Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IT Industry Technology
Management
5
Sectors
5
Topics
5 Search Computer Weekly
View All News
z f
1
Why we must prepare for a quantum impact
Software-defined storage vs NAS/SAN: What are the – Cliff Saran's Enterprise blog
We look at the pros and cons of software-defined storage and weigh up when it’s a
better option than buying NAS and SAN pre-built hardware shared storage arrays View All Blogs
There are many reasons for organisations to embrace SDS. Among them are more flexibility,
faster and simpler scalability, and improved automation.
SDS systems cans be configured and deployed in virtually any way, with organisations able to
specify the type of hardware, or run them on virtual, cloud or container platforms.
The evolution of software-defined storage, from simple software products to those that offer scale-out, hyper-
converged, NVMe, public cloud and container functionality.
The software-defined approach to storage is catching on. However, for now, enterprises prefer preconfigured SDS
products bundled with hardware for easier deployment.
This means that older storage systems can be re-used while enabling centralised data storage
management and the introduction of newer technologies such as data deduplication, compression
and encryption. In a lot of cases, this can be less expensive than buying newer storage hardware
that includes these technologies.
This extends the life of existing storage, evades hardware lock-in and lowers the cost of
ownership. Organisations can choose industry-standard x86 server and disk hardware and
configure storage service options for users. This offers organisations greater flexibility as the
software is decoupled from the underlying hardware.
It can also allow organisations to take advantage of native data management software that comes
with the hardware – such as compression, data duplication and encryption – with no additional
costs. If each storage hardware device is managed through its own interface it also eliminates a
single point of failure.
The choice for one over the other all comes down to the maturity and size of the IT department. If
your enterprise has a large IT team, it may well go for SDS as it probably has the skills and
experience to support multiple suppliers.
z
organisations to base buying decisions for each Paul Mercina, Park Place
Technologies
upgrade on business requirements and availability of
products.
However, some would argue that putting SDS on commodity servers can be more of a problem
than expected, so here it can make sense to use equipment from leading storage manufacturers,
with the price tags these suppliers advertise.
Paul Mercina, head of innovation at datacentre services firm Park Place Technologies, says that
over the longer term it’s harder to find use cases where traditional storage trumps SDS.
“The ability to upgrade software and hardware separately, combine different storage devices and
leverage commodity hardware ultimately make SDS the preferred solution for organisations
undergoing a data volume explosion, which is already a near-universal phenomenon in many
industries,” says Mercina.
Supplier: Datacore
Product: SANsymphony
Speeds and feeds: Fibre Channel (up to 32 Gbps), iSCSI (up to 40 Gbps), and Fibre Channel
over Ethernet (FCoE) via connection to FCoE switch
Drive type and capacities: Any internal drives, external drives, external disk arrays, JBODs,
solid-state disks (SSD), flash memories, and intelligent storage systems supported on Windows
Server 2008, 2008 R2, 2012 & 2012 R2 may be attached to DataCore nodes
Deployment size (min/max): 1PB (petabyte) per node; 64 nodes per group
Supplier: NetApp
Speeds and feeds: Minimum 2x 10Gb Ethernet ports (4-, 6-, 8-nodes)
Deployment size (min/max): 4-, 6-, or 8-node cluster, Up to 400TB raw per node
Supplier: SUSE
Speeds and feeds: 10Gb Ethernet (two networks bonded to multiple switches)
Drive type and capacities: All types of disks in JBOD configurations, or local Raid. Disks should
be exclusively used by SUSE Enterprise Storage
Protocols supported: iSCSI, NFS, CIFS/SMB, RBD (Block), RADOS (Object), CephFS (With
multiple active MDS Servers), S3 & Swift
Deployment size (min/max): SUSE Enterprise Storage scales to exabytes of data and maximum
number of nodes is only limited by the network topology
Supplier: Veritas
Protocols supported: Amazon S3, CIFS, NFS, SMB for file and object access, and iSCSI
Deployment size (min/max): starts at 700TB of usable capacity and scales to 2.8PB
Supplier: Nexenta
Product: NexentaStor
Drive type and capacities: All-flash, hybrid, all-disk pools Raid 10, N+1, N+2, N+3
Protocols supported: File: NFS 3.1, NFS 4, SMB 2.1, SMB 3 Block: Fibre Channel, iSCSI
Oldest 5
Reply
-ADS BY GOOGLE
SearchCIO
Latest TechTarget
resources
A2 2 2
Use of virtual Why ISO 56000 Enterprise
CIO
digital assistants Innovation architecture
SECURITY
for enterprise Management heats up to meet
applications matters to CIOs changing needs
NETWORKING
Virtual assistants are increasingly CIOs looking to further drive innovation Forrester Research analyst sees
DATA CENTER
becoming popular across several in the workplace can turn to ISO 56000 barriers to enterprise architects moving
industries. Read about how enterprises standards, which include the forward in skills, tools' ROI and tech-
DATA MANAGEMENT
are utilizing them to ... fundamentals, ... savvy execs who ...