Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rationale
There is an assumption that students are all capable of learning via the same methods as well as at the same pace (Masters, 2013), and while the concept of
learning styles has been disproven, it has been found that factors such as lagging skills, a lack of computer literacy and/ or access and social disconnect may
have significant impacts on learning, particularly students who fall into the low socio-economic status (low SES) category. Garcia and Weiss (2017) found
that there was a large distinction in performance gaps when comparing students belonging to different socio-economic statuses and also noticed that this
trend tended to act as a significant indicator of future academic success. This unit of work was constructed with a low SES public school context in mind and
for classrooms with students of mixed ability. Students are primarily of a western, english speaking background, with an evenly mixed gender population.
Classes are not graded and each class has a diverse range of ability.
A guided inquiry based approach was a prominent technique used throughout this unit of work so as to cater to a curiosity driven classroom. Banerjee
(2016) posited that students from disadvantaged backgrounds benefit from the encouragement of positive self-perceptions. This unit of work seeks to
promote this by engaging in a highly collaborative lesson activities; such as the initial ‘Think pair share roleplay: A scientific conference’. The Think pair share
approach allows students an independent start which fosters individual thought, leading into the collaborative discussion as a pair before presenting it
(Azlina, 2010). In addition to this, there are several more team based tasks where social connection between peers may be fostered; such as the game
show, additional think pair share activities and a second-hand investigation to name a few. Inquiry based learning is still in relatively early stages of
implementation and hasn’t demonstrated as significant an impact on retention as direct instruction, particularly with those who are of low SES bracket,
hence why a guided inquiry based approach has been used to facilitate learning for those who may need extra guidance.
Research has shown that students who do fit into the low SES demographic can most effectively be engaged by hands on activities as well as technology
based activities. In this unit of work, technology has been integrated in research tasks as well as for purposes of developing the ICT skills of students. The
Weebly tutorial worksheet gives students step by step instructions (With visual aides) on how they may develop their own weebly site. By doing this, the
educator grants the students ownership of a digitally produced artefact, again, boosting the student’s self confidence ( Luu, & Freeman, 2011). This unit of
work also accounts for the fact that one implication of being a low SES student at a low SES school is that students may not necessarily have their own
devices which can be used when required in digital first-hand investigations, thus in the resources column it has been accounted for that students may need
to borrow a laptop from the school to use in order to complete the activities.
The very first task in this unit of work is a diagnostic assessment in the form of a google form. This format was chosen as it allowed not only for multiple
choice but for open questions, which can be a stronger indicator of student retention of information ( Melovitz Vasan, DeFouw, Holland, & Vasan, 2018).
The google form was revisited at the end of the content statement for the purpose of being a progressive indicator on what students understood.
Formative assessment is used throughout the unit of work so that the educator is able to gauge whether or not the class is keeping up with the content or if
they need to allow extra time for the exploration of concepts.
Overall, the intention for this unit of work was to make it as engaging as possible by providing a range of activities, many of which were collaboratively
group based, developing and using ICT in a variety of different ways. Guided-inquiry based learning was used as a pedagogical approach to facilitate an
advanced understanding for low SES learners.
Chemical World | Stage 5 | CW2
Science Year 7-10 Syllabus Stage: 5 Number of Weeks: 4-6
Context
This is the second Chemical World module and is designed for a low socioeconomic group of year 9 students.
Content focus
The Chemical World strand is concerned with understanding the composition and behaviour of
matter. The key concepts developed in this strand are that the chemical and physical properties of
substances are determined by their structure on an atomic scale and that substances change and
new substances are produced in chemical reactions by rearranging atoms through atomic interactions
Syllabus Outcome:
A student:
› explains how models, theories and laws about matter have been refined as new scientific evidence becomes available SC5-16CW
A student:
Duration K&U Content Descriptor WS Outcome Teaching, learning and assessment Extensions/ Resources
Descriptor Adjustments
a) Diagnostic test: Google form Students will all perform the School computers and/ or
Students: test using school computers laptops.
Identify the atom as the Students demonstrate the level of knowledge or laptops in class time so
smallest unit of an element and understanding that has been retained that no students are excluded Google form - Resource 3
and that it can be from CW1, the last module completed, by from having access to the
represented by a symbol completing a google form test. google form.
~~~
A student: Paper and Scissors
› develops questions or
hypotheses to be Teacher guided mini-experiment: How small
investigated scientifically can a piece of paper be reduced to?
SC5-4WS
Student each tear a piece of paper in half.
Students discuss whether or not it can
continue to be split in half. The tearing of the
paper and the discussion repeats until it is
3 hours A student: physically impossible. Teacher repeats the
› presents science ideas question, (to which the students should
and evidence for a respond negatively), before cutting the paper
particular purpose and to with scissors. Students discuss the ~~~
a specific audience, using independent variable that changed (the
appropriate scientific Students should be assigned Palm cards
instrument used to separate the paper) which
language, conventions to pairs ensuring a matching Student workbooks and
and representations SC5- allowed for the paper to be further halved. of mixed abilities. stationary
9WS
A student:
› applies scientific
understanding and Think Pair Share roleplay: A scientific
critical thinking skills to conference
suggest possible
solutions to identified With the context that students are now all
problems SC5-8WS expert scientists, students independently
hypothesize whether or not they think there is
a limit to the amount of times the paper can be
reduced (as well as why/ how or why not) and ~~~
record this response in their books. In pairs,
students confer with their peers and discuss Projector or smart board
their thoughts and record additional/ altered
viewpoints beneath their initial thoughts. CrashCourse YouTube
Students take turns to present their pair’s Video:
https://www.youtube.co
thoughts to the rest of the class in a
m/watch?
conference style format. Students peer v=FSyAehMdpyI
evaluate thoughts that have been shared and
come to a consensus once all thoughts have Work booklets
been shared.
b) A student: Second-hand investigation: Developing an Differentiation: Students with School computers and/or
Students: elemental profile stronger ICT skills are in laptops
Distinguish between the › processes, analyses and charge of putting together the
atoms of some common evaluates data from first- Students work in groups of 3 to collaboratively ptable.com
powerpoint while other
elements by comparing hand investigations and research and construct a powerpoint students can perform the
information about the secondary sources to presentation on an element of their choice. https://www.sigmaaldric
numbers of protons, develop evidence-based research using the periodic h.com/technical-
3 hours neutrons and electrons arguments and Powerpoint should include information such table as well as reputable documents/articles/biolo
conclusions SC5-7WS as: online resources (E.g. gy/periodic-table-of-
ptable.com, Sigma-Aldrich elements-names.html
- Atomic structure: including labelled and Chem4Kids.com, in
http://www.chem4kids.c
Protons, Neutrons and Electrons, and descending order of
om/files/elem_intro.html
how many of each are present. difficulty).
- Atomic number
- If the element can bond with any other Printed weebly tutorial -
elements (Extension; What type of Resource 1
bond is formed)
Direct instruction
Worksheet activity
Students complete a worksheet on the content
covered this lesson and the results are
discussed as a class, if time permits.
Simulation activity
Reflection activity
Students: > Presents science ideas Students individually think about why the
and evidence for a periodic table is set up the way it is and come
Relate the properties of particular purpose and to up with theories as to why it is set out the way
some common elements to a specific audience, using it is. After a couple of minutes they are to
their position in the appropriate scientific
share their thoughts with the person next to
Periodic Table language, conventions
and representations SC5- them. Teacher facilitates a class discussion
9WS where students are to determine why the
3 Hours periodic table is laid out the way it is. (students
> Applies scientific are to draw on knowledge from the previous
understanding and content point and hopefully come up with
critical thinking skills to ideas for the upcoming content point) Scaffolding for students who
suggest possible cannot produce a scientific
solutions to identified report on their own
problems SC5-8WS
Students that are completing
> Processes, analyses and Practical observations of elements: the task easily are to come up
evaluates data from first- with ways in which this
hand investigations and Students develop a scientific report on viewing experiment could better
secondary sources to certain elements in a safe way. The report is to improve their learning and
develop evidence-based include understanding of different
arguments and Aim: element types Large piece of butcher’s
conclusions SC5-7WS paper
Equipment:
> Undertakes first-hand
investigations to collect Risk assessment:
valid and reliable data
and information, Methods:
individually and
collaboratively SC5-6WS Results/ observations:
Reflection activity
Students: > Produces a plan to Students will have a piece of paper, with an
investigate identified elemental symbol written on it, placed on their
Predict, using the Periodic questions, hypotheses or desk. Students have 2 minutes to write as
Table, the properties of problems, individually much information they can recall about the
some common elements and collaboratively SC5-
element on the piece of paper. Afterwards, if
5WS
they did not do so, they are to draw their
2 Hours > Undertakes first-hand element on their piece of paper. Finally,
investigations to collect students are to start creating their large scale
valid and reliable data periodic table by placing their pieces of paper
and information, in order of atomic number on the white board.
individually and Teams can be constructed
collaboratively SC5-6WS on a mixed ability
basis so that
> Processes, analyses and Game show unfairness is avoided.
evaluates data from first-
hand investigations and Students are split into teams (decided by the
secondary sources to teacher). Each team has a sound they must use
develop evidence-based to answer a question. Each question answered
arguments and
correctly will earn that team a point. The team
conclusions SC5-7WS
with the most points at the end of the game
> Applies scientific show wins. Questions in the quiz include:
understanding and
- Chemical symbols
critical thinking skills to
suggest possible - Periodic table sections
solutions to identified
problems SC5-8WS - Properties of elements
Research task
Banerjee, P. A. (2016). A systematic review of factors linked to poor academic performance of disadvantaged students in science and maths in schools.
Cogent Education, 3(1), 1178441.
García, E. & Weiss, E. (2017) Education inequalities at the school starting gate. Retrieved from https://www.epi.org/publication/education-inequalities-at-
the-school-starting-gate/#epi-toc-1
Luu, K., & Freeman, J. G. (2011). An analysis of the relationship between information and communication technology (ICT) and scientific literacy in Canada
and Australia. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1072-1082.
Masters, G. (2014). Addressing the learning needs of all students. Retrieved from https://rd.acer.org/article/addressing-the-learning-needs-of-all-students
Melovitz Vasan, C. A., DeFouw, D. O., Holland, B. K., & Vasan, N. S. (2018). Analysis of testing with multiple choice versus open ‐ended questions: Outcome ‐
based observations in an anatomy course. Anatomical sciences education, 11(3), 254-261.