Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Margaret Wheatley; Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., San Francisco, 2006, 193 pages
In Leadership and the New Science, Margaret Wheatley builds on the previous two
editions of the book by incorporating the reality that war makes veterans of us all and
turn, chaos is a familiar villain in most of our lives. Wheatley argues that this chaos may
Wheatley suggests that we connect the dots between our leadership activities regarding
terrorism and disasters in the public, non-profit, and for-profit sectors. She encourages us
to be leaders who are consciousness raising, aware of how change happens, and riddled
with curiosity. Through such a leadership lens or style, we will be able to apply quantum
physics (the New Science) to our work and society will re-orientate itself organically
The chain of connections and consequences between actions and reactions is apparent in
nature, yet muted in our homosapien centric societies. While quantum physics was used
to cage the powerful energy of the atom with a Cartesian approach to applying the new
science, the generous point of quantum physics was missed entirely: the systems of
matter found in stardust are also found in us. If we apply this principle to leadership,
organizations are also found within us. The key is in recognizing organizations as
learning opportunities towards creating whole systems of self, work, science, and society.
continuations rather that finite ends. The systems of connections in the world could never
be mapped because all linkages beget more lines of association (relationships between
events, decisions, people, form, function, and thought patterns). It may be uncomfortable
for many scientists and leaders to see themselves as explorers who are always asking new
questions rather than conquerors who divide, discover, and answer. However, Wheatley
claims that closed certainty will be our downfall while open curiosity will be humanity’s
saving grace. This means that science and leadership becomes highly context and person
specific because the questions you may ask might not be within my realm of curiosity.
Unfortunately, this creates a paradox between the individual freedom necessary for chaos
theory to thrive and the inter-connectivity required amongst individuals for quantum
physics and systems thinking to be fully deployed. In sum, objectivity, universal truths,
and best practices are no longer an option. Yet, Wheatley is proposing that we replace an
old paradigm with a new one…which technically is a universal and a proposal for a best
practice.
Leadership and the New Science is organized into ten chapters, not including a prologue,
introduction, epilogue, supporting resources, bibliography, and extensive index. The first
four chapters focus on explaining three areas of science: quantum physics, self-
organizing systems, and chaos theory. Specifically, these chapters serve the purpose of
deconstructing Newtonian scientific thinking about complex systems. All points are
applied to public and private organizational structures, processes, and practices. Chapters
five and six focus on the natural world of self-organizing systems as supported by
biology and chemistry. Chapter seven explores chaos theory while chapter eight outlines
the case for change being a requirement of all life. Chapter nine emphasizes the
importance of quantum physics as a new science with chapter ten being the backbone of
the 3rd edition illustrating how the new science is essential for our need to respond to
Wheatley’s Leadership and the New Science left more questions than offered answers
(which was likely intentional). While some interpretations to points of confusion may
have gotten lost within the dense metaphoric language of the book, the reader may be left
with a variety of insightful pauses and few tangible moments of clarity. For example,
Wheatley focuses a lot on the structures and processes within organizations. However,
sometimes we have too much data in organizations and we don’t know how to use it.
This is where the skill of translating data into information is essential. However, if the
inherently bound to always make decisions based upon the best available information in
that moment? If this is the case, how can we engage in forecasting or strategic planning?
Further, Wheatley claims that chaos is necessary for change. Yet, Wheatley’s book is
based on the premise that we need to see the order in chaos. In turn, science and
hierarchical structures in organizations are founded on the principle of keeping chaos out.
Therefore, is the old science really that different from the new science when it comes to
ushering in change? Finally, Wheatley contends that science is all around us, that science
is inherent in how we think and create in leadership, and that the impacts of science in
organizations are undeniable. However, she believes science is difficult for some to
embrace. Why is science the act of a few if it is ingrained in our modalities of being in
the world?
Leadership and the New Science is an interesting read for students who are intrigued by
traveling down the rabbit hole of meta-physical reality and systems thinking. It is written
in a streaming style with repetition and eye catching photos. The text would work well
for undergraduate and graduate students within courses focused on the following topics:
fields of social science by open a space for dialogue about chaos theory, systems
thinking, and quantum physics. However, a space with no boundaries offers the reader
few opportunities to embrace the concepts presented. We cannot get our mental net
around that which cannot be caught: the unknown quantum unknowns of change,