Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/338701273
CITATIONS READS
0 81
1 author:
Zafer Adiguzel
Istanbul Medipol University
63 PUBLICATIONS 25 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Zafer Adiguzel on 20 January 2020.
Chapter 9
Evaluating the Impact of
Strategic Management
and Strategic Thinking
on Performance in the
Public Health Sector
Zafer Adiguzel
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8743-356X
Medipol Business School, Istanbul Medipol University, Turkey
ABSTRACT
In the 2000s, change in the business world and pioneering strategies that shape
change are becoming the main conditions for superiority in competition. Until
recently the traditional management and organization approaches that are in
place are inadequate to meet the new expectations coming from change. The aim
of this study is to reveal the extent to which the managers of health institutions have
adopted the strategic management approach. In this study, it is explained whether
the managers have knowledge about strategic management tools which are the basis
of strategic management application methods, what strategic management tools they
use, their level of satisfaction with these tools and what tools they intend to use in
the future. In addition, the changes in the health management managers in the field
of strategic management, the priorities in the selection of strategic management
tools, the importance of strategic thinking and the effects of strategic management
understanding on performance are examined.
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-2329-2.ch009
Copyright © 2020, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
INTRODUCTION
In today’s world, rapid changes in the age of technology and information have made
many of the classical competition assumptions in the business world obsolete. It is
not enough for enterprises to benefit from new technologies in order to increase their
success and competitiveness. At the same time, uniform distribution, competitiveness
and access to consumers should be strengthened in their economies. All the efforts
of the enterprises are aimed at establishing strategies for superiority in competition.
In the 21st century, imagination is becoming the quality most needed by businesses.
Within this framework, the primary purpose of the enterprises is to reach the future
by defining strategies that will make a difference. In order for companies to gain a
structure that is stronger and more competitive in business life and to enable them
to compete, they should be put into practice by making use of different strategic
methods. With this in mind, “Strategic Management Approach” can be considered
as an application that will contribute to strengthening the competitive position of
enterprises in their internal world.
The concept of strategic management has come to the forefront in the management
of business organizations in the 1980s. With the increase in production, developments
in the market began to intensify competition. Increasing pressure from competition
has led businesses to set strategic goals for investment and market. Strategic
management approaches that lead businesses to set goals are the main subject of
the study. Effective management is based on long-term strategic strength as well as
the involvement of the organization in decisions. In this context, the implementation
of strategic decisions is important for organizations as well as for the country. An
excellent structure and criteria of excellence are among the items to be sought in the
future in terms of management. Today, participation principles, strategic management
forms gain importance and weight.
Strategic management is an important concept for health institutions as well as
for other institutions. Health institutions need the concept of strategic management
in order to survive in a competitive environment, to analyze the internal and external
environment of the institution, to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the
institution, and to identify the threat elements of the institution and the aspects that
will provide opportunities for the institution. In the face of globalization and the
concept of competition that comes with this globalization, health institutions are
beginning to give more strategic thinking, strategic decision making and strategic
thinking as much as other institutions.
Although the concept of management is very old, the concept of business
management is a concept that emerged about a century ago and is still being developed.
The reason why the concept of business management is so new is the absence of
large scale production-based enterprises until the industrial revolution that began in
232
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
the 18th century. From this perspective, it is possible to characterize the time before
the industrial revolution as the “pre-period” or “pre-period scientific”. However, it
is possible to say that the management activity existed in ancient times, even in the
early ages, considering that there existed individuals and communities who came
together to manage the same goal in the past.
Strategic Management is a concept obtained by combining the concepts of strategy
and management (Thomas 1984). Therefore, it is necessary to give information about
the concept of strategy. In the literature, it is stated that the strategy is based on two
sources in terms of its origin. One of these; latin concept with stratum meaning
road, line or bed. The second is related to the name of the former Greek General
Strategos. It was used to indicate the art and knowledge of the general (Steiner
1971). The concept of strategic management has entered the business literature
since 1980. Strategic management, planning the research, review, evaluation and
selection efforts necessary for the planning of strategies, taking all kinds of structural
and motivational measures within the organization for the implementation of these
strategies, taking into force and implementing the strategies before and after the
implementation of the top-level staff covering is the sum of the processes that
concern their activities (Eren 2005).
STRATEGY
Strategy literally means “forwarding, directing, sending, taking and moving” The word
is thought to have been used with reference to the knowledge and art of Strategos,
one of the former Greek generals. In some sources, it is stated that the strategy comes
from the Latin “stratum” which means road, line or river bed (Mütercimler 2006).
Although there is controversy about the origin of the word, it can be said that both
definitions have similar meanings in a general approach. This is related to direction
(Dinçer 2007). The concept of strategy has been used as a military concept for
centuries. According to Webster (1990)’s New International Dictionary, the strategy
is the science and art of placing the military power of the parties in accordance with
the conditions in order to reach a result in a war (Üzün 2000).
In general terms, the strategy is defined as the use of all kinds of instruments
and measures in every field taken by an institution (or state) in order to achieve the
objectives chosen in accordance with the politics pursued (Porter 1996). It is readily
understood that the concept of general strategy can no longer remain within the
framework of defense policy and cannot be distinguished from the general policy
of each country (or institution). Since all kinds of political and economic activities
are directed towards the welfare, demand and tendencies of the society, the current
field of the strategy includes psychological, social, economic, ideological, military
233
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
and administrative issues (Güçlü 2003). For the concept of strategy, it is possible to
define definitions from different perspectives with complementary features. These
definitions can be specified as follows (Akgemci 2013):
Strategy as a Plan: Orientation of actions and organizations in line with pre-
defined and announced goals in a conscious and purposeful way.
Strategy as an Emerging Direction: The emergence of the direction of action as
a result of the attitude and participation of the organizations within the sensitivity
of the environment rather than the previously defined and announced target.
Strategy as Location: Explaining the position of organizations within the
organization environment defined by the expectations and functions, and regulating
the relationship between the organization and its environment.
Strategy as a Perspective: The perspective of the organizations meeting in the
joint action, including the norms, values and behavior patterns they share due to
their common missions.
As our world is facing large-scale technological and economic developments in
the 21st century, the scales of all kinds of organizations are growing and turning
to more complex structures and operating systems. Therefore, it is difficult to take
measures to ensure the survival and development of enterprises and management
of enterprises becomes difficult. As a result of these reasons, the ability of the
business executives to anticipate the opportunities and dangers they may encounter
in order to be successful and to have information about them leads to better and more
reliable strategies. Therefore, they need to implement these strategies efficiently. The
Strategy; importance is given to predicting the future direction of external variables
and shaping alternative behaviors (Schelling 1980). The strategist demonstrates the
ability to combine opposing forces in harmony by effectively identifying and testing
strategies (Mintzberg 1987). Evaluating the possibilities of the person, what is being
done, what is wanted to be done, and seeing the strengths and weaknesses of the
enterprise, the values of the enterprise can be seen from a wide angle.
234
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
and removing obstacles in decisions and not aiming only one line or only one
solution (Stockport 2010).
2. Is A Factor Of Purpose: The strategy of an enterprise serves the general
objectives of that enterprise and ensures that the forces gather around them.
3. Regulates Interaction Relations with the Business Environment: It provides
the opportunity to comprehend the environmental changes in economic,
technological, political and social terms, to eliminate the negative effects on
the enterprise and to make use of them by realizing the positive effects in a
timely manner.
4. It concerns a distant future system, in contrast to continuously repeated works:
Strategic choices are strictly separated from monotonous decisions and works
since they are related to the policies that the enterprise will follow in a long
time (Miles et al. 1978).
5. Strategy is an Aspect That Manages and Activates All Financial and Human
Resources of the Enterprise in Harmony: The strategy is the guiding or compass
of the events and decisions taken in the daily life of the enterprise. The strategy
sets the rules of the game, reduces uncertainty and clarifies the paths and rules
to be followed (Teece 2010).
6. Strategy is a Tool for Encouraging and Mobilizing the Human Being in a
Complex and Dynamic Organization: Strategy is a motivating factor. People
act more pessimistically in an uncertain environment. However, as they provide
them with information to reduce or reduce uncertainty about the future and
determine the goals to be achieved, their ambitions and courage will increase.
Thus, employees and especially managers will be able to easily draft their
tactical activities and easily determine the suitability of their personal activities
for general purposes.
7. Determines the Business Activity Areas in a Complex and Dynamic Environment:
It includes how to take advantage of the existing resources of the enterprise
and how to distribute it over a long period of time.
The strategy, which was initially used as a military concept, has become an approach
that businesses should apply in order to adapt to changing conditions and succeed
in a competitive environment (Schendel and Hatten 1972; Bracker 1980). Just as
plans are made after evaluating the status of the unity, the situation of the enemy
and the possibilities at hand in order to achieve victory with the least loss in the
minimum strategy, in challenging competition conditions, transmissions must follow
the changing market conditions well in order to survive and prevent competitors and
know the current characteristics of the competitors well. It should recognize. In the
235
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
That the business world and the upper system it is a part of are constantly changing,
The institutions and competitors in the sector produce and implement various
strategies in accordance with the changing environmental conditions,
To understand the necessity of new strategies that can respond to these strategies
and even to make the company more productive states that they produce ideas and
work on these issues (Ülgen and Mirze 2006).
Although strategic management is not a new concept, today many companies are
unfamiliar with this concept. However, this is a fact that the necessity of enterprises
to anticipate future uncertainties and to plan and manage them accordingly is an
indispensable element. At this point, strategic management provides a competitive
236
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
237
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
In the 1970s, there were many uncontrollable and self-contained problems that would
shake the economic and industrial foundations. Production had fallen, inflation,
trade imbalance and cost competition had emerged. In addition, falling productivity,
increasing regulation, low growth rate, technological obsolescence, rising debts
of the III World, new technologies, fluctuations in money markets, serious global
competition and socio-political problems affected all institutions and organizations
trying to find a strategic direction. All these problems have led to a review of ongoing
implementation and management methods (Gönüllü 2008).
Organizations have had to think more strategically in the face of globalization, rapid
technological change, emerging markets, and the overwhelming competition resulting
from changing customer expectations. Prior to the 1980s, strategic management was
mostly implemented by a limited environment in the private sector, while today
many organizations use strategic management as an important tool (Atmaca 2007).
If we take a short look at the history of management; It is seen that it is aimed to
ensure compliance in every subject from classical management understanding to our
time. The Classical Management Approach, which started in the 1900s, the Behavioral
Approach in the 1930s and the Modern Management Approach that emerged in the
1960s, constitute the basic steps in the history of management. None of them has
completed their mission and has not withdrawn from the application areas and examples
of implementation are seen, if not on their own. Modern management approach
includes system approach, management according to objectives, direction-action
research, contingency approach and strategic management. Strategic management is
a form of management that incorporates, synthesizes and manages these management
processes and was developed to survive against changes (Erdem 2006).
238
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
Once upon a time, the Japanese were leading the whole market. It was a pioneer
because it was able to produce and sell quality products that were intact for the customer.
But every day all competitors have focused on quality service and production. As
a result, there are many competitors in the same sector that do not differ from each
other in terms of quality. As such, the size of the problem changed. Accordingly,
the problem; total quality alone will not be enough, all competitors provide quality
service if the customer is not the opponent, but what superiority of them to come
to you, you must have the difference. The answer to this question can be explained
with the concept of strategic management.
Towards the end of the 20th century, in parallel with globalization, a process of
restructuring was initiated in public administration (Hunger and Wheelen 2003).
In this structuring, the concept of social welfare state, including public ownership
and broad public service, was abandoned. The most obvious aspect of this situation
is the privatization of national industries and the abandonment of public services
suitable for production and delivery by the private sector to market conditions
(Güner 2005). With the change, organizations have had to apply various management
techniques in order to increase their efficiency and effectiveness. In recent years,
the economic, socio-social, health and political changes in the world due to the
changes in the organizations to benefit from the changes, adapt to the differences
in these changes in the environment, to be prepared for unexpected situations and to
be least affected by them depends on the management technique to be implemented
and continuous success.
The main tools used in the strategic management process are situation analysis
(SWOT), portfolio analysis, Q sort analysis, vision-mission statements, scenario
analysis, search conference, brainstorming, delphi technique and nominal group
technique. Among the tools used, SWOT analysis is used to evaluate the internal and
external environment of the organization, and to determine the fields of activity with
the help of portfolio analysis matrices; Q sort analysis is used to identify the most
important and the most important issues that determine the alternatives that can be
used in the selection of the strategy, the mission and vision statements indicating
the reason of existence of the organization, the transformation of the principles
and values into written form; scenario analysis is used in predicting the future and
determining alternative action styles, in-house communication in order to create a
common mind in the organization of the call conference, and delphi technique is
used in obtaining the opinions of experts in order to make predictions for the future,
and the opinions of nominal group technique group members are taken without
discussion. Apart from these techniques, open group discussions, quality circles,
cost-benefit analyzes and risk analyzes are among the other tools that can be used
in the strategic management process (Oyman 2009).
239
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
240
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
9. Strategic management helps to identify and solve the most effective problems
in the organization. In this context, total quality methods are widely utilized
(Bracker 1980).
10. Strategic management enables the planning, organization, coordination,
implementation and control of the future activities of the organization.
11. Strategic management utilizes competition and portfolio analysis in the
formation and selection of strategies. Portfolio analyzes are the techniques used
in strategy selection. It is aimed to make a more rational decision on issues
such as staying in the market or withdrawing from the market, merging with
other companies and so on.
12. Strategic management helps to” think strategically”. Within this framework, the
most accurate strategies and tactics are tried to be determined and implemented
(Franke et al. 1990).
13. The sources and data of the information used in decision making are different.
Since strategic management is concerned with the effectiveness and efficiency
of the business as a whole, the information sources and data on the subject
are very diverse. Many businesses require a wealth of information and data
on departments, functions and the environment (Brown 2005).
241
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
can be reverted to the previous stages at every stage, is of great importance for the
survival of the organizations.
Strategy is very important for businesses. Businesses that do not have a strategy
cannot clearly and precisely determine their objectives. In addition, resources can
not be used effectively and efficiently in enterprises without strategy (Eren 2005).
The benefits of strategic management can be summarized as follows (Glueck
and Jauch 1989):
The phases of strategic management can be listed as follows (Ülgen and Mirze
2006): Selection and assignment phase of strategists, Strategic analysis phase:
Determination of environmental opportunities and limitations, analysis of non-
operating environment and analysis of internal environment, preparation of due
diligence matrices,
Strategic steering phase: Determination of mission, vision and objectives,
Strategy formation phase: Determination and selection of basic and sub-strategies,
institutional, sectoral and functional strategies, determination of techniques to be
used in their implementation,
Strategic implementation phase: Studies on organizational structure, information
and decision systems to be used during the implementation of the strategy, appropriate
leadership understanding, corporate culture and management styles,
Strategic control phase: Control of performance obtained through the
implementation of strategies and techniques related to the control process.
In order to survive in the face of changing environmental conditions, today’s
enterprises must constantly change their balance and be prepared for new balance
situations. The rapid and constant change that the world is experiencing affects all
sectors to a great extent, renders existing goals and strategies invalid and inadequate
in a short period of time, creates a ball of new problems and threatens its existence by
242
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
243
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
thinking starts with your basic skills and examines how they are best used. Strategic
thinking sometimes means knowing when to avoid the game.
The main reason for drawing a strategy is to take long-term and rational actions;
all actions carried out by reason are planned actions. Practical strategic thinking is
all about planning future actions (Betz 2010).
Strategic management, which is a function of the top manager, is important for
the organization to carry out its strategic actions with the decisions planned and
made in the future. This is done with the support of senior management.
Therefore, Ülgen and Mirze (2010) emphasize the strategic awareness of managers
in organizations;
244
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
• Series of decisions
• Corporate behavior
• Plan
245
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
246
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
Strategic management is very important for health institutions to form the vision
of the organization based on the current situation, mission and basic principles and
247
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
to determine the objectives and appropriate targets and strategies in line with this
vision. In addition, strategic management is defined as a flexible and participatory
management approach that expresses the process of monitoring and evaluating
the performance of the institution by establishing measurable criteria for health
institutions by various methods. Strategic management in health care institutions
is not only a way to determine and formulate future-oriented strategies, but also to
implement these strategies and to check the success at the end of the implementation.
Strategic management; research, review, evaluation and selection efforts necessary
for planning strategies; It includes activities related to taking all kinds of measures
within the organization and putting them into force in order to implement the
planned strategies and to control the subsequent studies (Kavaler and Spiegel 2003).
Strategic management is the process of systematically implementing various research,
examination, evaluation, implementation, coordination and supervision steps for the
most efficient implementation of plans by conducting internal and external analyzes
in order to maintain an organization’s long-term existence and achieve its objectives
(Teece et al. 1997). It is a management that will create a strategic management
mission in health institutions and will enable the determination of the vision, goals
and targets for the future and the actions that can be taken to reach these targets.
Strategic management in health institutions is a management technique that helps
the organization to work more effectively, efficiently and with high performance.
248
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
249
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
Strategic Thinking
Strategic thinking requires a series of decisions about what actions the company wants
to take to achieve its goals more quickly and more successfully (Schoemaker 1995).
Companies should try to make strategic thinking not during the interim periods,
but throughout the whole process in which they operate. At the heart of strategic
thinking is the ability to identify and exploit opportunities that arise by anticipating
significant gaps in the competitive market. Strategic thinking helps managers make
crucial choice decisions and makes a vision contribution to the organization. In other
words, strategic thinking involves seeing and thinking of the future (Hartmann and
Rosche 2003). Strategic thinking, which is interested in balancing the environment,
opportunities, value and culture, is a continuous method. Strategic thinking is a
fundamental necessity and a useful first move for strategic management that seeks
to achieve its goals (Tampoe and Macmillan 2000). Strategic thinking requires
early action to keep pace with future variability. Strategic thinking is beneficial for
the business as it enables being targeted. Because the employees who focus on the
target offer all their powers cumulatively. Another benefit of strategic thinking is
the ability to think at the right moment (Heinrichs 2001).
Having strategic thinking helps businesses to minimize the risks of choosing
decisions they will regret later (Eren 2002). Organizational activities reduce the
risks and make it easier to solve the problems that arise during these activities
thanks to the plans that enterprises make in order to achieve their goals and targets.
In addition, the higher the level of strategic thinking in enterprises, the higher the
synergy associated with it (Pablo and Javidan 2009). Synergy is a sign that will
determine in which areas the existing tools or elements of the enterprise will be
successful and in which areas they will fail (Timuroğlu 2010). Therefore, synergy
is a key element in the choice of strategic decisions.
According to Heracleous (1998), strategic thinking primarily enables a manager
to determine how to use the limited resources he / she has in the most efficient way
and to advance the company towards its goals. At the same time, the emerging
competitive threats enable the company to be prepared by making various plans for
250
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
the situations that may arise as a result of changes in the national and local economy.
Companies with strategic thinking skills are strengthening the hand of managers on
the right time and the best tools to attack opponents, as they continually evaluate
the strengths and weaknesses of their businesses and the strengths and weaknesses
of the major competitors. On the other hand, it prefers to survive and grow by
renewing by contributing to the innovation of all aspects of the business. Finally,
it enables managers who make strategic thinking a central element of management
philosophy and become strategic thinkers in time as it enables them to use improved
decision making methods.
According to Liedtka (1998), strategic thinking can be a critical factor in the success
of companies as it helps managers to recognize and take advantage of opportunities by
chance, but also allows them to identify and evaluate lost opportunities. In addition,
since it encourages business managers and employees to think critically about the
rooted causes of the problems, it offers different recommendations for focusing on
problem solving about the company’s business model and operations. In the same
way, it enables the formation of an internal strategic mentality set and makes the
company active in creating a clearer strategy. Finally, it takes the company forward
to be proactive, as it requires working on programs to show early signs of how to
be successful in current business conditions and in more difficult times.
251
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
and identify patterns and tendencies, make concessions, think holistically, see the
“big picture”, activate their intuition, rely on the validity of these intuitions, engage
in complexity, think and visualize with metaphor they derive meaning from smoke
or a handful of air, collect complex and sometimes ambiguous data and interpret
them effectively and accurately, identify strategic goals effectively, are creative and
have creative thinking, analyze information and prioritize demand and competing
priorities (Collis 2011).
One of the specific steps in the process of strategic thinking, or in other words,
an important component of strategic thinking, is expressed as having creative and
creative thinking skills (Collis 2011). It should be remembered immediately that
effective strategic planning requires effective and very strong strategic thinking or
“strategic thinkers”, but the number of experts or strategic thinkers with strategic
thinking skills is very small (Mumford et al. 2012). No doubt, some of the award-
winning work (Bademci 2007) As can be seen, Vahid Bademci, “strategy” and
“strategic thinking” stands out as the most important and valuable names in the
Turkey issues (Korkmaz 2010).
252
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
253
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
Today, the rapid changes experienced in social, economic, political and technological
aspects necessitate renewal and adaptation to these changes. Regardless of the sector,
enterprises also need effective strategic management in order to exist and sustain
these assets despite environmental changes. Strategic management in general can be
expressed as the process of using the production resources effectively and efficiently
in order to realize the objectives of the organization (Ülgen and Mirze 2010). Health
institutions are highly complex, full-time and vitally important healthcare providers,
technology and labor intensive, affected by legal regulations and include many
different occupational groups. Each of these features causes health institutions to
face internal and external changes at any time. Therefore, the fact that the health
sector has an ever changing and developing environment increases the importance
of strategic management in the field of health and it becomes a subject that strategic
management managers should emphasize in both private and public sector (Swayne
et al. 2006). Hospital managers also benefit from strategic management tools as well
as other business executives within the scope of the strategic management approach
required for health institutions to adapt to all the changes and developments that
are experienced today, to anticipate the opportunities and threats that may occur,
to make the necessary organizational changes and to sustain their lives in short.
Given that the health sector is built on human life and health, it is thought to
be more complex and more difficult to manage than other sectors. However, it can
be difficult to implement the strategic management which can bring success in a
systematic way in the health sector where different professional groups, physicians
and managers operate together, whose common aim is to provide health services
and both groups have a say in its management. Therefore, all managers in the health
institution, who are responsible for both administrative and medical services, need
to be knowledgeable and effective in strategic management. Therefore, all managers
in health institutions are expected to be actively using strategic management tools
with the awareness of strategic management practices. Strategic management tools
are all techniques, methods, models, frameworks, approaches and methodologies
that help managers make strategic decisions (Preble 1997). The right strategies can
only be realized with the help of strategic management tools which are of great
importance in order to prevent the gap between theory and practice and to realize
the strategic management effectively (Key and Popkin 1998)
In the international literature, there are studies conducted in various sectors for
the use of strategic management tools. Among these studies, Bain & Company, a
global management consulting firm, has been conducting regular research every
year since 1993. On behalf of Bain & Company, Rigby and Bilodeau update this
study every year and use the 25 management tools they have developed to manage
254
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
the world’s leading companies and publish their results, revealing the management
trend in the world and annual changes in this trend (Rigby and Bilodeau 2013).
However, such a study investigating the level of knowledge and use of health care
managers about strategic management tools is not found in the literature.
Today’s health services are becoming more expensive in parallel with the developments
in rapidly changing technology and service provision, the share of the amount spent
on treatment services in total health expenditures increases and social security
institutions face payment problems. This situation necessitates the reduction of the
cost of the treatment services consuming a significant portion of the resources in
our country and the efficient use of the resources. To this end, efforts are underway
to make public hospitals autonomous, self-sufficient and to provide services in a
competitive environment with private hospitals in accordance with the principle of
efficiency. These studies aim to ensure that public and private hospitals produce
better quality and efficient services together and under competitive conditions in
the sector and this necessitates competition in the health sector.
Where there is scarcity, there is always competition. However, the peculiar
characteristics of health care markets make this competition different from most other
markets (Morrisey 2001). Therefore, health institutions have to take into account the
characteristics of health services in determining their competitive strategies. Because
the basis of determining a competitive strategy is to be successful in a competitive
environment. Determining appropriate competitive strategies for an enterprise
requires, first of all, an examination of the sector in which the entity operates and
its competitive status. To be successful in every sector, different needs must be met.
At the same time, there may be various differences between sectors depending on
factors such as concentration, economies of scale, product differentiation and entry
barriers.
In this case, developing a competitive strategy means developing a general formula
on how a company will compete, what its goals should be and what policies are
needed to achieve these goals (Porter and Locations 2000). Therefore, an enterprise
should examine the market and develop a competitive strategy before developing a
competition strategy. The aim of the competition strategy is to find a place where
the business can best defend itself against the competitive forces in the sector. This
defense can be realized by examining the structure of the market and competitive
forces (Pollard and Hotho 2006). More precisely, the development of a product or
service should be based not only on the capabilities of the organization, but also on
the competitive situation or external risks. Therefore, position strategies should be
255
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
selected considering internal requirements and external risks (Ginter et al. 2018).
So the essence of strategy formation is to overcome competition. The competition
situation in a sector is based on the five forces. The power of the sum of these forces
determines the ultimate profit potential of the sector (Porter 1998).
CONCLUSION
Today, when the waves created by globalization have changed the perception of
time and space and radically changed society and social structures, restructuring has
become a necessity in public health and management. Turkey, the health sector in
its geography, is destined to become a reference center in the health sector. In line
with this objective, radical changes and developments are experienced in the sector.
On the one hand, the number of private health institutions is increasing rapidly and
therefore competition has intensified, and on the other hand, the regulations have
paved the way for patients to receive health care services from both private hospitals
and public health institutions. Also; Providing service providers in health institutions
affiliated to the Ministry of Health to benefit from the revolving fund revenues of
the institution brought a different dimension to the competition. Service quality
and patient satisfaction have gained importance for healthcare providers in order to
gain and maintain superiority in such an environment. Targeted with the quality of
health services; it is not only a longer life, but an improvement in the quality of life.
It is important to provide equal, continuous and adequate service in the health
sector, to create the necessary infrastructure for these services, to meet the need of
manpower and financial resources, and to use the physical infrastructure and manpower
effectively. Health is one of the most important tools and indicators of development.
Since health care is an abstract product that transfers value to the recipient at the
time of production, it is difficult to define and measure the output. The quality of
health services provided by health institutions requires patient satisfaction. The high
level of patient satisfaction causes the patients to choose the same health institution
or recommend it to others in their subsequent needs and consequently to become a
loyal customer of that health institution.
In the context of globalization and overwhelming competition, organizations
have to renew and change their management structures, systems, processes, human
and information resources. Especially in the health sector, the concept of strategic
management is one of the most important concepts to be considered. Although
strategic management has emerged primarily in the private sector, it has found
application in public institutions as well. It is important to implement strategic
management of public organizations not for profit as private sector organizations,
256
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
but for the principle of effective service, and for citizen-oriented applications rather
than customer-oriented organizations such as private sector organizations.
Planning of a realistic reform according to the advantages and weaknesses,
opportunities and dangers of the internal and external environment analysis of
public administration, institutionalization and continuity of change can only be
ensured by the understanding of strategic management. Another important concept
for institutions is performance evaluation. In order for organizations to obtain the
expected benefits from performance measurement, the performance measurement
system must be in harmony with the organizational strategy, the information obtained
as a result of performance measurement should be reliable, the selected performance
indicators should have the capacity to reflect all aspects of performance and the
obtained performance information should be used in the decision process. Use
of strategic management and performance measurement in the public sector, It is
important for public institutions to require that they evaluate their internal processes
and external environmental conditions, to determine the objectives and strategies to
achieve these objectives by clarifying them, and to be the basis for the evaluation
of implementation results and accountability.
Modern management approach requires employees to be rewarded according to
their success. The most common of these rewarding methods is the performance-based
remuneration system. In other words, performance-based remuneration systems are
the means used to reward and appreciate employees in proportion to the achievement
of an organization’s goals or individual performance goals. The basic starting point
of these systems is to determine a part of the wages or the additional payment given
with the fixed wage according to the performance of the employee. Wages paid
based on performance are variable and are often a reflection of their performance.
These wages depend on the performance of the employee in the specified period
and vary depending on the performance of the organization, the performance of the
department in which he / she works, the individual’s performance or the combination
of these within the specified unit time period.
REFERENCES
257
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
258
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
259
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
Ginter, P. M., Duncan, W. J., & Swayne, L. E. (2018). The strategic management
of health care organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
Gluck, F., Kaufman, S., & Walleck, A. S. (1982). The four phases of strategic
management. The Journal of Business Strategy, 2(3), 9.
Glueck, W. F., & Jauch, L. R. (1989). Manajemen strategis dan kebijakan perusahaan.
Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Godet, M. (1987). Scenarios and strategic management (p. 210). London:
Butterworths.
Gönüllü, A. (2008). Kamu Yönetiminde Stratejik Planlamaya Geçiş: Mersin Milli
Eğitim Müdürlüğü Örneği. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
Güçlü, N. (2003). Stratejik yönetim. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,
23(2).
Güner, S. (2005). Stratejik yönetim anlayışı ve kamu yönetimi. Türk İdare Dergisi,
446, 61–78.
Hartmann, A. L., & Whiteman, R. (2003). Personality Correlates of Strategic
Thinking. In An Organizational Context. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. California:
Alliant International University.
Heinrichs, J. H. (2001). Interaction effects of strategic decision models and business
intelligence tools on knowledge generation in manufacturing firms. The University
of Toledo.
Heracleous, L. (1998). Strategic thinking or strategic planning? Long Range Planning,
31(3), 481–487. doi:10.1016/S0024-6301(98)80015-0
Hill, B. (n.d.). Why Is Strategic Thinking Important To The Success of Business?
Chron. Retrieved from http://smallbusiness.chron.com/strategic-thinking-important-
success-business4661.html
Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2012). Strategic management cases:
competitiveness and globalization. Cengage Learning.
Hunger, J. D., & Wheelen, T. L. (2003). Essentials of strategic management (Vol.
9). NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hussey, D. E. (2007). Strategic management: from theory to implementation.
Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780080498287
260
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
261
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
262
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
Rigby, D., & Bilodeau, B. (2013). Management Tools & Trends 2013. Bain &
Company. Retrieved from http://www.bain.com/consulting-services/strategy/
fundamentals-of-growth.aspx
Rodoplu, D. (2001). Stratejik Yönetim Düzeyinde Zaman Yönetimi ve Yetki Devri”.
Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, TC Kocaeli Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler
Enstitüsü. Kocaeli.
Schelling, T. C. (1980). The strategy of conflict. Harvard university press.
Schendel, D. E., & Hatten, K. J. (1972). Business policy or strategic management: A
broader view for an emerging discipline. In Academy of management proceedings
(No. 1, pp. 99-102). Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management. doi:10.5465/
ambpp.1972.4981324
Schoemaker, P. J. (1995). Scenario planning: A tool for strategic thinking. Sloan
Management Review, 36(2), 25–50.
Shrivastava, P. (1986). Is strategic management ideological? Journal of Management,
12(3), 363–377. doi:10.1177/014920638601200305
Shrivastava, P. (1994). Strategic management: Concepts & practices. South-Western
Publishing Company.
Simsek, M., & Nursoy, M. (2002). Toplam Kalite Yönetiminde Performans Olçümü.
Istanbul: Hayat Yayınları.
Steiner, G. A. (1971). Business and society.
Stockport, G. J. (2010). Semco: Cultural transformation and strategic leadership.
International Journal of Technology Marketing, 5(1), 67–78. doi:10.1504/
IJTMKT.2010.033297
Strickland, A. J., & Thompson, A. A. (1984). Strategic management: concepts and
cases. Plano, Tex.: Business Publications.
Swayne, L. E., Duncan, W. J., & Ginter, P. M. (2006). Strategic Management of
Health Care Organizations (5. bs.). Cornwall: Blackwell Publishing.
Tampoe, M., & Macmillan, H. (2000). Strategic management, process, content and
implementation. Oxford University Press.
Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range
Planning, 43(2-3), 172–194. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003
263
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic
management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. doi:10.1002/
(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Tetik, S. (2003). İşletme performansını belirlemede veri zarflama analizi. Yönetim
ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi,
10(2), 221–230.
Thomas, H. (1984). Strategic decision analysis: Applied decision analysis and its
role in the strategic management process. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2),
139–156. doi:10.1002mj.4250050205
Timuroğlu, M. K. (2010). Stratejik Düşünce, Öğrenme Yönlülük Ve Yenilik.
Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Erzurum: Atatürk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler
Enstitüsü, İşletme Anabilim Dalı.
Turunç, Ö. (2006). Bilgi Teknolojileri Kullaniminin İşletmelerin Örgütsel
Performansina Etkisi Hizmet Sektöründe Bir Araştirma. Toros Üniversitesi İİSBF
Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(5), 225–247.
Ülgen, H., & Mirze, K. (2006). İşletmelerde Stratejik Yönetim, Literatür Yayınları,
3. İstanbul: Basım.
Ülgen, H., & Mirze, S. K. (2004). Isletmelerde stratejik yonetim. İstanbul: Literatür
yayıncılık.
Ülgen, H., & Mirze, S. K. (2010). İşletmelerde stratejik yönetim (5. Baskı). İstanbul:
Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım.
Üzün, C. (2000). Stratejik yönetim ve halkla ilişkiler. Dokuz Eylül Yayıncılık.
Venkatraman, N., & Camillus, J. C. (1984). Exploring the concept of “fit” in strategic
management. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 513–525.
Webster, P. R. (1990). Creativity as creative thinking. Music Educators Journal,
76(9), 22–28. doi:10.2307/3401073
Wheelen, T. L., Hunger, J. D., Hoffman, A. N., & Bamford, C. E. (2010). Strategic
management and business policy. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Wissema, J. G., Brand, A. F., & Van Pol, H. D. (1981). The incorporation of
management development in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal,
2(4), 361–377. doi:10.1002mj.4250020405
264
Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Management and Strategic Thinking on Performance
Wooldridge, B., & Floyd, S. W. (1990). The strategy process, middle management
involvement, and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 11(3),
231–241. doi:10.1002mj.4250110305
Yürüşen, S. (2011). Veri zarflama analizi ile bayi performansının hesaplanması:
otomotiv sektöründe bir uygulama [Doctoral dissertation]. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
Zerenler, M. (2005). Performans ölçüm sistemleri tasarımı ve üretim sistemlerinin
performansının ölçümüne yönelik bir araştırma. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar
Dergisi.
265