You are on page 1of 6

EVIDENCE - BASED CASE REPORT

(QGRVFRSLF'LODWDWLRQYHUVXV2HVRSKDJHDO
6WHQWLQ%HQLJQ2HVRSKDJHDO6WULFWXUH
Hadyanto Caputra*, Iqbal I Awang*, Pringgodigdo Nugroho**, Ari Fahrial Syam***
*Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia/Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General National Hospital, Jakarta
**Division of Renal-hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas
Indonesia/ Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General National Hospital, Jakarta
***Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine
Universitas Indonesia/ Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General National Hospital, Jakarta

Corresponding author:
Ari Fahrial Syam. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo
General National Hospital. Jl. Diponegoro No.71 Jakarta Indonesia. Phone: +62-21-3153957;
Facsimile: +62-21-3142454. E-mail: ari_syam@hotmail.com

$%675$&7

Aim: Oesophageal stricture is one of the causes of dysphagia. It is a condition in which the lumen of
RHVRSKDJXVLVQDUURZHGE\¿EURWLFWLVVXHLQWKHRHVRSKDJHDOZDOO,WLVXVXDOO\FDXVHGE\LQÀDPPDWLRQRU
any other cause that leads to necrotizing of tissue. It is mainly differentiated into benign or malignant. The aim
of this article is to answer the clinical question on the effectiveness of oesophageal stenting compared to
endoscopic dilatation in patient with benign oesophageal stricture due to ingestion of corrosive substances,
who had undergone several endoscopic dilatations.
Method: We conducted search of relevant articles using PubMed search engine to answer the clinical
question. Keywords being used during the search process were: ("oesophageal stricture"[All Fields]
OR "oesophageal stenosis"[All Fields] AND (("dilatation"[All Fields] AND ("stents"[MeSH Terms] OR
VWHQWV>$OO)LHOGV@25VWHQW>$OO)LHOGV@ 5HVXOWVZHUHIXUWKHUFRQYHUJHGE\DGGLQJVSHFL¿F¿OWHUVZKLFK
were full text articles and clinical trial.
Results: The chosen article was further appraised in order to identify its validity and eligibility to answer
the clinical question. We chose to use CONSORT (statement to improve the quality of reporting of RCTs)
to facilitate the critical appraisal and interpretation of RCTs.
Conclusion: Stenting was associated with greater dysphagia, co-medication and adverse events. No
randomized controlled trials which compared biodegradable stents with other stents or with balloon
GLODWDWLRQZDVLGHQWL¿HG/DFNRIDGHTXDWHO\UREXVWHYLGHQFHIRUHIIHFWLYHQHVVDQGFRVWHIIHFWLYHQHVVIRUPHG
the rationale of this trial.
Keywords: benign oesophageal stricture, endoscopic dilatation, stent

$%675$.

Tujuan: Striktur esofagus merupakan salah satu penyebab disfagia. Striktur esofagus adalah suatu kondisi
GLPDQDOXPHQHVRIDJXVPHQ\HPSLWNDUHQDDGDQ\DMDULQJDQ¿EURVLVSDGDGLQGLQJHVRIDJXV+DOLQLELDVDQ\D
GLVHEDENDQROHKLQÀDPDVLDWDXSHQ\HEDEODLQ\DQJVHODQMXWQ\DGDSDWPHUDQJVDQJMDULQJDQXQWXNPHQJDODPL
nekrosis. Secara umum, striktur esofagus dibagi menjadi dua, yaitu jinak dan ganas. Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk
menjawab pertanyaan klinis tentang efektivitas sten esofagus dibandingan dengan dilatasi endoskopi pada pasien
dengan striktur esofagus jinak akibat menelan zat korosif dan telah menjalani dilatasi endoskopi beberapa kali.

Volume 17, Number 2, August 2016 141


Hadyanto Caputra, Iqbal I Awang, Pringgodigdo Nugroho, Ari Fahrial Syam

Metode: Kami melakukan pencarian artikel yang relevan dengan menggunakan alat pencarian PubMed
untuk menjawab pertanyaan klinis tersebut. Kata kunci yang kami gunakan pada proses pencarian adalah:
("oesophageal stricture"[All Fields] OR "oesophageal stenosis"[All Fields] AND (("dilatation"[All
Fields] AND ("stents"[MeSH Terms] OR "stents"[All Fields] OR "stent"[All Fields]). Kemudian, pada hasil
SHQFDULDQNDPLPHQDPEDKNDQ¿OWHUIXOOWH[WDUWLFOHVGDQFOLQLFDOWULDO
Hasil: Artikel yang terpilih selanjutnya ditelaah untuk mengevalusi validitas dan kesesuaiannya untuk
menjawab pertanyaan klinis tersebut. Kami memilih metode CONSORT (pernyataan untuk meningkatkan
kualitas pelaporan uji kontrol acak) untuk membantu menelaah dan menafsirkan uji kontrol acak secara kritis.
Simpulan: Pemasangan stent berhubungan dengan memberatnya gejala disfagia, penggunaan lebih dari
satu obat, dan timbulnya efek samping. Tidak ditemukan adanya uji kontrol acak yang membandingkan stent
dengan stent lain atau dilatasi balon. Kurangnya bukti kuat mengenai efektivitas dan kendali biaya merupakan
dasar dilakukannya pencarian ini.
Kata kunci: striktur esofagus jinak, dilatasi endoskopik, stent

,1752'8&7,21 LQ VRPH GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV OLNH ,QGLD ZKHUH


Esophageal stricture is one of the cause of hydrochloric acid and sulfuric acid are easily
G\VSKDJLDZKLFKLVDVXEMHFWLYHVHQVDWLRQRIRUJDQLF accessible. Acids and alkalis produce different types
abnormality during the process of food or liquid RIWLVVXHGDPDJH$FLGVFDXVHFRDJXODWLRQQHFURVLV
passing from the oral cavity to stomach. It varies with eschar formation that may limit substance
from unable to swallow (oropharingeal dysphagia) penetration DQG LQMXU\ GHSWK &RQYHUVHO\ DONDOLV
to sensation of obstruction while food passing the combine with tissue proteins and cause liquefactive
oesphagus to stomach (esophageal dysphagia). QHFURVLVDQGVDSRQL¿FDWLRQDQGSHQHWUDWHGHHSHU
Esophageal stricture is a condition which the lumen LQWR WLVVXHVKHOSHG E\D KLJKHU YLVFRVLW\DQG D
RIHVRSKDJXVQDUURZHGE\¿EURWLFLQWKHHVRSKDJHDO longer contact time through the esophagus. In
wall. Usually due to inflamation and any other  &LSWR 0DQJXQNXVXPR KRVSLWDO FRQGXFWHG
causes that lead to necrotizing of tissue.1 Esophageal endoscopic examination of upper gastrointestinal
stricture is differentiated into benign or malignant. WUDFWLQSDWLHQWV,WZDVIRXQGWKDW  
The later usually caused by malignancy or cancer SDWLHQWVKDGHVRSKDJHDOVWULFWXUHRIDQ\FDXVHV
LQ HVRSKDJXV FRXOG EH LQWUDOXPHQ RU H[WUDOXPHQ RIWKHPZHUHIRXQGDVROLGWXPRU
And the first may caused by gastro esophageal GXHWRFRUURVLYHVXEVWDQFHDQGLQSDWLHQWV
UHÀX[ GLVHDVH *(5'  FRUURVLYH VXEVWDQFH DIWHU after sclerotherapy of esopahageal varices Several
DQDVWRPRVHVRIHVRSKDJXVDIWHUUDGLRWKHUDSK\DQG modalities to treat the stricture such as dilatation
chronic esophagitis. Esophageal trauma caused by RIHVRSKDJXVLQWUDOHVVLRQFRUWLFRVWHURLGLQMHFWLRQ
corrosive substance may lead to stricture. Stricture SODFLQJ VWHQW VWULFWXURSODVW\ DQG UHVHFWLRQ RI WKH
that caused by corrosive substance should be stricture. Choosing treatment modality should
monitored periodically that recurrent of the sticture FRQVLGHUVHYHUDOWKLQJVDQGFRQGLWLRQDQGGLIIHUIURP
might happened. Ingestion of corrosive substances one patient to another. The main goal is to recover
remain an important public health issue in Western the function of esophagus as a passage way and
countries despite education and regulatory efforts swallowing process.6
to reduce its occurrence. These injuries are still Benign oesophageal strictures (narrowing of the
LQFUHDVLQJ LQ GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV UHODWHG WR WKH oesophagus) present with dysphagia of solid or liquid
VRFLDO HFRQRPLF DQG HGXFDWLRQDO YDULDEOHVDQG IRRGVZKLFKPD\UHVXOWLQPDOQXWULWLRQDVSLUDWLRQ
mainly to a lack of prevention. The problem is largely and weight loss. Strictures are conventionally
unreported in these settings and its true prevalence treated by endoscopic dilatation using either a
simply cannot be extrapolated from the scarce papers balloon (radially dilating the stricture) or a bougie
or personal experience. (dilating the stricture by shearing longitudinal
7UDGLWLRQDOO\LQJHVWHGFRUURVLYHVXEVWDQFHVDUH force). The placement of self-expanding metallic
either alkalis or acids. Alkaline material accounts stents is routinely used to maintain esophageal
for most caustic ingestions in Western countries patency in patients with malignancy that either
whereas injuries from acid are more common have non-resectable disease or are poor candidates

142 The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Endoscopy


Endoscopic Dilatation versus Oesophageal Stent in Benign Oesophageal Stricture

for surgery. Many reports have documented the VWLOOEHLQJDFKRLFHIRUWUHDWLQJWKHVWULFWXUHRULVLW


FOLQLFDO HIIHFWLYHQHVV RIWKHVH WRROVSDUWLFXODUO\ necessary to place a stent to prevent recurrent stenosis
FRYHUHGPHWDOOLFVWHQWV+RZHYHUWKHXVHIXOQHVVRI RUVWULFWXUHLQVWHDGRIUHSHDWHGO\GLODWLQJWKHVWHQRVLV
metallic stents for benign stenosis is limited due to through endoscopy in a benign oesophageal strictures.
relatively little information regarding their long-term
FRPSOLFDWLRQVLQFOXGLQJPLJUDWLRQWKHIRUPDWLRQ
0(7+2'
RIQHZVWULFWXUHV¿VWXODIRUPDWLRQDQGK\SHUSODVWLF
tissue reactions.  Since the cause of benign ,Q RUGHU WR DQVZHU WKH TXHVWLRQ ZH FRQGXFW
esophageal stenosis does not directly affect the searching in PubMed for evidences in studies or
SDWLHQWV¶SURJQRVLVLWLVPRUHLPSRUWDQWWRSUHYHQW clinical trials that has high correlation and answer the
the incidence of long-term complications. It is highly question. We used several keywords with bollean OR
desirable to develop a stent that could be kept in RUDQG$1'7KHVHDUHWKHNH\ZRUGVWKDWEHLQJXVHG
WKHSURSHUSRVLWLRQGXULQJWKHUHSDLUSURFHVV DQG for searching the articles: ("oesophageal stricture"[All
WKHQEHHDVLO\UHPRYHGWKXVDYRLGLQJUHVWHQRVLV Fields] OR "esophageal stenosis"[All Fields] AND
,Q RWKHU ZRUGV LI D VWHQW FRXOG EH FRQVWUXFWHG (("dilatation"[All Fields] AND ("stents"[MeSH
IURPDELRGHJUDGDEOHPDWHULDOWKHQDVXEVHTXHQW Terms] OR "stents"[All Fields] OR "stent"[All
stent removal operation would not be necessary. )LHOGV@ 7KHUHVXOWVKRZVDUWLFOHVLQDQ\NLQG
The degradable nature of the stent would prevent RIVWXGLHV:H¿OWHUWKHDUWLFOHVZKLFKDUHIXOOWH[W
serious long-term complications.7KH TXHVWLRQ LV articles. Then the articles converge into 16 articles.
when a person had underwent dilatation for several :HZDQWWRFRPSDUHEHWZHHQPRGDOLWLHVRIWKHUDS\VR
WLPHVWRWUHDWWKHVWULFWXUHLVLWQHFHVVDU\WRFKDQJHWKH ZHVKRXOG¿QGDUWLFOHVWKDWWKHW\SHRIVWXG\VXLWDEOH
modality of mid or long term treatment such as placing to answer the question. The proper type of study
stent in the stricture to prevent recurrent stenosis. VKRXOGEHDFOLQLFDOWULDO6RWKHQZH¿OWHUL]HGWKH
2ULVGLODWDWLRQVWLOOEHLQJDFKRLFHRIWUHDWPHQWIRU
WKHVWHQRVLVDOWKRXJKLWZRXOGEHGRQHUHSHDWHGO\LQ
several months? Keywords:

"oesophageal stricture"[All Fields] OR "esophageal stenosis"[All


Fields] AND (("dilatation"[All Fields] AND ("stents"[MeSH Terms]
&/,1,&$/48(67,21 OR "stents"[All Fields] OR "stent"[All Fields]

3DWLHQWLVDPDOH\HDUVROGZDVKRVSLWDOL]HG
due to hematemesis and melena. It started when he
had given a drink by his friend while working. He
IHOWWKDWWKHWDVWHRIFDUERQL]HGGULQNYHU\XQXVXDO
but he kept swallow it about half of bottle. About Result: found 125 articles
KRXUVODWHUZKLOHKHZDVDWKRPHDOORIVXGGHQ
KHKDGDSURMHFWLOHYRPLWZKLFKFRQVLVWRIEORRG Filter:
DERXWWLPHV+HIHOWWKDWKLVWKURDWOLNHEHLQJEXUQHG full text

Than he fell out and administered to the hospital. He


was diagnosed having a esophageal stricture due to Result: found 16 articles
FRUURVLYHVXEVWDQFH%HIRUHKHGUDQNWKHVRGDKH
VPHOWVRPHNLQGRIFKHPLFDORIÀRRUFOHDQHU Filter:
He had underwent several endoscopic dilation with Clinical Trial

EDOORRQDERXWPRQWKVGXHWRUHSHDWHGVWULFWXUHWKDW
PDGHKLPQRWEHDEOHWRHDWHYHQWRGULQN+HVKRXOG Result: found 1 article
drink small amount of water to get it swallowed. He ask
wether there is a way that he would not take dilation often.
Other option is placing stent which can dilate the lumen
IRUORQJHUSHULRGLQVWHDGRIVKRUWWHUPUHSHDWHGGLODWLRQ
How effective is stent would replace endoscopic dilation? Critical Appraisal
,QWKLVSDSHURI(%&5ZHVKRXOG¿QGWKHDQVZHU
RI WKH TXHVWLRQ PHQWLRQHG EHIRUH ZHWKHU GLODWDWLRQ )LJXUH)UDPHZRUNDQGFRQFHSWRIVHDUFKLQJDUWLFOHV

Volume 17, Number 2, August 2016 143


Hadyanto Caputra, Iqbal I Awang, Pringgodigdo Nugroho, Ari Fahrial Syam

)LJXUH&KHFNOLVWRILWHPLQUHSRUWLQJDUDQGRPL]HGWULDO &216257 
,WHP 5HSRUWHGRQ
3DSHUVHFWLRQDQGWRSLF 'HVFULSWRU
QXPEHU SDJHQXPEHU
Title and abstract 1 How participants were allocated to intervention (e.g., “random allocation,” 1
randomized, “ or randomly assigned”)
Introduction background 2 6FLHQWL¿FEDFNJURXQGDQGH[SODQDWLRQRIUDWLRQDOH 2
Methods
participants 3 Eligibility criteria for participants and the settings and locations where the 3
data were collected.
Interventions 4 Precise details of the interventions intended for each group and how and 3
what they were actually administered.
Objectives 5 6SHFL¿FREMHFWLYHVDQGK\SRWKHVHV 3
Outcomes 6 &OHDUO\GH¿QHGSULPDU\DQGVHFRQGDU\RXWFRPHPHDVXUHDQGZKHQ 3
applicable, any methods used to enhance the quality of measurements
(e.g., multiple observations, training of assessors)
Sample size 7 How sample size was determined and, when applicable, explanation of any 3
interim analyses and stopping rules
Randomization
Sequence generation 8 Method used to generate the random allocation sequence, including details 3
RIDQ\UHVWULFWLRQ HJEORFNLQJVWUDWL¿FDWLRQ 
9 Method used to implement the random allocation sequence (e.g., numbered 3
containers or central telephone), clarifying whether the sequence was
concealed until interventions were assigned
Allocation concealment 10 Who generated the allocation sequence, who enrolled participants, and who 3
assigned participants to their groups.
Implementation 11 Whether or not participants, those administering the interventions, and those 3
assessing the outcome were blinded to group assignment. If done, how the
success of blinding was evaluated.
Blinding (masking)
12 Statistical methods used to compare groups for primary outcome (s); 3
method additional analyses, such as subgroup analyses and adjusted
analyses.
Results
3DUWLFLSDQWÀRZ 13 Flow of participants through each stage (a diagram is strongly 4
UHFRPPHQGHG 6SHFL¿FDOO\IRUHDFKJURXSUHSRUWWKHQXPEHUVRI
participants randomly assigned, receiving intended treatment, completing
the study protocol, and analyzed for the primary outcome. Describe protocol
deviations from study as planned, together with reasons.
Recruitment 14 'DWHVGH¿QLQJWKHSHULRGVRIUHFUXLWPHQWDQGIROORZXS 4
Baseline data 15 Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of each group 5
Numbers analyzed 16 Number of participants (denominator) in each group induded in each 4
analysis and whether the analysis was by “intention to treat.” State the
results in absolute numbers when feasible (e.g., 10 of 20, not 50%).
Outcomes and estimation 17 For each primary and secondary outcome, a summary of results for each 4
JURXSDQGWKHHVWLPDWHGHIIHFWVVL]HDQGLWVSUHFLVLRQ HJFRQ¿GHQFH
interval).
Anciliary analyses 18 Address multiplicity by reporting any other analyses performed, including 6
VXEJURXSDQDO\VHVDQGDGMXVWHGDQDO\VHVLQGLFDWLQJWKRVHSUHVSHFL¿HGDQG
those exploratory
Adverse events 19 All important adverse events or side effects in each intervention group 7
Discussion
Interpretation 20 Interpretation of the results, taking into account study hypotheses, sources 5
of potential bias or imprecision, and the dangers associated with multiplicity
of analyses and outcomes
Generalizability 21 *HQHUDOL]DELOLW\ H[WHUQDOYDOLGLW\ RIWKHWULDO¿QGLQJV 7
Overall evidence 22 General interpretation of the results in the context of current evidence 7

search method by adding “clinical trial” in advance 5(68/76


search. The result leads to one article that can answer
The choosen article should be appraised in order
WKHTXHVWLRQWLWOHG³%LRGHJUDGDEOHVWHQWRUEDOORRQ
to see wether it has good validity and eligible to
dilatation for benign oesophageal stricture: Pilot
answer the question. A group of scientists and editors
UDQGRPLVHGFRQWUROOHGWULDO´E\'KDU$HWDOZKLFK
developed the CONSORT (statement to improve the
published in World Journal of Gastroenterology in
quality of reporting of RCTs. The statement consists
th 'HFHPEHU7KHIUDPHZRUNDQGFRQFHSW
RIDFKHFNOLVWDQGÀRZGLDJUDPWKDWDXWKRUVFDQXVHIRU
RIVHDUFKLQJLVLOOXVWUDWHGLQ¿JXUH

144 The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Endoscopy


Endoscopic Dilatation versus Oesophageal Stent in Benign Oesophageal Stricture

reporting an RCT. Many leading medical journals and RHVRSKDJHDOFDQFHUDQG%DUUHWW¶VRHVRSKDJXV VXFK


major international editorial groups have adopted the as endoscopic mucosal resection or photodynamic

CONSORT statement. WKHUDS\ SRVWVXUJLFDODQDVWRPRWLFVWULFWXUHVDQG
The objective of CONSORT is to facilitate critical eosinophilic oesophagitis.
appraisal and interpretation of RCTs by providing Self-expanding plastic or metal stents have
guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting been used to dilate benign recurrent oesophageal
of their trials. Peer reviewers and editors can also VWULFWXUHVDVDPHDQVRIUHGXFLQJWKHQHHGIRUUHSHDWHG
use CONSORT to help them identify reports that are HQGRVFRSLFEDOORRQERXJLH dilatation with mixed
GLI¿FXOWWRLQWHUSUHWDQGWKRVHZLWKSRWHQWLDOO\ELDVHG UHVXOWVDQGSRWHQWLDOFRPSOLFDWLRQVRIVWHQWPLJUDWLRQ
UHVXOWV+RZHYHU&216257ZDVQRWPHDQWWREHXVHG hyperplastic tissue ingrowth or overgrowth (metal

as a quality assessment instrument. VWHQWV RHVRSKDJHDOREVWUXFWLRQGXHWRFROODSVHG
VWHQWWKRUDFLF SDLQDQGGLVDSSRLQWLQJORQJHUWHUP
symptom relief.
',6&866,21
Biodegradable stents work to the same principle
The study has been using CONSORT guideline DVUHPRYDEOHPHWDOSODVWLFVWHQWVZLWKRXWUHTXLULQJ
LQUHSRUWLQJWKHPHWKRGVIURPDEVWUDFWWRRXWFRPH endoscopic removal since the stent dissolves
$OVRLQ ÀRZGLDJUDPLWKDVDOUHDG\DGDSWHG7KH JUDGXDOO\ LQVLWX WKXV DYRLGLQJ WKH QHHG IRU LW WR
study used a pilot multicentre randomised controlled be removed. The biodegradable stent is made from
trial design. Blinding of clinicians and patients SRO\GLR[DQRQHDPRQRFU\VWDOOLQHSRO\PHUWKDWKDV
ZDV QRW SUDFWLFDEOH HFRUGLQJ RI V\PSWRPV ZDV EHHQXVHGLQPRQR¿ODPHQWVXUJLFDOVXWXUHPDWHULDOV
SHUIRUPHGE\DVLQJOHEOLQGHGREVHUYHUDWEDVHOLQH DQGKDVDFU\VWDOOLQHVWUXFWXUH,WLVGHJUDGHGLQ
DQGPRQWKV living tissue by hydrolytic attack which breaks down
The article state that balloon dilatation relieves the crystalline structure into smaller fragments.
G\VSKDJLDLQDERXWRISDWLHQWV DOWKRXJK 7KH ORQJHU SHUVLVWHQFH RI WKH 3'; VWHQW LV
associated with small risks of bleeding and thought to allow adequate time for oesophageal
SHUIRUDWLRQ DQG LQ DURXQG  RI SDWLHQWV remodelling to take place. Typically the stent
the stricture recurs needing repeated endoscopic PDLQWDLQVLQWHJULW\DQGUDGLDOGLVWHQVLOHIRUFHIRU
dilatation. Recurrence appears more common for ZHHNVDQGGLVLQWHJUDWHVLQZHHNVIROORZLQJ
FRPSOH[ VWULFWXUHV UHODWHG WR UDGLDWLRQ WKHUDS\ implantation.
corrosive injury or surgical anastomosis. Repeat 5DQGRPLVDWLRQ ZDV ZHEEDVHG VWUDWLILHG E\
dilatation is preferred for refractory strictures when KRVSLWDO VLWH ZLWK D EORFN VL]H RI IRXU DOORFDWLQJ
FRPSDUHGWRVXUJHU\ZKLFKLVDVVRFLDWHGZLWKKLJK patients in a 1:1 ratio to biodegradable oesophageal
morbidity rates as well as high risk for patients with stent (BS) or standard endoscopic balloon dilatation
comorbidities. (' :KHQWKHVWXG\KDGUHFUXLWHGSDWLHQWV 
7KLV VWDWHPHQW ¿WV WR WKH SDWLHQW ZKLFK KDG %6DQG('  2QHSDWLHQWIURPHDFKJURXSZDV
underwent a corrosive injury and had several subsequently withdrawn before treatment due to in-
times of dilation. Dilation stretches the narrowed HOLJLELOLW\ %6PHQWDOLQFDSDFLW\('SULRUFDQFHU 
oesophagus by radial distension. Stretching is OHDYLQJ%6DQG('SDWLHQWVIRUDQDO\VLV
EHOLHYHGWRGLVUXSWWKH FROODJHQDQGHODVWLQ¿EUHV The primary outcome was the average dysphagia
LQWKHRHVRSKDJHDO ZDOO UHVSRQVLEOHIRUWKH¿EURWLF VFRUHGXULQJWKH¿UVWPRQWKVZKHUHG\VSKDJLDZDV
VWULFWXUH DQG RSHQ XS WKH OXPHQ 0RVW SDWLHQWV SDWLHQW DVVHVVHG RQ D ¿YHSRLQW VFDOH 6HFRQGDU\
respond to the dilatation well and maintain luminal endpoints assessed were: the number of repeat
patency of the oesophagus for a reasonable period HQGRVFRSLFSURFHGXUHV WKHUDSHXWLFDQGGLDJQRVWLF 
of time. DGYHUVH HYHQWV LQFOXGLQJKRVSLWDODGPLVVLRQV 
Patient is cathegorized as benign oesophageal quality of life assessed physically using the surrogate
VWULFWXUHV GXH WR LQMXU\ E\ LQJHVWLRQ RI DFLG RU PDUNHUVRIZHLJKWJHQHULFTXDOLW\RIOLIHDVVHVVPHQW
alkaline caustic agents (corrosive strictures). Other $OWKRXJK ERWK JURXSV LPSURYHG DYHUDJH
causes that cathegorized as benign oesophageal dysphagia score for patients receiving stents
VWULFWXUHVDUHLQMXU\E\DFLGUHÀX[ SHSWLFVWULFWXUHV  UHPDLQHGVLJQL¿FDQWO\KLJKHUDIWHUPRQWKV%6('
UDGLDWLRQLQGXFHGLQÀDPPDWRU\VWULFWXUHVVHTXHODH  &,S  (VWLPDWLRQRI
of therapeutic endoscopic interventions for early dysphagia by AUC method was similar (noting the

Volume 17, Number 2, August 2016 145


Hadyanto Caputra, Iqbal I Awang, Pringgodigdo Nugroho, Ari Fahrial Syam

ZHLJKWLQJIRUDPRQWKV average. Stenting was


DVVRFLDWHG ZLWK JUHDWHU G\VSKDJLD FRPHGLFDWLRQ
and adverse events. This may have occurred in part
because of chance atypical low dysphagia follow-up
scores in the balloon dilatation group.

&21&/86,21

6WHQWLQJZDVDVVRFLDWHGZLWKJUHDWHUG\VSKDJLD
co-medication and adverse events. This may have
occurred in part because of chance atypical low
dysphagia follow-up scores in the balloon dilatation
group. No randomized controlled trials comparing
biodegradable stents with other stents or with
EDOORRQ GLODWDWLRQ KDYH EHHQ LGHQWL¿HG /DFN RI
adequately robust evidence for effectiveness and
cost-effectiveness formed the rationale of this trial.

5()(5(1&(6
1. &RQWLQL 6 6FDUSLJQDWR & &DXVWLF LQMXU\ RI WKH XSSHU
gastrointestinal tract: a comprehensive review. World J
*DVWURHQWHURO
 .RED\DVKL6.DQDL12KNL77DNDJL5<DPDJXFKL1
,VRPRWR+HWDO3UHYHQWLRQRIHVRSKDJHDOVWULFWXUHVDIWHU
endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol

 %URRU6/.XPDU$&KDUL676LQJDO$0LVUD63.XPDU
1 HW DO &RUURVLYH RHVRSKDJHDO VWULFWXUHV IROORZLQJ DFLG
LQJHVWLRQFOLQLFDOSUR¿OHDQGUHVXOWVRIHQGRVFRSLFGLODWDWLRQ
J Gastroenterol Hepatol 
4. *XPDVWH99'DYH3%,QJHVWLRQRIFRUURVLYHVXEVWDQFHV
E\DGXOWV$P-*DVWURHQWHURO
 +DOOHU-$$QGUHZV+*:KLWH--7DPHU0$&OHYHODQG
WW. Pathophysiology and management of acute corrosive
EXUQVRIWKHHVRSKDJXVUHVXOWVRIWUHDWPHQWLQFKLOGUHQ
-3HGLDWU6XUJ
6. $FNUR\G 5 :DWVRQ ', 'HYLWW 3* -DPLHVRQ **
Expandable metallic stents should not be used in the
treatment of benign esophageal strictures. J Gastroenterol
+HSDWRO
 6RQJ+<3DUN6,'R<6<RRQ+.6XQJ.%6RKQ.+
et al. Expandable metallic stent placement in patients with
benign esophageal strictures: results of long-term follow-
up. Radiology 
 6DLWR < 7DQDND 7$QGRK$ 0LQHPDWVX + +DWD .
7VXMLNDZD 7  HW DO 8VHIXOQHVV RI ELRGHJUDGDEOH VWHQWV
FRQVWUXFWHGRISRO\,ODFWLFDFLGPRQR¿ODPHQWVLQSDWLHQWV
with benign esophageal stenosis. World J Gastroenterol

 $OWPDQ'* 6FKXO].)0RKHU'. The riveised CONSORT
Statement for Reporting Randomized Trial: Explanation
DQG(ODERUDWLRQ$QQ,QWHUQ0HG
10. 'KDU$ &ORVH + 9LVZDQDWK<. 5HHV &- +DQFRFN +&
'ZDUDNDQDWK$' HW DO %LRGHJUDGDEOH VWHQW RU EDORRQ
dilatation for beningn oesophageal stricture: Pilot randomised
FRQWUROOHGWULDO:RUOG-*DVWURHQWHURO

146 The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Endoscopy

You might also like