Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Edited by
Nancy A. Naples
University of Connecticut
A Routledge Series
Linking Activism
Ecology, Social Justice, and Education
for Social Change
Morgan Gardner
Unequal Partnerships
Beyond the Rhetoric of
Philanthropic Collaboration
Ira Silver
Routledge
New York & London
HQ1058.5.C16L44 2006
306.88'308694209596091734--dc22 2005029590
List of Tables ix
Acknowledgments xi
Preface xiii
Chapter One
Third World Widows’ Economic Vulnerability 1
Chapter Two
Cambodian Social and Historical Context 23
Chapter Three
“Rice Plus” and Family Solidarity 35
Chapter Four
Widows’ Access to Productive Resources 79
Chapter Five
Widows Surviving (Barely): Subordination and Resistance 115
Tables 129
Appendix A 131
Appendix B 139
vii
Notes 143
Bibliography 151
Index 155
ix
A study involving travel to a distant and unfamiliar land does not happen
without a great deal of social support. I am grateful for the intellectual
guidance of Professor Susan Eckstein who first taught me about women
in the developing world and encouraged me to look deeper and broader in
my understanding of their circumstances. Professor John Stone was a pillar
of encouragement with his ever-positive attitude of possibility and accom-
plishment. Professor Nancy Naples’ thoughtful comments on the manu-
script helped me sharpen my thinking about gender inequality. I would like
to thank the widows who took time from their arduous agricultural work
to open their lives and homes to me. Their quiet, dignified cooperation was
essential to the success of the project. My interpreters, Keang Ly, Samy Sok,
and Srey Sraspanha, were invaluable guides into the ways of motos, Cam-
bodian food, and village life. James Chhel Bun and Samon Phong linked
me to their village and their helpful relatives, especially my hosts the Sok
family. Numerous other Cambodians welcomed me and went out of their
way to assist me in adapting to their country. St. Luke’s Episcopal Church
in Fall River, Massachusetts and the Episcopal Diocese of Massachusetts
were most generous in providing time and funding for the journey. Finally, I
would like to express my deep gratitude for the encouragement of my fam-
ily, especially my late father, Dr. Richard D. Lee. His enthusiasm, example,
and support were essential to the completion of the project. Thanks go also
to my mother, Jeanne Davis Lee, and my dear sons, Eugene and Milton
D’Andrea. I am grateful for their gentle and constant encouragement dur-
ing my Cambodian adventure and in all my academic endeavors.
xi
xiii
The study concludes that in the aftermath of war, some Third World
rural widows manage to survive while others only barely survive. Age, edu-
cation, health, land ownership and number of children make the difference.
Cambodia’s gender expectations both subordinated and empowered Cam-
bodian widows. The patriarchal dividing wall between men and women
was only made of thatch and could be breached when necessity demanded.
Women resisted patriarchal arrangements in marriage and created women’s
spaces dominated by women’s values prioritizing children. Yet the devalua-
tion of women’s labor and the losses of war handicapped widows and their
children, consigning them to a deeper poverty than their fellow villagers.
A thorough understanding of widows in Cambodian society must look to
cultural explanations of women’s worth.
This study is part of the feminist project of making women’s lives vis-
ible, and in particular, making Third World rural women’s lives visible. Fem-
inist scholarship has engaged in a broad effort to describe women’s lives, so
often left out of the historical record. Women come in many colors and live
in a great diversity of social and economic situations. An important part of
the feminist project is to describe this broad diversity of female humanity
in both rural and urban areas, in all regions of the world, and across lines
of class and ethnicity. Throughout these diverse settings, women experience
similar subordination by men in their social group. Feminist scholarship aims
to describe and understand this widespread subordination of women and its
institutionalization in the social structures of patriarchy (Sachs 1996).
Patriarchy has been defined as “the social organization of the family,
the community and the state in such a way that male power is reinforced
and perpetuated” (Bourque and Warren 1981:57). Deniz Kandiyoti (1988)
modified the universal notion of patriarchy by noting that it must be seen
in its cultural context. Patriarchy is not the same everywhere; it has cultural
and local variations and presents women with distinct “rules of the game”
(p. 274). Individual women live their lives within a particular cultural con-
text and choose their behavior according to their perception of their maxi-
mum security and life chances. Kandiyoti refers to these arrangements as
“patriarchal bargains” (p. 275). She saw a continuum of patriarchal bar-
gains between “less corporate forms of householding, involving the relative
autonomy of mother-child units,” as in Sub-Saharan Africa, to “more cor-
porate male-headed entities” (p. 275) in areas labeled the “patriarchal belt”
(Caldwell 1978) such as southern Asia and the Middle East. Sylvia Chant
(1997) downplayed the concept of patriarchy due to its lack of attention to
cultural diversity. She preferred to speak of “structural concepts of gender
inequality,” an idea which acknowledges that “patriarchal relations take
different forms and have different impacts in different times and places” (p.
263). Chant placed this approach to patriarchy within post-modern femi-
nist theorizing which emphasizes differences among women’s experiences
rather than universal generalizations (p. 34).
In the face of persistent gender inequality, women do not submit pas-
sively to male control. In a great variety of ways, women resist patriar-
chal domination (Momsen 1993). Part of the feminist project is to make
women’s resistance visible. When economic alternatives are available, some
women “opt out of patriarchal families” (Tinker 1990:11). Rural women
are often reluctant to directly oppose male authority and resist subordina-
tion in personal and practical ways (Sachs 1996:9). Rural widows focus
narrowly on feeding themselves and their children and deal as best they can
with structured inequality, the inevitable social and economic context for
their lives. Their relationship to their family is critical in meeting the dif-
ficulties of widowhood.
must support not only themselves but also their dependent children. When
the children are very small, widows must be concerned with child care as
well. Because of the financial stresses of young female-headed families,
young widows may look to remarriage as a way to increase their financial
resources.
1996). The ownership of a crop does not depend on who labors to grow it
but on who controls its management and disposition. Men’s crops tend to
be grain or tree non-food crops grown for the market or for export, such
as wheat, sugar, coffee, or tobacco. Women are likely to raise food crops,
especially vegetable and root crops, for subsistence or local consumption.
The closer food is to the family table, the more likely women are to produce
it (Sachs 1996:72). The gendered division of labor can be seen in the care
of farm animals as well. Men raise valuable large animals used for meat or
draft power, while women care for less valuable small animals producing
milk, eggs, or wool that feed near the home on household waste (Sachs
1996:104).
In most cultures, some agricultural roles are barred to women. Susan
Bourque and Kay Warren (1981) found that in Peruvian agriculture, women
were not permitted to plow, clear fields, manage irrigation, or load burros.
Women had other spheres to themselves, such as storing the harvest and
selecting the seed potatoes. Women’s labor was not valued by the commu-
nity as highly as men’s, however. Women were not in demand for agricul-
tural work and could not earn cash income as laborers.
In cultures where some women are secluded in their homes, such as
India, women are strongly discouraged from working in agricultural fields.
Margaret Owen (1996) noted that even in lower castes in India where
women do engage in subsistence agriculture, only men may do the plowing.
In some parts of Africa, women are not supposed to graze cattle, drive trac-
tors, or do cash farming. Owen remarked that traditional female farming
tasks such as hoeing and reaping have been taken over by machines, mak-
ing it more difficult for women to find agricultural wage work. These diffi-
culties in pursuing agricultural work contribute to the migration of widows
to urban areas in search of employment.
It is not only in agricultural production but also in market trading that
work roles are divided along gender lines. Boserup ([1970] 1998) found
many women traders in Africa and Southeast Asia, unlike India and the
Middle East where men were the sellers and did all the shopping. Women
were half the trading force in Burma, Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, the Philip-
pines, and Vietnam. Women traders in these areas sold mostly agricultural
products which they had produced. In those parts of East Asia and South-
east Asia with a dominant Chinese population, such as Hong Kong, Taiwan,
and Singapore, however, a different pattern was evident, with women com-
prising only 10–15 percent of the trade labor force (Boserup [1970] 1998).
Often women find more economic opportunities in towns than in
rural areas, though their options are still limited by the gendered division
of labor. Bourque and Warren (1981) reported that women in the Andes
farm animals, so one cannot separate home activity from productive activity
(Benería and Sen 1981). As in most non-industrial economies, part of pro-
ductive work life takes place in the home. Women care for their children, a
key part of their reproductive labor, while they are engaged in productive
work. A revealing image of this mixture of productive and reproductive
tasks is the female farmer working her field with her infant strapped to her
back (Benería and Sen 1981).
Despite the uneasy fit of the productive/reproductive divide to the
rural subsistence setting, the distinction continues to be useful because of
the different cultural valuation of these two sorts of work. In rural econo-
mies as in urban ones, reproductive work is devalued and women do not
receive remuneration for their work (Moser 1989). Since so much of wom-
en’s time is spent in reproductive work, women have a lower income-earn-
ing capacity than people not involved in domestic work (Kantor 2002),
notably men. While women often step into productive roles, men very sel-
dom take on reproductive tasks (Sachs 1983) and consequently, men’s time
can be devoted to productive income-earning activity. The time that women
spend in unpaid reproductive work results in a weak economic position and
consequent dependency on men (Benería and Sen 1981). In development
planning, so important for poor people in Third World nations, women’s
reproductive work continues to be ignored and its value to the economy
discounted (Moser 1989). To facilitate women’s involvement in produc-
tive income-earning work, the demands of their reproductive work must be
taken into consideration in subsistence economies as in industrial ones.
Access to resources
After becoming widowed, women may lose not only their husband’s income
but access to their husband’s resources as well. In the developed world, the
lost economic resources may be a pension or social security account. In the
developing world, with its agricultural economy, the chief resource is land.
Land
Most land is owned by men, with women holding only 1 percent of the
world’s land in their own name (Seager 1997). Despite the fact that women
produce most of the world’s food globally, they own or control very little
of the land that they farm (Sachs 1996:45). Women’s land ownership var-
ies somewhat by region. In English-speaking areas of the Caribbean, for
instance, women have equal rights with men to land inheritance (Momsen
1993). Women’s access to land typically depends on their relationship to
men, usually their father or their husband.
When a woman becomes widowed, her access to land depends on cul-
tural traditions of land ownership by women. In patrilineal cultures, land is
inherited through the male line only and widows may have little access to
their late husband’s land. Even when women have rights to land inheritance,
such as under Koranic law or modern law, they often come under pressure
to turn their rights over to male relatives. Margaret Owen (1996) found that
traditional African mourning customs were sometimes used to prevent the
widow from gaining title to the husband’s land. For instance, the end of the
widow’s mourning period entailed a ritual cleansing done by her late hus-
band’s relatives. If the relatives refused to perform this ceremony, the widow
could not participate in normal village life. In order to win the coopera-
tion of the relatives for this ritual, the widow was constrained from pressing
them on issues of support and land inheritance. Sometimes relatives claimed
to be the rightful heir to the husband’s land and grabbed the property from
the widow, a practice referred to as “chasing off” (Owen 1996:59).
Women in some societies with matrilineal traditions of land inheritance
have an easier transition to widowhood. Women in some Native American
groups, for instance, control their own property, keep their assets separate
from their husband’s, and retain control over cash earned. Upon widow-
hood the women’s control over their financial resources continues and less-
ens the disruption of their husband’s death (Nelson 1988:28–30). In some
African matrilineal societies such as Malawi and Mozambique, however,
widows have to depend on the goodwill of their male relatives for access to
land (Owen 1996). Instead of the widow, it is the husband’s male relatives
on his mother’s side who benefit in traditional land inheritance laws.
While modern systems of law have given widows legal rights to land
inheritance in many countries, these modern systems often exist side by side
with traditional laws such as religious or customary law (Owen 1996). Tra-
ditional laws are sometimes unwritten or, even if written, are interpreted by
the village elders, typically men. Local courts often ignore inheritance reforms
passed at the national level and in some cases consider the widow herself as
part of her husband’s inheritance. One Kenyan lawyer remarked concerning
widows, “How can a chattel inherit a chattel?” (Owen 1996:51).
Even in places where widows have modern legal rights to land, wid-
ows are often under pressure from the husband’s family to turn the land
over to them. In India, where widows have land rights under the 1956
Hindu Succession Act, they must register their ownership of the land with
the local (male) authorities who are typically reluctant to be seen as giving
in to women (Owen 1996:57–58). Most Hindu widows in Martha Chen’s
study (2000) turned their husband’s land over to the husband’s relatives
to manage. Only one-quarter of the widows she interviewed had their son
manage their farm land and just one-fifth of the widows managed the land
themselves. She noted that Hindu women typically forfeit a share in their
father’s property in exchange for the promise of support in times of distress
from their parents and brothers. In her survey of Hindu widows, however,
she found that only 3.5 percent of the widows lived with their parents or
their brothers. Most of the widows Chen studied headed their own house-
hold while the rest lived in their son’s household or with another relative.
While widows looked to their brothers for support, twice as many widows
lived with their sister as with their brother.
Credit
In addition to the important economic resource of land, widows need
access to credit. Credit is important in the rural economy for purchasing
agricultural inputs. Widows may have access to their husband’s land but
struggle to find the cash to buy fertilizer needed to produce enough food
for their family (Green 1999:16–17). Widows also use credit to buy food
during the hunger gap before the following harvest. Credit is needed as
well to fund widows’ microenterprises to supplement their agricultural
production.
The Grameen Bank in Bangladesh provides a model for loaning
to poor women such as rural widows. Founded in 1983 by Mohammad
Yunus, the bank began by lending very small amounts of money to poor
people organized in groups (Wahid 1993a). The group members guaran-
teed one another’s loans and could only get new loans when previous loans
were paid on time.
The Grameen banking scheme appealed most to female borrowers
who had very poor access to the formal banking system. One investigator
noted that the “women seem to be more frugal and successful than men
in running small businesses” (Wahid 1993b:37). Women responded to the
credit opportunities offered by the Grameen Bank despite the fact that Ban-
gladesh is a traditional patriarchal culture and therefore men dominate
activities outside the home (Wahid 1993b). The women used the loans to
finance productive activities such as raising cows and poultry, processing
dry fish, and weaving fishing nets.
A 1993 study showed that the Grameen Bank was successful in reach-
ing the landless poor in Bangladesh, with two-thirds of bank borrowers
from this group (Rahman and Islam 1993). It generated new employment
for a third of its members, mostly female, who did not previously have an
occupation and expanded work for the underemployed. Over 90 percent of
Grameen Bank members reported that their income had increased (Rahman
and Islam 1993). Because the loans allowed rural farmers to buy improved
seed and grow more productive crops, the food supply increased. A study
of nutritional intake by the Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies
found that Grameen Bank members consumed more grams of food and
more calories per day than non-Bank members, including more vegetables,
milk, meat and sugar (Rahman, Wahid, and Islam 1993).
The United Nations has looked at microcredit as a means to allevi-
ate poverty in the Third World. The 1995 World Summit for Social Devel-
opment in Copenhagen underlined the importance of improving access
to credit for small rural or urban producers with special attention to the
needs of women and disadvantaged and vulnerable groups (United Nations
1998:3). A 1998 United Nations report noted the success of programs such
as the Grameen Bank and Banco Solidario in Brazil in lending to the poor
and creating a participatory process in which borrowers respect their obli-
Education
Access to education is another important economic resource for widows.
Education gives widows and their children occupational alternatives in the
modern economy of towns as well as rural professional service occupations
such as nursing and teaching. In the agricultural economy, education pro-
vides important skills in literacy and numeracy. A literate farmer can access
written materials about new agricultural products or available government
services. An understanding of basic math facilitates market work and finan-
cial transactions involving interest. Even more than the actual skills, educa-
tion confers confidence and status in the agricultural setting.
The education widows received as girls affects their capability in pro-
viding for themselves and their children. Widows with more arithmetic
skills are able to deal more confidently in the market whether buying or
selling and can figure their costs and profits on microenterprises. Those
who are able to read and write may have the option of a government job as
a teacher or other paid position.
In the rural economy, however, girls are less likely to obtain an edu-
cation than boys, and so rural widows often do not have an education to
help them support their children. Bourque and Warren (1981) found that
fathers in the Andes resisted educating their daughters, claiming that educa-
tion “will only allow them to write love letters to other men” (p. 131). By
contrast, the mothers “recognize the benefits to be garnered from their chil-
dren’s education” (p. 217). If limited resources demanded that only some
of a family’s children go to school, however, it was likely to be the male
children. The women “feel their sons have the greatest chance of success
and consequently will be most likely to provide support for the mother’s
old age” (p. 217).
Single mothers may be more likely to appreciate the benefits of educa-
tion for girls. In a cross-national study of female heads-of-household, Sylvia
Chant (1997) found that children of long-term single mothers attain com-
parable or greater education to their peers in male-headed households. She
noted that this preference for education, compared to male-headed house-
holds, was especially marked for the daughters of the female head. Chant
attributed this preference to the mothers’ concern about the daughters’
ability to survive on their own and the greater control of the female head
over household decisions and finances (p. 253). The sons of female heads of
household tended to acquire more education than the daughters, however,
due to sons’ greater ability to get well-paid part-time jobs that helped them
fund their secondary studies (p. 234).
The finances needed to provide their children with education are often
a stumbling block for widows. Education involves cash for fees, books and
uniforms as well as the opportunity costs of the loss of children’s labor.
Sometimes widows must make choices among their children. They may
choose to invest in their sons’ education rather than their daughters,’ plac-
ing their hopes for a better economic future on their sons’ labor potential.
The opportunity costs for girls’ education are particularly high, since girls
are useful assistants at home in child care and food preparation. Because
of the financial costs, the children of widows are at risk of not receiving an
education and perpetuating the poverty deepened by the father’s death.
Impact of war
The economic vulnerability of widows is exacerbated by war which
makes survival more difficult. Since war combatants are typically young
men, war widows are young widows, often with small children. The
consequences of war live on for decades after the formal peace treaty
in the person of the war widow and her children. Women widowed by
war have to pick up the pieces of their lives and their country and begin
This Study
Cambodia is a Southeast Asian country with a preponderance of widows
due to the recent wars fought on its territory. Nearly 11 percent of women
are widowed and 25 percent of households are headed by women (National
Institute of Statistics 1999:xii). The sex ratio is skewed towards women,
with 106 women to every 100 men in 2000 (United Nations 2000:19)3
or 93 men to every 100 women (National Institute of Statistics 1999:14).
Among middle aged women (40–44 years), the toll of the war years shows
in a sex ratio of only 67 men to every 100 women (National Institute of
Statistics 1999:14).
Cambodia’s widows have faced a lifetime of economic challenges
without the labor of their husband. Most widows live in rural areas, the
residence of 80 percent of the Cambodian population. They feed their
families in a nation that is so poor that it is often considered a “Fourth
World” country.
Because Cambodia shares Southeast Asian bilateral gender traditions,
widows in Cambodia can be expected to have important economic skills in
dealing with the challenges of widowhood. The combination of Cambodia’s
large number of widows, its poverty, and women’s traditional economic
strengths makes it a valuable place to study widows’ economic lives. No
studies have focused on Cambodian widows per se. Despite women’s eco-
nomic strengths, other Cambodia studies single out widows as among the
most economically vulnerable (Ledgerwood 1992:27, 1998; Chhoy, Touch,
Kham, and Prak 1995:26; Davenport, Healy and Malone 1995:17).
This study investigates rural Cambodian widows’ economic coping
practices4 and how they manage to survive. It considers how widows mar-
shal resources to feed their family without a male partner. It looks at the
economic reliance of widows on their relatives and their children, both
boys and girls, and the interest of young widows in remarriage. It investi-
gates how widows deal with gender role expectations to compensate for the
loss of their husband’s labor and looks at widows’ access to the important
economic resources of land, credit, and education. The study reflects on the
consequences of war in widows’ economic lives. Finally, it devises an expla-
Snowball sample
The women interviewed in the study were selected using a snowball sample
approach in which one informant refers the researcher to other possible
sources. The sample began with several initial U.S. contacts leading me to
people in Cambodia who knew the widows personally. The sample was
designed to find a diversity of widows whose stories would illustrate the
wide variety of ways that widows support themselves and their families in
Cambodia.
Two separate avenues were used to connect with widows, one through
personal contacts with Cambodians in Massachusetts and the other through
non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in Phnom Penh. Two avenues
were used to broaden the spectrum of widows interviewed and to counter
any bias inherent in a particular avenue.
Funding
My sources of funding for this research were two committees of the Epis-
copal Diocese of Massachusetts, the Sabbatical Committee and the Con-
tinuing Education Committee. St. Luke’s Episcopal Church in Fall River,
Massachusetts also assisted with a four-month paid leave of absence. None
of these groups placed any restrictions or specifications on my research and
I am deeply grateful for their financial assistance and moral support.
Interview procedure
The interviews usually took place in or near the interviewee’s home. Often
we sat just outside the front door of the stilt house on an elevated porch
covered with a thatch roof for shade. Sometimes we would sit on a kdaa
ngeur, a wooden platform about 6’ by 6’ and elevated 2’ to 3’ off the
ground, placed under a shady tree or in the cooler area under the house.
The interviews lasted from 2 to 2–1/2 hours each. In three cases the
interviews were cut short because the woman felt ill or fatigued. Each inter-
view began with an informed consent conversation between the interpreter
and the interviewee. The interpreter explained who I was, the purpose of
my research, the uses that would be made of the interview, the anonymity
of the information with her name and village always protected, her right to
end the interview at any time, to take a break or to skip a question, and the
cash donation that she would be given in appreciation of her time and coop-
eration. We told each interviewee that with her permission, we would tape
record the conversation as well as take notes. Every woman we talked to
agreed to be interviewed and most were eager to tell us about their lives. Sev-
eral said that they would talk to us all day if needed and seemed very appre-
ciative of the opportunity to speak with people from the United States.
Once the woman had agreed to be interviewed, I set up my tape
recorder equipment and took out my notebook and pen. During this time,
I gave the woman the small book of family photos I had brought to intro-
duce myself across the cultural barriers. I explained the photos to them
in simple Khmer while I set up my equipment. Usually a crowd of people
gathered around the interview at the beginning including the woman’s rela-
tives, neighbors, and village children. For the first several interviews, I asked
the woman if she would like to speak to me privately rather than have
so many people gathered around. In every instance, however, the woman
replied that it was fine to have people listen in and after a few interviews, I
stopped asking this question. Typically, the crowd dispersed after the first
few questions, leaving only the immediate family. For the NGO-facilitated
interviews, the NGO staff person was often part of the interview or sitting
nearby. In most cases, the relationship with the staff person seemed to be
friendly and relaxed. Sometimes the staff person would leave my interpreter
and me at the woman’s house and return for us later.
Each interview followed a similar format covering topics listed on
an interview guide . The range of questions included how the widows had
rebuilt their economic lives after the Pol Pot era, including accomplishing
farm work, food production and shortages, village relationships, and the
refugee experience. The questions also addressed current agricultural prac-
tices, income-producing activities, access to land and credit, the impact of
education, and the widows’ feelings about the future. I tailored each inter-
view to the woman’s particular experiences focusing on things that were
unique or different about her case. For instance, one woman had just begun
making charcoal as an income-producing activity so we spent some time
talking about what is involved in producing charcoal and who her custom-
ers would be. An older woman had built her new house virtually alone as
well as cleared a piece of forest land, both very energetic tasks for a woman
of her age. In each of these cases, I spent more time on the unique aspects of
that woman’s experiences.
At the end of the interview, I thanked each woman for her coopera-
tion and gave her a gift of 20,000 Cambodian riels,11 about US $5. I also
gave her a sarong and a kroma, the Cambodian multipurpose scarf worn
by both women and men. If there were children around, I gave them some
pencils or pens. In most cases, I took a photograph of the woman and her
family members to have, with their permission, a souvenir of the occasion.
In field research style, I wrote up each interview as soon as possible
after it had taken place, usually within a day or two. For the S’ang and
Rolea B’ier interviews, I wrote up the interviews the following week once I
had returned to my base apartment in Phnom Penh. I followed the detailed
notes in my notebook and used the tape recording as a backup to the notes.
The photographs of the women served to refresh my memory when a week
had passed between the interview and the write-up.
Following the interview write-up, I put together some reflections on
each interview in a “memo” (Charmaz 1990) section. This process enabled
me to begin to analyze the interviews while they were still fresh in my mind
and modify my questions as appropriate. By “asking questions of the data”
while still in the field, I developed my thinking about gender relationships
in Cambodia and about women’s family-oriented economic strategies.
Data analysis
In order to assess the effectiveness of various practices employed by the
women, groups of women were compared to one another within the sam-
ple based on amount of land owned, years of education completed, and
adequacy of rice output for the family’s needs. The results are suggestive
of possible connections and relationships and provide material for future
hypotheses.
To reduce the extensive body of interview data to manageable propor-
tions, the interviews were organized into uniform sections such as house,
family, Pol Pot era, farming, income-producing activity, land, credit, and
education. Spread sheets were then constructed around these topics, divid-
ing each into subtopics such as marital history, residence in own village
or husband’s, number of children born and how many died, plowing and
transplanting practices, yield on rice land, sources of income, use of credit,
women’s education, and children’s education. I gave pseudonyms to several
widows to allow the reader to follow their story throughout the text. The
organized interviews and the spreadsheets were the basis for the core of the
data chapters that follow.
23
When a parent is widowed, the resident child and spouse are in place to
help with work tasks and companionship.
Despite the presence of some extended families in Khmer villages, the
nuclear family is the basic unit of economic production and consumption.
In figuring work obligations and contributions to Buddhist ceremonies,
the nuclear family is considered one single social unit rather than a col-
lection of individuals (Ebihara 1968:111). The rights and obligations of
family members towards one another are defined by Buddhist precepts,
by belief in ancestral spirits who oversee their descendants’ conduct, and
by general cultural norms. Legally, the husband is considered the “chef de
famille” with nearly absolute powers over his wife, children and house-
hold. Buddhist doctrine grants the husband a superior position over other
family members. A wife nonetheless has a number of rights and privileges.
A husband owes his wife food, shelter, and respect and must get his wife’s
permission to enter the monastery. A wife can initiate divorce proceed-
ings. On her part, the wife is the primary caretaker of the household and
children and a coworker with her husband in the fields. Women often
undertake commercial ventures on their own to earn money for the family
(Ebihara 1968:113–4).
Parents have considerable legal authority over their children. They
have the right to discipline or punish their children and to use their property.
They may consent to or veto a child’s marriage. Parents have obligations as
well, to nourish and educate their children, provide them with moral guid-
ance, and arrange a suitable marriage. A parent has the legal right to dis-
own or disinherit a child who has offended them, but it is extremely rare.
In turn, children are expected to honor and obey their parents, support
them in old age, and provide them with a proper funeral. The relationship
between mothers and daughters is a close one, particularly in adolescence
when the daughter works alongside the mother. In cases of divorce, children
usually choose to stay with their mother. Khmer proverbs reflect traditional
respect for mothers. One notes, “A father is worth a thousand friends and a
mother worth a thousand fathers” (Ebihara 1968:118).
Older children in the family help their parents to raise the younger
children and frequently become the primary caretaker of infants and tod-
dlers. Younger siblings give their older brothers and sisters respect and
deference as if to a parent. Khmer culture encourages affection and loy-
alty among siblings, and serious disagreements among family members are
thought to be punished by watchful ancestral spirits. Siblings commonly
lend one another money at no interest and provide child care for one
another (Ebihara 1968:121). When parents are deceased, widows may call
for help from their older siblings as parent substitutes.
Customs of inheritance
Both women and men inherit land from their parents (Ebihara 1968:351).
During marriage, a woman’s land remains in her own name and she can
dispose of it as she wishes. If she inherits land while married, she retains
the title as well. Spouses share one another’s land and goods during mar-
riage but neither spouse can dispose of the other’s property without their
consent. In cases of divorce, the wife retains her own land and receives half
of the goods and money acquired by the couple during marriage. If the
husband dies, the wife assumes legal authority over the marital household
(Ebihara 1968:114).
Children have recognized property rights as well. Rice fields are
often given to children when they marry rather than at the parents’ death.
Newly-weds may receive other property as well such as a house site, fruit
trees, parental home, or jewelry. Women are the ones who usually transmit
and inherit village houses since widowed mothers leave the parental home
to their resident daughters (Ebihara 1968:356). The child who takes care
of the parents in their old age usually receives a more substantial share of
the parents’ property such as the parental home and remaining rice fields.
A child who has moved far away usually does not receive any rice fields in
the village, while one who has moved to a neighboring village does. If one
child has married someone affluent, they may receive very little from the
parents if there are many other children. A child for whom the parents have
financed a big wedding or given a house might receive only a little com-
pared to a still-unmarried child. A child who has failed to care for a parent
in their final illness, or who has not attended the parent’s funeral, may be
disinherited (Ebihara 1968:357–62).
though a female farming pattern prevailed among tribal groups in the out-
lying regions. Throughout the country, women are heavily involved in the
two types of Cambodian agriculture, rice production and chamkar cultiva-
tion of fruits, vegetables and other products2 along the rich riverbanks (Ebi-
hara 1968). Many women raise pigs and chickens for sale as well.
Rice is the staple crop. Cambodian families eat rice at every meal and
it provides the bulk of their caloric intake. A sexual division of labor gov-
erns rice agriculture with men plowing, transporting rice, and maintain-
ing the irrigation system. Women prepare the seed rice and sow it, pull
up and transplant the rice seedlings, reap the mature rice stalks, winnow
the harvested rice, and process rice before cooking. Traditionally, threshing
was done by men but now women are likely to thresh as well. In terms of
workers, women predominate in the total agricultural labor force (Boserup
[1970] 1998:28).
The village growing season begins when men plow the nursery beds
once the yearly rains have softened the earth. At the same time, women
air rice from the previous harvest and warm it in the sun on a palm mat.
Then they soak the rice to germinate it and dry it again in the sun before
sowing it in bunches in the nursery bed. Over several weeks, the rice seed-
lings sprout and grow to a height of one or two feet. Groups of women
then pull (daq) the dense seedlings up and bundle them for transportation
to the main field. To facilitate handling, the women trim the tops, which
are fed to the oxen. The bundles of seedlings are put in a pool of water for
a day to keep them moist and then left on a dike for a day to harden the
roots for transplanting.
While crews of women pull and bundle the rice seedlings, men plow
the main fields to prepare them for transplanting. Then the men transport
the seedlings by ox cart to the main rice field and the female work crews
transplant (stung) the seedlings, spacing them neatly to improve the yield.3
The fields have to be newly plowed for the transplanting to take place effec-
tively and the rice seedlings cannot remain out of the soil for more than a
day or two. Consequently, the timing and coordination of these phases of
rice planting are crucial. Women band together into work crews in order
to accomplish this time-sensitive work rapidly. The female crews work one
another’s fields in succession, pulling the rice seedlings and then replanting
them quickly before they dry out and die. Rainfall is a critical element dur-
ing this phase of rice agriculture. Too much will flood the fields and drown
the seedlings; with too little rain, the seedlings will dry up and die.4
Once the rice has grown to maturity, women cut the rice stalks and
place them on dikes alongside the rice fields. Women and men thresh the
rice by beating the stalks on an angled board to loosen the rice grains. Then
the rice is collected into baskets and men transport the baskets home. The
stalks are gathered and taken home also to use as hay for the oxen. At the
house, women winnow the grain by pouring the rice from baskets held over
their head onto a palm mat spread on the ground. The wind carries away
the chaff as the rice grains fall to the ground. The rice is then dried in the
sun and stored in rice granaries inside or under the house. Sometimes the
rice is placed in white bags for storage. It may also be poured into enclo-
sures made of palm mats with the top covered loosely with another palm
mat. Rice is husked bit by bit during the year as the family needs it, in a
village milling machine.5 The milled husks are collected in a basket and fed
to the pigs.
When a village farmer becomes widowed, she must compensate for
the loss of her husband’s labor in the agricultural cycle. Ebihara found
that a child of the opposite sex would often live with a widowed parent to
help with tasks assigned to that gender (1968:125). Without an adult child
to help, widows must do the men’s agricultural tasks themselves or else
arrange for someone to do them. Since women are unlikely to own oxen,
they may have to pay for a village plowman and a team of oxen. Many
widows may have help with their farm labor, perhaps male relatives who
live nearby. Widows without male relatives are likely in more dire straits.
As Ledgerwood noted, “the poorest of the poor seem to be widows with
children who have no male assistance with the labor of agricultural produc-
tion” (Ledgerwood 1992:27). It is the coping practices of these impover-
ished widows that this study aims to explore.
and their village. Schools were closed. Buddhism was abolished and most
monks were executed. The temples became storage facilities (Shawcross
1987:377). Entire villages were uprooted and moved to another part of the
country, where the villagers were distributed into work groups.
Rice production suffered under Khmer Rouge administration. To
bolster their international reputation, the Khmer Rouge exported rice as
an indicator to the outside world of their revolution’s success. In reality,
Cambodians were starving for lack of rice. It is believed that some two mil-
lion people died under the Khmer Rouge, most from starvation and disease,
out of a 1974 population of 7.9 million (Shawcross 1987:389). One older
widow that I interviewed, Ol, lost her husband and five children during the
Pol Pot era. They were desperate for food and resorted to eating bamboo.
Their stomachs swelled up and they died. Ol lost four additional children
to starvation in the aftermath of the Pol Pot era when food was still very
scarce. Another widow, Rin, lost her husband, most of her children, her
parents, and all but one of her siblings under Pol Pot. Many Cambodian
families suffered similar devastating losses of spouses, children, parents,
extended family, and lifelong neighbors under the cruelty and mismanage-
ment of the Khmer Rouge.
Khmer Rouge domination of Cambodia came to an end in January
1979, when Vietnamese forces captured Phnom Penh after a one-month
offensive. A flood of refugees escaped across Cambodia towards Thailand.
Several camps were established on the Thai side of the border to accommo-
date them, most notably Khao-I-Dang, a camp run by the United Nations
High Commissioner for Refugees. Within Cambodia, those who did not
flee to Thailand made their way slowly back to their home village.
The widows in this study were scattered across Cambodia in Khmer
Rouge work brigades at the end of the Pol Pot era. Along with hundreds
of thousands of others, they returned to their home villages to reunite with
lost family members and rebuild on familiar territory. Most found their
old homes destroyed and other displaced people living in their village. A
number of widows went to neighboring villages that were not yet peopled
by returnees or went to a relative’s village nearby. Some found family mem-
bers already there. One went to her mother-in-law’s house and found her
daughter, a niece, and a nephew who had returned a few days before. Her
son and husband had both died under Pol Pot. Many widows, on their
return to their village, found no home and few relatives. Most families in
every village had lost many members, often without any knowledge of the
place or circumstances of their death. The losses were hard for the families
to accept. One widow, Sophea, still hoped that her husband, who had dis-
appeared during the Pol Pot era, would one day return.
The Pol Pot era not only depleted families but also damaged village
relationships. The social solidarity that had existed among the villagers
before the war was difficult to reconstitute with the shuffling of people
around Cambodia. The lifelong relationships among village families were
lost forever. Returning families were emotionally and physically exhausted
by the Khmer Rouge devastation and had difficulty establishing relation-
ships of trust with families unknown to them.
The Vietnamese installed a former Khmer Rouge cadre, Hun Sen, as
their administrator in Cambodia. The Vietnamese-led government contin-
ued the collective agriculture and land arrangements of the Khmer Rouge
though with great modifications. Each village was organized into collec-
tive work groups called krom samaki13 or solidarity group. Each krom
comprised ten to fifteen households. There were several different forms
of collectivization that each village could choose. In the fully collectiv-
ized arrangement, all labor was undertaken collectively and the harvest
was divided among the workers according to the number of days that
they worked.14 Other arrangements were partially collectivized, with land
divided out to krom members but with collective ownership of oxen and
plows and collective labor.
Part of the rationale for the krom samaki system was the lack of male
workers. The arrangement was designed to help the many widows who
lacked agricultural labor. Plowing, for instance, was done by male mem-
bers of the collective and widows did not have to worry about paying for
it. Widows had mixed feelings about the system, however. Some thought
that it was unfair that everyone got the same share regardless of how hard
they worked (Kusakabe et al. 1995:WS-89). Others preferred to own their
own land even if it required making arrangements for plowing (Ledger-
wood 1998:10).
In 1989, the Vietnamese officially abandoned the krom samaki system
due to popular discontent and distributed the land to private ownership
(Kusakabe et al 1995). The constitution was amended guaranteeing citizens
the right to own, use, and inherit land that they themselves currently lived
on and farmed. Acquiring land for speculation or renting land out to others
were both forbidden.
In a nationwide land distribution, farm land was divided up accord-
ing to the number of people in each krom samaki, including children.
Families with many members got larger parcels of land than families with
only one or two people. Widows with one or two children got less land
than married couples with many children. Some women did not receive
land, however, because their husbands were ill and could not work or
because the women were away from the village trading or studying. On
their return to the village, the land had been allocated already to others.
Landless widows were hard pressed to rent land because of their lack of
male manpower (Chhoy et al 1995:20). In some areas, people drew lots
for the land (Kusakabe et al. 1995:WS-89). There were also charges of
manipulation by the village leaders who controlled the land distribution
process in each locality.
One widow, Leang, reported that in her village everyone got seven
ares15 a person. She had five people in her family and so she received 35
ares. She thought the distribution process was fair because everyone in
the village received seven ares. Laughingly, she remembered that the vil-
lage head, the mae phoum,16 received a little more than the others. Leang
wanted to regain some of her family’s former land, from before the Pol
Pot era, in addition to her regular distribution. She “sweet-talked” the mae
phoum and he gave her the house land her family had owned in the village.
She used it to grow vegetables to sell for cash income.
In September 1989, the Vietnamese officially withdrew their army
from Cambodia as part of geopolitical changes due to the demise of the
cold war. The Soviets had supported the Vietnamese in Cambodia to coun-
ter Chinese influence with the remnants of the Khmer Rouge in the north-
western part of the country. When these communist superpower rivalries
shifted, the Vietnamese lost their patron and source of funding. The United
Nations supervised a national election in 1992, and the Royal Government
of Cambodia was formed.
The following chapters will illustrate the implications of this history
of armed conflict and civil upheaval for rural widows’ economic lives. The
study will explore the extent to which traditional Cambodian culture helps
or hinders the economic coping practices of widows. While every culture
is unique, the experience of bilateral customs of rice cultivation and the
disruptions of armed conflict are found in many countries and regions. The
stories of Cambodian rural widows’ economic lives can deepen our under-
standing of rural poverty and gender relationships.
35
and moved into their own houses in the village, they continued to work
with Dara in her fields during the growing season.
Under the “rice plus” arrangement, the female head of household man-
aged the family resources and assumed responsibility for feeding the family.
The various household members did not maintain separate budgets or sav-
ings. Rather, all resources acquired by family members individually or coop-
eratively, including the rice harvest, other agricultural produce, and income
earned through microenterprises and wage labor, were turned over to the
female head. She then allocated resources to the family members as needed.
Widows and their family members relied on multiple sources of
income to acquire cash for their family needs. Davenport et al. (1995) refer
to this approach as a “portfolio” of income activities. The women did not
rely on just one microenterprise but typically had several. When one did
not work well, another might succeed in earning cash. The widows thus
spread their economic risk through diversification.
For instance, Dara earned income from producing palm thatch used to
side and roof rural homes. She also made palm mats, traditionally used for
eating and sleeping, and sold them to other households in the village. Dara
collected fire wood in the forest near her home and always had a supply in
her yard for sale to her neighbors. Dara’s youngest daughter, who was single
and still lived at home, had a tiny retail business selling after-school candies
to village school-children. Dara gave her daughter money to buy the snacks
and the daughter turned over any proceeds to her mother for the household
expenses. Before Dara’s husband died, he had a palm-sugar enterprise, col-
lecting palm sap from his trees and selling the semi-solid syrup that Dara
produced from the sap. After his death, Dara’s daughter and son-in-law car-
ried on the palm-sugar business. While the young couple lived with Dara,
they turned the income over to her for family expenses.
Often, young adults in a widow’s family worked for a wage in a fac-
tory or construction project. Development efforts in Cambodia such as the
export garment industry or construction projects in municipal areas pro-
vided rural families with an important source of income. If the job was
close enough that the young person could commute from home, the rural
household received a significant financial boost from this modern income
even when transportation and food expenses were figured in. If the job was
too distant for commuting, however, the young people had to live away
from home with city expenses that greatly eroded the income remitted back
to the rural family.
Dara’s third daughter, for instance, worked at a garment factory in the
capital city, Phnom Penh. She earned $20 or $30 per month and gave her
mother more than half her earnings. She had to keep some of her paycheck
to pay for the apartment she shared with other young women next to the
garment factory. Her remittances to her mother provided income for current
family expenses and contributed to the family purse for major expenses such
as weddings.
Young widows
Young widows with small children managed their many economic and
child care tasks mostly on their own. They put their children to work at an
early age, often four or five years old. Sometimes the children assisted their
mother or older sibling with farm or household tasks. At other times, they
had their own task such as minding oxen, feeding chickens, or selling rice
desserts made by their mother.
Lim’s household illustrates the “rice plus” arrangement for a young
widow and her children. Lim’s husband died of malaria after only one week
of illness. He was 28 years old and they had two children ages 12 and 9.
Lim carried on with rice cultivation after her husband’s death and raised
pigs and chickens for sale. She wove palm thatch for house repairs and sold
the sections to a town trader. She recently had learned to make charcoal for
sale and had her first batch ready for a merchant from town.
Children in young widows’ homes contributed their labor and any
income earned to the household budget managed by their mother. School-
age children typically went to class for part of the day, usually the morning,
then worked the rest of the day at productive tasks under the supervision of
their mother or an older sibling.
Lim’s two children, for instance, worked at her side in the rice paddy
after school, pulling rice seedlings and transplanting them under her direc-
tion. Lim’s older child, a boy, learned to climb village palm trees and col-
lected palm nectar for his mother to cook into palm sugar. He collected
enough for family consumption only due to his youth. In addition to palm
nectar, the boy helped Lim by collecting palm fronds for weaving from wild
trees in the forest. Lim carried the leaves home in a bundle on her head. The
two harvested leaves from one palm tree each day. As the boy grew older,
he became strong enough to plow his mother’s fields. Lim’s younger child, a
girl, watched a neighbor’s cows after school and earned a small amount of
cash for her mother.
The involvement of children in work from an early age resulted in
very different parent-child relationships than in industrialized countries.
Children were seen as workers and productive assets, not costs or finan-
cial liabilities. Large families meant more workers rather than additional
mouths to feed. As the children grew older, they took on more and more
responsibilities and helped bear the financial burden of the household. A
young widow with many children was in a better economic position over
her lifetime than a widow with few children.
Disabled widows
Several interviewed widows had illnesses that prevented them from working
on a daily basis. Medical care is spotty in rural Cambodia and is provided
only on a fee-for-service basis. Poor widows without cash could not afford
to pay for treatment and often did without. Their children did the necessary
agricultural work to feed the family and raised income through microen-
terprises. Several teenagers in the sample cared for their sickly mother, pro-
ducing the family’s food on their land, preparing daily meals, and raising
the livestock.
Vy, for instance, was a disabled widow whose husband had died from
injuries he received during the Pol Pot conflict. The Khmer Rouge sent him
into the mountains to collect wood and he stepped on a land mine. The
shrapnel from the explosion damaged his health and eventually caused his
death some fifteen years later. Vy had been sickly and nervous since her
husband’s death. She got dizzy easily and would black out. Because of her
health problems, she could not farm. She had four children, a son and a
daughter who were already married and lived nearby in the village, and
two teen children at home with her. The teens went to school in the morn-
ing and did the farm work in the afternoon. They also raised chickens to
sell. Vy’s married children sent prepared food to the house several times a
week. Occasionally, Vy felt well enough to produce palm mats and palm
thatch to repair their house.
Elderly widows
The widows’ economic strategy for the future, their personal social secu-
rity plan, was to take care of their children in their youth so that in their
old age, the children would take care of them. The women’s investment in
their relationships with their children was their economic security rather
than any money assets the mother might have saved. This sort of security
was a truly “social” security because it was based on social relationships,
not money. The widows trusted in this social capital to provide for their
old age. Women’s expectation that their children would take care of them
contrasts dramatically with industrialized countries like the United States
where elders typically prize their independence, do not want to depend on
their children, and rely on financial capital for their old age.
The number of children was an important factor in the rural mothers’
social security plan. If the widow had several children before her husband
died, she was better off than a widow with fewer children. The consequence
of women being widowed in their youth was not only the loss of their hus-
band but also the loss of children they might have had with their husband.
The effectiveness of adult children in supporting their widowed
mother depended on the children’s success in farming or earning money.
Children who were poor subsistence farmers had less capability to help
their widowed mothers than children who had a small business or a job.
The reliability of children as social security for their widowed mother
depended on the children’s emotional attachment to their mother and
their sense of responsibility for her. Children who lived at home with their
mother contributed substantially to the family upkeep. When unmarried
children left home to work in construction or the garment industry, they
continued to turn over most of their paycheck to their mother as long as
they were unmarried. Married children who lived at a distance from their
mother were less likely to be involved in their mother’s support. They vis-
ited on holidays only, bringing an occasional gift of cash or food. While
welcome, these gifts did not amount to the same support that a mother
could count on from a resident child.
If the mother had some assets, such as a house, land or business, the
child with whom she lived often took responsibility and control of the
assets as the mother got older. On the mother’s death, the caretaking child
was the likely heir for her assets. A widow with some assets had more lever-
age with her children and more capability to make choices about her care
as an elderly person.
Elderly widows in the study typically lived with an adult child. The
older children in a family would set up their own household when they mar-
ried. However, the youngest daughter and her husband often stayed in the
mother’s household after marriage and took care of her as she grew older.
If the mother was still able to farm, she continued to manage the household
money and food resources and took responsibility for providing the family
food. When she became too old or infirm to do substantial work, her adult
daughter assumed money management and household food provision. The
practice of daughters providing for their elderly mothers comprised an effec-
tive rural social security system for several interviewed widows, such as the
case of Ching.
Ching lived with her younger daughter, the daughter’s husband, and
their five children. Ching’s husband had died shortly after the Pol Pot era
at age 75 and she had survived him for over 20 years. Ching’s daugh-
ter was devoted to her and felt responsible for her elderly mother’s care.
The daughter noted matter-of-factly, “After marriage, you have to sup-
port your mother.” Ching had not done agricultural work for many years.
She had contributed to the household economy, however, by taking care
of the grandchildren, thus freeing her daughter to work in the fields. Her
daughter’s husband worked in the commune1 as a teacher in the mornings.
In the afternoons, he helped his wife with rice cultivation. The family had
a sturdy wooden house with Chinese good luck decorations.2 Ching had
plenty of food to eat and felt optimistic for the future. She had a grand-
daughter about to graduate from high school and Ching hoped that she
would become a teacher like her father.
If an elderly widow did not have a daughter, the social security system
worked less well. An elderly widow without a daughter usually lived with
an unmarried son or in her own house. No widows in the sample lived
under the same roof as a daughter-in-law. Sometimes the widow’s house
was on the same house lot as her son and his wife.3 The widow had her
own dwelling but ate with her son and his family. In other cases, the widow
lived elsewhere in the village but visited her son’s or another relative’s house
at mealtime.
One such widow was Sokha, whose father had been kidnapped by
the Issarak. She had two sons and had divided her land to them when they
married. She had retained only a tiny parcel for herself. When her own rice
ran out, she visited her older son’s family and ate their rice. She was wor-
ried about her future because she felt that her daughters-in-law had to sup-
port their own children. Both her sons were poor farmers with only a little
land. She had little hope that their circumstances would improve.
Some elderly widows, faced with their declining years, took up the reli-
gious role of daun-chi to earn merit for their next life. They took vows as lay
devotees and spent most of their time in the commune temple. Their daily
activities included periods of meditation and study of Buddhist scripture.
They shaved their head as a sign of worldly disregard and wore distinctive
garments, either white for special ceremonies or the more practical everyday
black sambot (skirt) and white blouse. These elderly lay devotees no longer
Childless widows
A widow without children had fewer choices than widows with children.
They mostly relied on their own labor. Sometimes childless widows lived
with extended family members, contributing their labor to a larger house-
hold and pooling their income.
Sophea, for example, had lost her husband during the Pol Pot era. She
was only twenty-three years old and they had not yet had children. Sophea
lived with her elderly father who had helped her with the farming before
his retirement. Sophea’s younger widowed sister and her son were also in
the household. The sister worked at a lumber factory for a wage. Sophea
earned income from selling vegetables that she grew on a large plot near
a lake. The two sisters pooled their income and had just purchased a new
wooden house. Despite her current good fortune, Sophea felt that her future
was precarious. She was uncertain if her nephew would be able to support
both Sophea and her sister in their old age. Cambodian tradition prescribes
that a boy leaves his mother’s home to take up residence with his wife in
her village. Sophea worried about her nephew leaving the household when
he married. She had other brothers and sisters but they lived far away.
Other childless widows lived alone but relied on nearby relatives
for assistance. They also worried about who would care for them in their
old age. Vanna, for instance, had lost her husband during the Pol Pot
era. Her only child, a daughter, also died under the Khmer Rouge. After
the war, Vanna returned to her natal village and joined her two surviving
siblings. She received a small parcel of land in the 1980s land distribu-
tion and lived in a modest house of her own. Her sister moved to a dis-
tant village when she married and Vanna never saw her. Vanna’s brother
was still in the village, however, and often helped her with plowing. Like
Sophea, Vanna felt insecure about her future. She was on good terms with
her brother and his son, but she worried about possible problems in her
relationship with them. She felt that if she had children of her own, she
would be in a better position.
Family Solidarity
Family as the unit of production
The spirit of family cooperation and mutual responsibility essential to the
“rice plus” arrangement may be called family solidarity or kruosa samaki.5
Household members from young children to elderly parents worked at var-
ious tasks to support the family enterprise of obtaining sufficient food. The
female household head organized family members to undertake various
work tasks and served as the family treasurer as well as the primary farmer
and trader. Children worked at their mother’s side while teens, and young
adults took on market or wage work outside the household.
The unit of production was the family household, not the individual
members of the family. Under the Vietnamese during the 1980s, the unit
of production was the work group or krom samaki6 consisting of ten or
more families. With the return to private property, the unit of agricultural
production reverted to the traditional family household. The same spirit of
samaki or solidarity was an essential part of the effectiveness of the family
production unit.
These cooperative family relationships took place in an economy of
scarcity. The widows’ families struggled each year to have enough food to
eat and did not have surplus income to divide or dispute. In most of the
women’s households, the rice grown cooperatively by the family was the
main source of food and was used exclusively to feed the family. It often
did not last the entire year and the family earned cash to buy rice in order
to survive until the new harvest. In poorer households, the widow had to
borrow rice and pay it back out of the new harvest, diminishing the rice
available to feed the family the following year.
The motivation for family members to cooperate in the family work
endeavors was the recognition on everyone’s part, including young children
and teens, that if they did not work cooperatively they would not have food
to last for the whole year. Children were willing workers in this economy of
scarcity and eager to help their mother. While some children ate the snacks
they were supposed to be selling, most children were proud to return to
their home with cash for their mother. The obedience and cooperation that
children accorded their mother was due to the recognition that their labor
was needed to feed the family, a structural concern. The Cambodian cul-
tural value, that it is expected, good, and proper for children to obey their
parents, is likely based on or at least reinforced by this structural reality of
food scarcity.
a married daughter and her six children. The daughter’s husband had fallen
from a palm tree while collecting nectar and was disabled. Chantha, the
school teacher, provided a home for her grandson whose divorced mother
had remarried, to help her daughter out with her new marriage. An elderly
widow, Heng, had opened her home to an orphaned granddaughter who
came to live with her at the age of three. When the widow later became
blind, the granddaughter began to cook and by the age of ten, made all the
family meals for her grandmother and her youngest uncle who still lived in
the family home.
Many widows said that they were too old to remarry. The elderly women
noted that they just wanted to go to the temple to pray. One wanted to
concentrate on her next life so she wouldn’t be a widow.
The widows remarked that they wanted to depend on themselves
and that they were loathe to give up their independence. “Why do I need
a husband?” Ching asked. Another elderly widow said, “I wanted to
be independent for the sake of my children, I wanted to support them
myself.” Lim and Leang, who both had young children at home, said that
they only wanted to take care of the children and provide a good future
for them.
Marriage was equated in the widows’ minds with dependence despite
the substantial economic role of women in Cambodian households. The
dependence they feared was not an economic or structural one but a cul-
tural dependence, the custom of the wife deferring to the male as the house-
hold head. As the female head of household, the widows could make their
own decisions about finances, their children’s schooling and marriages, and
business ventures. Under a husband as household head, they would have
had a very similar workload but less authority. The women would have had
to give up the headship of their own household and defer to male authority,
and they rejected that change.
In addition to the loss of household authority, a number of women
had unhappy memories of their previous marriage. Some women had been
lied to by their husband or his mother concerning other wives. In several
cases, the husband had left the wife when she was pregnant or nursing their
child and left them penniless with debts. Dara remembered that her hus-
band had not been a hard worker and she had done most of the farming
work herself, including the plowing. She didn’t think that things would have
been better for her family if he were still alive. Other widows remarked that
their husbands had spent the scarce family money on drinking and gam-
bling with their friends. “One husband was enough!” one said. While the
widows knew of some successful remarriages, most rejected the odds and
preferred to remain on their own.
The widows were skeptical that a new husband would be good to
their children and had no faith in men’s ability to care for children. The
elderly widows Heng and Sokha had worried that a second husband would
look down on their children or even hurt them. Other widows reasoned
that a second husband would have children of his own and worried that
the two sets of children would not get along. The widow would have more
work taking care of the new husband’s children as well as her own.
The widows were loyal to their children and viewed a possible hus-
band as a threat to the children rather than an asset to the family. The
women placed their hopes in their children’s future and mobilized their
resources to give their children as much help as possible. They expected
their children to care for them in their old age and oriented themselves
to their children’s well-being. The fear of dependence that they voiced in
speaking of a new husband did not seem to be a factor when thinking about
their elderly dependence on their children.
Enough rice?
The success of rice cultivation as a rural family’s main occupation can be
measured by whether the family produces enough rice to feed the house-
hold until the following harvest. Of the 18 interviewed widows who farmed
their own rice land,7 only seven usually had enough rice to feed their house-
hold all year. Eleven usually ran out of rice before the next harvest. To feed
their family during the hunger gap, the widows borrowed rice, borrowed
money, or earned cash through various income-producing microenterprises
to purchase additional rice. Leang, for instance, ran out of rice in May, only
halfway through the agricultural year. She borrowed from a moneylender
to buy rice until the December harvest. Leang grew vegetables in addition
to rice. She felt that if she could sell her vegetable crop at a good price,
she would have enough cash to pay off the moneylender. The price of veg-
etables was very low at the time of the interview, however, and she could
barely pay the interest on her loan, much less the principal. Often widows
sold their pigs, chickens, fruit or vegetables for rice in order to have enough
food to last the whole year.
Some widows grew a little rice on their own land and relied on their
children or other relatives to make up for shortages. Oeung ran out each
year and bought rice with money that her adult children gave her. Some-
times she borrowed rice from her neighbors and paid them back at harvest
time. Sokha grew only a small quantity of rice because she had given most
of her land to her children. When her own rice ran out, she ate at her chil-
dren’s or another relative’s house.
Flooding and lack of rain threatened the rice yield and affected the
price that widows paid for rice. Most widows gave their rice yield as two
figures, one with enough rain and one with little rain. In a bad year, every-
one’s rice yield was low. Then rice was scarce, fewer people had rice to loan
or sell, and the price of rice rose dramatically. When only a few households
ran short of rice, due to small landholdings or isolated flooding, other
households in the village had rice to lend or sell. Then the price of rice was
more stable. The price always went up just before the harvest, however,
when the demand for rice was highest. When a widow depleted her stores
of rice before the harvest, she had to borrow or purchase rice at a high
price. The difficulty for widows was the lack of cash income to purchase
available rice and the lack of credit to borrow money to buy rice.
One widow, Narin, managed during difficult years by putting together
income from her adult children and her city relatives. Narin owned land
near a lake that usually provided enough rice to feed her family. However,
flooding the previous year had completely destroyed her crop.8 She had
no rice to feed herself or her two children still at home. Her older children
gave her cash from their jobs at a garment factory so that she could buy
rice. At the time of our interview, Narin’s rice had run out and the garment
workers had not yet gotten paid. She was preparing to go to Phnom Penh
to ask her relatives for some money to tide her over until her children’s
next paycheck.
Three widows who usually had enough rice fed not only themselves
and their single children but other relatives as well. These women had
larger land holdings than most of the widows, 92 ares on average.9 Dara
fed eleven people in all, including two single children at home, a married
daughter who came with her six children to eat at her mother’s, and a single
daughter who lived with relatives but came home occasionally to eat. Dara
usually had enough rice to feed everyone from her one hectare of rice land.
Khoeurn fed her own two children as well as a grandson and a niece who
lived with her from her one hectare of rice land. Only in a bad year did she
have to buy rice.
established market. Sometimes the gathered wild item was processed before
being sold. Other microenterprises concerned agricultural activities such as
raising livestock or growing fruits and vegetables and selling them at matu-
rity. Sometimes interviewees engaged in trading businesses, buying livestock,
produce or processed wild materials from their neighbors and then reselling
them at a small markup in the central market. Occasionally, food ingredients
were purchased at a market, then processed and resold for a small profit.
Finally, some microenterprises involved services to other villagers.
Cambodians learn the gains and losses in village economics from an
early age. Children are often given chicks to raise as a way to learn micro-
entrepreneurship. They must attend to their animals daily and prevent
them from dying, a total loss. They plan ahead for the best return on their
investment and decide whether to sell the chicken’s eggs or raise them to
chicks. They must learn to market their products and to find the best price.
Through trial and error, under the watchful guidance of their elders, chil-
dren learn the risks and rewards involved in the village marketplace.
The adult women interviewed demonstrated their understanding of
village economics. They showed a willingness to take calculated risks, such
as invest in piglets or buy up rice when the price was low. When a vegetable
crop didn’t pay, widows dropped it for another more likely to be profitable.
One widow gave away produce whose price had plummeted as a way to
build good customer relations.
Women developed niches that became their own in the village, such as
trading vegetables, producing charcoal, or weaving palm mats and thatch.
They saw the forest or local streams as productive resources yielding fire-
wood or shrimp that could be sold. Their use of the land was efficient
because they had so little of it. Every bit of their rice field and often most of
their house land as well was planted with food-producing plants.
They collected the vegetables every afternoon and prepared them for sale
in the evenings. In the morning, Bopha would leave at four or five a.m. for
the Daoum Kor market in Phnom Penh. She hired a mototaxi10 for 2000
riels (about $0.50) one way and sold her vegetables at the market until
they were gone, around eight or nine a.m. Then she walked home to save
the moto fare, a journey of two to three hours. After she had prepared the
noonday meal, Bopha and the daughter would go back to the rice paddies
to gather more wild vegetables. It took them as much as an hour to walk to
a new rice paddy.
Several female-headed households supported themselves partially
by selling fish caught by a household member. The widows reported that
women rarely fished. Some households, however, included a son-in-law who
fished. The family of one landless widow, Moam, was entirely supported by
her son-in-law’s fishing activity. He went out on the lake in mid-afternoon
and returned with his catch by early morning, in time for the widow to sell
it in the village market which opened at dawn. If school was not in session,
his eleven-year-old son would accompany him to help fish.
Other families fished in streams or rivers. The young children of one
widow, Vuth, hunted shrimp in a shallow stream near their home and sold
the shrimp for 1000 to 2000 riels per day (about $0.25 to $0.50.) The
proceeds paid for all the rice for this landless family. A Kompong Chhnang
widow, Chan, defied convention and fished herself in a river nearby during
the rainy season.
Some widows collected wood to sell to their neighbors. All the house-
holds that we visited in the rural areas cooked with wood. The wood was
cut with a large machete-like knife in the wild areas surrounding the village.
Often this was a male task but women occasionally cut wood as well. Dara
cut wood to sell from her house. Ol’s adult son cut wood for his mother’s
use as well as for sale. He sold about one square meter of wood a day for
3000 riels (about $0.75) and gave most of the proceeds to his mother to
buy food, keeping a little for himself.
colors before weaving. This type of mat required a team effort with a mini-
mum of two women per mat. A team of five women, the ideal number,
could produce three mats a day. The women wove the mats on a loom
twelve to fifteen feet long. One woman wove from each end of the loom
using grasses of different colors such as green, yellow and blue. Red was
always the main color because it mixed well with all the other colors.
The women said that there were many different designs produced by
women in Cambodia but each team of women made only one design at
which they became expert. The mats were produced provas12 style with
one women providing all the reeds and then owning the finished mat, made
with the shared team labor. Each woman in the team provided the reeds in
turn until the women had produced a mat for each team member. One mat
required fifty kilos of dyed grass reeds. If there were not enough women to
do provas, the team would hire women weavers and pay them 4000 riels
(about $1) per day. The finished mats measured about one and one-half by
two meters.
One interviewed widow had previously woven kantael krahom to sell
to other villagers or to exchange for rice in a nearby town. She got the reeds
from her younger sister who grew them in a vacant field next to their family
home. When her sister married and moved out of the house, the widow had
to grow her own grass reeds. She dyed the grasses herself with purchased
dye and then dried the reeds before weaving them with a team of women.
She could exchange a mat for 36 kilos of rice or sell it for 15,000 to 30,000
riels (about $4 to $8). If a family didn’t have the cash to buy a mat, she
accepted rice in exchange. She had stopped weaving mats several years ear-
lier because she had become busy with the more lucrative work of growing
and selling vegetables and didn’t have time to weave. It was hard to make
much profit on the mats, she said, because they were so time consuming.
The women weavers in her village noted that the popularity of plastic mats
had not reduced the demand for the kantael krahom. Because of their lively
color and smooth texture, they still sold well and were particularly desir-
able as wedding gifts.
The production of palm sugar provided income for several widows.
Palm sugar production began with village men scaling tall palm trees with
the aid of a bamboo rod fastened along the length of the tree. At the top
of the tree, they attached cylindrical bamboo containers under the palm
flowers and squeezed each palm flower to start palm nectar flowing into
the container. The following day, they scaled the tree again to collect the
accumulated nectar.
The men brought the collected nectar to the women in their house-
hold who then cooked it into thick sugary syrup. As the syrup cooled, it
became semi-solid and was stored in large containers. The trees in the
village were allocated to particular families by the mae phoum, the village
headman. A man involved in palm sugar usually worked 15–20 trees a
day. Some risk was involved in this activity because occasionally men fell
from the palm trees while collecting the nectar and were injured or killed.
While both men and women were involved in producing palm sugar, vil-
lagers spoke of it as men’s work because women never scaled the palm
trees. Vy’s husband had collected palm nectar. After his death, Vy’s son
took up nectar collecting when he was a boy and Vy processed it into
sugar and sold it. When the son married, he continued to collect palm
nectar and his wife processed it into sugar. The income then went to Vy’s
son’s household.
Dara’s husband had worked in palm sugar during his lifetime and the
widow’s son-in-law had taken it up after marrying her daughter. The pro-
ceeds from the palm sugar were turned over to the widow as the head of
household. The son-in-law collected the palm nectar for three years before
he fell one day when the bamboo rod separated from the tree. He broke
his leg and never completed recovered his mobility. He still scaled a few
trees occasionally but only collected enough for the family’s own sugar con-
sumption needs.
Heng’s family collected and processed palm sugar for a short period
of time in order to save money to purchase a cow after the Pol Pot era.
Heng made palm thatch sections for the same purpose. Once she had saved
enough money to buy two cows, the family gave up the risky palm sugar
enterprise. Lim’s 17-year-old son did some palm sugar work, collecting the
nectar from six palm trees on their relatives’ land. Lim then processed the
nectar into sugar. The teen collected only enough for his family due to the
risk involved.
One widow, Lim, produced charcoal to sell. She had two children to
support and was very poor, so a neighbor suggested that she make char-
coal.13 From time to time, merchants came to the village to buy up char-
coal and then resell it in the town. Other charcoal producers in the village
showed Lim how to make it by digging a ditch and placing a cut tree in the
ditch over a fire. Once the tree was very hot, she covered it with dirt and
left it for two weeks. Then she uncovered the still warm charcoal and bor-
rowed a cart from a relative free of charge to transport it back from the for-
est to store in her home. At the time of our interview, she was waiting for a
merchant to come from the town to buy it. She didn’t know yet how much
she would make on this new business. No one in her village wanted to buy
it because they all used wood for cooking.
Agricultural enterprises
Many rural women in the sample earned income through agricultural enter-
prises, raising small animals such as pigs and chickens or growing fruits and
vegetables and then selling them in the town markets or to traders.
Many widows had raised pigs. Some women raised a single sow and
sold her piglets. Leang was the most successful of these. She had a female
pig and sold her piglets for 20,000 riels (about $5) each. The sow gave
birth to eight or nine piglets at a time and Leang would earn 160,000 to
180,000 riels (about $40 to $45) at once. A neighboring widow had got-
ten her first piglet from her older children. However, the piglet got sick and
died. She later got another piglet that her sister was raising to maturity for
her. It was a female pig and the two sisters planned to keep the sow and sell
her piglets. They planned to charge 50,000 to 60,000 riels (about $12 to
$15) per piglet and split the proceeds between them.
Other widows raised pigs to maturity (about seven to twelve months)
and then sold them, typically to a pig trader. It was harder to make a profit
this way because the costs of feeding the pig were not covered by the income
from selling the grown pig. Vanna had begun raising pigs during the krom
samaki time. She had done a provas exchange to get money for her first
piglets (she fed someone else’s pig until sold at maturity and then bought
her own piglets with her half of the proceeds). She fed her pigs rice husks
from the village rice mill machine that cost her 1250 riels per day (about
$0.30) per pig. When she sold the pigs she earned 100,000 to 180,000 riels
(about $25 to $45) each, depending on the size of the pig. The cost of feed-
ing each pig was over 300,000 riels (about $75), though, so she incurred a
substantial loss14 in raising pigs.
Other widows reported similar costs and sale prices for their pigs.
The benefit to them in raising pigs must not be in the overall profit but in
the gradual accumulation of value in the pig that was cashed in all at once.
Pig-raising can be seen as a savings plan, with the widow investing small
amounts each week in feed and then reaping a substantial amount when
she sells the pig, a sort of “piggy bank”!
A widow could make a real profit, however, if she did not have to buy
rice husks to feed the pig. One widow owned a rice mill and was paid for
milling in rice and rice husks. She used this extra rice and the rice husks to
feed her three pigs. The profit on her pigs, after deducting the expense of
buying the piglets, was 70,000 to 130,000 riels (about $18 to $33) each.15
The profit in a pig depends on the daily expenses. If the pig’s food
can be acquired for less (foraging, using leftovers or buying rice husks at
a discount), the owner stands to make more profit. The timing of the sale
is important, too, since the cost of raising the pig increases the longer the
pig is kept. The owner has to calculate if the higher price for a larger pig is
worth the increased costs. The seller’s bargaining skill with the pig trader
figures in as well. A danger in pig husbandry is that the pig will get sick
and die and then the owner’s investment is completely lost. Poorer women
in the sample could not afford to raise a pig at all. They could not manage
the initial costs of buying the pig and they did not have money for the daily
feed expenses. In essence, they did not have enough cash to “save” in their
“piggy bank.”16
Traditional provas exchanges require a degree of trust between vil-
lagers. The owner of the asset trusts that the borrower will care properly
for the asset and return it in good shape. For instance, the owner of a
sow entrusts the pig to a neighboring family to raise in exchange for half
the sow’s litter. If the neighbors neglect the pig, it will die. The owner’s
trust in the neighbors’ husbandry is partly based on self-interest. If the
neighbors neglect the pig, they will not get any piglets. The transaction
also requires familiarity with the neighboring household so as to assure
the owner that they will not behave foolishly. In villages where neighbors
have known one another for life, such knowledge is a given. Only those
villagers with a good reputation would be able to participate in these pro-
vas arrangements. The economic possibilities of rural villagers are closely
tied with their reputation with their neighbors. Since women supervise
the raising of pigs in the household, their reputation for astuteness and
good household management is part of their social capital, an important
economic resource.
Many widows in the sample had raised chickens at some point.
Chickens were less expensive to raise than pigs. They ate less and grew
faster and had large broods of chicks. The widows owned from a handful
of chickens up to 40, including both adult hens and roosters and clutches of
small chicks. As a rule, the women did not eat the eggs but raised them all
as chickens. The women fed the chickens unhusked rice or leftover cooked
rice, both readily available most of the year. Most of the interviewed wid-
ows did not eat the chickens themselves but sold them for cash. Female
chickens were mentioned more than male ones because they produced eggs.
The hens laid eggs three to six times a year, about 8 to 15 eggs each time.
Sometimes they roosted in baskets inside the widow’s house or under the
eaves of her porch.
At maturity, the chickens were sold for about 4000 riels ($1) per kilo,
or 6000 riels ($1.50) each (mature chickens weighed about 1–1/2 kilos.)
Some widows sold chickens out of their home to their neighbors for fam-
ily consumption. One widow sold them herself in the market two or three
times a year, transporting them alive. Usually the women sold their chick-
ens, four or five at a time, to a trader who resold them in the market.
Raising chickens was a way for impoverished widows to earn cash.
Neighbors or relatives would give a gift of several chicks and the widow
would raise them to maturity, feeding them leftover rice. Lim had acquired
some chicks this way from a neighbor. Children were often given a chick to
raise. Chandaravy’s 15-year-old son received some chicks from a neighbor.
All but one died, however. The one female who survived produced 6–8 eggs
five times a year. He raised the eggs to chicks and then sold them.
Ching and Ol had raised chickens when they were younger but had
given it up because it was incompatible with Buddhist temple participation.
As they faced the end of their life, they wanted to earn merit for their next
reincarnation and so did not want to kill animals.
Several widows sold fruit from their own fruit trees. The trees usu-
ally were on their house land, surrounding the house or along the property
border, and were tropical fruits such as coconut, mango, banana, papaya,
lemons, and jackfruit. One more affluent widow, Khoeurn, also grew small
quantities of sugar cane and bamboo.
Fruit trees were a sort of investment or insurance for a widow since
they produced fruit for years with little additional work. Widows with
fruit trees had a source of income that was small but fairly reliable. Even a
widow with health problems could harvest the fruit from her fruit trees and
make some income, unlike most agricultural work that was labor intensive.
Bopha’s husband had planted her fruit trees and the trees still gave fruit, a
welcome income at times when Bopha was too sick to work.
Women sold their fruit themselves at the market or to a fruit trader.
Khoeurn and her daughter sold their fruit once a week at the nearby mar-
ket, transporting it in a big basket on the back of a bicycle. Their neigh-
boring widow, Dany, went to market every day, harvesting her produce at
daybreak and taking it to market around 9 a.m. She stayed at the market
until she had sold everything, usually two or three hours. Bopha made 200–
300 riels ($0.05–0.08) a day from her fruit trees during the harvest season,
selling the fruit at a city market along with gathered wild vegetables. Lim
had only one fruit tree, a mango tree that she had inherited earlier in the
year when her grandparents died. She got 100 mangoes from her tree and
earned about 10,000 riels in all (about $2.50). She had to rent a car for
3000 riels ($0.75) to take the mangoes to market. With the proceeds of her
mango sales, she bought staples such as salt, fish sauce, and seasonings.
Vanna sold her fruit at the market if she wasn’t too busy with other farm
duties. In busy times, she sold them from her house, usually to a trader who
resold them at the town market.
Trading businesses
Meseth, Vanna, and Dany engaged in some sort of wholesale or retail trade,
buying items and then reselling them either to the consumer or to a retail
store. Fruits and vegetables were the most likely items to be bought and
sold but other food items such as rice, palm sugar, fish and beans were
traded by the women as well.
These small trading businesses involved buying the product in one
location and reselling it in another, such as an established central market
or a neighborhood street market. The women made their slender profits
by taking their product to a place where customers were willing to pay
more for it than the producers charged. The women vendors were seasoned
negotiators with both seller and buyer. Their profit depended on their skill
in bargaining with the store owners, their farmer neighbors, and the market
customers, all of whom tried to negotiate the best price for themselves. In
most cases, their business required that they have money up front to purchase
their product, and the women took the daily risk that they would not be
able to recoup their expenses.
Some women bought produce directly from the farmer. Meseth had
traded bananas when she returned to her home village after the fall of
the Khmer Rouge as a way to support herself and her seven surviving
children. She bought the bananas from others in her village once a week
and took them by boat to the nearby town of Prey Veaeng. She stayed
overnight in Prey Veaeng, sold the bananas the next morning, and took
the boat home.
Other women bought their fruits and vegetables from a trader or
street vendor. Dany bought vegetables from local street vendors each morn-
ing to sell in the town market along with the fruit and vegetables that she
grew herself.
Widows with some discretionary money could afford to buy up sup-
plies of products that changed in value over the course of the agricultural
year. Rice and palm sugar were two such products. By buying when the price
was low and selling when it rose, a more affluent widow could earn money
with little manual effort. Dany, for instance, bought rice during the harvest
season when the price was low and then sold it during the months before
the following harvest when the price was the highest. She usually bought
800 kilos of rice at 200 riels per kilo ($0.05) at the harvest in December, an
investment of 160,000 riels (about $40.) The following November, she sold
the rice at Kompong Chhnang market for 320 riels a kilo, yielding a profit
of 96,000 riels ($24). Dany also traded in palm sugar, selling one ton per
year with a profit of 300,000 riels (about $75.)
Dany’s success as a trader depended heavily on the availability of
capital to invest in rice and palm sugar for several months. She and her sec-
ond husband had planted a number of fruit trees on her land that yielded
enough produce for Dany to sell daily. She also raised a number of chickens.
Although she had only 30 ares of rice land, it was enough to feed her small
family of three, including her young daughter and her unmarried sister. All
of these activities together with Dany’s astute management of her resources
had contributed to her success. Dany felt that her six years of education
had helped her business ventures. She planned to send her daughter on to
secondary school in another year.
Service enterprises
A number of the widows had income from service enterprises in which the
widow rendered a service of some sort to other villagers. The interviewed
women described service work such as food preparation, rice milling, and
child care.
Women made prepared food at home and often used their children
to market the food door-to-door to their neighbors. They bought basic
food ingredients, prepared them into a more refined food product, and
resold them. The food products prepared by the widows included sour
soup, rice snacks, desserts, rice porridge, noodle soup, pickles, and rice
wine. The village market for such items meant that some families in the
village had discretionary income to spend on prepared food. The market-
ing of prepared food to other villagers served to redistribute village wealth
from more affluent families to poorer ones. Ol was a poor widow who
profited from the availability of customers in the village. She made rice
snacks throughout the year when she was not doing her agricultural work.
She filled mashed rice cakes with sweets such as coconut or banana and
wrapped them up in a banana leaf. She sold them for 100 riels each ($0.03)
door to door in her commune. It was easy to find customers and she made
about 2000 riels a day ($0.50), her main source of cash. Sometimes people
would pay in rice and then she would earn two kilos of rice a day. She
could not do this work when she was sick, however, and she was sick often
with fatigue and aching bones.
A more affluent widow, Khoeurn, owned a still in which she pro-
duced rice wine. She had acquired the still when her husband was still
alive and the couple had some discretionary money. With this productive
investment, Khoeurn had a steady cash income. She produced rice wine in
a large open kitchen area between her pig pen and her rice fields. She and
her husband had started the business in 1980 during the krom samaki era.
Khoeurn had always processed the wine herself. She mixed the mash of
cooked rice, water and sugar in a large covered metal drum and let it sit
for three days to ferment. She then heated it in her still and the steam from
the fermented rice mixture dripped down a long pipe through a cool water
cistern. As the rice steam cooled, it condensed into a fluid and the rice
wine dripped into a plastic thirty-liter container. Khoeurn mixed a batch
of mash every three days and figured that she made a profit of 10,000 riels
per week ($2.50).18
Another widow had acquired a rice milling machine as a home busi-
ness. Her investment in this machine helped leverage other income for her
family. Ry had purchased the rice mill two or three years earlier. She milled
rice for her neighbors and was paid in rice, two cans19 of husked rice for
ten kilos of milling. Ry made five kilos of rice a month from this small
business. She fed the rice husks from the milling to her pigs, five kilos a
day, as well as four cans of cooked rice. The income from her rice mill paid
for the feed for her three pigs, increasing the profits Ry made when she
sold her pigs.
After a certain age, women who had alternatives no longer did farm-
ing work or other income-producing work. Instead, they stayed at home
and took care of children. It was generally older women who lived with
their adult children who could afford to give up productive work outside
the home. While these women did not receive cash for their services, they
were housed and fed by their younger family members and their child care
work was a real economic contribution to the household. Ching, for exam-
ple, lived with her younger daughter, her son-in-law, and their five children.
The two youngest children were too small to attend school and the widow
watched these grandchildren during the day. Ching had been supported by
her two daughters since her husband died in 1980 shortly after the Pol Pot
era. She had supervised all five of her younger daughter’s children as they
were growing up, freeing her daughter to work in the fields.
her other two types of agriculture. Nonetheless, women provide more labor
than men do in the sort of irrigation agriculture seen in Cambodia. The
manual tasks of transplanting and weeding are much more time-consuming
than the male tasks of plowing and irrigation.
When a rural family loses male labor with the husband’s death, the
widow and her children must compensate for the loss. The widows in this
study engaged in a variety of tactics to fill the gap left by their husband and
to accomplish the necessary work of producing the family’s food.
Relatives plow
In some households, the widow’s son was old enough to do the plowing
himself at the time of his father’s death. Ching and Heng were in their six-
ties when their husband died and they each had adult sons who plowed for
them. In other cases, a son-in-law or other male relative did the plowing. A
brother plowed for Seak and Vanna, and Sophea’s father plowed her fields.
Sometimes the relative plowed for free. In other cases, the widow recipro-
cated the favor by pulling and transplanting the relative’s fields in return.
Some families calculated the exchange of labor in a provas man-
ner with a number of days transplanting in exchange for a half day of
plowing, though usually with a better exchange rate than a non-rela-
tive.23 Other families simply worked until everyone’s fields were plowed
and transplanted, no matter the time involved. If the widow was elderly,
the labor typically exchanged was to watch the grandchildren. Sometimes
equipment was exchanged for labor. In one family, two adult children
owned one ox each and their widowed mother had a plow. The two sons
plowed all their fields and their mother’s as well, using the two oxen and
the plow.
In some cases, the relative plowing was a teenage boy. Khoeurn’s 17-
year old son got up at 2 a.m. and plowed his mother’s fields by moonlight
before going to school at 7 a.m. His mother had six rice fields and it took
him six early mornings of labor to plow them.
Labor exchange
On occasion, there was no relative available to do the male tasks. In those
cases, widows exchanged transplanting labor (provas stung) with an unre-
lated male to get their plowing done. Leang, for instance, pulled and trans-
planted a neighbor’s rice seedlings for a specified period of time and he
in turn plowed her fields. Often the widows had to do the transplanting
exchange labor before the man plowed their fields. Then their own trans-
planting took place later in the growing season, delaying the progress of the
rice seedlings and therefore the harvest. When the mother was sickly, her
children did the labor exchange, transplanting in exchange for plowing on
their mother’s field. At times, even with the offer of exchange labor, it was
hard to find someone to do the plowing due to the loss of men in war.
Labor exchange for plowing was calculated based on one-half day
of plowing by a plowman with a team of oxen. In exchange for one-half
day of plowing, women transplanted for one to three or more full days.24
Ching noted that the ratio of exchange had worsened in her S’ang village,
with three or even four days of transplanting now required for a half day
of plowing rather than the two days previously. She said that there were
fewer men in the village to plow and so the price had gone up. Widows in
the Angk Snuol village had a better exchange ratio (only one or two days
of transplanting required for a half day of plowing) than the S’ang village
widows with three or more days required.
It usually took several mornings to plow a widow’s fields since the
plow team could only complete part of the fields in a single morning. The
widows interviewed needed the team for three or four mornings to plow
all their land. In exchange, the women would transplant three days for
every morning of plowing, nine to twelve days in all. Once the exchange
transplanting was done, the women had to transplant their own rice fields.
When they did not have sufficient family labor to do their transplanting
expeditiously, they exchanged labor with a work crew of women. The work
crew transplanted continuously until the rice fields of all the women in the
crew were completed. Women usually transplanted for four weeks or more
when they had to rely on labor exchange rather than family labor to do
their plowing and transplanting.
Some of the widows accepted the uneven male-female labor exchange
as justified by the greater strength involved in plowing. They reasoned that
men must manage the oxen as well as carry and assemble the heavy plow.
Some women noted that the oxen’s labor had to be considered as well.
Seak suggested that the exchange relationship was lopsided because one
party had the plow and oxen, important assets. Other widows protested
the uneven exchange. Chandaravy said that the uneven exchange rate was
unfair but it was the only way that a person without oxen could get their
plowing done. Transplanting was a backbreaking, arduous and tedious task
requiring hours bent over a wet rice paddy. The women’s hours of labor
were not valued as much by the community, however, as the male strength
involved in plowing. The difference between the two sorts of labor was
not effort but physical endowment, with male strength valued much more
highly than female persistence and endurance.
One widow noted that not only widows had to exchange labor for
plowing but also poor people who did not own a plow or oxen. Some vil-
lagers had oxen from before the Pol Pot era, particularly if they were “old
people” who had not been displaced by the Khmer Rouge.25 Many poorer
families, however, had no oxen after the Pol Pot time.
Paid labor
If a widow could find sufficient cash, she could hire someone to do her
plowing. Women resorted to this when they were sick, for example. Narin
did not have an ox and so she had to hire a plowman. She was too sick to
transplant and exchange labor for the plowing. So she taught her young
children to transplant and they earned money to pay for the plow team. It
cost 13,000 riels26 to hire a plow team for a morning. Meseth paid 10,000
riels for a morning of plowing on her chamkar land. These were the excep-
tional cases among the widows interviewed since most did not want to
spend precious cash on plowing.
and paid with her field labor, transplanting the owner’s fields for a day in
exchange for a day with the plow team. She plowed her own half-hectare
field as well as other fields that she farmed provas style, surplus land that
the owners could not farm personally. She did all the farm work on these
fields and split the harvest 50–50 with the owners. In all she plowed 1–1/2
hectares of land, 45 to 60 days of plowing.27 She had considered buying her
own plow and oxen but it was too expensive for her.28
Like Chandaravy, several widows had plowed while their husband
was alive, if he was sick or involved in other more lucrative work. Dara had
taken up the plow during her husband’s terminal illness. She had tried to
exchange her plow-team for plowing by a neighbor, but most villagers had
their own oxen. She could not find a laborer to hire, either. Ol had plowed
when her husband was sick. Chan plowed because her husband was busy
collecting wood to sell.29 One widow, Ry, plowed as a girl, driving one of
her father’s two teams of oxen.
The widows plowed because it was necessary to feed their family.
Dara found the plowing difficult but felt that it was her job to get the work
done. Ol commented that women plow by necessity, doing whatever was
needed for the family to have food to eat. Most widows learned to plow
from their father or their husband. A few like Chandaravy learned on their
own. Oeung said that she learned from her mistakes. Ol learned from her
mother, who plowed when Ol’s father was sick. One widow learned to
plow from the Khmer Rouge.
Most of the plow-women had acquired their plow and oxen while they
were married. Dany and her husband had kept their oxen with them during
the Khmer Rouge displacement. Sokha and her husband had left their oxen
with a neighbor to watch during the four years of the Pol Pot era. When
Sokha returned to the village, she reclaimed the oxen.30 Ry had found wan-
dering oxen abandoned by the Khmer Rouge in their 1979 retreat and had
appropriated them. Some widows did not own a plow team and borrowed
one each season, plowing the owner’s field in exchange. None of the wid-
ows were able to purchase oxen on their own. One widow had acquired a
young ox through provas, caring for the mother ox in exchange for a calf.
The young ox was not yet strong enough to plow, however.
The most difficult part of plowing for the widows was getting the
plowshare through hard, dry earth. Dara said that it was easier when there
was water on the field to soften it. She had trouble controlling the oxen
that would pull the wrong way when tired. Chan found it hard to control
the plow. Transporting the heavy plow31 was also difficult for the widows.
It usually was carried to the field and then attached to the oxen in the
field. The women would sometimes connect it in the village and have the
oxen drag it to the fields. Once the rice seedlings had been planted, how-
ever, this could no longer be done and the women had to carry the plow.
Though it was heavy, Dara, Chan, and the other women reported that they
had carried it regularly, placing a kroma32 on their shoulder to cushion
the plow.
In study villages in the S’ang and Kien Svay districts of Kandal prov-
ince, widows reported that only men plow. Sophea said that women do not
plow because they are weak and cannot handle the cows. Chantha remem-
bered that women had plowed during the Khmer Rouge era but now didn’t
have the money to buy a plow or oxen. Ching thought that women pre-
ferred to exchange labor rather than plow themselves. They knew the work
well, they could work in teams with other women, and no special equip-
ment was required.
Women’s plowing activity may explain the difference in the trans-
planting labor exchange rate. In the S’ang district where women did not
plow, a morning’s plowing exchanged for three or four complete days of
transplanting. In Angk Snuol where women did plow, a morning’s plowing
exchanged for only two days of transplanting. The availability of plow-
women in the village may have increased competition among those looking
for plow work. With a lower demand for plowing (because some women
plowed their own fields) and higher supply (the availability of both female
and male plowers), the value of female transplanting labor increased. A
cultural explanation is that the presence of plow-women may have raised
the value of female labor because everyone in the village knew that women
could plow if they had the equipment. Plow-women undermined the “male
mystique” of plowing as an exclusive and high-status male activity. It is
also possible that the different character of the sandy soil affected the
exchange ratios.
The experience of plowing affected one widow’s attitude towards
the uneven exchange rate. Chandaravy from Angk Snuol complained that
women had to transplant for two days in exchange for one-half day of
plowing. She herself usually plowed her fields but occasionally would do
labor exchange. Her own experience of plowing may have emboldened
her to complain about the uneven exchange rate for women’s transplant-
ing labor since she knew the hard effort involved in both sorts of work.
Her ability and experience of plowing raised her status in her own eyes, an
important effect of women’s labor. Since ownership of plow teams were a
significant factor in village stratification, women’s familiarity with the use
of these teams lessened the degree of gender stratification in the village and
provided a way for female heads of household to improve their family’s
financial standing.
of their fields as well, they spend more time in the collective experience of
a women’s transplanting team.
Women also work collectively to produce one sort of woven mat, the
kantael krahom or red mat. It takes a minimum of two women to make a
mat. The ideal is a team of five women who work from opposite ends of
the mat, weaving towards the center. The team completes as many mats
as there are members of the team with the finished product going to the
woman who has supplied the dyed reeds for the mat.
By contrast, men’s agricultural work in rural Cambodia is typically
done alone. Men plow and tend irrigation ditches by themselves. They
transport bundled seedlings or harvested rice on an ox cart. They climb
palm trees to collect palm nectar or collect wood in the forest on their own.
They go out on a lake to fish. If they take a person with them, it is typically
a younger male who is learning the skill and assisting the older man. The
relationship between the older man and the younger one is a hierarchical
relationship, where one is skilled and the other is the assistant.
Women’s team work is much more egalitarian with the workers on
the team cooperating on a peer basis. To accomplish transplanting or mat
production successfully, women must work together cooperatively. The
good of each individual woman is accomplished by all women working
together for their mutual benefit. Their work is a social task, a group
effort that requires social cooperation. The women bring to the work a
social rationality, a recognition that the group working together coop-
eratively can accomplish a goal beyond any of them individually. Group
cooperation is the means to the individual ends of transplanting or mat
production.
The krom samaki work arrangements under the Vietnamese in the
1980s were a similar group effort towards a common goal, informed by a
social rationality. Families were assigned to a group or krom to cultivate
a number of rice fields on a cooperative basis. The rice produced was
divided among the krom families based on the number of people in each
family. Cooperative group effort was the means to the goal of providing
for individual village families. Since women traditionally participated in
group work in transplanting teams, the real difference in the krom system
was the work conditions of men. In a departure from their usual work-
ing conditions, men worked together cooperatively for the common good
of the krom, each contributing their labor so that all the krom families
would have rice.
As part of their female leadership, the widows in the study empha-
sized cooperative effort for the common good of the family, the practices
labeled in this study family solidarity or kruosa samaki. Each member of
the household contributed their labor and earnings to meet the needs of the
household family. The female head adjudicated the distribution of resources
that were given according to need, not equality or individual contribu-
tions. So the cash income of an older brother might go to the school fees of
a younger brother, or two sisters might end their schooling to earn money
for an older brother’s tuition so that he could avoid the military draft.
The same collective social rationality that governed women’s transplant-
ing teams influenced the values and practices of the female-headed house-
holds. It would be interesting to compare these female-headed households
with male-headed households in Cambodia to see how this social rational-
ity differs with both a male and a female adult distributing resources.
work. Meseth’s son did not go to school because he watched his six younger
sisters while his mother worked in the fields.
Similarly, transplanting is a female task. Yet sons often help their
mothers through their teenage years and into young adulthood. In
Rolea B’ier, adult males worked at transplanting if their wife was sick or
involved in some other work. When asked if men resented doing women’s
work, the widows retorted that if they resented it, they wouldn’t eat! The
economy of scarcity and the need to feed the family trumped traditional
gender roles.
Women trespassed into males roles in plowing. In order to feed the
family, the plowing had to be done. If a woman had access to a plow and
strength enough to handle the oxen, it cost her less time to plow herself
than to exchange her transplanting labor for plowing by a man. Widows
said that no one ridiculed them for taking on men’s work. On the con-
trary, they seemed pleased with their skill at plowing and more confident
because they knew this traditionally male role.
The shift of plowing from male to female did not endure into the
next generation, however. When the widows had a son, they turned the
plowing over to him when he became a teenager. Oeung taught her sons
to plow rather than her daughters. She felt that it was right for her sons to
do the plowing rather than her daughters. Chan also gave the plowing to
her teen sons. Despite the permeability of gender roles, traditional alloca-
tions of work by sex persisted. Even women who had plowed for years
did not see plowing as a gender-neutral task. They themselves had taken
up the plow out of necessity. But as soon as their sons were old enough,
they expected them to do the family plowing.
Dara gave her son the plowing when he turned fourteen years
old. She taught an older daughter to plow, too. When the son was in
school, the older daughter would do the family plowing. As soon as the
son returned, however, the family expected him to be responsible for this
task. A son-in-law was available to plow for the family. However, the
female members of the household had to transplant his fields in exchange.
This transplanting labor was time-consuming and arduous. If the brother
plowed, the female members of the household were spared this lengthy
labor exchange. The traditional gender roles served to distribute work
tasks within the family.
In some contexts, gender role permeability may be perceived as “liber-
ation,” as women gaining access to traditionally male work that brings with
it financial rewards, authority, and prestige. The ability to plow seemed to
give rural Cambodian women a sense of accomplishment and empower-
ment and enabled them to feed their families in hard times. They did not
death. Vanna lost her only child during the Pol Pot era. These younger war
widows could reasonably have expected to have many more children in a
natural lifespan with their husband, had he survived the conflict. In a coun-
try where children are the social security system, the loss of children meant
an uncertain old age.
Those children who did survive to adulthood had trouble finding
an appropriate spouse since so many boys and young men had died. One
widow complained that she could not find a good husband for her teenage
daughters at the end of the Pol Pot era because all the available men were
widowers looking for someone to take care of their small children. The
young women were reluctant to become stepmothers and the widow her-
self was guarded about taking on a batch of unrelated grandchildren. Since
grandmothers often watch small children in Cambodia, the widow would
have been the caretaker of the new husband’s children. She didn’t want to
invest her energy in children whose loyalty and affection she was unsure of.
The consequence in this family was that the two daughters never married
and so did not have children of their own to care for them or their mother
in old age, a multi-generational effect of war.
In traditional societies, the extended family serves as an emergency
network to help in times of need. In Cambodia, the civil war blew huge
holes in the extended family safety net. All the war widows had lost many
family members during the Pol Pot time. Grandparents and parents, aunts
and uncles, cousins had all been lost in great numbers. The implications for
the widows were that there were few people to help in emergencies. There
were fewer family members to exchange labor for plowing or transplanting.
With the loss of extended family, widows lost their support network, their
cushion against the crushing effects of poverty. Rin lamented that all her
brothers had been killed in the Pol Pot time, except her youngest brother
who lived far away and was sick as well. When her son and daughter-in-
law died of AIDS, she had no one to turn to for assistance. She lost her land
because she had no relatives to lend her money for the hospital bills. When
she could no longer work, she had to rely on the charity of her neighbors.
She sobbed with grief over her unfortunate circumstances and her grand-
children’s threadbare existence. The war had taken away her social safety
net and there was nothing to replace it. The web of family relationships that
constituted the widows’ social capital was one of the long-term casualties
of war. War made rice cultivation more difficult for widows. War under-
mined and defeated the beneficial effects of family solidarity. In assessing
the causes of rural poverty in the Third World, war must be considered one
of the aggravating factors.
Chapter Summary
exchange rate for female labor was better than in villages where women did
not plow. The variation in gender roles did not persist to the next genera-
tion. Widows who plowed expected their sons to plow once they were old
enough, not their daughters.
The allocation of reproductive labor to women meant that widows
spent significant time in reproductive tasks rather than productive endeav-
ors. Widows lost income from the time spent in these non-income produc-
ing reproductive tasks. Widows’ income also dropped due to the loss of
their husband’s labor and his income activities, usually more lucrative than
women’s income activities.
War had enduring effects on widows’ economic lives. Many widows
lost not only their husband but also children and extended relatives. They
lost their husband’s labor and income and the future labor and income
of their children. They lost the children that they might have had if their
husband had lived. With the death of relatives, widows lost their extended
family safety net in times of need. Widows lost both financial capital and
social capital to war, effects that lasted their entire lives.
Land
Land is the most important rural resource. In Cambodia its basic utility is
to grow the family’s food staple, rice. Rice provides three meals a day to
Cambodian families and most of the widows interviewed grew their family
rice themselves. Cambodians distinguish between rice land, rice paddies in
79
which rice is grown, and house land, a plot in the village on which their
house stands. Villagers frequently grow vegetables and fruit trees on their
house land. Land is differentiated by grade into top, middle, and bottom
land.1 There also is summer land along a river or lake that can only be
farmed in the dry season when the water recedes. Widows usually did not
include summer land in calculations of their land holdings.
In the 1980s land distribution, following the collective farming of
land during the Pol Pot and Vietnamese periods, female heads of house-
hold as well as most other rural villagers received an allocation of land.
Some widows interviewed retained their land from this distribution and
some had passed the land on to their children in the traditional practice of
“dividing the land.” Some women had sold their land, many to pay family
medical bills. A very few had acquired more land to farm.
food in her case. She was not expected to farm because of her age. Instead,
she took care of the small children in a nursery arrangement. Sib had ten
children under her care at one point. They cried a lot, she said, and had
to be fed. Sib didn’t like the arrangement because she only got five thang
from the harvest, less than the agricultural workers. Her sons didn’t get
enough rice, either. They were married with one child each and if there
wasn’t enough rain, none of them got enough rice to last the year. Sib
had an ox and plow that she shared with the krom during this time, but
she didn’t get any additional rice for this contribution. She thought that
the krom was a good arrangement for widows because it helped them
with the plowing and everyone helped one another to survive. Nonethe-
less, she didn’t like the krom samaki arrangement and was glad when it
was changed.
Land distribution
In the 1980s, the Vietnamese regime decided to privatize the land due to
food shortages and popular discontent with the system. The ensuing land
distribution put Cambodia’s farm land back into the hands of farmers.
Because land is the key agricultural resource, the land distribution deeply
affected Cambodia’s rural villages and their residents. The widows in the
study had all received land in the distribution. In most cases, their current
economic capability was directly related to the amount of land they had
received. The land distribution was a very important event in the widows’
economic lives, second only to the death of their husband.
Rice land was divided up by the village head or mae phoum. The
decision to distribute the land and the basic rules of the distribution were
established by the national government although the interviewed women
attributed the decisions to the mae phoum, their local official. The exact
method varied from village to village but the process usually involved allo-
cating a certain number of ares per person. The number depended on how
much land the village owned and how many people were in the village. In
some villages, the land was divided up by household instead of by person.
Widows in another village than their own were sent back to their home
village before the land was distributed and they received land in their orig-
inal village.
The land was allocated with regard to the work capabilities of the
household. Elderly people who could not farm received less land. Large
households with many workers or with oxen received more land. The intent
appears to have been to cultivate all available land and to give uncleared
land to families able to clear it. So the governing values of the land distribu-
tion concerned productivity and rice output rather than equal treatment.
Dividing the land per person meant that families with many members
(children or others living with the family) got a larger allocation of land
than smaller and younger families. They had more mouths to feed as well
but it seems that the larger amount of rice produced from their land meant
that these large families had more discretionary rice. Perhaps the younger
and elderly members of the family ate less rice than could be grown on their
allocation of land. Over time the difference (measured in rice produced per
person) increased between the families that received more land and those
that received less. This increased inequality in land ownership was due to
the fact that the smaller and younger families often subsequently had sev-
eral children. Their small parcel of land then had to be divided, as the chil-
dren became adults, into more and more parcels.
Widows whose husbands were living at the time of the distribution
and who subsequently had children were in this category of small landhold-
ers. When the children married, the mother gave them smaller parcels of
land than other village newlyweds received because the younger children
had not gotten an allocation in the land distribution. So the differential in
land ownership in the village grew over time. The women interviewed did
not consider this unfair, however, or resent the differences in land own-
ership. Most of them saw the land distribution as a just process. They
acknowledged that some families had more land than others but they saw
this as an inevitable result of some families having been larger at the time of
the distribution.
An important drawback of collective farming expressed by the wid-
ows was the chronic shortage of food under the krom samaki system.
Several women reported that once the land was distributed and privately
owned, they were able to grow enough rice to feed their family. Narin said
that under her own management, her land usually produced enough food
for the family, though sometimes she had to purchase rice. Chandaravy
received 50 ares of land and she could grow enough rice to feed her family
on this land. She had never received enough rice for her small family during
the krom time.
seven ares for each child at the land distribution. The widows distributed
their land piece by piece as the children married, keeping the remainder for
their unmarried children and themselves. The land was typically divided
to the new owners at the beginning of the first growing season following
the wedding.
Land record keeping in rural Cambodia has traditionally been accom-
plished through collective village memory. A process of land registration has
been underway for several years in Cambodia, however, and in some villages
widows had a written certificate of ownership for their land. In those vil-
lages, when land was divided to children, the land certificate was marked by
the commune authorities, the mae khoum and the mae phoum.
In other villages, there was no written record of ownership and fami-
lies relied on their common memory in determining who owned which field.
As one widow said, “I pointed to each field and told each child which one
was theirs.” When the parent divided the land to the children, the younger
generation then took complete responsibility for farming and maintaining
the land.
Land was divided to both male and female children though some-
times a child would not receive any land if they had moved far away from
the village or had another occupation. Chantha gave seven ares of rice land
to her daughter when she married a rice farmer from a neighboring village.
Her two other children had married as well but had other means of sup-
port. Her second daughter had moved to Phnom Penh where her husband
was a policeman, and a son had become a nurse in the village. She retained
their allotment of land from the distribution as well as her own and farmed
them herself in the afternoon after teaching school. If one of her employed
children had to return to rice farming in the village, Chantha still had their
land as a fall-back resource for them.
When a widow divided her rice land to her children and so produced
less rice herself, she could expect to be welcomed at meals at her children’s
house. Sokha’s son lived in her village and farmed the land she had divided
to him. Sokha lived in her own house and grew rice on five ares of land that
she had kept for herself. It wasn’t enough to feed herself all year, however.
When she ran out of rice, she went to her son’s or another relative’s to eat.
Cooperative family work arrangements continued after the widows divided
their land to their children. Ry gave her son his share of land, one-half hect-
are, when he married. She still helped him with the transplanting, however,
and he still did the plowing on his mother’s land.
Land stayed with the owner despite changes in marital status. Ol had
given her sons one or two fields when they married, keeping two fields for
herself. When one of her sons got divorced and came back to live with her,
he brought the possession of his field back to his mother’s household. His
ex-wife kept his ox, however.
Sometimes a widow deeded over her land before her children’s mar-
riage, if she were sick and unsure how long she might live. Oeung was
sickly and she wasn’t sure how much longer she would live. She didn’t want
any jealousy among her children after her death so she divided all her land,
including her own allotment from the land distribution, to both her married
and unmarried children. She lived with her younger daughter and relied on
her for her rice.
Some elderly widows had not deeded their land over to their chil-
dren at marriage. In some cases, the widow had only one child who would
inherit the mother’s land at her death. When a widow, such as Ching and
Heng, lived with one of several children, it was likely that the resident child
would inherit the land. In other cases, elderly widows may not have divided
their land as a sort of insurance policy against future problems. Retaining
legal control over their chief asset gave them resources to help their other
children if they were in need. It also gave the widows leverage in the event
of a falling out between them and the child with whom they lived. Seak had
divided her land to her children and deeded her house over to her resident
daughter only to have problems arise with the son-in-law. In response, Seak
left her home and started a new one in her middle age. Such cases, however
rare, may have encouraged widows to keep their land in their legal posses-
sion as long as possible.
The Cambodian practice of dividing land among several children
rather than giving it intact to one child has resulted in the parcellization
of rural lands, with family holdings broken up into smaller and smaller
pieces. Because these small parcels often did not produce enough rice to
support the children and their family, the younger generation was under
increasing pressure to find other means of income generation. Younger peo-
ple often combined agriculture and modern employment. They stayed in
the city temporarily while working in construction or garment production
and then returned to the village until their next job, a sort of intermittent
urbanization. Young people’s departure from the village threatened to leave
their widowed mothers without immediate support. So land pressure from
increasing population threatened widows’ social security network.
children. Often, the treatment did not cure their family member and the
husband or child died. The result was that the widows lost not only their
rice land but also an important worker in their household. The significance
of the loss of rice land, for a widow who depends on agriculture for her
livelihood, cannot be overestimated. Without rice land, a widow must
purchase all her rice in a market where the price fluctuates dramatically
with the agricultural cycle. She needs a daily source of cash income and
the health to work each day. These were significant challenges to elderly or
disabled widows.
Vuth had lost her land when her husband fell ill with malaria. He was
treated in the village for eight months without improvement. Then Vuth
took him to a hospital in Phnom Penh for treatment where he stayed for
two weeks. He did not get better at the hospital and Vuth brought him
home again to be seen by a private doctor. In order to pay for the hospital
and the private doctor, Vuth sold all 85 ares of their rice land. Three days
after the sale, her husband died.
Other widows sold their land to pay for medical treatment for their
adult children. In some of these cases, the child died, leaving the widow
with medical bills and grandchildren to care for in her old age. Rin’s son
contracted AIDS and communicated it to his wife. Rin relied on her son
heavily because she had lost her other children and most of her relatives
during the Khmer Rouge era. She sold her 75 ares of rice land to pay for
expensive medical treatment for her son and daughter-in-law. It cost Rin
$2000 in all. After months of treatment, the daughter-in-law died. The fol-
lowing day, Rin’s son died. After paying for the medical and funeral costs,
Rin had some money left and bought a sturdy house for herself and the two
orphaned grandchildren. She supported the family by working as an agri-
cultural laborer until she became too old and sick herself. The bereft family
then had to depend on the charity of their neighbors.
Sometimes widows sold their rice land for some other reason than
medical emergencies. Narin sold 30 ares, about one-half of her land, to
obtain jobs for her children. She had to pay for a bribe to a garment factory
manager so that he would hire her two older children. She sold the ares for
$100 to neighbors who wanted more land to graze their ox. The garment
factory manager told her that the bribe cost $120 for the two children.
Narin used $100 from the land sale and borrowed $20 from a relative. She
felt it was a good trade-off because her children got paying jobs.
Acquisitions of land
Only one widow in the sample, Khoeurn, had purchased rice land since the
krom samaki land distribution. Her neighbors wanted to sell 50 ares to buy
an ox and she had some extra money from her rice wine business. When
Khoeurn’s husband had been ill, she had used her savings to pay for her
husband’s medical treatment and so did not have to sell any land.
Khoeurn’s case illustrates the value of a productive microenterprise
in building savings. Khoeurn’s savings helped her prevent loss of land dur-
ing her husband’s illness and allowed her to acquire additional land. An
important part of this positive picture was Khoeurn’s ownership of a rice
still which she acquired while her husband was living. His labor and addi-
tional income were no doubt key to the household’s ability to acquire this
important asset.
Credit
The use of credit varied according to the financial circumstances of the wid-
ows. Those with more resources in terms of land and working adults could
afford to borrow for productive purposes such as investing in a microbusi-
ness or buying fertilizer for a more abundant crop. For these widows, credit
was an valuable option. This group could also afford to choose not to bor-
row. They could save up small surpluses so that they had a financial cushion
in case of medical emergency. They could invest in new business ventures or
purchase a more substantial house for their family out of their savings and
did not need to borrow.
Poorer families borrowed out of necessity. They borrowed because
they had no rice to eat and needed food for the family. They borrowed to
cover debts that had become unmanageable or because they needed money
to pay for medical expenses. These families ran the risk of losing their land,
their chief productive asset, if they could not repay their debts. They tee-
tered on the edge of hunger and abject poverty.
The widows borrowed in small amounts, too small to be profitable
for commercial banks. The widows’ loans came from relatives, neighbors,
moneylenders or microcredit organizations. Interest rates varied widely
from no interest to over 800 percent per year. Most women repaid their
loans within a short period of time thus capping the amount of interest
they paid. Others could not repay quickly and paid interest for many years.
Besides their inability to pay down the principal, these indebted widows
lost their ability to borrow new money and were threatened with the loss
of their land.
Borrowing and saving was often done in rice rather than in cash. For
the poorer families, cash was extremely scarce and hard to find to pay back
a debt. Borrowing in rice was safer, especially just before the harvest when
rice would soon be plentiful. Families saved in rice as well, selling small
amounts when they needed cash. The price of rice varied depending on the
season so this strategy was not aimed at increasing a family’s total worth.
Rather, it was aimed at safety since rice was harder to steal than cash. And
in a bad harvest year, the family could always eat the rice.
the debt, they were forced to sell their land. If someone owed a lot of money
to the moneylender and couldn’t repay, they would run away from the vil-
lage and disappear.
planned to pay her debt off at harvest time as long as floods did not ruin her
crop. Until then, she paid 10,600 riels ($2.70) a month that included 2000
riels in savings. Meseth still had to borrow from relatives occasionally for
food. They did not charge her interest and she paid them back at the harvest.
Last year, a relative loaned her $50 to pay for the birth of her grandson. It
was a difficult delivery and the widow’s daughter had to give birth at the
hospital. The widow hadn’t yet been able to repay her relative.
Women in peer loan groups were keenly aware that their personal
reputation was at stake in their repayment history. Everyone in the group
knew whether they had made their payments. Village reputation was a
powerful motivator. Since widows lived in one location for most of their
lives, their personal standing with other villagers was very important to
them. Some were reluctant to join a peer loan group because they were
afraid they wouldn’t be able to repay and it would create tension and ill-
feeling in the village. Defaulting on a loan was seen as a disastrous outcome
which damaged the borrower’s reputation and ruined her credit. For these
reasons, women were careful about borrowing and keen to repay promptly.
Those who were unable to repay recognized the gravity of the situation and
feared losing their land and good standing in the village.
their land. Narin was offered credit by the government to buy oxen that
would have reduced her farming expenses. She would have had to sign a
five-year contract, however, and she was afraid of not being able to repay.
Worried about losing her land, Narin refused the loan.
Other widows had enough land and income that they did not need to
borrow money. Heng reported that she never needed to borrow. She said
that she always had enough rice to feed her family and did not want to bor-
row money. Widows with sufficient assets could afford to save money and
had some resources to draw on in difficult times. Khoeurn had savings to
use when her husband became ill and had to be hospitalized. She did not
have to borrow or put her land in jeopardy.
Education
Cambodian education is organized in tiers loosely based on the French
system. Primary education consists of six grades (first through sixth). Sec-
ondary school has two levels, lower secondary8 (seventh, eighth and ninth
grades) and upper secondary9 (tenth, eleventh, and twelfth grades). Com-
prehensive examinations are given at the end of the lower secondary level
(grade nine) and during upper secondary school.10 Until the Pol Pot era and
the abolition of education, Cambodian grade levels were numbered begin-
ning with twelve, the lowest grade (first grade in the current system). Pri-
mary school extended for six years, from the twelfth through the seventh
grade and secondary education began in the sixth grade. Older respondents
reported their education using these numbers.11
Education entered the lives of the interviewed widows in two ways:
the education that the women had received as girls and the education that
they provided for their children. The amount of education that the women
themselves received determined the skill level that they brought to their eco-
nomic life. The education that they arranged for their children reflected their
current financial situation and their strategies and hopes for the future.
Widows’ education
The amount of childhood schooling that the widows in the study received
varied widely from no schooling at all to eight years of school, with an
average highest grade attained of 1.6. Older women had received less edu-
cation while younger women had received more education (see Table 1).
No schooling
Fourteen women in the sample with an average age of 64 years had received
no schooling at all. They gave a number of reasons for not going to school
including their poor family’s need for their labor, civil unrest, the lack of a
nearby school, and parents’ fears concerning coeducation. All but one of
these women could not read or write. The exception, Meseth, had learned
to read as an adult.
Most women reported that they did not go to school because their
parents were too poor and needed their daughter’s labor at home. Chanda-
ravy had watched the family ox. Vy had taken care of younger siblings, and
Vanna had watched her sick father. Other widows had collected firewood
for cooking rice or for producing palm sugar.
Some widows mentioned civil unrest as a factor in their lack of educa-
tion. Chandaravy noted that in her teen years there were no schools because
of the Khmer Rouge anti-education policy. Sokha said that her family was
always on the move during her childhood out of fear of the insurgency
group, the Khmer Issarak. Their constant movements considerably aggra-
vated the family’s poverty and contributed to her lack of schooling. When
she was 12 years old, Sokha’s father died after being captured by the Issarak
guerrillas, and her mother died soon after of illness. Sokha had to work to
support her younger siblings and school was out of the question.
Some widows did not attend school due to the lack of a suitable school
nearby. Ching and Heng did not attend school because there was no school
close to their home when they were small for either girls or boys. Another
widow didn’t want to attend the wat school as some girls did because she
was afraid of the monks.12
Several widows mentioned that their parents’ fears about coeduca-
tion restricted their schooling. Ching said that in addition to the lack of
a school nearby, her parents feared that if she went to school and learned
to read and write, she would write love letters to boyfriends.13 The two
concerns may have been related. The love-letter reason may have been a
teasing parental explanation for the girl’s lack of education when the real
reason was the lack of a school nearby. By attributing the lack of education
to a parental decision, the parents presented themselves as if in control of
a situation over which they actually had little control, the lack of a suit-
able school. In the process, they shifted responsibility to the girl, blaming
her alleged future behavior (writing illicit love letters to a boyfriend) as the
reason that she could not go to school. In this way the parents were able to
hide their poverty and insignificance in the political system and maintain an
illusion of power and authority in the family, so important in the hierarchi-
cal Cambodian social arrangement.
In this manner of reasoning, the parents’ explanation about the girl
writing love letters, which appears to be a cultural matter of patriarchy,
is actually a structural issue, the availability of schools. Culture, how-
the grandparents minimized their own poverty and need for the girl’s labor
and reasserted their authority in the household.
Narin’s education was interrupted by the love-letter concern. Narin
had attended primary school in Phnom Penh, staying with a cousin and
watching the cousin’s children after school in return for her school fees.
When she was ready to advance to fourth grade, however, her parents
raised the love letter issue and pulled her out of school, bringing her home
to the village. Since Narin had already learned how to write, the parents’
behavior suggests a fear of the contacts in school more than literacy itself.
Perhaps they felt that the danger to their daughter’s reputation, so impor-
tant for a good marriage, was greater than the benefit to be gained from
more years of education. By bringing the girl home to the village, the par-
ents reestablished their control over their daughter and gained her youthful
labor power, as well as safeguarding her reputation for marriage.
Illness affected the school career of other widows. Ol missed school
often due to headaches and bouts of malaria. She attended school for
ten years but had to repeat every class and only attained the third grade.
Because of her frequent absences it was hard for her to do the schoolwork
and she kept falling behind. Chan had had an illness that interfered with
her mental ability and made her hair fall out. She had trouble remembering
and couldn’t keep up with the class. By age 13 she was only in the second
grade and decided to stop. Her parents wanted her to continue but she was
too discouraged and gave up. She never learned to read or write although
she could do a little arithmetic.
The expense of school fees affected one widow’s education. Ry
dropped out of school after three years because her family could no longer
afford the school fees. She had learned to read and write simple phrases as
well as some arithmetic.
Secondary school
One widow, Chantha, had entered secondary school and completed eighth
grade. She finished her education before the Pol Pot era. Khoeurn said that
it was unusual for girls in her age group to study past the primary level. Her
father had insisted that she continue her education. As a girl, Chantha stud-
ied at a renovated wat school. With her father’s encouragement, she went
to secondary school for two years and finished the eighth grade. Chantha’s
secondary education qualified her to be a teacher following the Pol Pot era
when her husband was killed. She taught in the mornings and tended her
rice field in the afternoons. She had an apartment at the school in a modern
building and was paid a monthly salary by the government.
Chantha used her earnings to pay the school costs for her three chil-
dren who all went to secondary school. Her son continued on to nursing
school in Phnom Penh and was the nurse in the commune clinic. Chantha’s
experiences underline the importance of education as a gateway resource,
opening up future possibilities not only for the woman educated but for her
children as well.
who produced enough rice for their household had more education (grade
3.0) than the landowners who did not produce enough rice (grade 2.4). In
contrast to these widows who had retained their land, the widows who
lost their land had much less education (grade 0.6). Widows lost their land
mostly in medical emergencies when they did not have cash resources to
fall back on. Those who did have cash reserves were able to weather these
crises and retain their land. Education may have played a role in the rural
landowners’ ability to earn and manage income and thus safeguard their
land in emergencies.
Khoeurn, for instance, had a sixth grade education and ran a rice
wine business out of her home kitchen. Pooling the proceeds with her hus-
band’s income, Khoeurn had been able to acquire an extra half hectare
of land from a neighbor, bringing her holdings to one hectare. When her
husband fell ill with malaria, Khoeurn had sufficient cash reserves to pay
for his medical treatment and preserve the land assets they had acquired
together. The fact that Khoeurn had been widowed only recently was an
important part of her more affluent circumstances. However, her own pro-
ductivity in the rice-wine business and her money-management skills were
an essential part of the picture as well. Her sixth-grade education was no
doubt instrumental in her business acumen and her confidence in manag-
ing her household finances.
Children’s schooling
The education that the children of the interviewed widows received can be
viewed as an outcome of their mothers’ economic coping abilities. Mothers
in general value their children and use their resources for their children’s
benefit. Education is a key benefit for children, a way to develop skills that
become a resource for the future. In addition, mothers who see their own
future as tied to their children’s economic endeavors will invest in their chil-
dren as liberally as they can. So mothers’ motivation to invest in children’s
education is twofold: they wish their children to do as well as possible for
the sake of the children themselves, and they see their own future social
security as dependent on the children’s success.
When the mother’s economic situation changes with the death or loss
of a husband, the ability of the mother to cope with her changed financial
circumstances is crucial for her children’s future. For her children to be
educated, the mother must accumulate resources for the children’s school
fees and manage to accomplish her work without the children’s full-time
labor. The amount of education that the children receive is therefore an
indicator of the mother’s resourcefulness in dealing with her financial and
personal situation.
poor students. Besides the annual costs and the daily school fees, parents
sometimes pay additional charges related to erecting or repairing the school
building itself. All of these informal fees vary by school locality.
The expenses of sending a child to school were a challenge to most of
the rural families in the study. Many widows mentioned lack of money as
the chief reason that their children stopped their schooling. Some mothers
had difficulty paying for school fees for all their children at once and traded
off one child’s education against another’s. Chan could not send her oldest
child to school because she was too poor but managed to come up with
the fees later for her younger children. When her second child completed
fifth grade, she pulled him out of school so that she could continue to send
the youngest children. Other mothers called on the older children to help
pay for the younger children’s expenses. Chandaravy sent her older son to
school until he was twelve years old and had reached the third grade. Then
she had no more money for the school fees and he left school to farm his
mother’s land. When he eventually began work as a construction laborer,
some of his earnings went to pay for the school fees for his younger brother.
In a similar case, Bopha paid for her son’s school fees until he was 20 years
old and had reached fourth grade. When she ran out of money and her son
went to work as a construction laborer, his income covered the school fees
for his younger sister, age 14, in the fifth grade.
A related tactic widows used to cope with school costs was to delay
the children’s entrance into school. Many children in the study did not start
school at the usual age of six but waited two or three years to begin first
grade. Lim waited until her daughter was ten years old to start her in school
because there was no money for the school fees and supplies for both the girl
and her older brother. Another way that rural widows coped with school
costs was to marshal their relatives to pay for some of the expenses. Narin
asked her Phnom Penh relatives to send school supplies for her children.
On rare occasion, children did not have to pay school fees. An elderly
widow, Rin, cared for two grandchildren whose parents had both died of
AIDS. Because the children were orphans, the teacher excused them from
the school fees. A neighbor paid for the children’s uniforms and the elderly
widow scraped together the money for their books.
Illness
Illness interfered with children’s education. If the widowed mother became
sick and could not work, her children missed school or dropped out alto-
gether to care for her and support the family. In other cases, the children
themselves became sick and missed school. In both cases, the children ran the
risk of falling behind in their studies because of the missed classes. Many chil-
dren repeated classes because of their spotty attendance and some dropped
out because it was so hard for them to learn under the circumstances.
Narin fell ill and needed her older children to work and care for her.
When she recovered her health, she was able to send her younger children
to school. Vuth’s older children stopped school because their father had
died and their mother was sick. The oldest girl took care of the young chil-
dren, a boy hired himself out as a laborer, and another girl went to work at
a garment factory. The four younger children in Vuth’s family were still in
school thanks to the efforts of their older siblings.
Another widow had chronic illnesses and needed her children’s labor
to grow the family’s rice and earn money. The daughter watched the smaller
children and then at age thirteen started doing the farming. The son col-
lected palm sap and made palm sugar to sell for cash. Because the daugh-
ter’s work was more time-consuming, she only went to the third grade. The
son could do the palm sugar work after school and so he continued to the
seventh grade.
Distance to school
Some older children delayed their schooling because there were no schools
in their area. Lim’s older child did not start school until age twelve due to
the lack of school in her village.
In some rural communities the lower primary school (grades 1–3) was
within walking distance but the upper primary school (grades 4–6) was
Children’s truancy
Some children skipped school with their friends. One widow sent her two
boys to school but they often would skip classes and play instead. Neither
learned to read and as an adult the one surviving boy regretted his youthful
foolishness. Another widow said that her sons were lazy and played tru-
ant with their friends. She was off in the fields and didn’t know that they
skipped school. When she found out about it, she punished them but they
still didn’t change. She thought it would have been easier with their father
present in the household. Her daughters were more manageable and the
oldest girl finished lower secondary school. Despite her sons’ misbehavior,
they nonetheless did learn to read.
Heng felt that her children skipped school because they were not treated
fairly by the teacher. They didn’t have money to give to the teacher to get
good grades and were failing. Finally, they got discouraged and dropped out.
Armed conflicts
Another important restraint on rural children’s schooling was Cambodia’s
many armed conflicts, first the civil war and American bombing campaign
and then the abolition of formal education by the Khmer Rouge. The chil-
dren of some widows missed five or six years of education because of these
civil disruptions. After the Khmer Rouge era, the smallest children resumed
their education under the reconstituted educational system. But children in
their teenage years often felt uncomfortable beginning school again in a
classroom with young children. These older students typically did not stay
in school for long and consequently missed out on a primary education.
Some did not learn to read or write and so their adult work options were
greatly restricted. Their adult illiteracy was a direct consequence of the war
era, a loss in human capital that was never recouped. In Leang’s case, her
older children started school late because of the Pol Pot era. The oldest
child was eleven when she entered second grade in the reopened schools.
She was embarrassed at being so much older than the other students and
only studied for one year. Her younger brothers didn’t feel so odd and con-
tinued into secondary school.
education. Ching still valued education for the female members of her family
and talked with pride about her granddaughter in upper secondary school.
The elderly widow hoped that she would see her graduation and expressed
the desire to have her granddaughter become a teacher.
Moam recalled how disappointed she felt as a girl when her parents
would not let her go to school because she was too skinny. She regretted
never learning to read or write. As soon as the Pol Pot time ended, she
started her two children in school. The widow put them through school as
long as she could and her daughter finished sixth grade and her son eighth
grade. She regretted that she didn’t have the money to send the children on
to the higher grades and said wistfully that she would have liked them to
study more.
Chantha’s mother, also a widow, sent all seven of her children to
school despite her own complete lack of education. The children’s schooling
began when a relative from Phnom Penh came to visit and Chantha’s father
was embarrassed that his children were not in school. The relative encour-
aged the parents to send the children to school in the hopes of eventually
having a business of their own in the city. The parents wanted their children
to have a better life than their own so they decided to send the children
to school. Chantha continued into lower secondary school and became a
teacher. At the time of the interview, four of Chantha’s siblings had moved
to the city and were working for the government or in a small business, so
Chantha’s mother felt that the plan had worked out well.
Dara, who had little education herself, had sent her five children to
the fourth grade, and the younger children had entered secondary school.
Dara was very supportive of education for her children, including her
daughters. She realized, however, that there were limits to education and
commented, “Education is not so important as money in acquiring a job.
But it’s not a waste, because you don’t know what the future will bring.”
Dara’s observation reflected the widely held view that to get a job a bribe
was always necessary.
In both these families, the mother was committed to education for her chil-
dren, juggling the farming duties among the school children and their older
siblings. Several of the children in these two families continued to study
through secondary school.
Some mothers educated their children even though they had no land.
Vuth had sold her land to pay for her husband’s medical treatment before
his death two years earlier. Once widowed, she managed to continue send-
ing her four younger children to school. The older children stopped school
when the father died to help the mother who had become sick herself. The
older children earned money for food and school fees and handled child
care responsibilities.
Chapter Summary
Most interviewed widows owned land acquired during the 1980s land dis-
tribution. They had all taken part in the krom samaki period when land
was owned and farmed collectively. The widows liked the group coopera-
tion but disliked the rules and chronic food shortages of collective farm-
ing. At the end of the krom period, the land was distributed by the village
head on a per-person basis. Large families received larger parcels than small
families. Several widows received more land in the distribution than they
had owned before the collective era, though some received less. Since the
village head took productive capability into consideration, elderly and sick
widows received less land than other villagers. Widows with small families
received so little land in the distribution that they could not support their
family and had to find other sources of income.
Some elderly widows interviewed had divided most of their land to
their children and relied on them for food. Other widows had lost their land
due to medical emergencies. Several sold all their land during their husband’s
terminal illness to obtain medical treatment for him. When he died, they
found themselves without their work partner and without land.
The use of credit varied according to widows’ economic circum-
stances. Poor widows borrowed by necessity for food and medical care.
When they could not repay their loans, they risked the loss of their land,
their chief asset. Other widows had more resources and borrowed for pro-
ductive purposes, to purchase an ox and to buy a rice mill. Widows pre-
ferred to borrow from relatives who often did not charge interest and were
lenient with repayment. If the widows’ relatives had been killed in the war
or were too poor to lend, widows turned to moneylenders. They had to
pay high interest on these loans, 10 percent per month or more, and some-
times had to sign over their land as collateral. Some widows paid interest
on loans for months, unable to repay the principal. Widows without land
typically could not get loans from moneylenders.
In some villages, widows had access to loans from NGO microcredit
organizations. They borrowed in groups and accumulated savings in a
group fund. NGO loans carried much lower interest rates. Some widows
did not want to borrow in groups, however, afraid that if they could not
repay, they would ruin their village reputation.
Most interviewed widows had very little education. Older widows
had less education than younger widows. Elderly widows had no education
due to the lack of schools for girls in their youth or their parents’ need for
their labor. Several widows reported that their parents had taken them out
of school, fearful that their daughters would write love-letters if they were
educated. Some widows had left school due to chronic illnesses or lack of
school fees. A few widows had finished primary school and felt that their
education had given them confidence in the marketplace and better inter-
personal skills. One completed eighth grade and became a schoolteacher
and managed to send all three of her children to secondary school.
The widows with more education were better able to farm produc-
tively and to keep their land. The widows who usually had enough rice
for their families had more education than widows without enough rice.
The widows who had lost their land to medical emergencies had much less
education than widows who had not lost their land. Education helped the
widows manage their money better and earn enough to have some cash in
reserve for emergencies.
The education of the widows’ children can be seen as a measure of
the widows’ economic coping skills. The widows prioritized their children’s
education. While the widows themselves had very little education on aver-
age, their children had reached the fourth grade. Even widows with no edu-
cation at all were eager for their children and grandchildren to be educated.
In order to pay for school costs, widows traded one child’s education off
against another’s. Widows delayed the entrance of younger children into
school until older children had received several years of education. Then
the older children earned income to pay for the school fees of their younger
siblings. Widows also marshaled resources from relatives to pay for school
costs. Widows educated their daughters on an equal basis with their sons,
unlike the prevailing practice in Cambodian society where sons receive
more education than daughters.
Widows pulled their children out of school when they were too sick
to work and needed their children’s labor to feed the family. Sometimes
children stopped school due to their own illnesses or the lack of a village
school. The civil war and Khmer Rouge era interrupted the education
115
Theoretical Implications
A number of theoretical conclusions can be drawn from this case study for
advancing our understanding of widows, poverty, and gender inequality in
rural areas of the Third World. First, it must be emphasized that the pov-
erty of rural widows is due largely to the difficulty of making a living by
subsistence agriculture. Land is often divided up into small parcels which
provide only a modest harvest, even in a good year. Credit is expensive,
available mostly from high-priced money-lenders. The weather is unpredict-
able, and crops fail through flooding, drought, and pests. Most rural areas
are far from the economic life of an urban center. Since nearly everyone in
rural villages is an impoverished subsistence farmer, little money circulates
to stimulate economic growth. As one widow plaintively noted, “We are
all poor farmers in this village.” Even with two adult earners, life is hard
in rural areas of the Third World. With the loss of their husband, women
struggle to support their household alone. Widows call on their children’s
labor because it is so essential to helping the family survive.
Patriarchal walls
It is not only the difficulties of subsistence agriculture which impoverish wid-
ows, however. They are additionally hampered by patriarchal values which
subordinate women and their labor, exacerbating female poverty. Patriar-
chy takes a particular shape in each locality (Kandiyoti 1988). Women are
subordinated in distinctive ways from one region to another. In some areas,
patriarchy is strong and highly oppressive to women. In other areas, patri-
archy is weaker and women have more choices and some freedom from
male domination. One may think of patriarchy as a wall dividing men and
women, which in some places is made of stone and heavily fortified, hard
to scale and impossible to see through. In other places, the wall is lower
and with effort, one may climb it and peer over. Elsewhere, the wall may be
a picket fence that one can slip through easily and perhaps even dismantle
in places. Patriarchy varies from one culture to another, and women adapt
to the particular expectations of their own culture. The economic options
available to women depend on the shape of patriarchy in their region.
In the case of rural Cambodia, patriarchy is like a thatch wall, a
divider between men and women that is distinct but thin and imperma-
nent, allowing some movement from one side to the other. Women are
subordinate to men overall but have economic options that empower them
and facilitate some freedom from domination. Both the subordination of
women and their economic empowerment are institutionalized in cultural
customs and practices.
a difficult challenge for widows without resident male labor. Since most
lacked a plow and oxen, their only alternative was to negotiate with rela-
tives or neighbors in the village for plowing services. The result for most
widows was that their plowing took place late in the planting season, after
the relative or neighbor had finished their own planting. The later start for
widows meant a later harvest with a lower yield and a longer hunger gap.
In view of the narrow margin in rural Cambodia between having enough
rice to last the year and going weeks or months with very little food, a
lower yield on the rice crop was a critical situation. If both men and women
ordinarily plowed in Cambodia, widows would have had a better chance of
feeding themselves and their children throughout the year.
The devaluation of female labor had many other consequences for
widows. They earned less income and had fewer savings than if their
labor were valued more equitably. With less cash in reserve, they found it
more difficult to raise school fees for their children. With less food secu-
rity, they were more anxious for the future. They were less able to deal
with family medical emergencies and more likely to lose their land. These
factors all distinguish widows’ households from other households with
adult male labor.
In the institutionalization of women’s subordination in Cambodia,
women have more work than men, and the work is valued less than men’s.
Women have less time to engage in productive income-producing work,
and the work that they do is paid less than men’s work. This double blow
helps explain the relative poverty of female-headed households and their
chronic food insecurity and sheds light on the process of the feminization
of poverty.
relatives nearby who can help in times of trouble. These traditional female
capabilities do not mean that women are equal to men in the household
or village. As Van Esterik observed (1996), women manage the household
money only when there is little to manage. Nonetheless, these skills give
women confidence in their economic endeavors and a foundation for self-
esteem and active participation in village life.
The institutionalization of women’s empowerment helps widows
manage economically. Women’s habitual participation in economic activi-
ties helps women cope with the challenges of widowhood with more assur-
ance than women who have not been economically active. They are used to
engaging in economic activities and handling money. They have the means
to produce resources for themselves and their children. They do not have
to change their economic behavior drastically on top of the personal emo-
tional adjustments of widowhood. Their ordinary economic routine helps
them make the transition to single head of household with less disruption
then an economically inactive woman. They are more likely to be able to
provide food and schooling for their children and to prevent a downward
slide into dependency and poverty.
Women’s right to land ownership is a particularly important aspect of
the institutionalization of women’s empowerment in Cambodia, as in other
Southeast Asia societies. Land provides widows with access to the key agri-
cultural resource. Even when the land owned is small, it allows widows to
produce a basic amount of food for their family, a crucial bulwark against
hunger. Outside Southeast Asia, some Caribbean islands with traditions of
female farming such as Barbados also allow female land ownership (Bar-
row 1993). These societies contrast sharply with the experience of Mayan
women whose land ownership was threatened after their husband’s death
(Zur 1998) or African widows who were chased off their land by their late
husband’s relatives (Owen 1996). Those widows’ lives were greatly compli-
cated by their tenuous rights to marital land holdings. Widows benefit from
cultures which allow land inheritance by women, smoothing the difficult
transition to widowhood. State-enforced systems of land distribution can
help widows and other female heads of household to acquire this crucial
agricultural resource, their own piece of land.
widow and the more children she had, the less likely she was to remarry.
A widow without children was more likely to remarry than a widow who
already had children. Like the Cambodian widows, Indian widows cited
their children’s well-being as a chief reason they were reluctant to remarry.
They were worried about the care of their children in a second marriage.
Chen (2000) observed that children did not easily gain legitimacy in their
stepfather’s home and they lost the legitimacy they had in their own late
father’s home.
Caribbean women historically have been resistant to marriage (Mom-
sen 1993). During the slave era in the region, marriage was forbidden for
African slaves. After the emancipation of slaves, women were encouraged
by the state to marry as the “morally superior and prestigious avenue”
(Momsen 1993:2). The newly freed women were reluctant to adopt mar-
riage, however, citing their fear of male violence and the risk of losing
parental rights to their children with whom they had the strongest bond.
The women were used to hard work as slaves and did not see marriage as a
valuable economic or social choice.
Linda Green found older Mayan widows reluctant to remarry due to
concerns about the quality of the married relationship. The widows pointed
out that “it is better to be alone than be with a man who drinks and who
hits his wife and children” (Green 1999:83). Margaret Owen found a disin-
terest in remarriage in parts of Africa where, like Cambodia, wives are eco-
nomically active. With their own economic base, the widows could afford
to be independent. As one African widow remarked, “I have my house;
my garden; I grow my vegetables; I sell in the market. Everything I make is
mine. Why should I have a man take it from me, spend my money on drink
and other women, or tell me now what to do? I am the boss now” (Owen
1996:108). For economically active women, widowhood ironically ushers
in more power than they have ever known (Sachs 1996) and they are reluc-
tant to relinquish it.
Sylvia Chant suggested three factors that influence the formation of
female-headed households, and the Cambodian case supports her theory
(Chant 1997:257). First, women must be able to survive economically
without a male partner. Second, they must be able to cope with the social
pressures of being a single woman. And third, the financial or psycho-
logical gains of living with men must not outweigh those of living alone,
with other women, or with their adult children. The widows in this study
met all three of Chant’s conditions. They had the means of surviving eco-
nomically without a male partner. They traditionally performed much of
the agricultural work even when married and they were able to recruit
male labor for roles such as plowing. While a man might have added to
the family income, the women nonetheless were surviving without a male
partner. Second, the widows were able to cope with the social pressures of
being a single woman. The widows did not complain about a loss of status
due to their unmarried state. They had a role in the village as mothers and
as farmers and usually had a network of relatives and contacts for assis-
tance and support. Third, the financial or psychological gains of living
with men did not outweigh those of living alone, with other women, or
with their adult children. On the contrary, many women expressed appre-
hension about the psychological cost of marriage in the loss of female
household authority. Several felt that their financial circumstances were
improved without a husband since their late husband had spent scarce
family resources on gambling or alcohol.
Plowing as resistance
Another instance of women’s resistance to patriarchy, in addition to remain-
ing unmarried, was the practice of plowing by women. As noted above,
when widows have to do extensive transplanting to pay for their plowing
in advance, their planting and their harvest are delayed, decreasing their
crop’s yield and exacerbating the hunger gap (Chen 2000). Some Cam-
bodian widows dealt with this problem by doing the plowing themselves.
They found it difficult to plow due to the physical strength needed to carry
the plow to the field and to manage the large oxen. Widows overcame these
barriers when they had access to a plow team, however. The widows who
plowed delighted in being able to carry out this task by themselves. They
knew that they were stepping into a traditional male role and defying cul-
tural stereotypes. Plowing gave them a new perspective on themselves and
their villages’ beliefs about gendered roles. The plow-women gained confi-
dence in their ability to support themselves and rejected the idea that only
men could plow. They came to value their own labor more highly, including
their traditional role of transplanting. In villages where women plowed, the
exchange rate for female transplanting labor rose in relationship to plow-
ing labor, traditionally carried out by men. The poorer women in the vil-
lage, who could not afford to own a plow team, were able to put in fewer
days of transplanting to pay for their plowing. The plowing capability of
women with oxen thus benefited not only their own families but poorer vil-
lage families as well. When women trespass on men’s work roles, the value
of women’s labor increases in that community. The increased value benefits
not only the women who have crossed the gender line but also other women
in the community. For the women who plowed, plowing represented a sort
of “declaration of independence” from men. It was a valuable symbol of
their self-reliance and autonomy.
To address the poverty of rural widows, the cultural beliefs that under-
lie the low valuation of women and their labor must be better understood.
Only by making patriarchy visible can it be dismantled. The patriarchal
beliefs that shape Cambodian society undergird the poverty that haunts
rural widows. Culture holds the key to unlock the devaluation of women
and the preference for men. Widows’ poverty will be alleviated only when
women are seen and accepted as equal partners in all aspects of rural life.
Table 2. Children’s Average Highest Grade Level Attained by Sex and Age Group
Female Male Total
Grade Grade Grade
Age Level Range N Level Range N Level Range N
<10 years 1 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0–1 2
10–19 years 3.5 0–5 8 3.5 0–8 14 3.6 0–8 22
20–29 years 4.6 0–11 7 4.6 2–11 11 4.6 0–11 18
30–39 years 5.1 1–8 13 4.1 0–9 8 4.7 0–9 21
40–49 years 1.8 0–5 4 2.4 1–6 4 2.1 0–6 8
50–59 years 7 6–8 3 2 2 1 5.8 2–8 4
Total 4.3 0–11 36 4.0 0–11 39 4.2 0–11 75
Source: Lee study interviews
129
Table 3. Percentage of Cambodian Population Aged 7 and over Attending School
by Sex and Age
Source: Final Census Results NIS 1999 (National Institute of Statistics 2000:29).
Named Widows
Bopha: Sickly landless widow from rural Phnom Penh who supported her-
self by gathering wild vegetables when she was well enough to work and
selling them in the city. Her fourteen-year-old daughter went to school in
the morning and helped her mother find wild vegetables in the afternoon.
The two also sometimes worked as day laborers in the rice fields. Bopha
had fruit trees which her husband had planted and which provided some
income for her. Her older child, a son, worked as a construction laborer
in Phnom Penh and contributed income to the family. Bopha had paid his
school fees until he was 20. Now his income paid the school fees for his
younger sister. Bopha had borrowed from a microcredit NGO for food and
medicine. She was deeply in debt and could only pay the interest.
Chan: A Kompong Chhnang widow who plowed and fished. She had
plowed even when her husband was alive because he was busy collecting
wood to sell. She preferred to have her son plow rather than her daugh-
ters, however. Chan owned two hectares of land with good access to water.
She produced palm thatch sections each week for sale to other villagers,
an important source of income for her household. As a girl, Chan had an
illness that interfered with her memory and she couldn’t keep up with her
class in school. She studied until she was thirteen but only completed the
second grade. When her first child was school age, she was too poor to pay
his school fees. But she managed to send her younger children to school.
Chandaravy: Angk Snuol widow with 50 ares of land from the distribu-
tion. Her older son worked in construction in Phnom Penh and sent money
home to pay for her younger son’s school fees. Chandaravy usually plowed
her own fields. She borrowed a plow team from a neighbor in exchange for
131
transplanting. In addition to her own fields, she plowed other fields provas
style, splitting the harvest 50–50 with the owners. Occasionally she made
palm thatch sections for sale, too. She always had enough rice for her fam-
ily and didn’t have to resort to credit. She resented the uneven exchange
rate for women’s labor and thought it was unfair.
Chantha: S’ang widow who had attended a wat school as a girl and later
became a teacher in her commune. She had received only a small portion
of land in the distribution and realized that she needed another source of
income to support her three children. Chantha taught in the mornings and
farmed her rice land in the afternoons. She sent all her children through
secondary school. Her son went on to nursing school as a way to avoid
being drafted into demining work. He worked as the commune nurse.
Ching: Elderly Pol Pot widow who lived with her younger daughter and
her family. Ching no longer participated in agricultural work but helped
the family by watching the grandchildren. Ching had received 64 ares of
well-placed land in the land distribution. Her younger daughter’s husband
worked as a commune teacher and the family usually had enough rice.
Ching had received no education as a girl because her parents were afraid
that she would write love letters. She made sure that her own daughters
received an education, however, and two finished primary school. Ching
still valued education for the female members of her family and talked
with pride about her granddaughter in upper secondary school. The
elderly widow hoped that she would see her graduation and expressed the
desire to have her granddaughter become a teacher. Ching had become a
daun-chi and attended tngay sel services at the commune temple several
times a month.
Dany: Pol Pot widow who lived with her daughter and her unmarried sis-
ter. Dany had 30 ares of land to grow rice for her family. She traded in rice
and palm sugar, buying large quantities when the price was low and selling
when the price was high. She also grew fruits and vegetables to sell in the
town market. Sometimes she traded in vegetables, buying from local street
vendors in the morning and selling them along with her own produce. She
raised chickens as well. Dany had remarried twice since her husband’s
death under the Khmer Rouge. Her second husband built her sturdy house.
He died of an illness after only three years of marriage. Her third husband
left her soon after she became pregnant with her daughter, her only child.
Dany had finished primary school herself and planned to send her daughter
to secondary school.
Dara: Widow with one hectare of land from the distribution who always
had enough rice for her large family. Her four daughters worked with her
in the rice fields. Dara plowed her own fields when she was younger and
taught all her children to plow as well. Her son had taken over the plow-
ing once he got old enough. Dara made palm thatch sections and palm
mats and collected wood to sell. Her daughter ran a small candy store from
her house. Another daughter worked at a garment factory in Phnom Penh.
Dara had borrowed from a community bank during her husband’s terminal
illness and paid the loan back over two years. She sent her older daughters
to primary school before taking them out to help her farm. These daughters
had some cash income that paid the school fees of the younger children.
Heng: Elderly Pol Pot widow who lived with an unmarried son and an
orphaned granddaughter. Heng wove palm thatch sections after the Pol Pot
time to save up money to buy two oxen. Her sons collected palm nectar
and Heng processed it into palm sugar. The family had managed to acquire
a large wooden house. Even though Heng had become blind in her old age,
she was well cared for by her large family. She always had enough rice and
never had to borrow money.
Khoeurn: Rolea B’ier widow with more than a hectare of land and a small
business distilling rice wine. She usually had enough rice and had a steady
cash income from the rice wine sales. She also grew small quantities of sugar
cane and bamboo. During her husband’s terminal illness, she had savings
to pay for his medical treatment and didn’t have to sell any land. Khoeurn
had finished the sixth grade and valued education. Her children, along with
Dara’s, had the most education of any family studied. Her teenage son did
her plowing in the early mornings before going to school.
Leang: S’ang widow who grew vegetables as well as rice. She had some extra
land from the distribution because she had “sweet-talked” the mae phoum.
She sold the vegetables from her extra land for cash income. She also raised
pigs. Despite these sources of income, she usually ran out of rice only halfway
through the agricultural year. She borrowed repeatedly from moneylenders
to buy food and was deeply in debt. She had surrendered the title to her land
to the moneylender the most recent time and was in danger of losing her
land if she couldn’t repay. The price for vegetables had fallen because the
harvest was plentiful and Leang was worried about her loan. As a girl, Leang
left school when she was ten. Her father had died and her mother needed
her help on the farm. She never learned to read. Her daughter’s education
had been interrupted by the Pol Pot era, so the daughter was illiterate, too.
Lim: Widowed as a young woman in her late twenties with two children.
Her husband died of malaria after an illness of just one week. She had a
hectare of rice land from the distribution and farmed it herself after her hus-
band’s death. She raised pigs and chickens for sale and had recently learned
how to make charcoal. She planned to sell it to a middleman. She also wove
palm thatch for house repairs and sold the sections to a trader. Her son
helped her collect the palm leaves after school. Both her children helped her
transplant and weed the rice fields. Lim’s education had been interrupted
by the Pol Pot era. She had managed to complete the fifth grade. She had
to delay her daughter’s entrance into school because she didn’t have the
money to pay for school fees for both children at once.
Meseth: Pol Pot widow who grew vegetables on a long narrow chamkar
plot. She had taken out an NGO loan to pay for the required inputs for
her crops and was relying on the proceeds to repay the loan. She was wor-
ried about flooding. She had also borrowed from her relatives to pay for
food and a hospital stay for her daughter. Meseth engaged in some trad-
ing, buying up fruits and vegetables in her village and reselling them in the
town market. Meseth had no one to plow her fields and used her scarce
cash to pay for plowing. Meseth had not received any schooling at all.
She had learned how to read as an adult, however, in a literacy class. Her
eldest son had never attended school because his mother needed him to
stay home and watch his six younger sisters. All the younger children had
received some education.
Moam: Landless S’ang widow who relied on her son-in-law’s fishing income
to feed her family. Moan sold the fish in the village market. She had never
gone to school and regretted her inability to read and write. She sent her
two children to school as long as she could. Her daughter finished primary
school and her son went on to secondary school.
Narin: S’ang widow who had sold some of her land to pay bribes for gar-
ment factory jobs for her children. She still had enough land to provide
rice for her family, however, unless the crop was destroyed by flooding.
When she ran out of food, she relied on her city relatives to loan her money.
The children at the garment factory gave her most of their income as well.
Narin was unhappy with the land distribution because she had received
less land than she had before the Pol Pot era. She thought it was unfair
that she didn’t get her family’s original land back. As a girl, Narin had
attended primary school in Phnom Penh while staying with a cousin whose
children she minded. Her parents had brought her home to the village when
she was about to enter fourth grade, however, claiming that her education
would only result in her writing love-letters. Narin felt that her education
had helped her with her farm and with family problems.
Oeung: Sickly widow with only 20 ares of rice land from the distribu-
tion. She always ran out of rice each year and had to borrow rice from
her neighbors. Because she was sick, she had already divided her land to
her children, and they gave her money to purchase rice. When she was
younger, Oeung had plowed her fields. She did not teach her daughters
to plow, however, because she thought her son ought to do the plowing.
Oeung had not received any education as a girl because her grandpar-
ents, who raised her, said that it was a waste of time to educate girls.
Oeung subsequently learned how to read in an adult class taught by her
husband when he was a volunteer literacy teacher. She had never learned
to write, however. Oeung sent her five children to school and they all
completed at least the fifth grade. Three went on to secondary school
and one completed the diplôme certificate at the end of ninth grade. They
stopped studying because Oeung could no longer afford the high second-
ary school fees.
Ol: Pol Pot widow who lost her husband and five children during the Pol
Pot era, then lost four additional children to starvation in the aftermath
when food was still very scarce. Ol had received one hectare of land in the
distribution for herself and her surviving two children. She had plowed her
own fields until her son was old enough to help her. She had learned how
to plow from her mother. When she was younger, Ol had raised chickens
for cash income. She no longer wanted to kill animals, however, because
she was near the end of her life and wanted to earn merit for her next
reincarnation. Instead, she made rice snacks and sold them in the village.
She often was too sick to work, however. Her adult son lived with her
and sold wood he had collected in the forest, and his cash income went
for household food. As a girl, Ol had missed many days of school due to
recurring bouts of malaria. She only advanced to the third grade.
Rin: Pol Pot widow who lost her husband, most of her children, her par-
ents, and all but one of her siblings under Pol Pot. Rin had only one son
to rely on in her elderly years. When both her son and her daughter-in-
law died of AIDS, Rin had no one to help her. Rin sold her land to pay
for the hospital bills and the double funeral. Without land as collateral,
she could not get a loan from a money-lender. She supported her two
orphaned grandchildren by working as an agricultural laborer until she
became too old and sick herself. The bereft family then had to depend on
the charity of their neighbors.
Ry: Rolea B’ier widow who owned a hectare of land and had a rice mill
business for income. She also traded in palm thatch, buying up palm sec-
tions from her neighbors in the village and selling them to a construction
supply business in town. The income from her rice mill paid for the feed
for her three pigs, increasing the profits Ry made when she sold her pigs.
Ry had plowed as a girl, driving one of her father’s two teams of oxen. She
only received three years of primary education because her family could
not afford the school fees. After the Pol Pot era, Ry appropriated oxen
abandoned by the Khmer Rouge in their retreat and now her son plowed
her fields.
Seak: Widow who had left her home in a dispute with her daughter and
son-in-law over excessive drinking. Seak had started over in a rice field.
She built a new house with the help of a nephew, doing most of the work
herself. She cleared 30 ares of forest land herself during the same period of
time. She received very little land during the distribution because she was
sick and couldn’t work. Seak made some cash income by producing palm
thatch sections and selling them to her neighbor Ry.
Sib: Elderly widow who did not farm during the krom samaki period
because of her age. She watched the small children instead, as many as ten
at a time. It was hard work but she got less compensation from the harvest
than the agricultural workers. Her sons had small families and never got
enough rice either. Sib had shared a plow and oxen with her krom but
didn’t get extra rice for this contribution. Even though the system had ben-
efits for widows, she thought it was unfair and was glad when it changed.
In the land distribution, she received less land than she had before the Pol
Pot era, due to her elderly years. She complained but the mae phoum told
her he had to treat all the elderly the same
Sokha: Pol Pot widow with less than 20 ares of land. She had received
little land during the distribution and she often ran out of rice before the
harvest. She ate with her son’s family when her own rice was gone. As a
girl, Sokha had received no education because her family was always on
the move to escape the Issarak. Her father was kidnapped by the Issarak
when she was twelve and he died shortly afterward. Her mother died
soon after her father and Sokha, as the oldest child, had to take care of
her younger siblings. She hired herself out to tend the fire in palm sugar
Sophea: Childless widow whose husband had disappeared during the Pol
Pot era. She was a young bride at the time and the couple had not yet
had children. Although Sophea had had marriage proposals since the Pol
Pot time, she turned them all down, hoping that her husband would one
day return. She lived with her elderly father and her sister who was also
a widow. The sister worked at a lumber factory and had one son. Sophea
owned a long narrow strip of chamkar land near the water on which she
grew vegetables to sell. She and her sister pooled their income and had
recently managed to construct a sturdy new wooden house. Sophea was the
treasurer of her microloan group which had enabled her to borrow at a rea-
sonable rate for agricultural inputs. Sophea felt uncertain about her future
because she had no children. She was worried that her nephew would not
be able to support her.
Vanna: Widow whose husband and only child had died under Pol Pot. She
received only 20 ares in the land distribution and raised pigs and fruit to
supplement her rice production. She relied on a brother in the village who
often helped her with plowing. Like Sophea, she felt insecure about her
future and believed that if she had children of her own, she would be in a
better position.
Vuth: Widow who lost her husband to malaria. She sold her land to pay
for his medical treatment. Three days after the sale, her husband died. Vuth
was sickly herself and could not work. Her older children left school when
their father died to earn income for the family and to pay the school fees of
the younger children. One of Vuth’s daughters worked at a garment factory
and contributed most of her wage to the family budget. After school, the
younger children hunted shrimp in a shallow stream near their home and
sold the shrimp to buy rice each day.
Vy: Disabled widow whose husband died from injuries he received during
the Pol Pot conflict. Vy had been sickly and nervous since her husband’s
death. She received only 25 ares of land in the distribution because of her
poor health. Vy was too sick to farm. Her teenage children grew rice on
Vy’s land and her adult children sent food over to the house several times
a week. Occasionally, Vy felt well enough to produce palm mats and palm
thatch to repair their house. Vy was in debt to a moneylender for the loan
to pay her husband’s medical treatment. In the ten years since her husband’s
death, she had paid interest on the loan but had never been able to pay
down the principal.
Glossary
ankgor: white rice which has been milled (its brown casing has been
removed) but which has not yet been cooked.
are: a metric measure of surface area equal to 100 square meters or 10
meters square. 100 ares make up one hectare.
chamkar: agriculture in well-watered locations along a river bank or lake.
daq: to pull. Refers to the practice of pulling up rice seedlings to transplant
them.
daun-chi: female lay temple devotee.
dey loe: top land, a measure of agricultural land. Contrasted with dey kan-
dal, middle land, and dey kraom, bottom land. Top land has the least water
and bottom land the most. Middle land or dey kandal is considered the best
for farming.
diplôme: a certificate issued at the end of the ninth grade in Cambodian
schools.
hectare: A metric measure of surface area equal to 10,000 square meters or
100 meters square. A hectare is made up of 100 ares. In American surface
measurement, one hectare is 2.471 acres or about 2–1/2 acres. One acre is
about 4/10 of a hectare.
kantael: mat
kantael kavsou: a commercially-produced multicolored plastic mat
kantael krahom: a reed mat whose dominant color is red
139
tau: a measure of milled rice. Two tau of milled rice equals 1 thang of
unmilled rice.
thang: a unit of rice equal to 24 kilos.
tngay sel: holy day services which take place every eight days and involve
food offerings to monks and ritual chanted prayer.
wat: temple
143
10. The municipality of Phnom Penh, the capital, includes both urban areas
and rural areas, presumably to provide land area for the urban portion to
expand in the future. The rural areas comprise villages surrounded by rice
fields, as in the rest of Cambodia. Phnom Penh also has suburban areas
along the roads leading into the city. Dense housing areas exist along these
major roads, including some substantial dwellings. Due to the proximity
of these rural and suburban areas to the city, the residents have more eco-
nomic options and the willingness of households to sell their riceland is
probably due to their sense of city opportunities.
11. One American dollar exchanged for about 3950 Cambodian riels in the
summer of 2001 when I conducted this research.
despite military objections that there was no use for them (Shawcross
1987:218).
10. Article 6 (b) of this Charter defines war crimes as “violations of the laws
and customs of war. Such violations shall include . . . wanton destruction of
cities, towns or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity”
(Shawcross 1987:219).
11. In 1956 Sar married Khieu Ponnary, another Paris-educated radical Khmer,
who was the first Cambodian woman to earn the baccalauréat. Ponnary
was eight years his senior; the two chose to be married on Bastille Day
(Kiernan 1996).
12. The frequent use of a field near a village for executions gave rise to the
term, the “killing fields.”
13. Krom means “group,” samaki means “solidarity.
14. Men and women received equal shares. Students who worked during the
holidays got their share according to the number of days worked. Children
and the elderly got 30 percent of an adult share, regardless of how much
they worked. If a person contributed a pair of draft animals, they received
two adult shares.
15. An are is a metric measure of surface ten meters by ten meters or 100
square meters.
16. Mae means mother, phoum means village. Despite this female nomencla-
ture, most mae phoum are male.
10. A mototaxi is a motorcyle with a passenger seat on the back, the usual
public transportation in Cambodia. It is also called a motodup or moto
double, from the French.
11. Whenever our research team (the author, my interpreter, our driver/s and
village guide), usually followed by assorted children and other onlookers,
approached a house for an interview, we could see the women of the house-
hold running for their kantael kavsou to throw on the front porch for us to
sit on, a vivid sort of “welcome mat.”
12. Provas means exchange and is a common way to accomplish tasks without
money. Not only labor but also land and oxen can be exchanged.
13. Charcoal is preferred by townspeople because it produces less smoke than
wood and doesn’t blacken pots like wood does.
14. Eight months or 35 weeks of feeding a pig at 1,250 riels per day amounts
to 306,250 riels, plus 50,000 riels to purchase the piglet, so 356,250 riels in
all, about $90. Her greatest sale price of 180,000 (about $45) is only half
this amount.
15. She paid 20,000 to 30,000 riels each (about $5-$7) for the piglets and
sold them to a Chinese-Cambodian merchant for 100,000 to 150,000
riels (about $25 to $38) each, depending on their size. Her profits must be
reduced by the amount of money she could have earned from the rice mill-
ing, however.
16. An additional factor, related to me by a Cambodian-American in Fall River,
Massachusetts, was if the pig could be put out to stud. My informant told
me that this is commonly done with male pigs. None of the women I ques-
tioned about pig husbandry in Cambodia mentioned this possible source of
additional income.
17. Costs for the three crops:
Tomatoes: Plowing 20,000 riels
Seed 30,000
Fertilizer 10,500
Sub-total: 60,500
Total: 319,500
This widow uses a homemade pesticide for her vegetable crops made from
human urine and field herbs which she says is effective, so she does not
have costs for pesticide.
18. Her expenses for the rice wine included the rice, which she bought at 3000
riels ($0.75) per kilo, and the sugar, 20,000 riels ($5) per 40-kilo jar. She
used two jars of sugar for each batch of mash.
19. The cans used as a universal measure in Cambodia were small milk cans orig-
inally given out by the United Nations as part of their emergency rations. Vil-
lagers kept them and used them for dry measuring of rice and other items.
20. While small amounts of money are usually quoted in riels in Cambodia,
large amounts are typically in US dollars. This bribe had to be paid in US
dollars.
21. The women distinguished between bottom land and top land. Bottom land
was nearer the river or lake and often flooded, so it could only be planted
during part of the year.
22. While mostly boys studied at the temple or wat schools, girls were allowed
to attend in some instances, according to my informants.
23. For instance, requiring only 2 days of transplanting for 1/2 day of plowing
instead of 3 or 4 days.
24. Sometimes, transplanting labor exchange was figured, not by day, but by
the quantity of seedlings transplanted. One-half day of plowing in Kom-
pong Chhnang required one sluk of transplanting. A sluk comprised 10
plon of transplanted rice or 400 bundles of seedlings. It would take 10
women one morning to transplant one sluk. The women would work each
others’ fields until all ten women had their plowing done.
25. The residents of the village in S’ang district were considered by the Khmer
Rouge to be “old people” and most were not internally displaced during
the Pol Pot era. Thus they were able to retain some of their goods such as
their oxen.
26. At the rate of 3950 Cambodian riels to one American dollar, the price for
a morning’s plowing comes to about $3.25. Fields had to be plowed two
or three times, so this arrangement was expensive in the rural subsistence
context.
27. Since she had to exchange labor for the plow equipment, she had to do
transplanting exchange for 30 to 60 days to rent the plow team for 60
days. She also had to transplant the rice on the 1–1/2 hectares she was
farming herself.
28. She reported that an ox costs about 2 million riels or about US $500.
29. This widow smiled broadly about her ability to plow, a rare smile in this
poor and harried widow. I concluded that she felt proud of her ability to
take on a valued task requiring strength which helped her to feed her family
despite her widowhood. It is likely that plowing increased women’s sense
of self-esteem because they were carrying out a traditionally male task, and
male labor was valued more highly than female labor.
30. Sokha reported that she had left her oxen with her neighbors when the
Khmer Rouge sent her and her children to the mountains. During her
absence of several years, the neighbors had a number of offers for the oxen.
Despite the fact that they didn’t know if Sokha was dead or alive, they kept
the oxen for her. Finally, four years later, she returned and reclaimed them.
They were her most important financial asset outside of her land.
31. One widow said that a plow weighs 30 kilos.
32. A kroma is a traditional Cambodian scarf, woven by women in certain
parts of Cambodia, with colorful small checked patterns. The kroma is
used in many ways, from protecting the head from the sun to a cover for
washing up in the river to wrapping around the baby. The classic pattern
is a red and white check, which the Khmer Rouge used as part of their uni-
form in an appeal to Khmer nationalism.
33. Not all widows in the study headed their household. The elderly women
sometimes lived with a married child and the husband was the head of the
household, though the elderly woman was treated with the respect due
her age.
34. Women are more likely to be seen on a bicycle.
Atkinson, Jane Monnig and Shelly Errington, eds. 1990. Power and Difference:
Gender in Island Southeast Asia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Barrow, Christine. 1993. “Small Farm Food Production & Gender in Barbados.”
Pp. 181–193 in Women & Change in the Caribbean: a Pan-Caribbean Per-
spective, edited by Janet Momsen. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University
Press.
Benería, Lourdes and Gita Sen. 1981. “Accumulation, Reproduction, and Wom-
en’s Role in Economic Development: Boserup Revisited.” Signs: Journal of
Women in Culture and Society 7:279–298.
Bilodeau, Charles. 1955. “Compulsory Education in Cambodia.” Pp. 11–67 in
Compulsory Education in Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam, edited by Charles
Bilodeau, Somlith Pathammavong, and Le Quang Hong. Paris: UNESCO.
Boserup, Ester. [1970] 1998. Woman’s Role in Economic Development. London:
Earthscan Publications Ltd.
Bourque, Susan C. and Kay Barbara Warren. 1981. Women of the Andes: Patriar-
chy and Social Change in Two Peruvian Towns. Ann Arbor, MI: University of
Michigan Press.
Caldwell, J.C. 1978. “A Theory of Fertility: From High Plateau to Destabilization.”
Population and Development Review 4:553–77.
Chant, Sylvia. 1997. Women-Headed Households: Diversity and Dynamics in the
Developing World. New York: St. Martin’s Press, Inc.
Charmaz, Kathy. 1990. “‘Discovering’ Chronic Illness: Using Grounded Theory.”
Social Science and Medicine 30:1161–72.
Chen, Martha Alter. 2000. Perpetual Mourning: Widowhood in Rural India. New
Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
Chhoy, Kim Sar, Varine Touch, Phalin Kham, and Sophea Prak. 1995. Rural Women
and the Socio-Economic Transition in the Kingdom of Cambodia. Cambo-
dian Researchers for Development. Unpublished manuscript.
Davenport, Paul, Sr. Joan Healy, and Kevin Malone. 1995. “Vulnerable in the Vil-
lage:” A Study of Returnees in Battambang Province, Cambodia, with a
Focus on Strategies for the Landless. UNHCR.
151
Ebihara, May Mayko. 1968. Svay: A Khmer Village in Cambodia. Ph.D. disser-
tation, Department of Anthropology, Columbia University. Ann Arbor, MI:
University Microfilms.
Errington, Shelly. 1990. “Recasting Sex, Gender and Power: A Theoretical and
Regional Overview.” Pp. 1–58 in Power and Difference: Gender in Island
Southeast Asia, edited by Jane Monnig Atkinson and Shelly Errington. Stan-
ford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Green, Linda. 1999. Fear as a Way of Life: Mayan Widows in Rural Guatemala.
New York: Columbia University Press.
Hochschild, Arlie, with Anne Machung. 1989. The Second Shift: Working Parents
and the Revolution at Home. New York: Viking Penguin, Inc.
Hossein, Mahabub. 1993. “The Grameen Bank: Its Origin, Organization, and
Management Style.” Pp. 9–21 in The Grameen Bank: Poverty Relief in Ban-
gladesh edited by Abu N.M. Wahid. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Kandiyoti, Deniz. 1988. “Bargaining with Patriarchy.” Gender and Society 2:274–
290.
Kantor, Paula. 2002. “A Sectoral Approach to the Study of Gender Constraints on
Economic Opportunities in the Informal Sector in India.” Gender and Society
16:285–302.
Karim, Wazir Jahan. 1995. “Introduction: Genderising Anthropology in Southeast
Asia.” Pp. 11–34 in ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in Developing Southeast Asia, edited
by Wazir Jahan Karim. Washington, DC: Berg Publishers.
Kibria, Nazli. 1993. Family Tightrope: The Changing Lives of Vietnamese Ameri-
cans. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kiernan, Ben. 1996. The Pol Pot Regime: Race, Power, and Genocide in Cambodia
under the Khmer Rouge, 1975–1979. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kusakabe, Kyoko, Wang Yunxian, and Govind Kelkar. 1995. “Women and Land
Rights in Cambodia.” Economic and Political Weekly October 28.
Lacey, Marc. 2004. “From Broken Lives, Kenyan Women Build Place of Unity.”
New York Times December 7. Retrieved from www.newyorktimes.com on
December 10, 2004.
Ledgerwood, Judy. 1992. Analysis of the Situation of Women in Cambodia:
Research on Women in Khmer Society. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: UNICEF.
——. 1998. “Rural Development in Cambodia: The View from the Village.” In
Cambodia and the International Community: The Quest for Peace, Devel-
opment, and Democracy, edited by Frederick Z. Brown and David G. Tim-
berman. Asia Society publication retrieved December 29, 1999 (http://www.
AsiaSociety.org/publications/ cambodia/rural.html).
Lopata, Helen Znaniecka. 1996. Current Widowhood: Myths and Realities. Thou-
sand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Lorber, Judith. 1994. Paradoxes of Gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Marx, K. 1978. “The German Ideology: Part I.” Pp. 146–200 in Robert C. Tucker,
ed., The Marx-Engels Reader, Second Edition. New York: W.W. Norton.
Mather, Celia. 1985. “Rather Than Make Trouble, It’s Better Just to Leave.” Pp.
153–77 in Women, Work, and Ideology in the Third World, edited by H.
Afshar. New York: Tavistock.
Mead, Margaret. 1949. Male and Female: A Study of the Sexes in a Changing
World. New York: W. Morrow.
Momsen, Janet, ed. 1993. Women and Change in the Caribbean: A Pan-Caribbean
Perspective. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Moser, Caroline. 1989. “Gender Planning in the Third World: Meeting Practical
and Strategic Gender Needs.” World Development 7:1799–1825.
National Institute of Statistics (NIS). 1999. General Population Census of Cam-
bodia. 1998: Final Census Results. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Ministry of
Planning.
National Institute of Statistics (NIS). 2000. General Population Census of Cambo-
dia. 1998: Analysis of Census Results, Report 7 (Literacy and Education).
Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Ministry of Planning.
Nelson, S.M. 1988. “Widowhood and Autonomy in the Native-American South-
west.” Pp. 22–41 in On Their Own: Widows and Widowhood in the Ameri-
can Southwest, 1848–1939, edited by A. Scadron. Urbana, IL: University of
Illinois Press.
Owen, Margaret. 1996. A World of Widows. London: Zed Books.
Rahman, Atuir, and M. Mahabub-ul Islam. 1993. “The General Performance of the
Grameen Bank.” Pp. 49–67 in The Grameen Bank: Poverty Relief in Bangla-
desh edited by Abu N.M. Wahid. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
Rahman, Atuir, Abu N.M. Wahid and Faizul Islam. 1993. “Impact of the Grameen
Bank on the Nutritional Status of the Poor.” Pp. 97–126 in The Grameen
Bank: Poverty Relief in Bangladesh edited by Abu N.M. Wahid. Boulder, CO:
Westview Press
Reinharz, Shulamit. 1992. Feminist Methods in Social Research.New York: Oxford
University Press.
Robinson, Kathy. 1988. “What Kind of Freedom Is Cutting Your Hair?” Pp. 63–77
in Development and Displacement: Women in Southeast Asia, edited by Glen
Chandler, Norman Sullivan, and Jan Branson. Clayton, Victoria, Australia:
Monash University Centre of Southeast Asian Studies.
Sachs, Carolyn E. 1983. The Invisible Farmers: Women in Agricultural Production.
New Jersey: Rowan & Allanheld.
Sachs, Carolyn E. 1996. Gendered Fields: Rural Women, Agriculture, and Environ-
ment. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Seager, Joni. 1997. The State of Women in the World Atlas, Second Edition. New
York: Penguin Books USA.
Sen, Amartya. 1990. “Gender and Cooperative Conflicts.” Pp. 123–49 in Persistent
Inequalities: Women and World Development, edited by Irene Tinker. New
York: Oxford University Press.
Shawcross, William. 1987. Sideshow: Kissinger, Nixon and the Destruction of Cam-
bodia. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Smith-Hefner, Nancy J. 1993. “Education, Gender, and Generational Conflict
among Khmer Refugees.” Anthropology and Education Quarterly 24:135–
58.
——. 1999. Khmer-American: Identity and Moral Education in a Diasporic Com-
munity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Stamp, Patricia. 1990. Technology, Gender, and Power in Africa. Hartford, CT:
Kumarian Press.
Tinker, Irene. 1990. “A Context for the Field and for the Book.” Pp. 3–13 in Per-
sistent Inequalities: Women and World Development, edited by Irene Tinker.
New York: Oxford University Press.
United Nations. 1998. “Report of the Secretary-General to the General Assembly.”
Role of Microcredit in the Eradication of Poverty. United Nations publication
A/53/223.
——. 2000. The World’s Women 2000: Trends and Statistics. United Nations Publi-
cation ST/ESA/STAT/SER.K/16.
Van Esterik, Penny. 1995. “Rewriting Gender and Development Anthropology in
Southeast Asia.” Pp. 247–59 in ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in Developing Southeast
Asia, edited by Wazir Jahan Karim. Washington, DC: Berg Publishers.
Van Esterik, Penny, ed. 1996. Women of Southeast Asia. De Kalb, IL: Center for
Southeast Asian Studies, Northern Illinois University.
Wahid, Abu N.M. 1993a. “The Socioeconomic Conditions of Bangladesh and the
Evolution of the Grameen Bank.” Pp. 1–8 in The Grameen Bank: Poverty
Relief in Bangladesh edited by Abu. N.M. Wahid. Boulder, CO: Westview
Press.
——. 1993b. “The Growth and Progress of the Grameen Bank.” Pp. 33–48 in The
Grameen Bank: Poverty Relief in Bangladesh edited by Abu N.M. Wahid.
Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Winzeler, Robert L. 1996. “Sexual Status in Southeast Asia: Comparative Perspec-
tives on Women, Agriculture, and Political Organization.” Pp. 139–69 in
Women of Southeast Asia, edited by Penny Van Esterik. De Kalb, IL: Center
for Southeast Asian Studies, Northern Illinois University.
Wolf, Diane Lauren. 1992. Factory Daughters: Gender, Household Dynamics, and
Rural Industrialization in Java. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Zur, Judith N. 1998. Violent Memories: Mayan War Widows in Guatemala. Boul-
der, CO: Westview Press.
A B
Access to resources Banco Solidario, 10
credit, 9–11, 90–97 Bangladesh Institute of Development Stud-
education, 11–12, 97–111 ies, 10
land, 8–9, 79–90 Barbados, female farming, 121
means of production, 125 Barrow, female land ownership, 121
plow-team, 124, 125 Battered women’s shelters, 127
technology, 125 Benería, Lourdes, 6–7
Agriculture; see also Provas exchange; Rice Bicycles, 57
Barbados, 121 Bilateralism, Southeast Asia, 14
collective farming, 31, 33, 69–70 Bilodeau, Charles, 29
female farming, 4, 26–27, 121 Bopha, 131
irrigation, 4, 26, 63, 125 agricultural wage laborer, 61
men’s crops, 4–5 children’s school fees, 105
men’s work, 70 debt problems, 94
Peru, 5 fruit trees, 57
planting delayed, 74 landless, 80
plow, 4 microcredit loan, 94
rice, 27 palm thatch income diminished, 52
sexual division of labor, 27 son’s construction work, 62, 105
shifting, 4 stopped school, 99
subsistence, 39, 118 wild vegetables, 49–50
wage labor, 4, 61, 63 Borrowing; see also Credit
women’s crops, 4–5 banks, 91, 94
AIDS, 75, 89 cash, 91
American bombing of Cambodia, 30 debt repayment, 90
Angk Snoul government sources, 96
land distribution, 83 interest, 91–92
plow-women, 66–69 interest-free, 91
provas exchange ratio, 65 medical expenses, 90
source of widows, 19 microcredit organizations, 94–96
Are, definition, 145, 148 moneylenders, 91–94
Armed conflict; see also War productive purposes, 90, 92, 95
Cambodian history, 28–34 relatives, neighbors, and friends, 91–92
children’s education, 107–108 repay with employment income, 94
widows’ lives 29 several sources, 94
155
M plowman, 66
Mae phoum son’s labor, 73
definition, 140, 145 Microcredit organizations, 116
krom, 80 Banco Solidario, 10
land distribution, 82–85 Cambodian NGOs, 94–96
sweet-talked by Leang, 34, 83 food consumption, 10
village palm trees, 54 group savings fund, 95
Marital problems, 46 limits, 11
dishonesty, 46 loans to poor widows, 95
drinking, 45, 46, 74, 123, 124 peer loan groups, 95
gambling, 46, 74, 124 United Nations report, 11
poor work habits, 46 village reputation, 96
violence, 123, 127 World Summit for Social Development,
wife desertion, 46 10
Marriage; see also Remarriage Microenterprises, 48–61, 116
arranged by widow, 44, 45 agricultural enterprises, 55–58
customs, 3, 42 cash income, 71–72
dividing land, 86–87 children, 38, 49
education, 100 definition, 48
resistance, 121–124 gathering and processing activities,
social security for widow, 44 50–54
Marx, productive and reproductive work, 6 hunger gap, 35, 47
Matrilineal cultures, 9 hunting and gathering activities, 49–50
Matrilocal cultures, 3 krom samaki, 81
bilateral kinship, 14 need for credit, 10
marital residence, 23, 42, 44 savings, 90
relatives nearby, 121–121 service enterprises, 59–61
Mats, 146 trading businesses, 58–59
Mats, palm or kantael, 27, 28 vegetable sales, 41
source of widows’ income, 36 Military draft, 71
supplanted by plastic mats, 52 Moam, 134
uses, 52 children’s education, 110
Mats, reed or kantael krahom lack of education, 99
collective labor, 53, 70 landless, 80
colored red, 52–53, 70 son-in-law’s fishing, 50
produced provas style, 53 Momsen, Janet
Mayan war widows, 13 Caribbean women, 8
Mead, Margaret, sexual division of labor, 4 houseyard, 127
Medical care, 1, 38, 119 resistance to male domination, 2, 121,
Medical clinics, 63, 102 123
Medical problems Money lenders, 47
devaluation of women’s labor, 120 Money management, women’s, 26
land losses, 88–90, 93, 103 Moser, Caroline, 6–7
schooling disruption, 99, 100, 106 Motodup or motos or mototaxi, 143, 146
Meseth, 134 commuting, 61
adult education, 98, 99 male income-producing work, 72
banana trading, 58–59 research transportation, 19, 20
chamkar cultivation, 58 transport goods to market, 50
children’s education, 106
land distribution, 84 N
microcredit loan group, 95 Narin, 134–135
multiple debts, 95–96 borrowing, 92
bribe, 62, 89 P
children’s education, 105, 106 Palm sugar production
flooding, 48 gender roles, 53–54
food security, 86 hazardous for men, 44, 54
illnesses, 66, 106 lucrative enterprise, 72
krom, 81 production process, 53–54
land distribution, 85, 145 source of widows’ income, 36
land for collateral, 96 support for younger siblings, 29
love letters, 100 widows’ sons, 37
rewards of education, 101 Palm sugar trading, 59
Native American women, 9 Palm thatch or sleuk
“New” people, 31 age-related production, 51
NGOs (non-governmental organizations), diminishing market, 52
58, 94 gender roles, 51
house construction, 45
O income source, 36, 37–38
Oeung, 135 production method, 51
adult literacy class, 99 trading, 51–52
children’s education, 108 uses, 50–51
dividing land, 88 Parent-child relationships, 24
hunger gap, 47 Patriarchy
krom, 81 bargains, 2, 122
land holdings, 80 Cambodia, 118, 127
plowing, 67, 73 credit in Bangladesh, 10
Ol, 135 cultural variation, 118
borrowing, 91 definition, 2
chicken husbandry, 57 families, 2
divorced son, 87 girls’ education, 99
education, 100 institutionalization, 2
firewood collection, 50 patriarchal belt, 2
land distribution, 83 resistance, 2, 121–124
palm thatch production, 51 values, 118, 119
plow-woman, 67 visibility, 128
rice snack production, 60 walls, 118, 120
starvation, 32 weak, 122
“Old” people, 31, 66, 147 Patrilineal cultures, 3, 8
Owen, Margaret Pesticides, 58
African disinterest in remarriage, 123 Phnom Penh
“chasing off,” 121 base apartment, 22
daughters as providers for mother, 3 Khmer Rouge evacuation, 31
gender roles, 5, 125 widows’ residence, 20
inheritance, 9 Pig husbandry
land ownership, 8, 9 economics, 55–56
Oxen elderly, 41
asset, 65–66 hunger gap, 47
considered in land distribution, 82 rice husks, 60
expensive, 67, 147 savings plan, 55
krom samaki era, 82 Plowing, 64–69, 148
labor, 65 assistance hard to find, 8, 65, 67
repay debt, 94 hiring, 58
sell land, 89–90 krom samaki, 33, 80–81
widows lack, 74 land distribution, 83