Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Management
Fall 2020
Farzad Saidi
Assumption: cash flows are received at the end of the period (important
if holding period is long)
1
Arithmetic average
2011 -21.56%
2012 44.63%
2013 23.35%
2014 20.98%
2015 3.11%
2016 34.46%
2017 17.62%
2
Arithmetic average
2011 -21.56%
2012 44.63%
2013 23.35%
2014 20.98%
2015 3.11%
2016 34.46%
2017 17.62%
n
!1/n
Y
HPRavg = (1 + HPRt ) −1
t=1
This is the fixed return that would yield the same after 7 years.
3
Arithmetic vs. geometric average
year value
2015 $100
2016 $50
2017 $75
−0.5+0.5
• Arithmetic: 2 =0
• Geometric: (0.5 × 1.5)1/2 − 1 = 0.866 − 1 = −0.134
4
Arithmetic or geometric: which one to use?
• Use arithmetic average if you are not reinvesting, e.g., have $100
portfolio in the beginning of every year
• Use geometric average if you are reinvesting everything
5
Annualizing returns
APR = HPR × n
APR = HPR/T
6
Problem: APR and EAR
You bought a 3-month T-bill (discount bond) with face value of $100 for
$95.23. What is the annual rate of return with and without
compounding?
7
Dollar-weighted rate of return
8
Example
9
Solution Part I
• Arithmetic average:
((110–100+4)/100+(90–110+4)/110+(95–90+4)/90)/3 = 3.15%
• Geometric average:
(1.14 × 0.8545 × 1.1)(1/3) − 1 = 2.33%
10
Solution Part II
11
Solution Part II
11
Real interest rates
12
Real vs. nominal interest rates
rreal ≈ rnom − i,
where rreal (rnom ) is the real (nominal) interest rate and i is the inflation
rate.
Exact Fisher equation is:
1 + rnom
1 + rreal = or
1+i
rnom − i
rreal = .
1+i
Example:
13
Realized real returns
14
Negative interest rates
15
Expected vs. realized returns
Averages:
16
Expected mean and variance
Expected returns: X
E (r ) = ps rs
s
Variance of returns:
X 2
Var (r ) = σ 2 = ps × (r − E (r ))
s
17
Problem: scenario analysis
P
• E (r ) = s ps rs
2
P 2
• Var (r ) = σ = s ps (rs − E (r ))
18
Ex-post average return and variance
Variance:
n
1 X 2
σ̄ 2 = (rt − r¯)
n − 1 t=1
19
How to yield expected returns?
20
How could we resolve this?
state return
good 15%
bad -10%
21
How could we resolve this?
state return
good 15%
bad -10%
• In the past 100 years there were 71 good and 29 bad years
• Guess: pg = 71/100 = 0.71 and pb = 29/100 = 0.29
21
Stock index: S&P 500
22
Stock index: S&P 500
22
Stock index: S&P 500
• S&P 500
• “Widely regarded as the best single gauge of the U.S. equities
market, this world-renowned index includes 500 leading companies in
leading industries of the U.S. economy.” (Standard & Poor’s website)
• Represents approximately 75% of U.S. market cap
• Important benchmark for portfolio managers
• Does not include dividends
22
S&P 500 1950–2019: index level
3000
2500
2000
S&P500 price level
1500
1000
500
0
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
23
S&P 500 1950–2019: log returns
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
S&P500 return
-0.05
-0.1
-0.15
-0.2
-0.25
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
80
70
60
50
Normal distribution
40
30
20
10
0
-0.3 -0.25 -0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2
25
S&P 500 1950–2019: summary statistics
26
Volatility as a measure of risk
27
Volatility as a measure of risk
27
Kurtosis and skewness
28
Value-at-Risk (VaR)
29
Example: VaR
2 assets:
30
Example: VaR
2 assets:
30
Example: VaR
2 assets:
30
Value-at-Risk inputs
• Probability (p)
31
Value-at-Risk inputs
• Probability (p)
• Most common level is 1% (equivalent: confidence level c = 99%)
31
Value-at-Risk inputs
• Probability (p)
• Most common level is 1% (equivalent: confidence level c = 99%)
• Holding period
31
Value-at-Risk inputs
• Probability (p)
• Most common level is 1% (equivalent: confidence level c = 99%)
• Holding period
• Time period over which losses can occur
• Must be long enough for corrective measures and needs to reflect
illiquidity of assets
• Usually one day
• Longer holding periods more realistic for institutional investors,
shorter (intra-day) VaR for trading desks
31
Value-at-Risk inputs
• Probability (p)
• Most common level is 1% (equivalent: confidence level c = 99%)
• Holding period
• Time period over which losses can occur
• Must be long enough for corrective measures and needs to reflect
illiquidity of assets
• Usually one day
• Longer holding periods more realistic for institutional investors,
shorter (intra-day) VaR for trading desks
• Probability distribution
31
Value-at-Risk inputs
• Probability (p)
• Most common level is 1% (equivalent: confidence level c = 99%)
• Holding period
• Time period over which losses can occur
• Must be long enough for corrective measures and needs to reflect
illiquidity of assets
• Usually one day
• Longer holding periods more realistic for institutional investors,
shorter (intra-day) VaR for trading desks
• Probability distribution
• Estimated using past observations and statistical model
31
Interpreting VaR
32
Interpreting VaR
32
Interpreting VaR
32
Capital requirements of banks
• Required bank capital against market risk are based on VaR (since
1996 amendment to 1988 Basel I)
• Inputs:
• Probability: 1%
• Holding period: 10 days or two calendar weeks
• Observation period based on at least a year of data, updated at least
once a quarter
• Regulatory framework allows capital to depend on accuracy of VaR
model ⇒ can have important consequences if the VaR model is
defective
• Capital is higher of previous day’s VaR and average VaR over last 60
business days times a “multiplier” k ≥ 3
• Higher k imposed by regulators if backtesting reveals large number
of exceptions
• Required capital against credit and operational risk is based on a
one-year VaR with 99.9% confidence level (Basel II)
33
Capital requirements in the insurance industry
BV −IV
• BV determines NAIC 1 − 6 (if ELOSS = 0 ⇒ NAIC 1)
• where IV (intrinsic value) = IP × Par value
34
New capital requirements do not provide buffer against unexpected losses
35
New capital requirements do not provide buffer against unexpected losses
35
New capital requirements do not provide buffer against unexpected losses
35
New capital requirements do not provide buffer against unexpected losses
35
Summary
This class:
Next class:
36