Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/255722981
CITATIONS READS
0 1,095
3 authors:
Jaganath Bindu
Central Institute of Fisheries Technology
68 PUBLICATIONS 628 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Sudheer K P on 03 February 2018.
a
Department of Post-Harvest Technology and Agricultural Processing, Kelappaji College of Agricultural
Engineering & Technology (KCAET), Kerala Agricultural University, Tavanur, Kerala -679573, India
E-mail: drkpsudheer@gmail.com
study focuses on the optimization of Ltd., UK), using a 50 N load cell and
blanching process, including blanching equipped with a 5 mm diameter probe. A
time and pre-treatment to extend the shelf double compression measurement was
life without much alteration in nutritional made on each sample with trigger force of
and organoleptic qualities of the canned 0.5kg (10 mm depth of penetration,
jackfruit. velocity of 10 mm s-1). Force–distance
MATERIALS AND METHODS curves were recorded and firmness
Sample preparation:Tender jackfruit (maximum peak force, N) and toughness
(Artocarpus heterophyllus L. cv ‘Varikka’) (area under force-distance curve, N.sec)
harvested at 50-70 days after fruit were used as indicators of textural
formation were procured from the KCAET parameters (Goncalves et al., 2007). At
Instructional Farm, Tavanur, Kerala least three measurements were done for
Agricultural University, Thrissur. The each tested condition.
collected jackfruits were washed, peeled Colour evaluation: The colour of blanched
and cut into pieces of almost uniform size tender jackfruit samples was assessed
and subjected to further analysis. using a Hunter Lab colorimeter (Mini Scan
Blanching time optimization: Boiling XE Plus) and a Commission International
water method was used for blanching the de l’ Eclairage (CIE) standard illuminant C
washed tender jackfruit as the pH of to determine CIE colour space co-
jackfruit was below 4.5 (Srivastava and ordinates, ‘L’ ‘a’ ‘b’ values. The sample
Sanjeev, 1994; Sudheer and Indira, 2007). colour was measured by filling the cut
Two hundred and fifty grams of the samples of tender jackfruit in the
sample was placed in a batch type stainless transparent cup without any void space.
steel hot water blancher (600 x 300 x 300 The deviation of colour of samples from
mm with thermostat arrangement the standard were observed and recorded
fabricated for the analysis) at 100oC for in the computer interface (Goncalves et al.,
different durations of time (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 2007). Each sample was replicated three
min) forming five temperature-time times and the average value of ‘L’, ‘a’ and
combinations as represented as B1, B2, ‘b’ were determined.
B3, B4 and B5. After blanching, the Based on the estimated quality parameters
samples were instantly cooled in distilled viz; texture, colour and enzyme
water-bath at room temperature to avoid inactivation, the most appropriate
over cooking and discolouration temperature-time combination was
(Dattatreya et al., 2006), followed by estimated.
spreading samples over Whatman No.4 Blanching treatment optimization: The
filter paper to remove excess water. Then optimized blanching time-temperature
the samples were subjected to quality combination was used to standardize the
analyses. The blanching time was initially blanching treatment. Potassium meta
standardized based on hydrogen peroxide bisulphite (Dattatreya et al., 2006) and
(H2O2) test. The time of blanching at citric acid (Patricia et al., 2007) are
which the pink colour disappeared was considered as the best preservatives for
considered to be the optimum time for blanching process. The prepared tender
blanching (Sudheer and Indira, 2007). In jackfruit samples were dipped in boiling
addition to peroxidase inactivation the water (BT1), and boiling water containing
study utilizes colour and texture as 0.1% potassium meta bisulphite, KMS
indicators of hot water blanching time (BT2), 0.3% citric acid (BT3) and
optimization. combination of 0.1% KMS and 0.3% citric
Texture evaluation: Texture acid (BT4). The blanched samples were
measurements were performed in a cooled immediately in distilled water-bath
Texture Analyzer (Stable Micro-System at room temperature after respective
100 100
Toughness (N.Sec)
80 80
Firmness (N)
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
Fresh B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 Fresh B1 B2 B3 B4 B5
Treatments Treatments
Colour changes:The Hunter colorimeter colour more than for other samples. The
colour values (Fig 2) showed that one average CIE colour values viz., ‘L’, ‘a’
minute blanched samples retained the and ‘b’ of the reference raw sample were
83.74, 0.36 and 18.93 respectively. While was minimum for one minute blanched
increasing the processing time, ‘L’ and ‘b’ samples (40.76 ± 0.174 and 33.44 ± 0.185
values decreased, while slight loss in respectively). Chroma is the indicator of
greenness was noted. Similar colour colour saturation and intensity. The higher
alterations were observed by Sims et al. its values are, the more desirable a food
(1993) for carrot juice, Bao and Chang product is. The decrease in chroma values
(1994), for carrots and Barreiro et al. with rise in temperature and processing
(1997) for tomato paste and Avila and time revealed the effect of blanching on
Silva (1999) for peach puree. the colour of the commodity. Similar
The change in colour (∆E) was found to be findings were reported by Vina et al.
higher during five minute blanching and (2007) and Lespinard et al. (2009).
100
80
Color values
L a b chroma
60
40
20
0
Fresh B1 B2 B3 B4 B5
Treatments
Fig.2. Colour changes due to blanching of tender jackfruit
fresh sample and also clocked the least their similar values for all treatments
blanching time amongst all treatments. (Chowdhury et al., 2009). The firmness for
Standardization of blanching treatment: the treatments BT1, BT2, BT3 and BT4
Effect of preservatives on textural were 33.39 ± 0.68, 34.87 ± 0.31, 34.42 ±
qualities of blanched tender jackfruit: 0.46 and 33.16 ± 0.53 N, respectively.
The effect of different preservatives on Similarly less significant difference was
texture in terms of firmness and toughness found for toughness of treatment BT4. For
of the blanched samples are shown in Fig the treatments BT1, BT2, BT3 and BT4,
3. It was observed that the textural the values of toughness were estimated to
attributes were not much affected by the be 86.64 ± 0.57, 87.18 ± 0.37, 86.6 ± 0.23
addition of preservative as justified by and 85.95 ± 0.36 N.Sec, respectively.
100 120
Toughness (N.Sec)
80 100
Firmness (N)
80
60
60
40
40
20 20
0 0
Fresh BT1 BT2 BT3 BT4 Fresh BT1 BT2 BT3 BT4
Treatments Treatments
Fig.3. Effect of preservatives on texture of blanched tender jackfruit
Effect of preservatives on colour of hand ‘a’ was highest in BT1 and lowest in
blanched tender jackfruit: The Hunter BT3 with value -0.74 and -1.48
colour parameters (‘L’, ‘a’, ‘b’ and respectively. Most desirable product
chroma) of tender jackfruit samples during represented by its highest chroma value
different blanching treatments are was found in treatment BT3 and lowest in
presented in Fig 4. The difference in BT1 with values 19.78 ± 0.374 and 16.80
colour (∆E) values for each treatment from ± 0.472 respectively. Hence the blanching
fresh samples was also recorded. As in 0.3% citric acid (BT3) performed as the
illustrated in the Fig 4, the colour values better pre-treatment in terms of colour
followed the same trend for the treatment parameters.
BT1. The pattern was typically opposite in Statistical analysis of effect of blanching
case of treatments with preservatives in treatment: The statistical analysis for the
which ‘L’-value increased (lighter than the effect of preservatives used in blanching
standard sample), ‘a’-value decreased on textural and colour properties is shown
(gain in greenness) and ‘b’-value increased in the Table 2. Blanching treatment
(gain in yellowness). The gain in green significantly affected the texture and
colour of the treated sample is due to the colour at 0.1% significant level. From the
inhibition in transformation of chlorophyll Table, it is evident that the treatments BT2
into pheophytin which gives a brownish and BT3 were on par except for ‘L’ values.
colour. The inhibition is due to Based on the colour values and with the
preservatives like KMS and citric acid statistical results, BT3 was chosen as an
raises the pH of the blanching water (NIIR appropriate treatment satisfying all the
Board, 2003). The maximum value for ‘L’ conditions.
and ‘b’ were found in treatment BT3 and
minimum in treatment BT1. On the other
100
L a b Chroma
80
Color values
60
40
20
0
Fresh BT1 BT2 BT3 BT4
-20
Treatments
shrinkage and extraction. J Food Eng, Mitra, S. K., Mani, D., 2000. Conservation
28 (2), 139–152. and utilization of genetic resources in
Bose, T.K., 1985. Jackfruit. In: Mitra, B.K. jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus
(ed.), Fruits of India: Tropical and Lam.) – A potential underutilized fruit.
subtropical naya prokas. Calcutta, Acta Hortic, 523, 229–232.
India, pp.488-497. Morton, J.F., 1987. Fruits of warm
Chowdhury, M.G.F., Miaruddin, M., climates. : Creative Resources Systems,
Rahman, M.M., Islam, M.S., Tariqul, Inc. pp.58−63.
I.A.F.M., 2009. Study on the effect of NIIR Board., 2003. The Complete
preservative on the storage quality of Technology Book on Processing,
spiced papads. J Innov Dev Strateg, 2 Dehydration, Canning, Preservation of
(3), 30-33. Fruits & Vegetables. National Institute
Dattatreya, M. K., Samuel, D.V.K., of Industrial Research, Kamala Nagar,
Rajender, P., 2006. Optimization of pre- Delhi, pp.38-40.
treatments of solar dehydrated Patricia, A.D., Patricia, A.K., Yohan,
cauliflower. J Food Eng, 77, 659–664. Yoon, John, N.S., 2007. Influence of
Goncalves, E.M., Pinheiro, J., Abreu, M., modified blanching treatments on
Brandao, T.R.S., Silva, C.L.M., 2007. inactivation of Salmonella during
Modelling the kinetics of peroxidase drying and storage of carrot slices. Food
inactivation, colour and texture changes Microbiol, 24, 500-507.
of pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima L.) Samaddar, H.N., 1985. Jackfruit. In: Bose,
during blanching. J Food Eng, 81, 693– T.K. (ed.), Fruits of India: Tropical and
701. Subtropical. Naya Prokash, Calcutta,
Goncalves, E.M., Pinheiro, J., Abreu, M., pp.487–497.
Brandao, T.R.S., Silva, C.L.M., 2010. Sims, C.A., Balaban, M.O., Matthews,
Carrot (Daucus carota L.) R.F., 1993. Optimization of carrot
peroxidase inactivation, phenolic juices and cloud stability. J Food Sci,
content and physical changes kinetics 58 (5), 1129–1131.
due to blanching. J Food Eng, 97, 574– Song, J.Y., An, G.H., Kim, C.J., 2003.
581. Colour, texture, nutrient contents, and
Jha, S. N., Prasad, S., 1996. Determination sensory values of vegetable soybeans
of processing conditions of gorgon nut [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] as affected
(Euryale ferox). J Agr Eng Res, 63 (2), by blanching. Food Chem, 83 (1), 69–
103–112. 74.
Kotwaliwale, N., Bakane, P., Verma, A., Srivastava, R.P., Sanjeev, K., 1994. Fruit
2007. Changes in textural and optical and Vegetable Preservation. Principles
properties of oyster mushroom during and Practices. International Book
hot air drying. J Food Eng, 78 (4), Distributing Co, Charbagh, Lucknow,
1207–1211. 474p.
Lespinard, A.R., Goni, S.M., Salgado, Sudheer, K.P., Indira, V., 2007). Post
P.R., Mascheroni, R.H., 2009. harvest Technology of Horticultural
Experimental determination and Crops. New India Publishing House,
modeling of size variation, heat transfer Pitampura, New Delhi, 291p.
and quality indexes during mushroom Vina, S.Z., Olivera, D.F., Marani, C.M.,
blanching. J Food Eng, 92 (1), 8-17. Ferreyra, R.M., Mugridge, A., Chaves,
Matser, A.M., Knott, E.R., Teunissen, A.R., 2007. Quality of Brussels sprouts
P.G.M., Bartels, P.V., 2000. Effects of (Brassica oleracea L. gemmifera DC)
high isostatic pressure on mushrooms. J as affected by blanching method. J
Food Eng, 45 (1), 11–16. Food Eng, 80 (1), 218-225.