Professional Documents
Culture Documents
and Analysis
Chapter 2
The pattern of
decisions made in
managing processes
so that they will
achieve their
competitive priorities
Figure 2.1
Table 2.1
• Customization
– Service level ranging from highly customized to standardized
• Process Divergence
– The extent to which the process is highly customized with
considerable latitude as to how its tasks are performed
• Flow
– How the work progresses through the sequence of steps in a process
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.3
• Make-to-Order
• Assemble-to-Order
– Postponement
– Mass Customization
• Make-to-Stock
– Mass Production
• Customer Involvement
• Resource Flexibility
• Capital Intensity
• Equipment
– General-purpose
– Special-purpose
Figure 2.4
• Economies of Scope
Figure 2.5
– Information technology
– Clean-slate philosophy
– Process analysis
The documentation
and detailed
understanding of how
work is performed and
how is can be
redesigned
Figure 2.6
• Flowcharts
• Process Charts
Figure 2.7
Average Normal
Obs 1 Obs 2 Obs 3 Obs 4 RF
(min) Time
Figure 2.8
Figure 2.9
• Checklists
• Histograms and Bar Charts
• Pareto Charts
• Scatter Diagrams
• Cause-and-Effect Diagrams (Fishbone)
• Graphs
The manager surveyed his customers over several weeks and collected
the following data:
Complaint Frequency
Discourteous server 12
Slow service 42
Cold dinner 5
Cramped table 20
Atmosphere 10
35 –
30 –
25 –
20 –
10 –
5–
0–
Discourteous Slow Cold Cramped Atmosphere
server service dinner tables
Failure Name
Bar Chart
Figure 2.11
45 – – 100.0%
40 –
– 80.0%
Percent of Total
35 –
30 – – 60.0%
Failures
25 –
20 – – 40.0%
10 –
– 20.0%
5–
0– – 0.0%
Failure Name
Figure 2.12 Pareto Chart
Copyright ©2016 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-41
Example 2.3
A process improvement team is working to improve
the production output at the Johnson
Manufacturing plant’s Header Cell that
manufactures a key component, headers, used in
commercial air conditioners.
Figure 2.13
Figure 2.14
Figure 2.14
• Benchmarking
• Implementing
Continued on
Figure 2.16 Next Slide
Copyright ©2016 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-54
Solved Problem 1
Figure 2.16
6
Defective seals represent × 100% = 10% of defects;
60
the cumulative percentage is
10% + 90% = 100.00%
28 – – 70
Frequency of Defects
24 – – 60
48%
20 – – 50
16 – – 40
12 – – 30
8– – 20
4– – 10
0– –0
Figure 2.18 Label Fill Mix Seal