Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research Article
Pu Zheng1,2, Hongfeng Yu2, Zhihao Sun1,2, Ye Ni1,2, Wei Zhang3, Yunliu Fan3 and Yan Xu1,2
1Key Laboratory of Industry Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, Southern Yangtze University, Wuxi, P. R. China
2Laboratoryof Biocatalysis, School of Biotechnology, Southern Yangtze University, Wuxi, P. R. China
3Biotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing, P. R. China
The preparation of galacto-oligosaccharides (GOSs) was studied using the immobilized recombi- Received 29 June 2006
nant β-galactosidase from Aspergillus candidus CGMCC3.2919. The optimal pH and temperature Revised 18 August 2006
for the immobilized enzyme were observed at pH 6.5 and 40°C, respectively. Increasing the initial Accepted 4 September 2006
lactose concentration increased the yield of GOSs. The dilution rate was found to be a key factor
during the continuous production of GOSs. The maximum productivity, 87 g/L·h was reached
when 400 g/L lactose was fed at dilution rate of 0.8/h. The maximum GOS yield reached 37% at
dilution rate of 0.5/h. Continuous operation was maintained for 20 days in a packed-bed reactor
without apparent decrease in GOS production. The average yield of GOSs was 32%, correspon-
ding to the average productivity of 64 g/L·h, which implied that the immobilized recombinant
β-galactosidase has potential application for GOS production.
2.2 Enzyme immobilization Figure 1 showed a typical example of the reaction mixture
separated by HPLC. Five peaks appeared, expressing
The immobilized enzyme was prepared as following [27]: oligosaccharides, lactose, glucose and galactose in turn.
57 mL liquid β-galactosidase and 100 g (wet weight) ad- Although the peaks (1) and (2) are partially superimposed,
sorptive resin D113 (Cangzhou Bon Chemical Co. China.) oligosaccharide formation is illustrated. Furthermore, the
were mixed at 20°C with constant shaking for 1 h, then composition of oligosaccharides was determined by LC-
the resin was taken out and entrapped with 3% alginate. MS spectrum (Waters ZMD400), as shown in Fig. 2. The
After submerging in 0.1 mol/L CaCl2 solution for 1 h at results show that the oligosaccharides comprised tri-,
4°C, the immobilized enzyme was treated with 2% glu- tetra- and pentasaccharides with molecule weight of
taraldehyde at pH 7.0 to enhance the stabilization. Before 539.4, 701.5 and 863.7, and further proved that the prod-
being stored at 4°C, the immobilized enzyme was washed ucts of the immobilized recombinant β-galactosidase cat-
with distilled water. The activity of the immobilized en- alyzed reaction were GOSs.
zyme was 964 U/g resin. One unit was defined as the
amount of enzyme that liberates 1 µmol o-nitrophenol
3.2 Effect of pH and temperature on GOS formation with a production of about 33 g/L GOSs from initial lac-
tose concentration of 200 g/L, was unexpected because
No significant difference in pH effects on the activity be- the optimum temperature of the free β-galactosidase was
tween the immobilized and free β-galactosidase was ob- 65°C [24]. To compare the thermal stability of the immo-
served in a previous study [27]. The immobilized enzyme bilized and free β-galactosidase, samples were taken at
has a wide operation pH ranging from pH 2.5 to 7.0. How- appropriate time intervals at 60°C. The half-lives of the
ever, at lower pH the immobilization of the enzyme was immobilized and free enzyme were about 87 and 62 min,
affected, which could cause β-galactosidase leakage. respectively (as shown in Fig. 4). Therefore, immobiliza-
Therefore, the GOS production using immobilized β- tion significantly improved the thermal stability of the en-
galactosidase at a wide range of pH 4.0–7.0 was com- zyme, especially under extended incubation time. After
pared. As shown in Table 1, all the yields of GOSs reached 90 min, the residual activity of immobilized β-galactosi-
about 35 g/L with initial lactose concentration of 200 g/L. dase was around 45%, which was 2.0 times of that of the
This suggested that neutral pH was feasible, and aqueous free enzyme.
solution of lactose could be directly used as reaction
medium. 3.3 Effect of initial lactose concentration on GOS formation
Increasing the temperature from 25 to 40°C promoted
the GOS synthesis and lactose hydrolysis by immobilized Initial lactose concentration was found to be the most sig-
β-galactosidase, as shown in Fig. 3. When temperature nificant factor in GOS formation. It was clear that the pro-
rose over 40°C, lactose hydrolysis declined and the GOS duction of GOSs increased with the increase of initial lac-
content slightly increased. It might due to the product in- tose concentration, while the lactose hydrolysis went
hibition effect. The optimum temperature of 35–45°C, down slowly to a constant level (as shown in Fig. 5). This
was in agreement with results obtained by others [28]. It
was generally observed that the hydrolysis and trans-
Table 1. Effect of pH on GOS formation by the immobilized enzyme. GOS galactosylation reaction occurred simultaneously. What
production by immobilized β-galactosidase at various pH with initial lac- dominates the profile of the reaction is largely dependent
tose of 200 g/L at 40°C. Reaction time was 30 min on lactose concentration. GOSs were produced at high
Exp pH GOS formation Lactose hydrolysis lactose concentration. When the initial lactose concentra-
(g/L) (%) tion was less than 150 g/L, no GOSs were detected. When
it was increased from 200 to 400 g/L, the GOS content in
1 4 36.7 55.9
the product increased from around 30 g/L to 87 g/L. If the
2 5 35.1 52.8
lactose concentration was further increased to over
3 6 34.4 52.6
400 g/L, crystal lactose could be separated from the solu-
4 7 35.1 52.9
tion.
(A)
(B)
Figure 2. (A) Mass spectra of the sample. (B) Ion current chromatogram
of the sample.
The effect of lactose concentration on initial rate of cose and galactose, and galactose was transferred to an-
lactose hydrolysis with the free and immobilized β-galac- other lactose molecule to produce GOSs. GOSs could also
tosidase was also investigated within the concentration become substrate for lactase and were slowly hydrolyzed
range of 40–100 g/L, under which the transgalactosylation [3]. So the process of GOS formation may be concluded as
reaction hardly occurred (data not shown). The kinetic a balance between hydrolysis and transgalactosylation.
constants, Km and Vmax, of the free and the immobilized This phenomenon was observed in the study.
lactase were 0.27 mol/L, 666 µmol/mL·min and 0.71 mol/L, As shown in Fig. 6, lactose hydrolysis, monosaccha-
626 µmol/mL·min, respectively. The Km value of the im- ride yield and GOS formation changed with dilution rate.
mobilized β-galactosidase was 2.7 times larger than that When dilution rate was decreased from 1.5/h to 0.8/h, lac-
of the free one. These changes in kinetic parameters may tose hydrolysis maintained at a level of about 55%, but
be the consequence of either the structural changes in the monosaccharide yield decreased from 42 to 27%, while
enzyme occurring upon immobilization or the lower ac- GOS concentration increased from 52 g/L to 111 g/L. This
cessibility of substrate to the active sites of the immobi- implied that GOSs were formed from monosaccharides in
lized enzyme [29]. this period. When dilution rate was decreased from 0.8/h
to 0.7/h, lactose hydrolysis increased by 5.8%, monosac-
3.4 Effect of dilution rate on continuous GOS formation by charide yield increased by 4.3%, while GOS concentration
the immobilized β-galactosidase in a packed-bed reactor increased by 7.7 g/L. When the dilution rate was further
decreased from 0.7/h to 0.5/h, lactose hydrolysis kept at
As β-galactosidase catalyses both hydrolysis and trans- similar level, monosaccharide yield were 31 and 24%, and
galactosylation reactions, lactose was hydrolyzed to glu- GOS concentration increased from 119 g/L to 148 g/L, cor-
Figure 3. Effect of temperature on GOS production by the immobilized Figure 4. The residual enzyme activity of the immobilized and free β-galac-
β-galactosidase with initial lactose of 200 g/L at pH 6.5. Reaction time tosidase at 60°C with initial lactose of 100 g/L at pH 6.5.
was 30 min.
responding to GOS yield of 30–37%. This was evident that productivity of 64 g/L·h. This exhibits good operational
GOS yield reached the maximum value of 37% under the stability and commercial available.
experiment condition. Further decreases in the dilution
rate led to the GOS yield decreasing dramatically and
monosaccharide yield significantly increasing. This was 4 Concluding remarks
likely due to the fast hydrolysis of GOSs at a low dilution
rate. We have described the operation conditions for biocon-
GOS productivity is, however, affected by GOS con- version of GOSs by the immobilized recombinant β-galac-
centration and the dilution rate. The highest productivity tosidase from A. candidus CGMCC3.2919 in a packed-
reached 87 g/L·h at dilution rate of 0.8/h. However, when bed reactor. It was noted that GOS yield and GOS pro-
GOS yield reached its highest level of 37%, the GOS pro- ductivity reached their maximum at dilution rates of 0.5/h
ductivity was 74 g/L·h, just 85% of the maximum. The and 0.8/h, respectively. The maximum values of GOS yield
highest lactose hydrolysis resulted in the lowest GOS pro- and GOS productivity were 37% and 87 g/L·h, respective-
ductivity of 30 g/L·h, 66% lower than the maximum. ly. The GOS capacity of each gram of immobilized β-
galactosidase reached 1.1 g/day. In comparison with oth-
3.5 Operation stability of the reactor er immobilized enzyme such as B. circulans, B. singularis
[18] Albayrak, N., Yang, S. T., Immobilization of Aspergillus oryzae β- [24] Zhang, W., Fan, Y. L., Yao, B., Overexpression of Aspergillus can-
galactosidase on tosylated cotton cloth. Enzyme Microb. Technol. didus lactase and analysis of enzymatic properties. Acta Microbiol.
2002, 31, 371–383. Sin. 2005, 45, 247–252.
[19] Ateş, S., Mehmetoğlu, Ü., A new method for immobilization of β- [25] Becerra, M., Esther, R. B., Esperanza Cerdán, M., Siso, M. I., Engi-
galactosidase and its utilization in a plug flow reactor. Process neered autolytic yeast strains secreting Kluyveromyces lactis β-
Biochem. 1997, 32, 433–436. galactosidase for production of heterologous proteins in lactose me-
[20] Sheu, D. C., Li, S. Y., Duan, K. J., Will Chen, C., Production of galac- dia. J. Biotechnol. 2004, 109, 131–137.
tooligosaccharides by β-galactosidase immobilized on glutaralde- [26] Fan, Y. L., Zhang, W., Yao, B., Lactase from recombinant Pichia pas-
hyde-treated chitosan beads. Biotechnol. Tech. 1998, 12, 273–276. toris and its application. Chinese patent 02108141. 7.
[21] Becerra, M., Baroli, B., Fadda, A. M., Blanco Méndez, J. et al., Lac- [27] Sun, Z. H., Fan, Y. L., Zhang, W., Yao, B. et al., A method for lactase
tose bioconversion by calcium-alginate immobilization of immobilization and its application in the production of low-lactose
Kluyveromyces lactis cells. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2001, 29, milk Chinese patent 200510080492. 0.
506–512. [28] Albayrak, N., Yang, S. T., Production of galacto-oligosaccharides
[22] Foda, M. I., Lopez-Leiva, M., Continuous production of oligosaccha- from lactose by Aspergillus oryzae β-galactosidase immobilized on
rides from whey using a membrane reactor. Process Biochem. 2000, cotton cloth. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2002, 77, 8–19.
35, 581–587. [29] Tümtürk, H., Aksoy, S., Hasırc, N., Covalent immobilization of -amy-
[23] Pessela, B. C. C., Fernández-Lafuente, R., Fuentes, M., Vián, A. et al., lase onto poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) and poly (styrene -2-hy-
Reversible immobilization of a thermophilic β-galactosidase via ion- droxyethyl methacrylate) microspheres and the effect of Ca2+ ions on
ic adsorption on PEI-coated Sepabeads. Enzyme Microb. Technol. the enzyme activity. Food Chem. 2000, 68, 259–266.
2003, 32, 369–374.