Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter I
Introduction
in costs and volume affect a company's operating income and net income. In
performing this analysis, there are several assumptions made, including the
sales price per unit, variable costs per unit and the total fixed costs that are
affected because activity changes. CVP analysis requires that all of the
margin is the difference between total sales and total variable costs. For a
business to be profitable, the contribution margin must exceed total fixed costs.
The contribution margin may also be calculated per unit. The unit contribution
margin is simply the unit variable cost subtracted from the unit sales price. The
sales.
business analysis. Questions such as what the company's breakeven point help
managers project how future spending and production will contribute to the
2
success or failure of the company. For instance, when a manager knows the
decisions can be broken down into probabilities that help with the decision –
making process.
plan and control more effectively and also to concentrate on the relationship
among revenues, cost, volume changes, taxes and profit. It is also known as
break – even analysis where revenue is equal to the costs associated. Finally,
this study is aimed at examining the effect of cost – volume – profit analysis on
volume – profit analysis control, the CVP analysis system must first of all indicate
what is attainable by efficient performance and then highlight any area where
attainable efficiency is not being achieved. The definition of cost – volume – profit
quantification of materials, labor and other costs to prices and/or wages expected
to apply during the period which the cost – volume – profit analysis is expected to
be used.
3
managerial decisions with the use of different tools and techniques. With the help
of CVP analysis, the most profitable combination of variable cost, fixed cost,
selling price and sales volume can be established. It can help companies
determine their contribution margin, which is the amount remaining from sales
revenue after all the variable expenses have been deducted. The amount that
remains is first used to cover fixed costs, and whatever remains afterward is
considered as profit.
With regards to the profit planning, CVP analysis is a valuable tool for
a broad range of decisions. In doing so, CVP analysis compares the relationship
between costs of producing goods, volume of goods sold and profits. Managers
continually use CVP analysis to estimate the level of sales that will allow the
company to make a particular profit, called the targeted income. If the level of
sales is not enough to cover the costs incurred, they can think of a way of
reducing their costs or increasing the sales volume they will produce to attain the
desired profit.
analysis is very significant and can effect on the decision of the managers.
4
manufacturing firms in making sure that proper decisions are made in order to
should have an effective costing system so that proper costing of its material,
labor and overhead can be easily effected, so as to determine the actual cost of
should be cut from time to time. Oftentimes, the difficult work of profit planning is
a periodic program rather than an ongoing way of life. Almost all of the business
wants to increase their profit so in line with this, researchers want to know if the
practices under CVP analysis would help to attain this goal. Especially with these
days wherein there are increase in the cost of raw materials that result in the
increase in the cost of production and leads to the high prices of the products.
This study is focused on the effect of using CVP analysis on the profit
Literature Review
According to Roque (2016), one of the analytical tools that managers can
Cabrera (2015) and Agamata (2014) that CVP analysis has a great impact on
effect in the decision making process in the said industries. CVP analysis is a
manufacturing firm faced with managerial problems which includes cost, volume
determine the specifics of the hotel product and the needs to be addressed from
agreed by Georgiev (2015), CVP analysis is one of the most common tools used
(2016), states that CVP model is an essential instrument in the decision making
process of the management that can help in the production decisions, selling,
and etc.
the total costs are fixed costs that tend to decline over time. These costs affect
behavior from price setting and returns to scale. Industries with higher fixed costs
and lower variable costs have higher returns to scale and markups. The classical
Translog cost allows for interactions between the fixed and variable costs.
6
According to Ameyaw (2016), not all cost maintains same relationship with
volume of production over entire production period and volume range. Due to the
frequent change in prices of goods and services, it is possible that fixed cost
could change twice or thrice in production year not following the underlying
assumptions of CVP analysis that fixed cost may not change over time.
Nevertheless, fixed cost such as electricity and transportation costs could be cut
down to increase the profit margin. If the manager wants to cut down fixed costs
data on costs and revenues mainly from financial accounting. CVP analysis and
break – even point has been known to theorists even before the onset of
the variable costs a solid information base has been created for its application in
the field of short term business decision making. Naturally the very accounting
behavior of the short – term costs within the relevant range of activity volume and
Marjanovic (2013), added that the division of costs into the fixed and
variable component is often made difficult because of the well – known problem
of choice of base of activities about which the paper discusses among other
issues. The choice of base of activities and methodologies for separating mixed
costs into fixed and variable components constitute a single body of initial
7
management may use CVP analysis to calculate the profit yield by a given
amount of sold goods. Or, based on the CVP analysis, the management may set
the necessary sales level to earn the desired profit. Moreover, CVP analysis is
increasingly used in the budgeting process. CVP analysis may be used also in
separating fixed and variable costs that help in gathering relevant costs, related
information useful in short – term decision – making, such as, for instance, profit
standardized.
Dalci (2015), stated that the activity – based CVP analysis provides better
prediction of costs and much more complete picture of break – even analysis.
application of this analysis include effective cost control, high production, service
capacity, and increased profitability. Also, applying CVP analysis during the
measurement tool however it may be used also in health care centers and
provides benefits therein. Health care administrators and managers must know
outcomes. The use of CVP analysis for hospital unit gives benefits that it is
particular attention to CVP analysis during the planning process based on the
previous years. Profit planning assists in finding the most profitable combination
between selling price, cost and volume, and hence it enables calculations of
profit at different sales levels. It assumes that sales volume is the primary cost
reducing costs, especially variable costs per unit, which vary with the level of
A high level of cost information for profit planning was being used by
to meet their profit target as only profitable project are likely to be undertaken and
they are aware of what to expect during the period. However, management may
considered not profitable on the demand for other products and the overall
profitability of the company. It was also observed that the use of sales budget for
9
practiced.
Agamata (2014), stated that the process of managing costs and sales
volume as they impact profit is known as cost – volume – profit analysis. The
profit planning is the process of anticipating profit under varying conditions and
analyzing the effects of variables affecting it. Profit planning is an effective tool
units of a product must be sold so that the business „breaks even‟ total costs,
both fixed and variable are covered by total sales revenue. It allows the business
determine the sales volume required to achieve a specific profit level and to
establish the amount by which the current sales level can decrease before losses
are incurred.
sales of a product at the entire point to measure the product profitability in its
selling domains. One of the reasons why traditional analysis of CVP still remains
powerful is its simplicity and its effect on the profit planning in a certain entity.
10
Cabrera (2015), stated that CVP analysis serves as a basis for price
product at P3.50 and the business is unable to go below P5, it‟s time to review
the available options. The business can reduce the fixed cost and variable cost to
price the product at P3.50 or terminate it. In addition, CVP is helpful in price
determine what levels of sales to achieve to meet their targeted profits, they use
CVP analysis. To achieve this they prepare flexible budgets that indicate the
costs and the expected revenues at various stages of production. They are also
able to understand the break – even concept, and hence they can make strategic
Similarly, Roque (2016), cited that the CVP model helps in evaluating the
achieved and costs incurred. For example, a company may want to purchase
new equipment to increase its production level. The new machine may increase
fixed costs. In this case, to find out the figure by which to decrease the variable
cost in order to maintain the same profit level, the company uses CVP analysis.A
cost like the variable cost and fixed cost. In manufacturing industries, profit
not to only to reduce those costs but also achieve this reduction at the right time,
not having gone through a long period of time and finding cost overrun for a
analysis and application of ways to continually reduce the cost provide real
Theoretical Framework
limiting factor which is the constraint or the bottleneck that stands in the way of
achieving a goal and then systematically improving that blockage until it becomes
multiple linked activities, in that entire system, the weakest link in the chain is the
constraint.
The theory of constraints provides a set of holistic processes and rules, all
based on a systems approach that exploits the inherent simplicity within complex
systems through focusing on the few leverage points as a way to synchronize the
still relevant with the differences in cost that vary with output and cost that remain
constant. They modified the traditional CVP analysis and applied Goldratt‟s
volume with a constraint on the horizontal axis and termed the new approach
bottleneck hour.
using CCP. It is important to realize that reducing the cost for an individual unit is
not profitable unless the cost of the entire product line is reduced.
13
Conceptual Framework
in terms of:
years in operation
usage
benefits
variable and the dependent variable of the whole research. The independent
cost and variable cost; and the CVP analysis in terms of contribution usage and
profit analysis on the profit planning in terms of sales volume and cost control.
14
The aim of this study is to determine the effects of using the cost – volume
Laguna.
2.1. usage
2.2. benefits
3. What are the components of cost – volume – profit analysis in the profit
4. Is there a significant relationship between the profile and the profit planning of
of:
Hypotheses
1. There is no significant relationship between the profile and the profit planning
cost control.
companies and they can know what company they‟ll prefer. They are indefinitely
further knowledge in managing their company and this can help for the
employees and this study may give information about better ways of doing work.
the scope is limited, study may also apply to all business in general, small or
Students and Future Researchers. This research can help them have a
better knowledge regarding the management‟s practice in profit planning and this
study may enable them to think or give them data that they might need in order to
create a valuable study as well. They may also find useful information about any
related topics.
between profit planning and cost – volume – profit analysis used by certain
the respondents. This study focused on the given presumptions and data was
Definition of Terms
Break – even Analysis. Break – even analysis entails the calculation and
examination of the margin of safety for an entity based on the revenues collected
and associated costs. Break – even analysis determines what level of sales is
product's gross operating margin calculated simply as the product's price minus
production as well as fixed costs. It first measures and records these costs
individually, then compare input results to output or actual results to aid company
Cost Control. This is a practice wherein the business identifies and reduces the
expenses to increase profit. When in budgeting process the actual costs are
higher than the planned this is the time that the management takes actions.
Fixed Cost. Cost that does not vary on the increase or decrease of the number
their profit, on either increasing the sales volume or minimizing costs or any other
factors.
Sales Volume. Sales volume is derived from what number of total unit of
products are sold in the market. This may also refer on the sales revenue in a
particular business.
volume, rise when production increases and fall when production decreases.
19
Chapter II
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This chapter provides information about the methods of research that the
researcher used in the conduct of the study. The presentation includes research
and research procedure which were done. The survey research method was
used to determine the relationship with the cost – volume – profit analysis and
instrument has been designed using the Likert type of questionnaires to measure
the respondents' rating to the given statements. The data collection and data
Research Design
the phenomenon being studied. Instead of answering the questions how, when or
why, it rather addresses the “what” question so the researchers can use the
descriptive research design in gathering data and verifying results. This type of
research is very applicable for the study because it attempts to describe and
questionnaires which is the Likert type. The respondents answered the questions
20
by means of rating scale then the researchers analyzed the relevance of their
answers.
The main purpose of the study is to determine the effect of cost – volume
planning.
Research Instrument
research instrument that was used in this study. Survey is a no experimental and
a descriptive research method. It was useful in this study because of the fact that
the researchers collected data on the cost – volume – profit analysis and profit
wherein they rated their answers as five (5) being the highest and one (1) being
the lowest.
The researchers also gathered data from the financial statements for the
year ended 2018 for the purpose of analyzing its financial performance.
through rating scale to measure the significance of their answer. It was done
Statistical Tool
operations that the researcher used to compare the figures that were used as the
to each potential choice and a mean figure for all response was computed at the
Mean was used to get the average of the gathered data which was
helpful to analyze and interpret the ratings given by the respondents. It is also
used to determine the average perception of the respondents on the factors such
The hypotheses were tested using the Product Moment Correlation or also
variables are related. This tool simply calculates the correlation coefficient (r)
which states how much one variable tends to change when the other one does.
When the (r) is equal to zero (0) then there is no relationship. In contrast, when
(r) is positive, there is a trend that while one variable goes with the other variable.
22
between the cost – volume – profit analysis to the profit planning of the
variables have.
between the profile of the respondents to the profit planning and the correlation
between the cost – volume – profit analysis and profit planning of selected
between two variables: one continuous variable (must be ratio scale or interval
Research Procedure
that collected the information from the respondents about their perception on the
effect of the cost – volume – profit analysis on the profit planning of various
according to the results of the given answers by the respondents. Lastly, the
researchers analyzed, presented and aimed to interpret the result of the surveys
Chapter III
corresponding interpretation derived from the statistical treatment of data for the
study entitled “Effect of Using Cost – Volume – Profit Analysis on the Profit
4.5% 4.5%
4.5%
63.6%
22.9%
1 - 5 years
6 - 10 years
11 - 15 years
16 - 20 years
21 years and
above
15 years, 16 – 20 years, and 21 years and above. 4.5%, 4.5%, 4.5%, 22.9%
Based on the result, it can be seen that there are more old
respondents are good enough to maximize the sales volume and control the
costs because they are more efficient when it comes to profit planning.
36.4% 63.6%
and the remaining 36.4% are perishable goods. This suggests that
perishable goods because they are not likely to spoil fast unlike perishable
4.5% 0% 4.5%
9.2%
81.8%
1 to 3,000
3,001 to 6,000
6,001 to 9,000
9,001 to 12,000
12,001 and above
per Month.
9,000, 9,001 to 12,000 and 12,001 and above in kilograms or in liters. The
12,001 and above. 9.2% of the respondents produced 9,001 to 12,000 kilos
or liters of products. For both products of 6,001 to 9,000 and 1 to 3,000 kilos
Table 1
Table 1 shows the amount of fixed cost that has a trimmed mean of
1,947,272.73. The presented data detected the outliers and trimmed the
expected since majority of the companies that were surveyed are of small scale.
to 60% of the total costs are fixed costs that tend to decline over time. These
costs affect behavior from price setting and returns to scale. Industries with
higher fixed costs and lower variable costs have higher returns to scale and
markups. Ameyaw (2016), added that not all cost maintains same relationship
with volume of production over entire production period and volume range. Due
to the frequent change in prices of goods and services, it is possible that fixed
cost could change twice or thrice in production year not following the underlying
assumptions of CVP analysis that fixed cost may not change over time.
Nevertheless, fixed cost such as electricity and transportation costs could be cut
down to increase the profit margin. If the manager wants to cut down fixed costs
Table2
Table 2 illustrates the amount of variable cost that has a trimmed mean of
3,251,060.61. The presented data detected outliers and trimmed the distribution
asked were a small entity only that‟s why the trimmed mean of variable cost is
predicted.
data on costs and revenues mainly from financial accounting. CVP analysis and
break – even point has been known to theorists even before the onset of
the variable costs a solid information base has been created for its application in
the field of short term business decision making. Naturally, the very accounting
behavior of the short – term costs within the relevant range of activity volume and
Table 3
Standard
Usage Mean Interpretation
Deviation
The CVP Analysis was used to:
1. give emphasis on contribution margin for Strongly
the purposes of profit analysis and control. 4.50 .67
Agree
2. increase the profit growth.
4.23 .81 Agree
3. provide measurement to determine the
appropriate sales to achieve desired profit. 4.27 .99 Agree
4. provide break-even of total sales and total
cost. 3.95 .79 Agree
5. anticipate the change in income if the
manager is convinced that the reduction in
selling price would result to 3.82 .80 Agree
increase/decrease of products sold.
6. estimate required sales to yield at the
same net income as projected in the pro-
3.82 .85 Agree
forma statement.
7. calculate the magnitude of variable cost for
different volume levels. 3.91 1.02 Agree
8. attain the ultimate goal of firms which is to
maximize profit. 4.27 .88 Agree
9. segregate the fixed and variable elements
of mixed costs. 3.95 .84 Agree
10. indicate the amount of actual or planned
sales without incurring a loss. 4.05 .95 Agree
Grand Mean 4.08 .45 Agree
Legend: 4.30 – 5.00 Strongly Agree
3.50 – 4.29 Agree
2.70 – 3.49 Moderate
1.90 – 2.69 Disagree
1.00 – 1.89 Strongly Disagree
The table above shows that 4.5 is the highest mean which indicates that
CVP analysis gives emphasis on contribution margin for the purposes of profit
29
planning and controlling costs and 3.82 is the lowest wherein CVP analysis can
help to anticipate the change in income if the manager is convinced that the
also it can be used to estimate required sales to yield at the same net income as
It further shows that the extent of the respondents usage of CVP analysis
in profit planning is 4.08 which is interpreted as agree. This could mean that the
CVP analysis is moderately used to attain the objectives stated in the indicators.
management may use CVP analysis to calculate the profit yield by a given
amount of sold goods. Or, based on the CVP analysis, the management may set
the necessary sales level to earn the desired profit. Moreover, CVP analysis is
increasingly used in the budgeting process. CVP analysis may be used also in
separating fixed and variable costs that help in gathering relevant costs, related
information useful in short – term decision – making, such as, for instance, profit
Table 4
Standard
Benefits Mean Interpretation
Deviation
1. It can anticipate profit under varying
conditions. 4.09 .811 Agree
2. It can analyze effects of variables
affecting profit planning through 4.09 1.07 Agree
forecasting.
3. Management can control costs. 4.05 1.05 Agree
4. It can control the operations to come up
with the target profit. 4.00 .87 Agree
5. It can foresee the cost and profit if
there‟s a decided new product. 4.14 .71 Agree
6. It is able to change the amount of fixed
cost if there‟s an objective of increasing 3.82 .85 Agree
the income.
7. It can calculate the indifference point
where the firm must exceed. 4.27 .83 Agree
8. It can go with the flow of cost behavior
which may happen 4.05 .90 Agree
9. It helps to identify break-even point if a
company sells one or more that 4.05 .84 Agree
product.
10. It computes the maximum increase in
sales that will lead to possible Strongly
4.32 .72
maximum profit. Agree
Grand Mean 4.09 .46 Agree
Legend: 4.30 – 5.00 Strongly Agree
3.50 – 4.29 Agree
2.70 – 3.49 Moderate
1.90 – 2.69 Disagree
1.00 – 1.89 Strongly Disagree
awareness of the benefits derived from the use of CVP analysis in profit planning
has a grand mean of 4.09 which means they agreed with all the indicators.
31
It proves that all the selected manufacturing companies are using CVP
analysis are mindful of the benefits they gain in using CVP analysis.
financial measurement tool however it may be used also in health care centers
and provides benefits therein. The use of CVP analysis for hospital unit gives
Furthermore, Dalci (2015), stated that the activity – based CVP analysis
provides better prediction of costs and much more complete picture of break –
Table 5
Table 5 illustrates the amount of sales volume that has a trimmed mean of
6,553,030.30. The presented data detected outliers and trimmed the distribution
found appropriate and expected because almost the respondents are small
entities only.
32
determine what levels of sales to achieve to meet their targeted profits, they use
CVP analysis. To achieve this, they prepare flexible budgets that indicate the
costs and the expected revenues at various stages of production. They are also
able to understand the break – even concept, and hence they can make strategic
Table 6
Table 6 illustrates the amount of cost control that has a trimmed mean of
2,582,575.76. The presented data detected outliers and trimmed the distribution
of about 5% in each extremity. The cost control was found appropriate since
not to only to reduce those costs but also achieve this reduction at the right time,
not having gone through a long period of time and finding cost overrun for a
analysis and application of ways to continually reduce the cost provide real
Table 7
Sales Volume
Profile Interpretation
r – value p – value
results showed that the computed value of test statistics in terms of years in
and amount of fixed cost and variable cost are equal to -0.48, -0.17, 0.09, 1.000
and 1.000 respectively while the p – value are 0.02, 0.46, 0.71, 0 and 0
respectively. Some profiles of the respondents are significant and others are not
because CVP analysis does not vary with the type of products to be produced by
perishable products can use the cost – volume – profit analysis and still get with
34
low sales volume, there is also less cost associated with the volume, and if the
sales volume is high, a high cost is also expected. Thus, it is not significant with
the CVP analysis in terms of sales volume but is significant with fixed costs and
variable costs wherein these costs vary with the sales volume.
companies produced more sales volume than the older companies as shown in
Cabrera (2015), affirmed that CVP analysis serves as a basis for price
business can reduce the fixed cost and variable cost to price the product or
business can establish the sensitivity of prices to the sales volume. An increasing
sales volume also means an increasing profit. Consequently, Kelly (2010), stated
that CVP analysis assists by determining how many units of a product must be
sold under the assumption that any type of products can be used so that the
business „breaks even‟ total costs, both fixed and variable are covered by total
sales revenue. It allows the business to consider the effect on profits of various
specific profit level and to establish the amount by which the current sales level
Table 8
Cost Control
Profile Interpretation
r – value p – value
showed that the computed value of test statistics in terms of years in operation,
type of products produced, volume of products produced per month and amount
of fixed cost and variable cost are equal to -0.48, -0.17, 0.09, 1.00 and 1.00
respectively while the p value are 0.02, 0.46, 0.71, 0 and 0 respectively.
products produced and volume of products produce per month with the cost
control. On the other hand, the cost control was found to be significant related to
The years in operation has a moderate negative relationship with the cost
control which implies that the younger company records higher cost control. In
36
the case of one of these companies, they disclosed to the researchers that they
A perfect positive relationship was found between fixed cost and variable
cost with the cost control since most of the company respondents did not gave
the actual cost control and only gave approximate amounts based on ratios.
just the quantity to be produced by a company and not the actual amount they
will incur in producing products consequently cost control is not associated with
it.
cost on changes in volume for the purpose of reviewing profits achieved and
costs incurred. For example, a company may want to purchase new equipment
to increase its production level. The new machine may increase fixed costs. In
this case, to find out the figure by which to decrease the variable cost in order to
maintain the same profit level, the company uses CVP analysis. A deep study of
the elements of cost is necessary to understand how to reduce cost like the
Table 9
Correlation between the Cost – Volume – Profit Analysis and Profit Planning of
Sales Volume
Profile Interpretation
r – value p – value
volume. Based on the results, the computed value of test statistics as to usage
and benefits of CVP analysis are equal to -0.39 and -0.48 respectively and p –
This clearly indicates that usage is not significant while benefits derived
from CVP analysis are significant and therefore failed to reject Ho.
The usage of cost – volume – profit analysis in terms of sales volume has
respondents, CVP analysis can be used to determine the break – even point and
the contribution margin and it may help to determine the profit but it cannot help
to increase the profit. Also, they said that it is because of the decision – making
It was proved by Budugan (2008), that CVP analysis may be used for
forecasting purposes to calculate the profit yield by a given amount of sold goods
however not used as a method to obtain the desired profit. It may also be used
by the management to set the necessary sales level, used in the budgeting
process and may be used also in separating fixed and variable costs that help in
making.
The benefits derived from cost – volume – profit analysis in terms of sales
volume has a significant relationship with the profit planning because CVP
analysis is used to calculate different costs related with the amount of sales
volume a company will produce to be able to foresee the amount of profit they
will be having. Also, the respondents are aware on the benefits they gain on
analysis include effective cost control, high production, service capacity, and
increased profitability. Also, applying CVP analysis during the decision – making
Overall, the respondents have awareness on the benefits derived from the
cost – volume – profit analysis but they are not using it to increase their profit.
39
Table 10
Correlation between the Cost – Volume – Profit Analysis and Profit Planning of
Cost Control
Profile Interpretation
r – value p – value
Based on the results, the computed value of test statistics as to usage and
benefits of CVP analysis are equal to -0.39 and -0.48 respectively and p – value
of 0.08 and 0.03 respectively. This clearly indicates that usage is not significant
while benefits derived from CVP analysis are significant and therefore failed to
The usage of cost – volume – profit analysis in terms of cost control has
no significant relationship with the profit planning because the decision – making
cooperation made by the different departments of a company are the key to have
analysis plays a big role. The interviewed respondents disagree that there is a
sales volume and the profit planning because they are aware to the advantages
center gets from using CVP analysis and thus CVP analysis give benefits like an
Chapter IV
aimed to find out the relationship between the factors of this study. Specifically, it
sought to answer the following questions (1) what is the company profile in terms
of: number of years operating in the business; type and volume of products
produced; and amount of fixed cost and variable cost (2) usage and benefits of
CVP analysis (3) the sales volume and cost control of the business.
Summary of Findings
produces non – perishable goods and majority of them generates large units
which is 12,001 and above. This merely indicates that the study has large scales
and some small scales companies who had responded to the survey
analysis because the younger and smaller businesses has more large sales
volume and cost control than the older and larger ones.
There‟s a perfect relationship between fixed cost, variable cost and CVP
analysis since most of the company respondents gave estimates based on ratio.
42
In addition, type of products produced is not relevant because CVP analysis does
not vary on what kind of products. It can be used in whatever product the
company is producing. So with the volume of products because the less unit of
products the less cost and the more unit of products the more cost so it is not
in as much as they agreed that they have benefits derived on this technique such
CVP analysis has no significant relationship considering the fact that the
company respondents are not only using CVP analysis for their profit planning
but they also formulates strategic management to attain their target income. It is
not only based on the proper use of CVP analysis but also on the efficiency and
Conclusions
The findings gathered in this study lead to the formulation of the following
conclusions:
volume and cost control is accepted, due to some of the profile of the
respondents such as years in operation and amount of fixed cost and variable
cost are significant so it is rejected; and the other profiles like type and volume of
The usage of CVP analysis is not significant while the benefits derived
companies in Laguna in terms of sales volume and cost control is also accepted.
Recommendations
researchers a clear perception with regards to the effects of using cost – volume
volume – profit analysis and the profit planning in terms of sales volume
and cost control of a certain business, they may account for the benefits
derived from CVP analysis for a meaningful decision – making and they
may discover new tools like cost – constraint – profit (CCP) analysis
cost that vary with output and cost that remain constant thus they replaced
business as a strategy to get the break – even point and may consider
using any other method like the CCP analysis to increase their profit.
testing. They may consider using respondents of business with the same
range in doing their research so that they could get patterns of practices of
BIBLIOGRAPHY
A. Book
B. Journal
http://maaw.info/ArticleSummaries/ArtSumLutherODonovan98.htm
from cost-volume-profit-cvp-analysis.pdf
C. Related Studies
http://dx.doi.org/10.18775/jibrm.1849- 8558.2015.11.3001
20150401110108_526106120551bcff407d6f.pdf
Briciu, Sorin (2010). Cost Volume Profit Model, the Break-even Point and
from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/49615434
Koebel Bertrand M, Chen Xi. (2013). Fixed cost, variable cost, markups
Ameyaw Daniel Sasu (2016). CVP and sensitive analysis of Ntow Poultry
MarjanovicP-Oradea-2013.pdf
01_C01_Budugan_IGeogescu.pdf
Activity-based-Cost-volume-profit-Analysis_-Another-Approach-To-
47
Break-even-Analysis59832-50234.pdf
and the Analysis of Cost, volume and profit (CVP) Retrieved from
paper-28022015093917.pdf
http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/30969/
case-of-Nigeria-Listed-Manufacturing-Companies..pdf
D. Websites
analyzing-costvolumeprofit.html
48
www.leanproduction.com/theory-of-constraints.html
http://www.tocico.org/?page=toc
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/breakevenanalysis.asp
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/contributionmargin.asp
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cost- accounting.asp
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/cost-reduction.html
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fixedcost.asp
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/managerialaccounting.asp
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/v/variablecost.asp
49
APPENDICES
Appendix A
Letter to the Dean
Republic of the Philippines
Laguna State Polytechnic University
Province of Laguna
Melinda Almazan,
Associate Dean
College of Business Management & Accountancy
Laguna State Polytechnic University
San Pablo City, Laguna Province
Dear Ma‟am,
Respectfully yours,
Atienza, Glaissel M.
Mercado, Ricarly May K.
Noted by:
Ismaela M. Bawica
Thesis Adviser
Melinda Almazan,
Associate Dean, CBMA
50
Appendix B
Letter to Respondents
Republic of the Philippines
Laguna State Polytechnic University
Province of Laguna
Dear Respondents,
Respectfully yours,
Atienza, Glaissel M.
Mercado, Ricarly May K.
Noted by:
Ismaela M. Bawica
Thesis Adviser
Melinda Almazan,
Associate Dean, CBMA
51
Appendix C
Survey Questionnaire
COMPANIES IN LAGUNA
I. Company Profile
Yes No
Profile as to:
II. Questionnaire
Kindly rate the appropriate answer on the given data from 1 (lowest) to 5
(highest). Put a check (√) on the box that corresponds to your answer.
Legend:
3 – Moderate
III. Data
Signature of Respondent
55
Appendix D
Raw Data
Respondents Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
1 5 1 5 343,000 1,491,000
2 5 1 1 70,000 80,000
3 2 1 5 5,900,000,000 6,350,000,000
4 5 1 5 7,000,000 20,000,000
5 3 1 4 8,550,000 13,000,000
6 4 1 5 11,000,000 11,500,000
7 5 2 5 17,000 500,000
8 4 1 5 1,200,000 1,500,000
9 5 2 5 500,000 1,500,000
10 5 2 5 500,000 1,500,000
11 4 1 5 500,000 700,000
12 5 1 5 650,000 850,000
13 5 2 5 450,000 900,000
14 1 2 3 100,000 200,000
15 5 1 5 2,500,000 3,000,000
16 4 1 4 300,000 400,000
17 5 1 5 600,000 1,200,000
18 5 2 5 1,200,000 1,650,000
19 5 1 5 600,000 800,000
20 5 2 5 2,000,000 3,000,000
21 4 1 5 700,000 1,500,000
22 5 2 5 900,000 1,200,000
Mean 4.36 1.36 4.64 1,947,272.73 3,251,060.61
56
Respondents Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10
1 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
3 5 4 5 3 3 4 2 2 3 2
4 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 4
5 4 3 4 3 4 3 5 4 3 5
6 5 5 5 5 5 4 3 5 5 5
7 4 5 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 3
8 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 4
9 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 4
10 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 4 5
11 4 4 5 4 3 4 3 3 4 4
12 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 3
13 5 4 5 4 4 3 3 5 4 5
14 5 5 5 4 5 3 2 3 4 3
15 5 3 4 3 5 5 5 4 5 5
16 3 5 5 5 5 3 5 4 2 5
17 4 5 5 4 4 2 4 5 5 5
18 5 4 3 3 3 3 4 5 3 5
19 4 5 3 3 2 5 3 5 4 4
20 5 4 5 4 3 3 5 5 4 5
21 5 3 3 5 4 4 5 5 4 3
22 5 4 2 3 3 4 3 4 4 3
Mean 4.5 4.23 4.27 3.95 3.82 3.82 3.91 4.27 3.95 4.05
57
Respondents Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10
1 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4
2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
3 4 3 5 4 3 2 2 2 3 3
4 4 5 5 5 4 4 5 3 5 3
5 5 4 5 3 4 3 4 4 3 4
6 4 5 4 4 5 4 5 5 4 5
7 5 5 5 3 4 3 4 5 5 4
8 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 5
9 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 5
10 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 5
11 4 5 5 5 3 3 4 4 5 4
12 3 3 2 4 4 5 5 5 3 4
13 5 3 4 4 4 3 5 5 3 5
14 3 2 4 4 5 5 4 3 4 4
15 4 5 2 5 3 5 5 5 5 4
16 4 5 4 5 5 3 5 3 5 5
17 4 4 5 3 5 5 5 3 4 5
18 3 5 3 3 4 3 3 5 3 4
19 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 4
20 3 2 3 4 5 4 4 4 3 5
21 5 4 4 3 4 4 5 4 5 5
22 3 3 3 3 4 5 5 5 4 5
Mean 4.09 4.09 4.05 4.00 4.14 3.82 4.27 4.05 4.05 4.32
58
Respondents Q1 Q2
1 2,100,000 400,000
2 1,780,000 500,000
3 2,250,000,000,000 6,350,000,000
4 30,000,000 16,000,000
5 31,500,000 12,000,000
6 30,000,000 15,000,000
7 1,000,000 200,000
8 2,300,000 700,000
9 1,500,000 300,000
10 6,000,000 2,000,000
11 1,800,000 450,000
12 2,000,000 700,000
13 1,700,000 400,000
14 600,000 75,000
15 6,000,000 1,200,000
16 800,000 150,000
17 2,000,000 500,000
18 2,700,000 450,000
19 1,500,000 200,000
20 3,500,000 800,000
21 2,200,000 300,000
22 2,600,000 500,000
Trimmed Mean 6,553,030.30 2,582,575.76
59
CURRICULUM VITAE
Atienza, Glaissel M.
376, SitioCalumpit, Barangay Santisimo Rosario
San Pablo City, Laguna 4000
09090270513
glaissel.atienza@gmail.com
Career Objectives: To find a job wherein I can apply all the knowledge I have
together with my skills and talents that can be used to achieve the objectives of
the company.
I. EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
V. PERSONAL INFORMATION
Mark YonieEnrade
Picar Development Inc.
HeneralMascardo St., Brgy. Bangkal, Makati City, Manila
Human Resource Specialist
09158077509
I hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best
of my knowledge and belief.
Atienza, Glaissel M.
62
I. EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
V. PERSONAL INFORMATION
Darwin Ofrin
Laguna State Polytechnic University – San Pablo City Campus
Barangay Del Remedio, San Pablo City
Professor
09988590662
I hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best
of my knowledge and belief.