Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LDM2 Teachers Evaluation Procedure PDF
LDM2 Teachers Evaluation Procedure PDF
LAC Leaders MTs, HTs, or Other senior teachers 1. Collect outputs of Participants in the assigned LAC
2. Evaluate the outputs following the evaluation procedures (use of evaluation
rubric, use of electronic forms, etc.)
3. Submit LDM2 Form 1: Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of Teachers to the
appropriate submission folder
4. Assist Instructional Coach in the validation of outputs
5. Provide feedback to LAC members’ outputs
Instructional Coach Division and District Supervisors 1. Collect from LAC leaders the participants’ outputs
2. Validate, if needed, the LDM2 outputs of teachers
3. Provide LAC Leaders their respective school submission folders for Form 1
files.
SDO LDM Program 1. Consolidate Form 1 results by accomplishing Form 2: Division Summary of
Management Team LDM2 Completers (Teachers)
2. Collect and submit LDM2 Form 4: Division Summary of LDM2 Completers
(Teachers)
Regional LDM Program 1. Coordinate with the SDO LDM Program Management Team regarding
Management Team method of submission for LDM2 evaluation forms
2. Validate, if needed, the LDM2 outputs of participants and LAC leaders
3. Issue certificate of participation signed by NEAP Director
2- Planning for the Implementation Individual/LAC Group Presentation on Unpacking of a Sample MELC 15%
of LDM2 for Teachers Guide Questions for Evaluators:
1. Were the logical sequence of learning objectives, and alignment of content and
performance standards considered?
List of targeted learning interventions + Learning tasks for DL + Assessment methods in DL 15%
Guide Questions for Evaluators:
1. Were the possible outcomes considered in coming up with the learning interventions?
2. Were the learning tasks reasonable for the distance learning modality and aligned to the
3A- Lesson Design and objectives of the lesson?
Assessment in the Modalities, 3. Were the assessment methods able to measure learners’ progress in the distance learning
modality?
Individual Learning Monitoring Plan for student behind on learning tasks 15%
Guide Questions for Evaluators:
1. Were learners’ needs and intervention strategies clearly identified?
3B - Learning Resources Two (2) accomplished LR Rapid Assessment Tools with reflections 15%
Guide Questions for Evaluators:
1. Was the accomplished material able to meet all the requirements that need to be
assessed?
2. Did the reflection show understanding of the challenges in gathering LRs in teaching in the
LDMs?
4 - PD and LAC Planning Finalized LDM Individual Development Plan (produced after discussion during LAC) 20%
Guide Questions for Evaluators:
1. Were the objectives aligned with the identified interventions?
2. Did the plan clearly state the Developmental Needs of the teacher?
2. Monitor submission of outputs by keeping a record of submission. You may do this manually, or use an online Platform such as
Google Classroom, where participants can submit their requirements. The LAC Leaders in the school will facilitate the collection
of outputs.
3. Download LDM2 Form 1 through bit.ly/LDM2eval4teachers. Form 1 includes sub-forms 1A and 1B. A guide on how to use them
is embedded in the form.
a. LDM2 Form 1A - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating for Teachers
b. LDM2 Form 1B - Summary of LDM2 Rating for Teachers
4. Rate each output using the rubric below. Record the ratings in Form 1.
DEMONSTRATION The outputs demonstrate The outputs The outputs demonstrate The outputs The outputs have more
OF clear and complete demonstrate clear some understanding of demonstrate minimal than 3 serious errors that
UNDERSTANDING understanding of the understanding of the the concepts and understanding of reflect misunderstanding
OF THE LDM
concepts, principles and concepts, principles, principles with one major concepts and principles of the concepts,
TRAINING
tasks. and tasks. misunderstanding of the with 2-3 major principles, and tasks
MATERIALS
/INPUTS concepts, principles and misunderstandings of
The outputs must also meet The outputs meet three tasks. the concepts, principles None of the indicators
the following indicators: out of four indicators. and tasks. was met.
50% a. Convey excellent The outputs meet two of
understanding of key the four indicators. The outputs meet one of
concepts and processes the four indicators.
in each LDM
b. Show integration of the
LDM inputs through
evidence-based outputs
c. Demonstrate novel
connections/ideas/persp
ectives on the LDMs
d. The information required
from each output is
complete and concisely
presented
DEMONSTRATION The outputs demonstrate a The outputs The outputs demonstrate The outputs The outputs do not show
OF clear understanding of demonstrate clear fair understanding of demonstrate minimal any attempt to use data,
UNDERSTANDING school and community understanding of school school and community understanding of school i.e., no consultation was
OF ONE’S
context through careful and community context context with reference to and community context; made to understand the
CONTEXT VIS-A-
analysis and utilization of with reference to data in data in some parts of the reference to data is also school and community
VIS LDM
IMPLEMENTATION data in most parts of the many parts of the output, i.e., only the minimal, i.e., only context in relation to LDM
output, i.e., all stakeholders output/s, i.e., only teaching & non-teaching teaching and non- implementation.
(teaching & non-teaching teaching & non-teaching personnel along with the teaching personnel were
30% personnel, parents, personnel, parents, and learners were consulted. consulted.
community leaders and learners were
learners) were consulted. consulted.
TIMELINESS OF The output/s is/are The output/s is/are The output/s is/are The output/s is/are The output/s is/are
SUBMISSION submitted more than 3 days submitted 1-2 days submitted on the submitted 1-3 days after submitted more than 3
ahead of the deadline. before the deadline. deadline. the deadline. days after the deadline.
5%
Output 1 4 x 50% = 2.0 4 x 30% = 1.2 5 x 15% = 0.75 5 x 5% = 0.25 4.20 40% 4.20 x 40% = 1.68 Outstanding
Output 2 4 x 50% = 2.0 5 x 30% = 1.5 4 x 15% = 0.6 5 x 5% = 0.25 4.35 60% 4.35 x 60% = 2.61 Outstanding
6. After the evaluation of outputs, provide constructive feedback on the outputs of your LAC members. Depending on their rating
and the nature of your feedback, you may return the output to your participant for refinement, if necessary. The LDM2 Course for
Teachers is a space to improve the quality of their teaching in the modalities. You may use the evaluation period as an
opportunity to prepare teachers for the coming school year by providing constructive feedback, correcting misconceptions, and
providing for their specific learning needs based on their individual rating results. You may indicate your constructive comments
to the participants in the “Remarks” portion of their individual rating sheets.
7. Once all ratings are in, coordinate with your Instructional Coach regarding the method and deadline of submission of Form 1.
8. There will be an additional material that will cover the submission and evaluation of the LDM implementation portfolio, and the
assignment of NEAP PD credit units for each part of the course. LAC leaders are expected to provide technical assistance to
school heads as they build their LDM implementation portfolio throughout the school year.
Note: All evaluation forms are confidential. NO ENTRY in the LDM2 evaluation forms can be divulged with anyone except the
concerned participant and appropriate authorities for purposes of evaluation, validation, and issuance of certificates.
IV. INSTRUCTIONS TO SDO LDM PROGRAM MANAGEMENT TEAM – Evaluation Form Managers
1. SGOD and M&E Unit: Set the deadline and method of submission of LDM2 Form 1 from Instructional Coaches in your SDO, so
they can timely inform their LAC Leaders.
2. SGOD: Organize your Google Drive folder so that each school in your division has a dedicated submission folder for LDM2 Form
1. Give Instructional Coaches access to the Google Drive folder for their respective schools. Links to your main SDO folder can
be found in Contact Details of LDM Evaluation Form Managers of your region (similar to the Form 3 used in LDM1).
3. M&E Unit: Consolidate all Form 1B/summaries of ratings from LAC leaders using LDM2 Form 4 – Division Summary of LDM2
Completers (Teachers). Upload Form 4 files to the appropriate school folder. Coordinate with the regional LDM PMT for the
submission deadline.
V. INSTRUCTIONS TO REGIONAL LDM PROGRAM MANAGEMENT TEAM – Evaluation Form Managers
1. NEAP-R and QAD: Set the system and deadline of submission of Form 4 from SDOs. Assist SDO LDM PMTs.
2. QAD: Validate and consolidate all Form 4 files from SDOs. Conduct validation in coordination with SDO LDM Program
Management Team and Instructional Coaches.
3. NEAP-R: Organize Form 4 files in the SDO folders. Monitor the SDO submissions of LDM2 Form 4 for their respective schools.
Links to the SDO folders are in Contact Details of LDM Evaluation Form Managers (similar to the Form 3 used in LDM1).
4. NEAP-R: Prepare certificates for issuance based on the validated list from QAD.
A. CERTIFICATE OF PARTICIPATION
1. A participant gets a Certificate of Participation when he or she gets an overall descriptive rating of at least Satisfactory or
a final rating equivalent to or higher than 2.500 for Part I/Theoretical Part (Modules 1-4).
2. If a participant gets a rating below Satisfactory, the Instructional Coach assigned to the LAC may conduct a validation in
coordination with the LAC leader. Validation may be done by looking at the outputs or interviewing the participant and his
or her colleagues, as may be deemed necessary.
3. Once validation and agreement have been made by RO, CO, and external partner coaches, NEAP-R facilitates the
issuance of the Certificate of Participation signed by the Regional Director.
B. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
1. Certificate of Completion is awarded to a participant who gets an overall descriptive rating of at least Satisfactory or a
final rating equivalent to or higher than 2.500 for Part II/LDM Implementation portfolio (practicum part).
2. If a participant gets a rating below Satisfactory, the Instructional Coach assigned to the LAC may conduct a validation in
coordination with the LAC Leader. Validation may be done by looking at the outputs or interviewing the participant and/or
his or her colleagues, as may be deemed necessary.
3. Once validation and agreement have been made by RO, CO, and external partner coaches, NEAP-R facilitates the
issuance of the Certificate of Completion signed by the Regional Director.