Nuremberg Moot Court 2021

Table of Abbreviations

1
 Nuremberg Moot Court 2021
Table of Abbreviations

Table of Abbreviations 1
AC Appeals Chamber
ACHPR African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights
ACHR American Convention on Human Rights
ACtHPR African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights
Art. Article
Arts. Articles
AU African Union
doc. Document
EACJ East African Court of Justice
ECCC Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia
ECHR Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental
Freedoms / European Convention on Human Rights
ECJ European Court of Justice
ECtHR European Court of Human Rights
ed. editor/edition
eds. editors
e.g. for example
et al. and others
et seq. et sequent
IACHR Inter-American Commission for Human Rights
IACtHR Inter-American Court of Human Rights
ibid. ibidem
ICC International Criminal Court
ICCPR International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
ICJ International Court of Justice
ICTR International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda
ICTY International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
id. idem
ILC International Law Commission
IMT International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg
IMTFE International Military Tribunal for the Far East
KSC Kosovo Specialist Chambers
MICT International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals
no. number
p. page
pp. pages
para. paragraph
paras paragraphs
PTC Pre-Trial Chamber
Res. Resolution
SC Security Council
SCSL Special Court for Sierra Leone
STL Special Tribunal for Lebanon
TC Trial Chamber
TWC Trials of War Criminals
UN United Nations
UNCAT UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman
or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
v. versus
Vol. Volume
 Nuremberg Moot Court 2021
Table of Abbreviations

2
Rules for Written Memoranda Journal Articles:
Author, “Article title”, Journal title, volume number (year), p./para.
Antonio Cassese, “Is the ICC still having Teething Problems?”, Journal of International
Criminal Justice, 4 (2006), p. 438.

Books:
Author, Title (edition, year), p./para.
William Schabas, Genocide in International Criminal Law: the Crime of Crimes (2nd ed., 2009),
p. 39.
Knut Dörmann, “Art. 8 para. 2 (b)(i)” in Triffterer (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute
of the International Criminal Court – Observers‘ Notes, Articles by Articles (2nd ed., 2008),
para. 31.

Decisions and judgements:

Court, names of the parties, Case no./Application no., decision/judgement, date, para./p.
ECHR, Nabil et al. v. Hungary, 62116/12, Judgement, 22 September 2015, para. 25.
ICC, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-3173, Decision on the review concerning
reduction of sentence of Mr. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, 22. September 2015, paras. 33 et seq..
TWC, United States v. Wilhelm v. Leeb et al., Vol. IX, 462.

UN Documents:
UN doc. S/Res/1540 (2004), p. 8 (Security Council Resolution).
UN doc. A/CONF.183/9* (1998), article 5 (United Nations Diplomatic Conference of
Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court).

Footnotes:
Please insert the footnote marker to the right of the punctuation.

Headings:
Headings should be numbered as follows: I.A.1.a.
Do not use I.A. if not followed by any I.B.

References:
The full details of a publication (as detailed above) should be given for the first reference only.
For the other references, please use a short title:
First reference: Antonio Cassese, “Is the ICC still having Teething Problems?”,
Journal of International Criminal Justice, 4 (2006), p. 438 (“Antonio Cassese, 2006”).
Following references: Antonio Cassese, 2006, p. 438.
Please avoid any confusion with other publications.
Do not cross-reference footnotes, such as see supra note 2, p. 203.

International Nuremberg Principles Academy

Bärenschanzstrasse 72
90429 Nuremberg
Tel +49 (0)911 231-10379
Fax +49 (0)911 231-14020
info@nurembergacademy.org
www.nurembergacademy.org