This document provides an overview of different costing methods for overhead costs, including absorption costing, marginal costing, and activity-based costing (ABC). It discusses the nature of overheads, how overhead costs are allocated and absorbed using predetermined overhead rates under absorption costing, the treatment of fixed and variable costs under marginal costing, and the use of cost drivers to assign overhead costs under ABC. The document also compares absorption costing and marginal costing, noting arguments for and against each method.
This document provides an overview of different costing methods for overhead costs, including absorption costing, marginal costing, and activity-based costing (ABC). It discusses the nature of overheads, how overhead costs are allocated and absorbed using predetermined overhead rates under absorption costing, the treatment of fixed and variable costs under marginal costing, and the use of cost drivers to assign overhead costs under ABC. The document also compares absorption costing and marginal costing, noting arguments for and against each method.
This document provides an overview of different costing methods for overhead costs, including absorption costing, marginal costing, and activity-based costing (ABC). It discusses the nature of overheads, how overhead costs are allocated and absorbed using predetermined overhead rates under absorption costing, the treatment of fixed and variable costs under marginal costing, and the use of cost drivers to assign overhead costs under ABC. The document also compares absorption costing and marginal costing, noting arguments for and against each method.
Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 1
CONTENTS • Nature of overheads • Absorption costing • Marginal costing • Activity Based Costing (ABC)
Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 2
NATURE OF OVERHEADS • Overheads are all the indirect costs. The sum of the indirect costs what is what is called overheads. Overheads consist of: – Indirect materials – Indirect labour – Indirect expenses • The overheads will fall in any one of the following categories: – Production overheads – Administration overheads – Selling and distribution overheads
Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 3
ABSORPTION COSTING • This is a method of cost accumulation under which all the costs of production are charged to the units of products. • The main reason is to ensure that the costs are charged to the products on a fair basis. Each product is charged with a share of the organisation’s total production overheads.
Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 4
ABSORPTION COSTING • The other reasons why it is important to use absorption costing are as follows: – Inventory valuation – Pricing decisions – Profit measurement – Compliance with IAS2 - Inventory
Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 5
ABSORPTION COSTING • The stages of dealing with production overheads under absorption costing is as follows: – Allocation – Apportionment – Service cost centre reapportionment – Calculation of predetermined overhead absorption rates – Absorption of production overheads into products
Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 6
OVERHEAD ABSORPTION RATES • These are the rates that are used to charge production overheads to units of products. • Predetermined overhead absorption rates are used • The predetermined overhead absorption rates should be departmental overhead absorption rates
Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 7
OVERHEAD ABSORPTION RATES • Predetermined OARs (based on budgeted figures) are used for the following reasons: – Many overheads are not known until the end of a period and to wait until then to calculate overhead absorption rates would produce unacceptable delays in invoicing, pricing, stock valuations and so on. – Because of random fluctuations in overheads from, for example, month to month, absorption rates calculated on a monthly basis would vary, which would produce misleading information for costing purposes and would be administratively and clerically inconvenient to deal with.
Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 8
OVERHEAD ABSORPTION RATES • Departmental overhead absorption rates rather than blanket overhead absorption rates should be used so as to reflect the different times different products spend in production cost centres and, consequently, the different resources put into making them. • The use of blanket (plant wide) overhead absorption rates cannot reflect these differences.
Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 9
OVERHEAD ABSORPTION RATES • Overhead absorption rates (OAR) are therefore calculated using the formula: OAR = Budgeted overheads Budgeted activity • Budgeted activity upon which the calculation may be based may be any suitable activity.
Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 10
OVERHEAD ABSORPTION RATES • Commonly used bases of absorption are as follows. – Units basis (if all units are identical) – Direct labour hour basis (appropriate for a labour intensive production cost centre) – Machine hour basis (appropriate for a machine intensive production cost centre) – Percentage of prime cost (appropriate if prime cost forms a greater proportion of total cost) – Percentage of direct materials cost – Percentage of direct labour cost
Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 11
OVER/ UNDER ABSORPTION • The OAR is predetermined from budget estimates of overhead cost and the expected volume of activity. It is quite likely that one of the following will occur. – Actual overheads are different from budgeted overheads – Actual activity level is different from budgeted activity level – Both actual overheads and actual activity level are different from the budgeted overheads and budgeted activity level. Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 12 OVER/ UNDER ABSORPTION • There may be discrepancy (under/over absorption of overheads) between actual overheads incurred and overheads absorbed using the predetermined OAR. • This discrepancy is an adjustment in the statement of profit or loss at the end of the period. – Over absorption means that the overheads charged to the cost of production are greater than the overheads incurred. – Under absorption means that insufficient overheads have been included in the cost of production. Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 13 MARGINAL COSTING • This is a method of cost accumulation under which only the variable production costs are charged to the units of product. • The fixed costs are treated as period costs and charged to the profit and loss account of the period in which they are incurred.
Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 14
MARGINAL COSTING • Cost and profit concepts in marginal costing are: – Marginal cost is the cost of one unit of a product/service which would be avoided if that unit were not produced / provided. This is the same as the variable cost. Therefore, the marginal cost in this context is the variable cost. – Contribution is the amount by which sales revenue exceeds the total variable (marginal) costs. In marginal costing, profitability of products or services is generally measured using the contribution. A product that earns a contribution is said to be more profitable than that which earns no contribution at all. The level of fixed costs is the same for all activity levels. As such, the higher the contribution, the higher the profit is expected to be.
Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 15
MARGINAL COSTING • The principles of marginal costing are: – Only variable costs are charged as cost of sales – Closing stocks are valued at marginal (variable) production cost – Fixed costs are treated as period costs, are deducted from profit and hence are charged in full against profit of the period in which they are incurred. – If the volume of sales rises/falls by one item, profit will rise /fall by the contribution earned from the item. – Contribution per unit is constant at all levels of output and sales (whereas profit per unit varies)
Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 16
MARGINAL COSTING COMPARED WITH ABSORPTION COSTING • Arguments in favour of marginal costing and therefore against absorption costing are: – Absorption costing information is irrelevant when making short-run decisions. – It is simple to operate. – There are no arbitrary fixed cost apportionments. – Fixed costs in a period will be the same regardless of the level of output and so it makes sense to charge them in full as a cost of the period. – It is realistic to value closing stock items at the (directly attributable) cost to produce an extra unit. – Under/over absorption is avoided. Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 17 MARGINAL COSTING COMPARED WITH ABSORPTION COSTING • Arguments in favour of absorption costing and therefore against marginal costing are: – Fixed production costs are incurred in order to make output and so it is only ‘fair’ to change output with a share of these costs. – Closing inventory will be valued in accordance with IAS 2. – Appraising products in terms of contribution gives no indication of whether fixed costs are being covered. – Where stock building is necessary fixed overheads should be included in stock valuation. If this is not the case, then a series of losses will be reported in earlier years.
Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 18
ACTIVITY BASED COSTING (ABC) • This is a method of cost accumulation under which overheads are charged to products using the cost drivers. Arbitrary bases of absorption of overheads are not used under activity costing. • ABC has been developed to overcome the inability of absorption costing to deal with features of the modern manufacturing environment. • The developments in industry and commerce have changed the nature of operations from being highly labour intensive to machine intensive.
Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 19
FEATURES OF THE MODERN MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT • Features of a modern manufacturing environment are: – An increase in the cost of service support functions which are unaffected by changes in production volume, varying instead with the range and complexity of production. – An increase in overheads as proportion of total costs.
Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 20
INADEQUACIES OF ABSORPTION COSTING • Implies all overheads are related primarily to production volume. • Developed at a time when organisations produced only a narrow range of products and when overheads were only a small fraction of total costs. • Developed at a time when organisations produced only a narrow range of products and when overheads were only a small fraction of total costs. • Tends to allocate too great proportion of overheads to high volume products (which cause relatively little diversity) and too small a proportion of overheads to low volume products (which cause greater diversity and therefore use more support services).
Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 21
PRINCIPLES OF ABC • The major ideas behind ABC are as follows. – Activities cause costs. Activities include ordering, materials handling, machining, assembly, production scheduling and despatching. – Producing products creates demand for the activities. – Costs are assigned to a product on the basis of the product's consumption of the activities. • Activity based costing (ABC) involves the identification of the factors which cause the costs of an organisation's major activities. • Support overheads are charged to products on the basis of their usage of the factor causing the overheads.
Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 22
COST DRIVERS • In order to operate an activity based costing system, cost drivers should be identified. • The CIMA’s management Accounting Official terminology defines a cost driver as ‘any factor which causes a change in the cost of an activity e.g., the quality of parts received by an activity is a determining factor in the work required by that activity and therefore affects the resources required. • An activity may have multiple cost drivers associated with it. A cost driver may also be defined as an activity or transaction that is a significant determinant of a cost.
Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 23
COST DRIVERS • Two types of cost drivers are: – Volume based cost drivers – Transaction based cost drivers • Volume based cost drivers are things such as direct labour hours and machine hours. These cost drivers are the primary determinants of conventionally based variable costs. • Transaction based cost drivers include such things as number of production runs, purchase requisitions issues, invoices processed and so on. These are determinants of cost that do not vary in the short run with the level of output but tend to vary in the longer term as the increasing complex nature of the production process places additional burdens on support departments.
Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 24
COST DRIVERS • In the development of a set of cost drivers it may be useful to use cooper’s classifications of the activities that drive expenses at the product level. These are: – Unit level activities – Batch related activities – Product sustaining activities
Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 25
COST DRIVERS • Unit level activities – These take place every time a unit of the product is made. They vary in direct proportion with the output of the product. • Batch related activities – These are activities that take place every time a batch is produced but do not vary with the size of the batch. • Product sustaining activities – These are performed to enable a product to be produced and sold. They are independent of the volume of output and the number of production runs. – The costs associated with these product sustaining activities tend to vary with the number of products. They can be traced to product cost using cost drivers.
Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 26
COST POOLS • Cost drivers define cost pools. However the problem is that many categories of overheads may be influenced by more than one activity. • The cost pool can therefore be defined with reference to the dominant activity. • The proponents of Activity Based Costing have stated its uses as to include the following: – Presentation of information for planning, – Presentation of information for controlling and – Presentation of information for decision making. Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 27 ADVANTAGES OF ABC • ABC recognizes the fact that manufacturing processes are now complex. Cost drivers are used to charge costs to products fairly, • ABC is concerned with all overhead costs including non-manufacturing costs, • ABC enables companies to be able to asses product profitability realistically,
Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 28
ADVANTAGES OF ABC • ABC can be of assistance in cost reduction campaigns, • ABC can be used in conjunction with customer profitability analysis to determine more accurately the profit earned for serving particular customers, • ABC can also be applied in service businesses as these businesses have characteristics which are similar to those of modern manufacturing businesses. Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 29 DISADVANTAGES OF ABC • The cost of obtaining and interpreting the information may be considerable and as such, ABC should only be introduced if it would lead to additional management information for planning and controlling. • Some measure of arbitrary cost apportionment may still be required at the cost pooling stage for certain items. • There will have to be a tradeoff between accuracy, the number of cost drivers and complexity. • ABC tends to burden low volume products with a punitive level of overheads and hence threatens opportunities for successful innovation.
Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 30
DISADVANTAGES OF ABC • The fundamental assumption that activities cause costs does not appear to be true as it can be argued that there may not be a clear cause of cost since so many factors, not only activity, cause costs. • A single cost driver may not explain fully the cost behaviour of all the costs in its associated pool. • It can only be used in where cost drivers can be quantified. There is no scope for dealing with qualitative cost drivers. Tuesday, 26 March, 2019 AFIN210 ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS 31