Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MEMORANDUM
Introduction:
On June 3rd, 2020, the National City Police Department no longer authorized the
use of the carotid restraint as a less-lethal option. This decision came about as a response
to the widespread attention of the “chokehold” from incidents that resulted in the death of
a person at the hands of the police. The aftermath of incidents involving George Floyd
and Eric Garner resulted in civil rights activists to call for use of force reform. Campaign
Zero suggested eight reforms in their agenda, one being to “Ban chokeholds,
strangleholds (i.e., carotid restraints).” Included in their agenda was ANY police use of
force tactics that restrict oxygen or blood flow to the head or neck.1
increasingly scrutinized. Even in situations where a person has other contributing factors,
such as drugs, or previous medical conditions, police officers are given a portion of
The current policy on the carotid restraint has yet to be published by the
1
Limit Use of Force. Retrieved October 12, 2020, from https://www.joincampaignzero.org/force
2
Martinelli, R. (2014, January 30). Reconsidering Carotid Control. Retrieved October 13, 2020, from
https://www.policemag.com/341089/reconsidering-carotid-control
use of force tactics to prevent restriction of oxygen and blood flow to a person’s brain.
medical attention when a person reports difficulty breathing. In this report, I will provide
evidence to support this supplementation of the carotid restraint policy. These changes
will protect individual officers and the department from ramifications while further
Public Opinion:
Campaign Zero has had a significant influence on police reform, with many
Force Policy, which lists the following: “Law enforcement officers shall not use
compressions, or any other tactics that restrict oxygen or blood flow to the head or
neck.”3
The city of New York passed a bill that “establishes a misdemeanor for
compressing the windpipe or the carotid arteries on each side of the neck, or sitting,
kneeling, or standing on the chest or back in a manner that compresses the diaphragm, in
3
Model Use of Force Policy. Campaign Zero. Retrieved October 12, 2020, from
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/55ad38b1e4b0185f0285195f/t/5deffeb7e827c13873eaf07c/15760094
00070/Campaign+Zero+Model+Use+of+Force+Policy.pdf
4
Chapman, B., Honan, K., & Avila, J. (2020, June 18). New York City to Ban Police Restraints That
Choke People. Retrieved October 13, 2020, from https://www.wsj.com/articles/new-york-city-to-ban-
police-restraints-that-choke-people-11592519365
“I can’t breathe” are three words that have been synonymous with unlawful use of
force by police. In June 2020, the New York Times produced an article titled, “Three
Words. 70 Cases. The Tragic History of ‘I Can’t Breathe.’” This article details several
cases where officers restrained detainees while they verbalized they could not breathe.
“Most frequently, officers pushed [detainees] face down on the ground and held them
Cases involving the inability to breathe are not just limited to the use of the
carotid restraint. Many involve the use of spit hoods or by being pinned down.
use of force log. Use of force logs indicates three separate tactics that may involve a
hands-on approach. These three tactics are Lateral Vascular Neck Restraint (Carotid
Restraint), Control Hold, and Arrest and Control Tactic. It has been practiced that if a
subject loses consciousness during the application of a carotid restraint, then it would be
documented as such. Any unsuccessful attempt at a carotid restraint may likely have
Since January 2016, the carotid restraint was used once, a control hold was never
used, and an arrest and control tactic was used 112 times. In the single incident where the
carotid restraint was used, the suspect was transported to the hospital for an evaluation
where they declined medical treatment. According to the log, none of these incidents
5
Baker, M., Valentino-devries, J., Fernandez, M., & Laforgia, M. (2020, June 29). Three Words. 70 Cases.
The Tragic History of 'I Can't Breathe.' Retrieved October 13, 2020, from
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/06/28/us/i-cant-breathe-police-arrest.html
6
Cekander, L. National City Police Department Crime Analyst. Use of Force Log (Rep.).
In the 2018 National City incident, Earl McNeil died of brain damage caused by
respiratory arrest. While still under review, several factors could have contributed to his
death, including spit socks over his mouth and the WRAP device, which affected his
breathing.7 Despite evidence suggesting otherwise, the medical examiner deemed the in-
custody death a homicide.8 This incident resulted in mass protests with eight officers
investigation.
Important language in our Policy and Procedures manual already considers the
safety of a detainee.
Spit hoods should not be used in situations where the restrained person is bleeding
profusely from the area around the mouth or nose, or if there are indications that the
person has a medical condition, such as difficulty breathing or vomiting. In such cases,
Unless arrested, the use of restraints on detainees should continue only for as long
as is reasonably necessary to ensure the safety of officers and others. When deciding
whether to remove restraints from a detainee, officers should continuously weigh the
safety interests at hand against the continuing intrusion upon the detainee.
7
Moran, G. (2019, October 04). Review board investigation concludes deputy violated policy in Earl
McNeil death. Retrieved October 13, 2020, from
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/courts/story/2019-10-04/review-board-concludes-deputy-
violated-policy-in-earl-mcneil-death
8
Racino, B. (2018, December 15). New details emerge in Earl McNeil's death following arrest by NCPD.
Retrieved October 13, 2020, from https://inewsource.org/2018/09/20/earl-mcneil-shirt-national-city-death/
9
National City Police Department Policy Manual
Other Agency Practices:
All San Diego County agencies agreed to ban the Carotid Restraint in May of
2020. This decision to ban this tactic was forced upon our department because there
would no longer be training available to certify its use. This is an example of submission
Conclusion:
I believe this to be a small consideration that will help prevent death by those
breathing complaints should be left to medical professionals. This policy addition will
Respectfully,