Cross Tabulation Examples

1) SPSS Menu Sequence: Analyze  Descriptive Statistics  Crosstabs

2) Select Cell to indicate which Percentages you need calculated then press Continue.
3) Select Statistics to indicate which Statistics you need then press Continue. Information to be
4) Press OK to run the analysis. reported:
 Pearson Chi-Square
significance level
including value and
df.
 If significant, report
Cramer’s V value and
significance level.
 Appropriate counts
and percentages.
Basic Cross Tab Table:

Doctor recommendation? * Utilized therapy pool? Crosstabulation

Count
Utilized therapy pool? Total
no yes
no 107 70 177
Doctor recommendation?
yes 20 34 54
Total 127 104 231

Cross Tab Table with Total Percentages:

Doctor recommendation? * Utilized therapy pool? Crosstabulation

Utilized therapy pool? Total
no yes
Count 107 70 177
no
% of Total 46.3% 30.3% 76.6%
Doctor recommendation?
Count 20 34 54
yes
% of Total 8.7% 14.7% 23.4%
Count 127 104 231
Total
% of Total 55.0% 45.0% 100.0%
Cross Tab Table with Row Percentages:

Doctor recommendation? * Utilized therapy pool? Crosstabulation

Utilized therapy pool? Total
no yes
Count 107 70 177
no % within Doctor
60.5% 39.5% 100.0%
recommendation?
Doctor recommendation?
Count 20 34 54
yes % within Doctor
37.0% 63.0% 100.0%
recommendation?
Count 127 104 231
Total % within Doctor
55.0% 45.0% 100.0%
recommendation?

Cross Tab Table with Column Percentages:

What percentage of
Doctor recommendation? * Utilized therapy pool? Crosstabulation those who were
Utilized therapy pool? Total recommended by a
no yes Doctor used the therapy
pool?
Count 107 70 177
no % within Utilized therapy What percentage of
84.3% 67.3% 76.6%
pool? those who used the
Doctor recommendation?
Count 20 34 54 therapy pool were
yes % within Utilized therapy 23.4% recommended by a
15.7% 32.7% doctor?
pool?
Count 127 104 231
Total % within Utilized therapy
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
pool?
Cross Tab Table with Row, Column, and Total Percentages:

Doctor recommendation? * Utilized therapy pool? Crosstabulation

Utilized therapy pool? Total
no yes
Count 107 70 177
% within Doctor
60.5% 39.5% 100.0%
recommendation?
no
% within Utilized therapy
84.3% 67.3% 76.6%
pool?
% of Total 46.3% 30.3% 76.6%
Doctor recommendation?
Count 20 34 54
% within Doctor
37.0% 63.0% 100.0%
recommendation?
yes
% within Utilized therapy
15.7% 32.7% 23.4%
pool?
% of Total 8.7% 14.7% 23.4%
Count 127 104 231
% within Doctor
55.0% 45.0% 100.0%
recommendation?
Total
% within Utilized therapy
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
pool?
% of Total 55.0% 45.0% 100.0%
Chi Square and Cramers V for Cross Tab Table:

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 9.165a 1 .002
Continuity Correctionb 8.243 1 .004
Likelihood Ratio 9.169 1 .002
Fisher's Exact Test .003 .002
Linear-by-Linear
9.125 1 .003
Association
N of Valid Cases 231
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 24.31.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

If Pearson Chi-Square is significant (always report

value, df, and significance level), then you also
Symmetric Measures review/report Cramers V (value and significance
Value Approx. Sig. level). If Pearson Chi-Square is NOT significant
then Cramers V is irrelevant.
Phi .199 .002
Nominal by Nominal
Cramer's V .199 .002
N of Valid Cases 231
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null
hypothesis.
 Presenting Cross-Tab Results: Banner Tables
(see Exhibit 18.3 pg. 393 Brown et al. 8e)

Avery Fitness Center: Banner Table

Utilized Doctor Friend

therapy recommendation? recommendation? Gender
pool? No Yes No Yes Male Female
No 208 39 104 143 78 163
  60% 36% 48% 61% 79% 48%
Yes 137 68 114 91 21 180
  40% 64% 52% 39% 21% 53%
  n = 452 n = 452 n = 442

Note: Different datasets were used in the example hence the difference in results.