12/7/2020 Inpatient placement and management of nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes in adults - UpToDate

Authors: Richard A Hodin, MD, Liliana Bordeianou, MD, MPH

Section Editor: Amalia Cochran, MD, FACS, FCCM
Deputy Editor: Kathryn A Collins, MD, PhD, FACS

Contributor Disclosures

All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.

Literature review current through: Jun 2020. | This topic last updated: Mar 17, 2020.

INTRODUCTION

Nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes are flexible double or single lumen tubes that are passed
proximally from the nose distally into the stomach or small bowel. Enteric tubes that will be removed
within a short period of time can also be passed through the mouth (orogastric). This topic will
review the indications, contraindications, placement, management, and complications of nasogastric
and nasoenteric tubes in the adult inpatient.

INDICATIONS

Nasogastric tubes are indicated for the following reasons:

● Treatment of ileus or bowel obstruction – Gastrointestinal decompression using nasogastric

tubes is important for the treatment of patients with bowel obstruction or prolonged ileus.
Nasogastric decompression improves patient comfort, minimizes or prevents recurrent
vomiting, and serves as a means to monitor the progress or resolution of these conditions. (See
"Postoperative ileus" and "Management of small bowel obstruction in adults".)

● Administration of medications – A nasogastric tube may be needed to administer medications,

or oral contrast for computed tomography, to patients who cannot swallow or who are
neurologically impaired.

● Enteral nutrition – Nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes are used to deliver enteral nutrition into
the stomach (gastric feeding) or into the small intestine (postpyloric). (See 'Enteral nutrition'
below.)

● Stomach lavage – Lavage may be needed to remove blood or clots to facilitate endoscopy.
(See 'Gastric lavage' below.)

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/inpatient-placement-and-management-of-nasogastric-and-nasoenteric-tubes-in-adults?search=sonda nasogastric… 1/16

12/7/2020 Inpatient placement and management of nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes in adults - UpToDate

Contraindications — Nasogastric intubation is contraindicated in patients with esophageal stricture

because of the risk for esophageal perforation, and in patients with basilar skull fracture or facial
fracture due to the potential for intracranial misplacement [1,2].

Nasogastric tubes should also be avoided in patients with esophageal varices because tube
placement may trigger variceal bleeding, which can be life-threatening. In patients with a bleeding
diathesis, minimal trauma to the pharynx, esophagus, or stomach from nasogastric tubes can also
lead to severe bleeding, and, thus, tubes are avoided whenever possible.

TYPES OF TUBES

Nasogastric tubes are made of polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyurethane, or silicone and come in
numerous sizes. A variety of tubes are available for gastrointestinal decompression or the
administration of medications or enteral formula (table 1). Nasogastric tubes made of PVC (eg,
Salem Sump) are relatively stiff and therefore more irritating long-term and are used primarily for
gastrointestinal decompression. The most commonly placed nasogastric tube size in adults is 16 Fr,
although larger and smaller sizes are available.

The Salem Sump tube is the most commonly used tube for gastrointestinal decompression. The
tube has two lumens. The larger lumen is connected to intermittent wall suction for aspiration of
gastric contents, or, alternatively, it can be used for irrigation, delivery of medications, or enteral
feeding. The smaller lumen vents to atmosphere (equalizes the pressure in the stomach once the
gastric contents have been emptied), thus preventing the distal holes from adhering to and
damaging the stomach mucosa.

Nasoenteric tubes are more flexible, have a smaller diameter (3.5 to 12 Fr), vary in length (15 to
170 cm), and may be weighted or non-weighted. Although nasogastric tubes can be used as enteric
feeding tubes, a feeding tube cannot be used for gastric decompression because its soft walls tend
to collapse when suction is applied.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

Prophylactic placement — We do not recommend routine prophylactic use of nasogastric tubes

for gastric decompression following abdominal/gastrointestinal surgery. When selectively applied,
only approximately 10 percent of postoperative patients require nasogastric decompression. If the
patient develops a prolonged postoperative ileus or early postoperative small bowel obstruction,
then a nasogastric tube is indicated. (See 'Indications' above.)

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/inpatient-placement-and-management-of-nasogastric-and-nasoenteric-tubes-in-adults?search=sonda nasogastric… 2/16

12/7/2020 Inpatient placement and management of nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes in adults - UpToDate

Postoperative nasogastric decompression after major abdominal or thoracic surgery has been used
extensively since its initial introduction by Levin [3]. It was thought that such decompression might
reduce postoperative ileus, pulmonary complications, and anastomotic leakage after gastrointestinal
and thoracic surgery [4]. However, data do not support this belief and most clinicians argue against
prophylactic use of nasogastric tubes following surgery.

Numerous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have shown a lack of benefit from prophylactic
nasogastric tube decompression in the postoperative setting, including in a wide range of abdominal
and thoracic surgeries (eg, biliary, gastroduodenal, colorectal, gynecologic, trauma, esophageal,
and vascular surgery) [4-11]. A meta-analysis of randomized trials and nonrandomized studies
published prior to 1995 found that, although vomiting and distension were more common when
nasogastric tubes were not routinely used, other parameters were improved [12]. Management of
postoperative nausea and vomiting has become more effective with the introduction of antiemetic
agents that do not cause drowsiness and respiratory depression (eg, ondansetron). The
management of postoperative nausea and vomiting is discussed elsewhere. (See "Overview of
post-anesthetic care for adult patients", section on 'Postoperative nausea and vomiting'.)

In light of these data, allowing a nasogastric tube to remain following recovery of anesthesia should
only be considered in cases where placement may be difficult or associated with added risks, such
as in patients with hiatal hernia, prior stomach or bariatric surgery, esophagectomy patients, or in
patients who may not be able to cooperate postoperatively.

Gastric lavage — Nasogastric tubes have traditionally been used to evaluate patients with
hematochezia, especially when no concomitant hematemesis is present. It was thought that
nasogastric intubation and lavage would distinguish upper from lower gastrointestinal bleeding by
confirming a gastric source for blood per rectum. However, the use of nasogastric aspiration and
lavage alone has a low sensitivity for predicting an upper gastrointestinal bleeding source. (See
"Approach to acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in adults" and "Approach to acute upper
gastrointestinal bleeding in adults", section on 'Nasogastric lavage'.)

Although commonly used in the past, gastric lavage is no longer routinely used in the treatment of
poisoning. The specific indications for gastric lavage in these patients are discussed elsewhere.
(See "Gastrointestinal decontamination of the poisoned patient", section on 'Gastric lavage'.)

Enteral nutrition — Nasogastric sump-type tubes are often initially inserted for gastrointestinal
decompression and then used to deliver medications or enteral nutrition when decompression is no
longer needed. Although less prone to clogging, use of a sump-type nasogastric tube in this manner
should be limited to a short period of time and the tube replaced with a softer, specifically designed
enteral feeding tube to minimize potential complications. Whether to administer feedings into the

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/inpatient-placement-and-management-of-nasogastric-and-nasoenteric-tubes-in-adults?search=sonda nasogastric… 3/16

12/7/2020 Inpatient placement and management of nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes in adults - UpToDate

stomach or postpyloric into the small intestine is discussed in detail elsewhere. (See "Enteral
feeding: Gastric versus post-pyloric".)

At what point a nasogastric or nasoenteric tube should be discontinued in favor of percutaneous or

surgical gastrostomy tubes for enteral nutrition is unclear [13]. (See "Gastrostomy tubes: Uses,
patient selection, and efficacy in adults".)

TUBE PLACEMENT

Most nasogastric tubes are placed at the bedside in an alert patient. Placement is usually
straightforward; however, some patients who have unusual anatomy (eg, gastric bypass, hiatal
hernia repair) may require nasogastric tube placement with fluoroscopic or endoscopic guidance
[14].

Prior to nasogastric tube placement, the appropriate length can be estimated using several means;
however, no single method has been found to be foolproof [15]. A common technique is to use the
distance from the tip of the nose to the tip of the ear to the tip of the xiphoid as the initial length of
nasogastric tube for insertion. Investigators have found that this method can underestimate or
overestimate the length of nasogastric tube needed for proper placement [15,16]. Other
measurements such as tip of nose-tip of ear-umbilicus, sternal notch-tip of the xiphoid, tip of nose-
umbilicus, body length, and crown-rump length and various formulas using these measurements
have also been correlated to the internal esophagogastric length, but these methods are
unnecessarily cumbersome. We advise initially placing the nasogastric tube no deeper than the tip
of nose-tip of ear-xiphoid distance and stress that all placements should be followed by a plain
abdominal radiograph to exclude kinking of the tube and to evaluate for correct placement. If the
tube is in the esophagus, it should be advanced into the stomach to ensure adequate stomach
decompression. If the tube is beyond the pylorus, it should be pulled back to minimize the potential
for electrolyte abnormalities. (See 'Confirmation of placement' below.)

Placement for decompression

Alert patient — In alert adult patients, a soft 14- to 16-Fr Salem sump nasogastric tube provides
an adequate diameter for gastrointestinal decompression. The tube, which is coiled in its packaging,
should be straightened by pulling on each end prior to placement, and lubricated. Several small
randomized trials have found that instillation of local anesthetic spray (eg, preservative free 4%
lidocaine spray) helps control gagging and will ease some of the discomfort associated with tube
placement [17]. The spray can be intermittently repeated to help lessen discomfort associated with
the ongoing presence of the tube. (See 'Management' below.)

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/inpatient-placement-and-management-of-nasogastric-and-nasoenteric-tubes-in-adults?search=sonda nasogastric… 4/16

12/7/2020 Inpatient placement and management of nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes in adults - UpToDate

The patient should be seated with the head tilted toward the chest. The tube is introduced into one
of the nares and advanced horizontally (picture 1). If any resistance is met, the contralateral nostril
should be used. When the tube reaches the posterior nasopharynx, the patient may feel like
gagging. It is helpful to take advantage of the patient's swallowing mechanism to help passage of
the tube into the esophagus and then into the stomach. The patient can be asked to swallow as the
tube is being advanced, but it may be more helpful to provide the patient with a cup of water to drink
using a straw. If the patient gags excessively or cannot speak, the tube may have entered the
trachea. In this case, the tube should be immediately withdrawn and placement re-attempted.

Once the tube is in the stomach and its location is confirmed, further manipulation of the tube is
performed depending upon the intended purpose. In general, tubes for decompression are
positioned in the gastric fundus and connected to low intermittent wall suction, which decreases the
risk of injury to the gastric mucosa. If the nasogastric tube has a venting side-port (eg, Salem
Sump), it may be practical to use continuous suction initially to rapidly evacuate accumulated fluid
from the stomach, but as the amount of drainage lessens, the tube should be placed to intermittent
suction. Although the vent port of these tubes should theoretically prevent mucosal injury, the vent
port frequently malfunctions or gets capped inadvertently, essentially converting the tube from a
dual lumen to a single lumen tube.

Tubes intended for feeding can be positioned into the antrum, duodenum (postpyloric), or jejunum.
(See "Enteral feeding: Gastric versus post-pyloric".)

Intubated patient — When an intubated patient requires a nasogastric tube, we suggest

avoiding blind nasogastric tube placement due to the risk of inadvertently placing the tube into the
lung, which can occur even with an inflated endotracheal cuff [18]. The best approach is to use a
laryngoscope to advance the nasogastric tube into the esophagus under direct vision. However,
experienced clinicians, such as anesthesiologists who regularly deal with intubated patients, often
use an alternative technique of placing a finger inside the patient's mouth to guide the tip of the
nasogastric tube into the esophagus. If resistance is felt or the tube begins to coil, a laryngoscopic
is then used. Regardless of how the tube is placed, its position should be verified before instilling
anything into the tube. (See 'Confirmation of placement' below.)

A trial that included 216 anesthetized, intubated adult patients compared nasogastric tube
placement using the conventional methods with modified techniques, such as a guidewire, neck
flexion with lateral pressure, or the reverse Sellick's maneuver (ie, upward traction of the thyroid
cartilage to elevate the larynx anteriorly) [19]. In this study, assisted methods were more reliable
than conventional techniques for providing successful, quick nasogastric tube insertion on the first
attempt. A separate study of 195 intubated patients compared nasogastric tube placement using
conventional methods, placement of a slightly frozen tube, or placement of a tube using the reverse

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/inpatient-placement-and-management-of-nasogastric-and-nasoenteric-tubes-in-adults?search=sonda nasogastric… 5/16

12/7/2020 Inpatient placement and management of nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes in adults - UpToDate

Sellick's maneuver [20]. The reverse Sellick's maneuver provided effective placement in 95.2
percent of the patients. Freezing the tube improved successful insertion over traditional insertion
(84.6 versus 69.2 percent). We suspect that the combination of the nasogastric tube freezing plus
the reverse Sellick maneuver might further increase success rates.

There seems to be some interest in the experimental esophageal guidewire-assisted technique,

which was evaluated in a separate trial that randomly assigned 480 patients to the experimental
technique or a conventional control technique of nasogastric tube placement with head flexion and
lateral neck pressure [21]. The guidewire-assisted technique consisted of esophageal guidewire
placement with manual forward displacement of the larynx. The first-attempt success rate was
significantly improved for the guidewire-assisted technique (99 versus 57 percent) compared with
the control group. However, the technique used in the control group (head flexion and lateral neck
pressure) may not be the most reliable blind technique. Also, there remains concern over the cost of
the guidewire and the potential that it could perforate the pharynx or esophagus.

Placement for feeding — Soft, small-caliber tubes are used for feeding to minimize patient
discomfort. To place an enteral tube, the stylet (for tubes smaller than 12 Fr) is placed into the
enteral feeding tube and the tube is lubricated. As with nasogastric tubes, the tube is placed into
one of the nares and advancement of the tip is aided by having the patient swallow. Once the
position of the tube is confirmed, the stylet is removed. It is important that the stylet is not replaced
because doing so can lead to gastrointestinal perforation. (See 'Complications' below.)

Confirmation of placement

Radiographic — We always radiographically confirm the position of tubes that will be used to
administer tube feeding formula or medications. Although malposition of nasogastric or nasoenteric
tubes most commonly involves curling of the tube within the esophagus, placement into the
bronchial tree can occur and may lead to disastrous consequences (image 1). (See 'Complications'
below.)

Various guidelines agree that the placement of all nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes should ideally
be documented with a radiograph of the lower chest/upper abdomen [22,23]. However, confirming
the placement of nasogastric tubes used only for gastrointestinal decompression (Salem Sump
type) is probably not necessary provided the patient does not have any respiratory complaints or
difficulties, and the position of the tube is adequately confirmed by clinical means. (See 'Clinical
confirmation tubes used for decompression' below.)

When obtaining radiographs, it is important to inform the radiologist that the study is being done to
specifically to assess nasogastric tube placement. Absence of explicit request regarding tube
placement leads to a higher rate of misinterpreted radiographs and unhelpful reports that fail to

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/inpatient-placement-and-management-of-nasogastric-and-nasoenteric-tubes-in-adults?search=sonda nasogastric… 6/16

12/7/2020 Inpatient placement and management of nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes in adults - UpToDate

mention the tube location [24]. The entire course of the tube within the gastrointestinal tract should
be seen. Confirmation of proper nasogastric tube placement on plain chest radiograph is made by
noting that the tube is centrally located distal to the carina (ie, does not deviate laterally) and
continues inferiorly, crossing the diaphragm in a central position into the gastric region below the
level of the diaphragm.

The tip of a decompressive nasogastric tube should be positioned into the most dependent portion
of the stomach and should not be seen to cross the midline (ie, postpyloric position). If the tip of a
Salem Sump type nasogastric tube is found to be postpyloric, it should be withdrawn into the
stomach. It should not be allowed to remain in a postpyloric location because these stiff tubes have
the potential to damage the duodenal mucosa. Whenever possible, we prefer to place feeding tubes
in a postpyloric position to minimize risk of aspiration related to distention of the stomach with
feeding. However, the postpyloric placement of feeding tubes does not eliminate the risk of
aspiration. (See "Enteral feeding: Gastric versus post-pyloric".)

Clinical confirmation tubes used for decompression — Once a Salem Sump tube has been
positioned, the main lumen is aspirated. Gastric contents are usually obvious based on appearance
and volume. Placement into stomach will provide enteric-looking contents that are typically bilious
(ie, green in color). Placement within the lung will not provide an aspirate. If an insufficient amount
of fluid returns, the tube should be readjusted and the test repeated [25].

Once gastric contents are returned, the tube can be tested by flushing with 20 to 30 cc of warm
water with a large syringe (eg, Toomey), and the water immediately suctioned back into the syringe.
If most (approximately 70 percent) of the water can be retrieved, the tube is likely in the proper
position. It is important to realize that auscultating over the epigastrium during air injection into any
tube is not an accurate way to evaluate tube position since the tube may be in too far, or not in far
enough. While some have advocated using pH testing of the aspirate [26-28], this is also not likely
to be helpful and may provide confusing information given the ubiquitous use of proton pump
inhibitors.

Nursing staff should be informed that the tube placement has only been confirmed clinically, and
instructions should be given not to administer any medicines or feeds through the tube without
radiological confirmation of placement. If there is any question about the position of the tube, a
radiograph should be obtained.

Capnography is an alternative method for verifying nasogastric tube position in mechanically

ventilated patients. In a systematic review, calorimetric capnography (semiquantitative CO2
monitoring) was found to be a reliable predictor of misplacement of the nasogastric tube into the

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/inpatient-placement-and-management-of-nasogastric-and-nasoenteric-tubes-in-adults?search=sonda nasogastric… 7/16

12/7/2020 Inpatient placement and management of nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes in adults - UpToDate

airway, with a sensitivity of 88 to 100 percent and a specificity of 99 to 100 percent, according to a
2015 meta-analysis [29]. (See "Carbon dioxide monitoring (capnography)".)

Tube fixation — Once the nasogastric tube is in its proper position, it should be taped securely to
the nose, but care should be taken not to push the tube up against the nares because pressure
ulceration or necrosis can occur [30]. The nasogastric or nasoenteric tube can then be secured to
the patient's gown with a safety pin. (See 'Nasal alar ulceration or necrosis' below.)

Various commercial tapes can be used for this purpose. A retrospective comparison of three types
of tape (pink tape, clear tape, "butterfly") in 264 taping episodes reported an advantage for pink tape
with a significantly increased time until failure of the securing method (100 versus 56 and 30 hours,
respectively) [31]. Duodenal tubes stayed secured significantly longer than sump-type tubes for all
taping methods (86 versus 41 hours). The results were independent of patient alertness, confusion,
mobility, or use of restraints.

Other, more aggressive methods of securing nasogastric or nasoenteric tubes have been described,
and these can be used when the risk of losing the tube justifies the intervention. For example,
placing a suture through the membranous nasal septum and securing it to the tube has been
described as an alternative to adhesive tapes. However, significant soft tissue damage can occur
with chronic tension on the columella [32]. Bridles that pinch the membranous septum provide an
anchoring point and are commercially available as an alternative to suturing, but their safety has not
been prospectively evaluated, and routine use is not recommended. In patients with distorted
anatomy such as due to facial trauma or head and neck surgery, a fine bore suction catheter can be
looped around the nasal septum to secure the nasogastric tube in place (figure 1) [33].

MANAGEMENT

The function of nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes should be checked frequently by irrigating the
tube with water every four to eight hours.

The drainage from nasogastric tubes placed for gastrointestinal decompression should be
documented to help judge the progression or resolution of obstruction/ileus and the need for
supplemental intravenous fluid. Fluid and electrolyte replacement for nasogastric losses depends
upon the volume and nature of the loss. (See "Maintenance and replacement fluid therapy in
adults".)

The measurement of gastric residual volume, while administering enteral nutrition, does not appear
to be necessary and is not feasible when the small flexible tubes are used. However, if a larger-bore
nasogastric tube is being used, gastric residuals should be periodically checked in order to avoid

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/inpatient-placement-and-management-of-nasogastric-and-nasoenteric-tubes-in-adults?search=sonda nasogastric… 8/16

12/7/2020 Inpatient placement and management of nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes in adults - UpToDate

problems related to gastric overdistension [34]. (See "Nutrition support in critically ill patients:
Enteral nutrition", section on 'Monitoring'.)

Many patients experience oropharyngeal discomfort, which usually resolves in 24 to 48 hours. Local
anesthetic spray applied to the oropharynx may alleviate some of the gag reflex and discomfort
associated with the presence of a tube [17]. New onset of gagging or respiratory difficulties in a
patient with a nasogastric tube should raise the concern of migration into the oropharynx and
indicates the need to reevaluate the position of the tube. Any tube that does not appear to be
functioning properly should be evaluated and may need to be removed, and replaced if still needed.

Nasogastric tubes should be removed when the indication for placement no longer exists. For
example, in patients with a small bowel obstruction, a decrease in nasogastric output and the
passage of flatus suggest a resolution of the obstruction and that the tube can be safely removed. A
trial of nasogastric drainage to gravity or nasogastric tube clamping are advocated by some as
interim maneuvers prior to nasogastric tube removal to minimize the need for tube reinsertion. In
contrast, others argue that clamping should not be performed, because it increases the risk of
aspiration by allowing gastric distention in the presence of an impaired esophageal sphincter. There
is little evidence to justify or discredit this practice. If a clamping trial is used, one should check the
gastric residuals at least every four hours. (See 'Pulmonary' below.)

Nasogastric tube removal is generally uneventful (picture 2). If resistance is met upon attempted
removal of a nasogastric or nasoenteric tube, removal should be abandoned and radiographs
obtained. Nasogastric or nasoenteric tube knotting can occur [35]. (See 'Complications' below.)

COMPLICATIONS

Gastrointestinal — In the gastrointestinal tract, malposition, coiling, or knotting of tubes can occur
anywhere along the course of the tube, including pharynx, pyriform sinus, esophagus, stomach, and
duodenum [36]. Pharyngeal and pyriform sinus misplacement can be recognized in a patient who
complains of significant gagging or emesis. In patients who may not be able to complain, a
laryngoscopic examination easily reveals the misplacement. Fluoroscopy or endoscopy may be
needed to safely remove a knotted tube.

The presence of a nasogastric or nasoenteric tube impairs the normal function of the lower
esophageal sphincter, making the patient more susceptible to reflux of gastric contents that may
lead to esophagitis, esophageal stricture, gastrointestinal bleeding, or pulmonary aspiration. The
development of new-onset epigastric or chest pain suggestive of acid reflux may indicate the
development of esophagitis, and, ideally, the tube should be removed [37]. For patients who
continue to require the tube, suppression of gastric acid secretion may be indicated. The treatment
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/inpatient-placement-and-management-of-nasogastric-and-nasoenteric-tubes-in-adults?search=sonda nasogastric… 9/16
12/7/2020 Inpatient placement and management of nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes in adults - UpToDate

of gastroesophageal reflux is discussed in detail elsewhere. (See "Medical management of

gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults".)

Nasogastric tubes can cause gastritis or gastric bleeding due to chronic irritation or pressure
necrosis due to suctioning of the gastrointestinal mucosa [38]. This is usually recognized when the
aspirated gastric contents become guaiac positive or grossly bloody. Patients with bloody gastric
drainage require further evaluation, and, whenever possible, the nasogastric tube should be
removed. (See "Acute hemorrhagic erosive gastropathy and reactive gastropathy".)

Esophageal bezoar has been reported as a consequence of improper nasogastric tube placement
[39].

Pulmonary — The risk for pulmonary complications is increased in patients with nasogastric tubes.
Avoidance of prophylactic postoperative nasogastric decompression decreases pulmonary
complications and has other beneficial effects. (See 'Prophylactic placement' above.)

A systematic review identified 28 trials in which patients were randomly assigned to no nasogastric
tube or selective nasogastric tube placement [4]. Among 19 of these trials looking at pulmonary
complications, a subanalysis identified a trend toward decreased pulmonary complications in those
patients who did not have a nasogastric tube, but the difference was not significant. However, an
updated meta-analysis that included four additional trials did find an increased risk of pulmonary
complications (odds ratio 1.45, 95% CI 1.1-1.92) [5]. Pulmonary complications were increased in
patients with a nasogastric tube undergoing upper gastrointestinal surgery but not in patients
undergoing colorectal surgery.

Intubation of the lung and inadvertent administration of medications, radiocontrast media, or enteral
formula through the malpositioned tube (image 1) can lead to pneumonia. Pulmonary abscess may
result [40]. Tracheal perforation and pneumothorax have also been reported. Proper placement and
positioning of these tubes and radiographic confirmation of position for any tube used for the
administration of medications or enteral nutrition can help prevent these complications. (See 'Tube
placement' above.)

Nasal alar ulceration or necrosis — As mentioned above, improperly securing the tube or
placement of too large a tube in an unconscious patient who cannot convey his/her discomfort can
lead to pressure ulcers and even alar necrosis [41]. Frequent retaping of the tube to decrease
pressure on any particular point may help to prevent this complication. Other methods of tube
fixation may be needed. (See 'Tube fixation' above.)

Perforation — In addition to potential perforation of pulmonary structures or the gastrointestinal

tract, nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes can perforate other structures in patients with certain

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/inpatient-placement-and-management-of-nasogastric-and-nasoenteric-tubes-in-adults?search=sonda nasogastr… 10/16

12/7/2020 Inpatient placement and management of nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes in adults - UpToDate

pathologic conditions. Patients with prior esophageal or gastric surgery are at risk for
gastrointestinal perforation, and patients with facial trauma are at risk for cribriform plate perforation
and intracranial intubation [1,2].

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

● Nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes are flexible double or single lumen tubes that are passed
proximally from the nose or mouth distally into the stomach or small bowel. In adults, they are
used for gastrointestinal decompression in the treatment of small bowel obstruction or
prolonged severe ileus, administration of medications or enteral nutrition, and occasionally for
gastric lavage. (See 'Introduction' above and 'Indications' above.)

● Nasogastric and nasoenteric tube placement is contraindicated in patients with esophageal

stricture, and every effort should be made to avoid their use in patients with esophageal varices
or a bleeding diathesis. Nasal intubation is contraindicated in patients with basilar skull fracture
or facial fracture; these patients should undergo oral tube placement. (See 'Contraindications'
above.)

● We recommend not using prophylactic postoperative nasogastric tubes after gastrointestinal or

abdominal surgery (Grade 1B). Although nasogastric or orogastric tubes are placed in the
operating room for gastrointestinal decompression during surgery, the majority of these tubes
should be removed once the patient is alert and recovered from anesthesia. In the past, routine
postoperative gastrointestinal decompression was thought to speed the return of
gastrointestinal function following thoracic or abdominal surgery. However, the time to return of
bowel function was not significantly changed and could even be delayed. (See 'Prophylactic
placement' above.)

● Nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes are available in multiple sizes and lengths (table 1). Dual
lumen sump tubes are most commonly used for gastrointestinal decompression. Although
sump tubes can be used for the administration of medications and for enteral nutrition, these
tubes are stiff and irritating. Specifically designed, flexible, small-diameter enteral tubes are
preferred for long-term nutrition. (See 'Types of tubes' above.)

● The majority of nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes can be placed at the bedside. For tubes that
will be used only for gastrointestinal decompression, initial confirmation of the tube's position
by clinical means is usually adequate. However, we always radiographically confirm the
position of any tube that will be used to administer tube feeding formula or medications. (See
'Confirmation of placement' above.)

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/inpatient-placement-and-management-of-nasogastric-and-nasoenteric-tubes-in-adults?search=sonda nasogastri… 11/16

12/7/2020 Inpatient placement and management of nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes in adults - UpToDate

● The proper functioning of nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes should be routinely checked every
four to eight hours by irrigating the tube. The drainage from tubes placed for gastrointestinal
decompression should also be documented to help judge the progression or resolution of
obstruction/ileus and requirements for supplemental intravenous fluid. Tubes are removed
when the indication for their use is no longer present. (See 'Management' above.)

● Complications of nasogastric tubes are a consequence of tube placement (eg, perforation,

pulmonary abscess), chronic irritation of the gastrointestinal tract (eg, gastritis, ulcer), or altered
physiology (eg, reflux) due to the presence of the tube. Proper placement and confirmation of
positioning should prevent many of these complications. When gastrointestinal reflux, gastritis,
or ulcer is identified, the tube should be removed (ideally) and other treatment measures
instituted as indicated. (See 'Complications' above.)

Use of UpToDate is subject to the Subscription and License Agreement.

REFERENCES

1. Ferreras J, Junquera LM, García-Consuegra L. Intracranial placement of a nasogastric tube

after severe craniofacial trauma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;
90:564.

2. Başkaya MK. Inadvertent intracranial placement of a nasogastric tube in patients with head
injuries. Surg Neurol 1999; 52:426.

3. AL, L. A new gastroduodenal catheter. JAMA 1921; 76:1007.

4. Nelson R, Tse B, Edwards S. Systematic review of prophylactic nasogastric decompression

after abdominal operations. Br J Surg 2005; 92:673.

5. Nelson R, Edwards S, Tse B. Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal

surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; :CD004929.

6. Inman BA, Harel F, Tiguert R, et al. Routine nasogastric tubes are not required following
cystectomy with urinary diversion: a comparative analysis of 430 patients. J Urol 2003;
170:1888.

7. Otchy DP, Wolff BG, van Heerden JA, et al. Does the avoidance of nasogastric
decompression following elective abdominal colorectal surgery affect the incidence of
incisional hernia? Results of a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38:604.
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/inpatient-placement-and-management-of-nasogastric-and-nasoenteric-tubes-in-adults?search=sonda nasogastr… 12/16
12/7/2020 Inpatient placement and management of nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes in adults - UpToDate

8. Yang Z, Zheng Q, Wang Z. Meta-analysis of the need for nasogastric or nasojejunal

decompression after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2008; 95:809.

9. Daryaei P, Vaghef Davari F, Mir M, et al. Omission of nasogastric tube application in

postoperative care of esophagectomy. World J Surg 2009; 33:773.

10. Rao W, Zhang X, Zhang J, et al. The role of nasogastric tube in decompression after elective
colon and rectum surgery: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011; 26:423.

11. Kunstman JW, Klemen ND, Fonseca AL, et al. Nasogastric drainage may be unnecessary
after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparison of routine vs selective decompression. J Am
Coll Surg 2013; 217:481.

12. Cheatham ML, Chapman WC, Key SP, Sawyers JL. A meta-analysis of selective versus
routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy. Ann Surg 1995; 221:469.

13. Dennis M, Lewis S, Cranswick G, et al. FOOD: a multicentre randomised trial evaluating
feeding policies in patients admitted to hospital with a recent stroke. Health Technol Assess
2006; 10:iii.

14. Kelly G, Lee P. Nasendoscopically-assisted placement of a nasogastric feeding tube. J

Laryngol Otol 1999; 113:839.

15. Hanson RL. Predictive criteria for length of nasogastric tube insertion for tube feeding. JPEN J
Parenter Enteral Nutr 1979; 3:160.

16. Beckstrand J, Cirgin Ellett ML, McDaniel A. Predicting internal distance to the stomach for
positioning nasogastric and orogastric feeding tubes in children. J Adv Nurs 2007; 59:274.

17. Gallagher EJ. Nasogastric tubes: hard to swallow. Ann Emerg Med 2004; 44:138.

18. Wang PC, Tseng GY, Yang HB, et al. Inadvertent tracheobronchial placement of feeding tube
in a mechanically ventilated patient. J Chin Med Assoc 2008; 71:365.

19. Mandal MC, Dolai S, Ghosh S, et al. Comparison of four techniques of nasogastric tube
insertion in anaesthetised, intubated patients: A randomized controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth
2014; 58:714.

20. Mandal M, Karmakar A, Basu SR. Nasogastric tube insertion in anaesthetised, intubated adult
patients: A comparison between three techniques. Indian J Anaesth 2018; 62:609.

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/inpatient-placement-and-management-of-nasogastric-and-nasoenteric-tubes-in-adults?search=sonda nasogastr… 13/16

12/7/2020 Inpatient placement and management of nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes in adults - UpToDate

21. Kirtania J, Ghose T, Garai D, Ray S. Esophageal guidewire-assisted nasogastric tube

insertion in anesthetized and intubated patients: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Anesth Analg 2012; 114:343.

22. Metheny NA, Krieger MM, Healey F, Meert KL. A review of guidelines to distinguish between
gastric and pulmonary placement of nasogastric tubes. Heart Lung 2019; 48:226.

23. Baskin WN. Acute complications associated with bedside placement of feeding tubes. Nutr
Clin Pract 2006; 21:40.

24. Cohen MD, Ellett M. Quality of communication: different patterns of reporting the location of
the tip of a nasogastric tube. Acad Radiol 2012; 19:651.

25. Ellett ML. What is known about methods of correctly placing gastric tubes in adults and
children. Gastroenterol Nurs 2004; 27:253.

26. Borsci S, Buckle P, Huddy J, et al. Usability study of pH strips for nasogastric tube placement.
PLoS One 2017; 12:e0189013.

27. Gilbertson HR, Rogers EJ, Ukoumunne OC. Determination of a practical pH cutoff level for
reliable confirmation of nasogastric tube placement. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2011;
35:540.

28. Boeykens K, Steeman E, Duysburgh I. Reliability of pH measurement and the auscultatory

method to confirm the position of a nasogastric tube. Int J Nurs Stud 2014; 51:1427.

29. Bennetzen LV, Håkonsen SJ, Svenningsen H, Larsen P. Diagnostic accuracy of methods used
to verify nasogastric tube position in mechanically ventilated adult patients: a systematic
review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2015; 13:188.

30. Banerjee TS, Schneider HJ. Recommended method of attachment of nasogastric tubes. Ann
R Coll Surg Engl 2007; 89:529.

31. Burns SM, Martin M, Robbins V, et al. Comparison of nasogastric tube securing methods and
tube types in medical intensive care patients. Am J Crit Care 1995; 4:198.

32. McGuirt WF, Strout JJ. "How I do it"--head and neck. A targeted problem and its solution:
securing of intermediate duration feeding tubes. Laryngoscope 1980; 90:2046.

33. della Faille D, Schmelzer B, Hartoko T, et al. Securing nasogastric tubes in non-cooperative
patients. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 1996; 50:195.

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/inpatient-placement-and-management-of-nasogastric-and-nasoenteric-tubes-in-adults?search=sonda nasogastr… 14/16

12/7/2020 Inpatient placement and management of nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes in adults - UpToDate

34. Reignier J, Mercier E, Le Gouge A, et al. Effect of not monitoring residual gastric volume on
risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults receiving mechanical ventilation and early
enteral feeding: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2013; 309:249.

35. Palta S. Nasogastric tube knotting in open heart surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1999;
43:790.

36. Agarwala S, Dave S, Gupta AK, Mitra DK. Duodeno-renal fistula due to a nasogastric tube in a
neonate. Pediatr Surg Int 1998; 14:102.

37. Newton M, Burnham WR, Kamm MA. Morbidity, mortality, and risk factors for esophagitis in
hospital inpatients. J Clin Gastroenterol 2000; 30:264.

38. Metheny NA, Meert KL, Clouse RE. Complications related to feeding tube placement. Curr
Opin Gastroenterol 2007; 23:178.

39. Tawfic QA, Bhakta P, Date RR, Sharma PK. Esophageal bezoar formation due to solidification
of enteral feed administered through a malpositioned nasogastric tube: case report and review
of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan 2012; 50:188.

40. Malik NW, Timon CI, Russel J. A unique complication of primary tracheoesophageal puncture:
knotting of the nasogastric tube. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 120:528.

41. Lai PB, Pang PC, Chan SK, Lau WY. Necrosis of the nasal ala after improper taping of a
nasogastric tube. Int J Clin Pract 2001; 55:145.

Topic 15070 Version 18.0

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/inpatient-placement-and-management-of-nasogastric-and-nasoenteric-tubes-in-adults?search=sonda nasogastr… 15/16

12/7/2020 Inpatient placement and management of nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes in adults - UpToDate

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/inpatient-placement-and-management-of-nasogastric-and-nasoenteric-tubes-in-adults?search=sonda nasogastr… 16/16