Professional Documents
Culture Documents
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 4 of 5
Focus Student 1: English Learner Focus Student 2: Student w/ILP/504 Focus Student 3: Your Choice
FS1 for the most part was able to
achieve the learning goal. ⅔ of his FS2 did not really meet the
To what degree did focus storyboards showed thoughtful learning goal of the lesson. He was FS3 performed as he normally
students achieve lesson analysis. He still has a few grammar a bit distracted with the options to does. He technically met the
objectives?
mistakes and 1 of his storyboards create so I think he focused more goals but looks like he didn’t put
was more summary, but overall I’m on the creation of the storyboard that much effort in.
satisfied with his overall than on the actual assignment.
achievement.
Next time I would have them create one storyboard for their initial usage of the website. Even though we did a
What would you do differently
next time? practice run that did help, some students were still distracted or worked at a slower pace because they were
also trying to figure out the website. I believe I’ll have to gradually build them from the beginning of the year.
The top three strengths of my lesson were:
1. Engagement
2. Creativity
3. Analysis
What were three top Lesson
Strengths? Engagement was a strength for this activity because I definitely saw that my students were enjoying creating
storyboards and were more invested into this assignment than usual written assignments. Since this allowed
for creativity it was nice to see some students who aren’t as engaged buy into this assignment. Lastly, it was a
benefit to see their analysis skills outside a formal written product. This is helping me break out of the view that
only formal essays should be an assessment.
The three areas for improvement are
1. Timing
2. Quantity of storyboards
3. More writing
What were three top areas for
improvement? As I mentioned before timing was a key problem as my students didn’t get as much time to discuss as I would
like. I also think timing is linked to the amount of work that was asked of them to do. As I mentioned previously
next time I think I should have them focus on making one storyboard instead of three. I think I would have seen
overall better responses with just one storyboard as opposed to three. Lastly, I would have liked to have seen
more writing in some of the responses.
Now that they have demonstrated that they can identify and explain how a theme is created, the next step is
What are next steps? going to be to teach them how to write a thematic statement. I will continue to use storyboards in my class, but
I will adjust the requirements to make it more practical for students.
Other Comments/Notes
All parts of this form should be transcribed (typed; not hand-written) into a single document and submitted to course instructor.
Information from this POP Cycle should be summarized on the NT ILP as appropriate.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 5 of 5