Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Eggins (2004) states that the mood structure of the clauses refers to the organization of the
set of functional constituents including constituent subjects. The mood system at the
clause encodes the relationship between the participants in interaction as well as the
speakers' or writers' attitudes and comments. Included here, for example, are indicative,
imperative, and interrogative instructions. The mood system also includes choices
in modality, such as expression of probability and obligation.
Gerot, L, and Peter W. (1994). Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Australia: Gerd Stabler.
Topic 2
Mood & Residue
Gerot, L, and Peter W. (1994). Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Australia: Gerd Stabler.
Topic 3
Participants, Processes, Circumstance
Gerot, L, and Peter W. (1994). Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Australia: Gerd Stabler.
Topic 4
Participants, Processes, Circumstance
Gerot, L, and Peter W. (1994). Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Australia: Gerd Stabler.
Eggins, S. (2004). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. Second Edition.
London: Continuum.
Topic 5
Struktur Theme- Rheme
Topic 6
Struktur Theme- Rheme
Topic 7
Mid-Term Test
Topic 8
Communicative Competence/Discourse Competence.
Topic 9
Context of Situation, Register, and Genre
Functional linguists put great emphasis on the relationship between language and context.
The main contention here is that it is impossible to understand the meaning of what
someone has said or written without knowing something about the context surrounding the
text. And the opposite is also true: if we can understand what our interlocutor writes or
says, we can also draw conclusions about the context of situation (Martin, 2001). The
relation between language and context is one of ‘realization’: the text ‘realizes’ the situation
and the linguistic system ‘realizes’ the culture. We must keep in mind, however, that we are
referring to a semiotic and not a material relationship, that is, not a relationship of cause
and effect but of semiotic construal −the culture is construed by systems of linguistic
choice, while the situation is construed by patterns of language use (Halliday, 1978).
Martin, J. R. (2001). Language, register, and genre. In A. Burns & C. Coffin (Eds.), Analysing
English in a global context: A reader (pp. 149-166). London: Routledge/Macquarie
University.
Topic 10
Stratification and Metafunctions of Language
Gerot, L, and Peter W. (1994). Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Australia: Gerd Stabler.
Topic 11
The Characteristics of Spoken and Written Texts
Topic 12
Gambits, Lexical Bundles, Noun Groups, Nominalization
As we move from the spoken to the written version, the main means of achieving these
changes is through the process of nominalization: turning things that are not normally
nouns into nouns, with consequences for other parts of sentences.
Although heavily nominalized language can sound pretentious and may make the meaning
obscure, the real motivation for this grammatical process is a functional one: by
nominalizing, we are able to do things with the text that we cannot do in unnominalized text.
Nominalization has two main textual advantages: rhetorical organization and increased
lexical density.
Understanding the relationship between logical and clause.
for further information, you may learn this following books;
Gerot, L, and Peter W. (1994). Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Australia: Gerd Stabler.
Topic 13
Clause Complex and Cohesive Devices
Conjunction and reference are within the grammatical zone, but lexical cohesion operates
within lexical zone. It is achieved through the choice of lexical item.
Gerot, L, and Peter W. (1994). Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Australia: Gerd Stabler.
Topic 14
Descriptive text, Report, Procedure, Explanation, Recount, Narrative, News
items, Discussion, Exposition, and Review.
Topic 15
Final-test