Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/221567380
CITATIONS READS
0 260
1 author:
Suzan Bayhan
University of Twente
70 PUBLICATIONS 923 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Suzan Bayhan on 12 January 2014.
Abstract—The main focus of this thesis is to design and develop II. B EST F IT C HANNEL ACCESS FOR AN A D H OC CRN
cognitive MAC protocols for various networks. Furthermore, we
aim to explore the design tools, approaches and auxiliary systems We design a channel access scheme for an ad hoc CRN
that can be adapted to and applied in cognitive radio (CR) that facilitates the distributed channel access in an efficient
domain. In particular, we proposed a distributed spectrum access way. In the literature, mostly an SU applies various learning
scheme for ad hoc CR networks (CRN) in which each secondary and prediction schemes to estimate the availability times of
user (SU) acts in an altruistic way. The proposed access scheme PU channels. Next, the channel with the highest probability
improves CRN throughput compared to the selfish scheme that is
mostly considered in the literature. Next, we propose a symbiotic of being idle or the one with the longest remaining idle time
operation of CRs and cognitive femtocells, in which SUs use the (longest idle time channel selection) is selected for access.
sensing outcome of the femto-BS and are charged accordingly. However, this scheme may decrease system performance since
Addition of “cognitive” sensing to the femto-BS contributes to the an SU selects selfishly the best channel even it does not use
discovery of spectrum holes and facilitates higher bandwidth at it. As a solution, we propose best fit channel selection (BFC)
the femtocells compared to the conventional femto-BS. Currently,
we focus on design and development of adaptive medium access scheme in which each SU selects the channel that meets its
control (MAC) protocol that considers various aspects of the requirements instead of the longest idle time channel. BFC
operating environment (e.g. PU mobility) and the CR itself. scheme outperforms LITC in terms of secondary throughput.
Figure 1 depicts the performance of these two schemes under
varying traffics.
I. I NTRODUCTION
0.8
SLLS
Future communication networks are expected to be het- SSLS SLLL
α = {0.75, 1,5}
β = {0.75, 1,5}
BFC
LRITC
0.7
erogenous and thereby it is crucial to have the intelligence to SSLL
LLLS
adapt to these heterogenous and time-varying environments. 0.6
SSSS
SLSS
LSLS LLLL
SLSL
This intelligence can be provided by “cognitive” capabilities
Probability of success
SSSL LSLL
0.5
that cover a wide range of capabilities from spectrum sensing, LLSS
LSSS
parameter adaptation to prediction based operation. Cognitive 0.4
LSSL
LLSL
18
17
schemes considering the PU mobility. A simple sketch of
Scenario II this issue is depicted in Figure 4. Various methods for next-
16
location estimation are proposed in the literature, mostly in
Average SU Throughput (packets/timeslot)
10 λ=0.6
PU1
9 λ=0.9
PU2
8
0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5
SU Probability of False Alarm (Pf)
SU/CR