Professional Documents
Culture Documents
0.450 0.450
12.000
0.450
1.000
STEEL T-BEAM
3.20 1.200
The deck slab has been analysed transversely as a continuous slab (supported on Longitudinal girders) with cantilever overhang on either
side by taking unit width of deck along the span. The analysis has been carried out for various loads i.e. DL, SIDL & CWLL. Effect of
1.0 Design Data:
b/lo = 9.375
450
2.3 WEIGHT OF RCC RAISED KERB :
Impact Factor :
a) For Continuous span, Class A =1.5
70R (W & T) =1.25
b) For cantilver span Class A =1.5
70R (Ww & T) =1.25
0.000 0 57 57
1200
1200
1st LOAD
a1 = -0.4 m
b1 = 0.38 m
beff = -0.1 < 1.2
beff (modified) = -0.100 m
Load per meter width = -855.00 KN
2nd LOAD
a2 = 2.200 m
b2 = 0.38 m
a = 2.60
beff = 2.17 > 1.2
beff (modified) = 1.68 m
Load per meter width = 50.78 KN
3rd LOAD
a3 = 0.700 m
b2 = 0.38 m
a = 2.6
beff = 1.80 > 1.2
beff (modified) = 1.50 m
Load per meter width = 56.96 KN
4th LOAD
a4 = 0.700 m
b2 = 0.38 m
a = 2.6
beff = 1.80 > 1.2
beff (modified) = 1.50 m
Load per meter width = 56.96 KN
2.6.2 FOR MAX. MOMENT AT INTERMEDIATE SUPPORT
2.6.2.1 70 R (AXLE-L)
100 100
1.93
FP END
1 2 3
0.965
3.200
1 & 2 nd load
a = 0.965 m
b = 0.393 m
a = 2.6
beff = 2.15 > 1.22
beff (modified) = 1.68 m
Load per meter width = 74.29 KN
2.6.2.2 70 R (AXLE-M)
50 50 50 50
FP END 0.79
1 2 3
a2
a1
FP END
0.84
2.90
100 100
1.93
1 2 3
0.33 1.6
3.200
1st LOAD
a1 = 0.33
b1 = 0.393
a = 2.6
beff = 1.16 < 1.22
beff (modified) = 1.16 m
Load per meter width = 107.53 KN
2nd LOAD
a2 = 1.6 m
b2 = 0.393 m
a = 2.6
beff = 2.47 > 1.22
beff (modified) = 1.85 m
Load per meter width = 67.70 KN
2.7.2 70 R (AXLE-M)
50 50 50 50
0.795 0.79 0.795
a2
a1
a3
a4
1st LOAD
a1 = 0.015
b1 = 0.393
a = 2.6
beff = 0.43 < 1.22
beff (modified) = 0.43 m
Load per meter width = 144.74 KN
2nd LOAD
a2 = 0.810
b2 = 0.393
a = 2.6
beff = 1.97 > 1.22
beff (modified) = 1.59 m
Load per meter width = 39.24 KN
3rd LOAD
a3 = 1.6
b3 = 0.393
a = 2.6
beff = 2.47 > 1.22
beff (modified) = 1.85 m
Load per meter width = 33.85 KN
4th LOAD
a4 = 0.805 m
b4 = 0.393 m
a = 2.6
beff = 1.96 > 1.22
beff (modified) = 1.59 m
Load per meter width = 39.31 KN
350 350
2.9
0.84
0.46 1.60
1st LOAD
a2 = 0.46 m
b2 = 4.70 m
a = 2.6
beff = 5.72 m
Load per meter width = 76.43 KN
2nd LOAD
a1 = 1.60 m
b1 = 4.70 m
a = 2.6
beff = 6.78 m
Load per meter width = 64.53 KN
s = Ec.a.T
F1 = 1/2.(s1+s2) & F2 = 1/2.(s2+s3)
M1 = F1 . e1 & M2 = F2 . e2
F1 130
150 e1
4.0 or s2 e2
F2
110
2.2 or s3
s1 = 6.16 Mpa
s2 = 1.38 Mpa
s3 = 0.78 Mpa
F1 = 565.86 KN
F2 = 118.78 KN
e1 = 0.071 m
e2 = 0.070 m
F = F1 + F2 = 684.64 KN
M = F1.e1+F2.e2 = 31.78 KN-m
F1'
e1' 260
0.3 or s2'
s1 = 3.67 Mpa
s2 = 0.11 Mpa
F1' = 490.59 KN
e1' = 0.0409 m
M' = 20.074 KN-m
PROJECT: DATE
Design of deck without slab
26.06.20
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
Design Of Deck Slab
MYA AHM
b) Intermediate
Supports at face of
bDESIGN
10 OF DECK
200 SLAB
392.70
flange b2 12 200 565.49 958.19 312 OK 6500 OK
c)End supports at b1 10 200 392.70
face of web b 10 200 392.70 785.40 349 OK 6500 OK
c)End supports at b1 10 200 392.70
face of flange b 10 200 392.70 785.40 312 OK 6500 OK
b) At face of web 10.00 225 0.0038 205000 579.72 93.8 0.00028 0.163 OK
c)End supports at
face of web 10.00 225 0.0038 205000 579.72 161.47 0.00048 0.281 OK
c)End supports at
face of flange 10.00 225 0.0068 115000 384.92 141.7 0.00043 0.164 OK
0
PROJECT: DATE
Design of deck without slab 0
26.06.20
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
Design Of Deck Slab
MYA AHM
STAAD FLOOR
START JOB INFORMATION
ENGINEER DATE 30-Jan-14
END JOB INFORMATION
**************************DECK SLAB ANALYSIS***********************************
INPUT WIDTH 79
UNIT METER KN
JOINT COORDINATES
1 0 0 0; 7 1.287 0 0; 8 1.4875 0 0; 9 1.65 0 0; 10 1.8125 0 0; 11 2.013 0 0;
12 4.487 0 0; 13 4.6875 0 0; 14 4.85 0 0; 15 5.0125 0 0; 16 5.213 0 0;
17 7.687 0 0; 18 7.8875 0 0; 19 8.05 0 0; 20 8.2125 0 0; 21 8.413 0 0;
22 10.75 0 0; 23 11.0875 0 0; 24 11.25 0 0; 25 11.4125 0 0; 26 11.75 0 0;
27 12.9 0 0;
********************************************************************************
***********************************************
* STAAD.Pro Generated Comment *
***********************************************
*1 1 2 26
************************************************
MEMBER INCIDENCES
1 1 7; 5 10 9; 6 11 10; 7 7 8; 8 8 9; 11 11 12; 12 12 13; 13 13 14; 14 14 15;
15 15 16; 16 16 17; 17 17 18; 18 18 19; 19 19 20; 20 20 21; 21 21 22; 22 22 23;
23 23 24; 24 24 25; 25 25 26; 26 26 27;
*********************************************************************************
DEFINE MATERIAL START
ISOTROPIC MATERIAL1
E 3.3e+007
POISSON 0.15
DENSITY 25
ISOTROPIC CONCRETE
E 2.17185e+007
POISSON 0.17
DENSITY 23.5616
ALPHA 1e-005
DAMP 0.05
TYPE CONCRETE
STRENGTH FCU 27579
END DEFINE MATERIAL
*********************************************************************************
CONSTANTS
MATERIAL CONCRETE ALL
********************************************************
MEMBER PROPERTY INDIAN
1 5 TO 8 11 TO 26 PRIS YD 0.25 ZD 1
*********************************************************
SUPPORTS
9 14 19 24 PINNED
**********************************************************
LOAD 1 SELF WEIGHT
SELFWEIGHT Y -1
**********************************************************
LOAD 2 SIDL CRASH BARRIER
MEMBER LOAD
****WEIGHT OF CRASH BARRIER ON LEFT SIDE
*****WEIGHT OF CRASH BARRIER ON RIGHT SIDE
0
PROJECT: DATE
Design of deck without slab 0
26.06.20
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
Design Of Deck Slab
MYA AHM