.5 ␮L of U/␮L TaKaRa LaTaq. The conditions for the PCR ampli- days. As ␤-galactosidase produced by K. marxianus KM and the dis-
fication were as follows: initial denaturation at 94 ◦ C for 5 min, ruptant KM-15 was intracellular, the cultures were centrifuged at
denaturation at 94 ◦ C for 40 s, annealing temperature at 55 ◦ C for 8000 × g and 4 ◦ C for 10 min and the pellets obtained were washed
H.-X. Zhou et al. / Biochemical Engineering Journal 76 (2013) 17–24 19

Fig. 1. Construction of the knock-out vector for disruption of the MIG1 gene in K. marxianus KM.

with sterile distilled water three times by centrifugation at 8000 × g 2.9. Determination of ˇ-galactosidase
and 4 ◦ C for 10 min and the washed cells were used as the crude ␤-
galactosidase preparation. The washed cells were mixed with 1 g of The washed cells obtained above were suspended in 4% acetate
glass beads (diameter was 0.5 mm, bought from Sigma, USA). The ether and the suspension was incubated at 4 ◦ C for 4 h. Then, 5.0 mL
cells were shaken in a Merckenschlager cell homogenizer (Braun- of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) was added to the suspension and
Melsungen, Germany) with CO2 cooling for 7 min. The disrupted the new cell suspension was further incubated at 4 ◦ C for 4 h. The
cells were used as the crude ␤-galactosidase preparations. mixture containing 0.5 mL of the new cell suspension and 0.5 mL of

Table 1
The primers used in this study.

Primer Sequence

H1 5 -CTCGAGCCATAAGCATCCGAAGAATAGAAAAGTCGA-3 (Both the underlined and bold bases encode XhoI site)
H2 5 -GTGAGTTCAGGCTTTTTCATACCTATTCTATACTCGTCGTCG-3 (The underlined base are the shared bases)
H3 5 -GAGTATAGAATAGGTATGAAAAAGCCTGAA-3 (The underlined and bold bases are the shared bases)
H4 5 -GTAGCTGCAGTCAGTGCTTCAGTGTTCTATTTCTTTGCCCTCGGACGAGTGC-3 (the underlined and bold bases are the shared bases)
H5 5 -GCACTCGTCCGAGGGCAAAGAAATAGAACACTGAAGCACTGACTGCAGCTAC-3 (the underlined and bold bases are the shared bases)
H6 5- CTCGAGACTAGTAATTATGTCCAGTAAGTAGGTTGTG-3 (Both the underlined and bold bases encode XhoI site)
HY1 5 -AACCCGCTCGTCTGGCTAAGATCGGC-3
HY2 5 -ACGCGGATTTCGGCTCCAACAATGTC-3
K26S 5 -CGAGTGAAGCGGCAAAAGC-3
K26X 5 -CCAAGGAACATAGACAAGGACCAG-3
KLS 5 -TTGGGCTTTTGCGTTGTTTG-3
KLX 5 -TCCATTTCTTTGCCGTTTCC-3
20 H.-X. Zhou et al. / Biochemical Engineering Journal 76 (2013) 17–24

4 mg/mL of o-nitrophenyl-␤-d-galactopyranoside (ONPG) in 0.1 M 2.14. Hydrolysis of lactose


phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) was incubated at 40 ◦ C for 10 min. The
␤-galactosidase activity in the mixture was inactivated by adding Time course of lactose hydrolysis was obtained by incubation of
2 mL of Na2 CO3 (0.5 M) solution to the mixture. The o-nitrophenol the mixture containing 600 ␮L of 300 g/L of lactose solution (dis-
(ONP) released was quantitatively measured by reading the OD solved in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0), 500 ␮L of the treated
value of the mixture at 420 nm using the spectrophotometer. The yeast cells (final ␤-galactosidase activity was 440 U/g of lactose),
same mixture containing the new cell suspension that was heated and 900 ␮L of 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 at 40 ◦ C for 5 h, and
at 100 ◦ C for 5 min was used as the control and the ONP from Sigma lactose concentration in the mixture was determined as described
served as the standard. One unit of ␤-galactosidase activity was below each 1.0 h until no more lactose content was changed. Time
defined as the amount of ␤-galactosidase producing 1 ␮M ONP per course of lactose hydrolysis in the whey powder was obtained by
min under the conditions used in this study. incubation of the mixture containing 600 ␮L of 400 g/L of the whey
powder (suspended in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0), 500 ␮L of
the treated yeast cells (final ␤-galactosidase activity was 450 U/g of
2.10. Measurement of cell dry weight lactose), and 900 ␮L of 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 at 40 ◦ C for
4 h. Lactose in the mixture was determined using the same methods
The yeast cells from 10.0 mL of the culture were harvested as described below. Time course of lactose hydrolysis in the treated
and washed three times with distilled water by centrifugation at milk (lactose content was 46.5 g/L) was acquired by incubation of
5000 × g and 4 ◦ C for 10 min. Then, the cells in the tube were dried the mixture containing 10.0 mL of the treated milk and 12.5 mg of
at 100 ◦ C until the cell dry weight was constant. the treated yeast cells (final ␤-galactosidase activity was 268.8 U/g
of lactose) at pH 7.0 and 40 ◦ C for 3 h. Lactose in the mixture was
determined using the same methods as described below.
2.11. Fluorescent real-time PCR

The seed cultures were prepared as described above. One 2.15. Analysis of lactose in the whey powder and in the milk
milliliter of the seed culture (OD600nm = 3.0) was inoculated into
the lactose medium for ␤-galactosidase production and the culture Lactose content in the whey powder and in the milk was deter-
was grown aerobically at 28 ◦ C and 180 rpm for 48 h. The cultures mined according to the methods described by Teles et al. [20].
were centrifuged at 8000 × g and 4 ◦ C for 10 min and the pellets Lactose in the standard solutions with different concentrations
obtained were used as the samples for total RNA isolation. Total (0 mg/mL, 0.25 mg/mL, 0.5 mg/mL, 0.75 mg/mL and 1 mg/mL) of lac-
RNA was purified by a RNAprep pure Tissue Kit (TIANGEN, China). tose was also determined using the same methods as described
Reverse transcription was performed using PrimeScript RT reagent above, and lactose content in the whey powder was calculated from
Kit (TaKaRa, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The the standard curve of lactose.
fluorescent real-time RT-PCR assay was carried out according to the
methods described by Liu et al. [13]. The primers KLS and KLX were 2.16. Thin layer chromatography
designed according to the ␤-galactosidase gene sequence (GenBank
accession No. AY526090) (Table 1). The primers K26S and K26X The end products of lactose or whey powder hydrolysis or milk
were designed according to the 26S rDNA gene sequence (GenBank after the incubation at 40 ◦ C were withdrawn and identified to
accession No. AB617981) (Table 1). The relative expression quantity ascertain the extent of hydrolysis by ascending thin layer chro-
was calculated using the formula RATE = 2−DDCt . The sample data matography (Silica gel 60, MERCK, Germany) with the solvent
obtained from the real-time PCR analysis were subjected to One- system of butanol:absolute ethanol:water (5:3:2 by volume) and
way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) [15]. P values were calculated by a detection reagent comprising 20 g/L diphenylamine in acetone-
Student’s t-test (n = 3). P values less than 0.05 were considered sta- 20 g/L aniline in acetone-850 g/L phosphoric acid (5:5:1 by volume).
tistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS The reaction mixtures in which the crude ␤-galactosidase was inac-
11.5 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). tivated prior to addition by heating at 100 ◦ C for 10 min were used
as the controls.

2.12. ˇ-Galactosidase production and cell growth by the


disruptant KM-15 in the 2-I fermentor 3. Results and discussion

The seed cultures were prepared as described above. The fer- 3.1. Confirmation of glucose repression
mentation was carried out in a Biostat B2 2-L fermentor (B. Braun,
Germany). Fifty milliliters of the seed culture was transferred into The previous studies have shown that production of many extra-
1500 mL of the whey powder medium. The fermentation was per- cellular enzymes by yeasts was repressed by glucose available in the
formed under the conditions of the agitation speed of 180 rpm, the medium [10]. However, it is still unknown if the ␤-galactosidase
aeration rate of 8 L/min, the temperature of 28 ◦ C, and the fermen- produced by the industrial yeast K. marxianus KM is repressed
tation period of 84 h. Samples were taken approximately every 12 h by glucose available in the medium. In order to know if glu-
to determine cell growth and ␤-galactosidase activity as described cose in the medium affects ␤-galactosidase production by the
above. industrial yeast K. marxianus KM used in this study, effects of differ-
ent concentrations of glucose on ␤-galactosidase production were
examined. The results in Fig. 2 indicated that as the glucose concen-
2.13. Determination of total sugar in the fermented media trations were increased from 0 to 20 g/L, ␤-galactosidase activity
was increased continuously. However, as the glucose concentra-
The mixture containing 200 ␮L of the sample and 1.0 mL of 2 M tions were increased from 30 to 80 g/L, ␤-galactosidase activity
HCl was heated at 100 ◦ C for 30 min. After cooling, the mixture was was decreased continuously. This confirmed that ␤-galactosidase
neutralized by adding 1.0 mL of 2 M NaOH. The total reducing sugar production by K. marxianus KM was indeed sensitive to high con-
in the hydrolysate was determined by the Nelson–Somogyi method centration of glucose available in the media. However, in our
[19]. previous studies [21,22], it was found that repression of invertase
H.-X. Zhou et al. / Biochemical Engineering Journal 76 (2013) 17–24 21

4
Beta-galactosidase (U/mg) 3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0 2 4 6 8
Concentration of glucose (g/100ml)

Fig. 2. Effects of different concentrations of glucose on ␤-galactosidase biosynthesis


by K. marxianus KM. The yeast strain was grown in the YNB medium supplemented
with different concentrations of glucose at 28 ◦ C for three days and ␤-galactosidase
activity was determined as described in Section 2. Data are given as means ± SD,
n = 3.

secretion in Saccharomyces sp. W4 occurs at glucose concentra-


tions higher than 20 g/L while repression of invertase secretion
in Schizosaccharomyces pombe occurs at glucose concentrations
Fig. 4. Cell growth of the disruptant KM-15 on the YPD medium containing 2-deoxy-
higher than 10 g/L. d-glucose and X-gal (A1) and no growth of K. maxiaxum KM on this medium (A2);
cell growth of the disruptant KM-15 on the YPD medium containing hygromycin and
3.2. Disruption of the MIG1 gene X-gal (B1) and no growth of K. maxiaxum KM on this medium (B2). The cultivation
temperature and time were 28 ◦ C and 3 days, respectively.
The results in Fig. 2 showed that glucose repression occurred
partial sequence of 5 -end of the HPT gene (data not shown) and
in this yeast and the KmMIG1 gene encoding the transcriptional
after PCR products were amplified from the genomic DNA of the
repressor has been cloned [12]. To determine the role of KmMig1
disruptant KM-15 using the primers H6 and HY2, the PCR products
in the regulation of the ␤-galactosidase production and its gene
(585 bp) (Lane 3 in Fig. 5) contained the whole sequence of the ter-
expression in the industrial yeast K. marxianus KM used in this
minator and the partial sequence of 3 -end of the HPT gene (data
study, we disrupted the KmMIG1 gene as described in Section 2
not shown). In contrast, after PCR products were amplified from
and in Fig. 1. After determination of ␤-galactosidase activity from
the genomic DNA of K. marxianus KM using the same primers, no
different disruptants and K. marxianus KM, it was found that all
PCR products were obtained (Lanes 1 and 4 in Fig. 5). These results
the disruptants could produce more ␤-galactosidase activity than
demonstrated that the HPT gene indeed had been inserted into the
K. marxianus KM (Fig. 3). One of the disruptants could produce the
ORF so that the disruptant KM-15 obtained could grow on the plate
highest amount of ␤-galactosidase and named disruptant KM-15
with hygromycin (Fig. 4A1).
(Fig. 3). It was found that the positive disruptant KM-15 obtained
could grow on both the plate with hygromycin and that with 2-
deoxy-d-glucose (Fig. 4A1 and B1) while K. marxianus KM could 3.3. Effects of disruption of KmMIG1 gene on ˇ-galactosidase
not grow on either of them (Fig. 4A2 and B2), suggesting that the production and its genes expression
HPT gene has been expressed and glucose-derepression occurred
in the disruptant KM-15. It also can be seen from the results in As stated above, K. marxianus KM can produce high level of
Fig. 4A1 and B1 that the colonies of the disruptant KM-15 were ␤-galactosidase. Therefore, we examined the effects of KmMIG1
blue when they grew on the plates with X-gal, indicating that the
disruptant KM-15 could produce ␤-galactosidase. After PCR prod-
ucts were amplified from the genomic DNA of the disruptant KM-15
using the primers H1 and HY1, the PCR products (600 bp) (Lane 2
in Fig. 5) contained the whole sequence of the promoter and the

7
Beta-galactosidase (U/mg)

1
Fig. 5. PCR products amplified from the genomic DNAs of the disruptant KM-15 and
0 K. maxiaxum KM. Lanes M1: DNA markers (sizes of bands from top to bottom were
KM 2 6 8 9 15 35 37 44 49 56 59 67 69 74 78 2 kb. 1 kb, 0.75 kb, 0.5 kb, 0.25 kb and 0.1 kb); Lane 1: No PCR products amplified
Different yeast strains from the genomic DNA of K. maxiaxum KM using the primers H1 and HY1; Lane 2:
PCR products amplified from the genomic DNA of the disruptant KM-15 using the
Fig. 3. ␤-Galactosidase activity of the different disruptants and their parent strain K. primers H1 and HY1; Lane 3: PCR products amplified from the genomic DNA of the
marxianus KM. The medium was the lactose medium for ␤-galactosidase production disruptant KM-15 using the primers H6 and HY2; Lane 4: No PCR products amplified
and the yeast strains were aerobically cultivated at 28 ◦ C for three days. Data are from the genomic DNA of K. maxiaxum KM using the primers H6 and HY2; The DNA
given as means ± SD, n = 3. sequences of the primers H1, H6, HY1 and HY2 are shown in Table 1.
22 H.-X. Zhou et al. / Biochemical Engineering Journal 76 (2013) 17–24

8 P=0.0144
250% KM
7 KM-15

Beta-galactosidase activity (U/mg)


6 200%

Relative transcription level


5
150%
4

3 100%

2
50%
1

0 0%
KM KM-15 1
β-Galactosidase

A1 A2

Fig. 6. Effects of KmMIG1 disruption on ␤-galactosidase biosynthesis (A1) and transcript levels of ␤-galactosidase gene (A2). The medium was the lactose medium for
␤-galactosidase production and the yeast strains were grown aerobically at 28 ◦ C and 180 rpm for 48 h. Data are given as means ± SD, n = 3.

disruption in this pathway in K. marxianus KM. The results in the solid ␤-galactosidase preparation was gained (Fig. 7B). After the
Fig. 6A1 showed that the specific ␤-galactosidase activity in ␤-galactosidase activity in the lyophilized solid sample was deter-
the cells of the disruptant KM-15 reached 7.2 U per mg of cell mined as described above, it was found that the ␤-galactosidase
dry weight within 48 h of the cultivation, while the specific ␤- activity was 10,440 U/g (data not shown). As shown in other
galactosidase activity in the cells of its wild type strain KM reached research [14], K. marxianus KM, the parent strain of the disruptant
only 3.4 U per mg of cell dry weight under the same conditions. KM-15, is industrial yeast, can produce 4140 U/g of ␤-galactosidase
After ANOVA analysis, it was found that there were significant and has been widely used for ␤-galactosidase production on a large
differences (P = 0.015) of the specific ␤-galactosidase activity in scale in Chinese food industries. This meant that ␤-galactosidase
the cells of the wild type strain KM and its disruptant KM-15. yields produced by the disruptant KM-15 were much higher than
This meant that the production of the intracellular enzyme was those produced by K. marxianus KM. Therefore, the disruptant
derepressed and the ␤-galactosidase production in the cells of the KM-15 mutant obtained in this study had highly potential appli-
disruptant KM-15 was greatly enhanced after the KmMIG1 gene cation in food biotechnology and other fields. After the effect of
had been disrupted by the HPT gene. After analysis of transcript oscillating dissolved oxygen tension (DOT) on the metabolism of
level of the corresponding gene using real-time PCR, it was found K. marxianus was investigated, it was found that oscillations at
that the expression of ␤-galactosidase gene was also significantly
increased from 100% in the cells of K. marxianus KM to 205.5%
in the cells of the disruptant KM-15 (Fig. 6A2). This strongly
demonstrated that the expression of the gene encoding the intra-
cellular enzyme in the disruptant KM-15 was derepressed at the
transcript level. In our previous study [10], it also was found that
the production of all the extracellular enzymes was derepressed
after the SfMIG1 gene in the disruptant A11-c of S. fibuligera A11
had been disrupted by the HPT gene and the expression of all the
genes encoding the extracellular enzymes in the disruptant A11-c
was derepressed at the transcriptional level. This suggests that dis-
ruption of the MIG1 gene encoding the transcriptional repressor is
one way to greatly enhance enzyme production in industrial fungi.
In contrast, glucose repression of the K. lactis invertase gene KIINV1
does not require Mig1p [23]. However, after disruption of the
KmMIG1 gene, the cell growth (OD600nm value of the culture was
32) of the disruptant KM-15 was negatively influenced compared
to that (OD600nm value of the culture was 35) of its parent strain
(data not shown). The similar phenomenon (OD600nm value of the
culture of the wild type strain was 2.2 while OD600nm value of the
culture of the mig1 mutant was 1.8) also happened in the mig1
mutant of S. fibuligera A11 [13]. However, it is still unknown why
the cell growth of the disruptant KM-15 was negatively influenced.

3.4. ˇ-Galactosidase production and cell growth during the 2-l


fermentation and preparation of the solid ˇ-galactosidase

During ␤-galactosidase production and cell growth in the Fig. 7. The time course of ␤-galactosidase production (), cell growth () and
2-l fermentor, the disruptant KM-15 produced 121.8 U/mL of ␤- changes in total sugar () by the disruptant KM-15 during 2-l fermentation (A)
galactosidase activity within 60 h when cell growth (cell dry weight and the solid ␤-galactosidase preparation obtained from the washed cells (B). The
medium was the whey medium for ␤-galactosidase production and the fermenta-
was 12.3 mg/mL) reached the end of log phase (Fig. 7A) while K.
tion conditions were the agitation speed of 180 rpm, the aeration rate of 8 l/min,
marxianus KM only produced 60.6 U/mL under the same condi- the temperature of 28 ◦ C, and the fermentation period of 84 h. Data are given as
tions (data not shown). After the washed cells were lyophilized, means ± SD, n = 3.
H.-X. Zhou et al. / Biochemical Engineering Journal 76 (2013) 17–24 23

(A) 110
100
Hydrolysis degree (%)

90

80
70
60
50
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Time (h)

(B) 110

100
Hydrolysis degree (%)

90
Fig. 9. Thin layer chromatography of hydrolysis products of lactose and
whey powder. 1: lactose + the active ␤-galactosidase; 2: lactose + the inacti-
80 vated ␤-galactosidase; 3: lactose; 4: glucose; 5: galactose; 6: whey powder; 7:
whey powder + the inactivated ␤-galactosidase; 8: whey powder + the active ␤-
70 galactosidase, 9: milk, 10: milk + the inactivated ␤-galactosidase, 11: milk + the
active ␤-galactosidase.
60

50
0 1 2 3 4 5 440 U/g of lactose was found to be the most suitable for lactose
Time (h) hydrolysis (data not shown). The results in Fig. 8A showed that
99.2% of lactose in 90 g/L of lactose solution was hydrolyzed within
(C) 110 3 h while the data in Fig. 8B and C revealed that 99% of lactose in
100 120 g/L of the whey powder suspension was hydrolyzed within 4 h
and 99.3% of lactose in the milk was hydrolyzed within 3 h. After
Hydrolysis degree (%)

90
80 permeabilization of alginate-immobilized yeast cells, the lactose
hydrolysis rate was increased and ethanol fermentation was pre-
70
vented, allowing 99.5% of milk whey lactose to be hydrolyzed at
60
30 ◦ C for 30 h [27]. Over 77.1% of lactose in the whey powder (50 g/L)
50
was hydrolyzed in the presence of the ␤-alactosidase activity of
40 280 U/g of lactose within 9 h while over 77.1% of lactose in the
30 whey powder (the concentration was 50 g/L) was hydrolyzed by
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 the ␤-galactosidase produced by the mutant NTG-133 within 9 h
Time (h) [26]. It has been reported that the optimum conditions for lactose
hydrolysis in whey by the commercial lactase were lactose con-
Fig. 8. The time course of lactose hydrolysis in the lactose solution (90 g/L lactose) centration of 150 g/L, temperature of 40 ◦ C, reaction time of 3 h,
(A), in the whey powder suspension (120 g/L) (B) and in the milk (C). Data are given
and lactase dosage of 90 U/g. Under these conditions, the hydroly-
as means ± SD, n = 3.
sis degree was 68% [28]. After K. marxianus MTCC 1389 was grown
the shortest period tested (i.e., 300 s) resulted in higher specific in the whey containing 44 g/L lactose for 36 h, lactose concentra-
and volumetric ␤-galactosidase activity (2800 U/g and 31.7 U/mL, tion dropped drastically to 0.4 from 44 g/L [29]. The hydrolysis
respectively) [24]. When K. marxianus CBS 6556 was grown in rate of lactose in milk could reach 70% by addition of the liq-
concentrated cheese whey in the bioreactor, resulting in a higher ␤- uid lactase from the K. fragilis cells, which was disrupted by low
galactosidase production (11 U/mL and 900 U/g) [25]. The mutant of concentration of ␳-hydroxybenzoate [30]. Moreover, 99.5% of milk
G. pullulans 17-1 could produce 48.1 U/mL of total ␤-galactosidase whey lactose was hydrolyzed by a new ␤-galactosidase based bio-
activity including 17.2 U/mL of extracellular ␤-galactosidase activ- catalyst consisting of whole K. lactis cells entrapped in calcium
ity within 144 h in the same 2-L fermentor [26]. This demonstrated alginate beads at 30 ◦ C for 30 h [27]. This demonstrated that the
that the disruptant KM-15 mutant obtained in this study over- mig1 mutant obtained in this study could efficiently hydrolyze lac-
produced very high level of ␤-galactosidase activity from the whey tose and lactose in the whey powder and in the milk within very
medium within the short period. The results in Fig. 7A also indi- short time.
cated that when the ␤-galactosidase activity reached 121.8 U/mL,
only 12 g/L of total sugar was left in the fermented medium, indicat-
ing that most of sugar in the medium was sued for ␤-galactosidase 3.6. Hydrolysis products
production and cell growth.
The hydrolysis products of lactose, whey powder and milk by the
3.5. Hydrolysis of lactose crude ␤-galactosidase were analyzed by thin layer chromatography
(TLC). Only mono-saccharides were detected after the hydrolysis
Our results showed that 90 g/L of lactose in the hydrolysis sys- (Fig. 9). This meant that the crude ␤-galactosidase indeed effec-
tem was most suitable for lactose hydrolysis (data not shown). After tively converted lactose and lactose in whey powder and in the
effects of different amount of ␤-galactosidase on lactose hydrolysis, milk into glucose and galactose.
24 H.-X. Zhou et al. / Biochemical Engineering Journal 76 (2013) 17–24

4. Conclusions [11] Z.M. Chi, J.F. Li, X.H. Wang, S.M. Yao, Inositol and phosphatidylinositol mediated
glucose derepression gene expression and invertase secretion in yeasts, Acta
Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 36 (2004) 443–449.
After the MIG1 gene in the industrial yeast K. marxianus KM was [12] J.P. Cassart, J. Ostling, H. Ronne, J. Vandenhaute, Comparative analysis in three
disrupted, the disruptant (mig1 mutant) KM-15 obtained could pro- fungi reveals structurally and functionally conserved regions in the Mig1
duce more ␤-galactosidase than K. marxianus KM and expression of repressor, Mol. Gen. Genet. 255 (1997) 9–18.
[13] G.L. Liu, D.S. Wang, L.F. Wang, S.F. Zhao, Z.M. Chi, Mig1 is involved in mycelial
its gene in the disruptant KM-15 were significantly enhanced com- formation and expression of the genes encoding extracellular enzymes in Sac-
pared to that in K. marxianus KM. Under the optimal conditions, the charomycopsis fibuligera A11, Fung. Genet. Biol. 48 (2011) 904–913.
␤-galactosidase activity of 121.0 U/mL was produced by the disrup- [14] W. Li, J.Z. Liang, The extraction and fermentation conditions optimization of
lactase from Kluyeveromyces fragilis, Liq. Mak. 35 (2008) 46–49.
tant KM-15 within 60 h during 2-L fermentation. 99.2% of lactose in
[15] F. Zhang, J. Chen, Z.M. Chi, L. Wu, Expression and processing of Vibrio anguil-
90 g/L of lactose solution, 99.0% of lactose in 120 g/L of whey pow- larum zinc-metalloprotease in Escherichia coli, Arch. Microbiol. 186 (2006)
der suspension and 99.3% of lactose in the milk were hydrolyzed 11–20.
[16] D.S. Wang, Z. Chi, S.F. Zhao, Z.M. Chi, Disruption of the acid protease gene
by the crude ␤-galactosidase within 3 h, 4 h and 3 h, respectively.
in Saccharomycopsis fibuligera A11 enhances amylolytic activity and stabil-
The end products of the lactose hydrolysis were only glucose and ity as well as trehalose accumulation, Enzyme Microb. Technol. 49 (2011)
galactose. 88–93.
[17] J.L. Slightom, B.T. Metzger, H.T. Luu, A.P. Elhammer, Cloning and molecular char-
acterization of the gene encoding the Aureobasidin A biosynthesis complex in
Acknowledgments Aureobasidium pullulans BP-1938, Gene 431 (2009) 67–79.
[18] J. Sambrook, E.F. Fritsch, T. Maniatis, Molecular Cloning A Laboratory Manual,
This work was supported by Grant 31070029 from National Nat- 2nd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Beijing, 1989367–370 (Chinese
translating ed.).
ural Science Foundation of China, and State Oceanic Administration [19] R.G. Spiro, Analysis of sugars found in glycoproteins, Methods Enzymol. 8
People’s Republic of China for providing financial support to carry (1996) 3–26.
out this work. The Grant No. 201005032. [20] F.F.F. Teles, C.K. Young, J.W. Stull, A method for rapid determination of lactose,
J. Dairy Sci. 61 (1978) 506–508.
[21] Z.M. Chi, Z. Liu, Inositol-mediated invertase secretion in Saccharomyces sp. W4,
References Enzyme Microb. Technol. 21 (1997) 463–467.
[22] Z.M. Chi, S. He, S. Yao, Effects of Pichia pastoris INO1 expression in Schizosaccha-
[1] M.A. Lachance, Kluyveromyces van der Walt em end. van der Walt, in: C.P. Kurtz- romyces pombe on phosphatidylinositol (PI) synthesis and expression of INV+
man, J.W. Fell (Eds.), The Yeasts. A Taxonomic Study, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1998, encoding invertase, Enzyme Microb. Technol. 37 (2005) 395–401.
pp. 227–247. [23] I. Georis, J.P. Cassart, K.D. Breuning, J. Vandenhaute, Glucose repression of the
[2] B. Llorente, A. Malpertuy, G. Blandin, F. Artiguenave, W.P. Dujon, Genomic Kluyveromyces lactis invertase gene KIINV1 does not require Mig1p, Mol. Gen.
exploration of the hemiascomycetous yeasts: 12. Kluyveromyces marxianus var. Genet. 261 (1999) 862–870.
arxianus, FEBS Lett. 487 (2000) 71–75. [24] G. Cortés, M.A. Trujillo-Roldán, O.T. Ramırez, E. Galindo, Production of ␤-
[3] M.M. Lane, J.P. Morrissey, Kluyveromyces marxianus: a yeast emerging from its galactosidase by Kluyveromyces marxianus under oscillating dissolved oxygen
sister’s shadow, Fung. Biol. Rev. 2 (2010) 1–10. tension, Proc. Biochem. 40 (2005) 73–778.
[4] F.F. Freitas, L.D.S. Marquez, G.P. Ribeiro, G.C. Brandao, V.L. Cardoso, E.J. Ribeiro, A [25] R. Rech, C.F. Cassini, A. Secchi, M.A.Z. Ayub, Utilization of protein-hydrolyzed
comparison of the kinetic properties of free and immobilized Aspergillus oryzae cheese whey for production of ␤-galactosidase by Kluyveromyces marxianus, J.
galactosidase, Biochem. Eng. J. 58/59 (58) (2011) 33–40. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 23 (1999) 91–96.
[5] C.Z. Guidini, J. Fische, L.N. Soares Santana, V.L. Cardoso, E.J. Ribeiro, Immobiliza- [26] J.L. Xu, J. Zhao, L.F. Wang, H.Y. Sun, S.L. Song, Z.M. Chi, Enhanced ␤-galactosidase
tion of Aspergillus oryzae ␤-galactosidase in ion exchange resins by combined production from whey powder by a mutant of the psychrotolerant yeast Que-
ionic-binding method and cross-linking, Biochem. Eng. J. 52 (2010) 137–143. homyces pullulans 17–1 for hydrolysis of lactose, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.
[6] D.B. Martins, C.G. de Souza, D.A. Simões, M.A. de Morais, The ␤-galactosidase 124 (2012) 261–269.
activity in Kluyveromyces marxianus CBS6556 decreases by high concentrations [27] M. Becerra, B. Baroli, A.M. Fadda, J.B. Me’ndez, M.I. Gonza’lez Siso, Lactose bio-
of galactose, Curr. Microbiol. 44 (2002) 379–382. conversion by calcium-alginate immobilization of Kluyveromyces lactis cells,
[7] K. Huo, Y. Li, Cloning and expression of Kluyveromyces fragilis LAC4 gene, Sci. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 29 (2001) 506–512.
China B 38 (1995) 1332–1340. [28] N. Xu, B. Sun, Y.J. Chi, Study on enzymatic hydrolysis of lactose in whey, Food
[8] V.D. Farkade, S.T.L. Harrison, A.B. Pandit, Improved cavitational cell disrup- Sci. 28 (2007) 286–289.
tion following pH pretreatment for the extraction of ␤-galactosidase from [29] S. Bansal, H.S. Oberoi, G.S. Dhillon, R.T. Patil, Production of ␤-galactosidase by
Kluveromyces lactis, Biochem. Eng. J. 31 (2006) 25–30. Kluyveromyces marxianus MTCC 1388 using whey and effect of four different
[9] G.G. Fonseca, E. Heinzle, C. Wittmann, A.K. Gombert, The yeast Kluyveromyces methods of enzyme extraction on ␤-galactosidase activity, J. Ind. Microbiol.
marxianus and its biotechnological potential, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 79 Biotechnol. 48 (2008) 337–341.
(2008) 339–354. [30] S.H. Tan, J. Gao, A.M.A.M. Hadeel, X.Y. Shang, X.D.M. Gao, W.T. Wu, A novel
[10] J.M. Gancedo, Yeast carbon catabolite repression, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62 method for preparation of lactase from Kluyeromyces fragilis, J. Chin. Pharm.
(1998) 334–361. Univ. 35 (2004) 86–89.

You might also like