ering and copy, enim he fam xcept ny with canst oe pubaher DVS - DEUTSCHER VERBAND FOR SCHWEISSEN UND \VERWANDTE VERFAHREN E.V, Contents: ange of Application ‘Shape and Numer of Samples Procedure Evaluation ‘Types of Failure Strength of Fused Joints Inspection Record ‘Standards, Guidelines and Regulations 1. Range of Application “The pacing testis designated for judgment of fusions on PE liners under shorter peeling stress. The qualty ofa seam can ‘only be sutticienty judged in combination with other tests (e.g, ‘dynamic mechanical analysis). Sheets are made of thermoplastics or elastomer and fused by welding, vulcanization or gluing. Overlap joints and overlap seams with coated seams are applied ‘The sheets can be bultup homogenous or as multilayer. “The fusion procedures are treated in DVS 2225-1, the on-site test in DVS 2225-2 “The requicoments are settled in part 1 ofthis guideline 2. Shape and Number of Samples Stip shaped Samples are applied forthe peeling tst according {a Fig. 1. They are taken out vertically to the fusion seam of the Joint area ofthe ner tre way the fusion seam is situated onthe de. Figure 1. Sample or Peaing Test Test of fusions on PE liners — Peeling test Direction DVS 2226-3 (out 1967) bby. Seam width, total wicth for overiap seams with test channel Liner thickness 8 Width 415 mm, at least Sold shoot thickness for homogenous sheets 50 mm for reinforced sheets ‘Sum of both distances between the end of the seam width and clamping x+y =40x shoot thickness d and xy 2 106 L-_ Length of sample 250 mm + Le The Samples can be produced by sawing, miling, punching, cutting oF simlar procedures, Noches onthe cuting edges should be avoided! Atleast § Samples have to be checked per test In case of sutfcient overap length at least 3 Samples have to be checked per side (Fig. 2). Figure2. Taking out a sample under sutlclert overap lath on bath 3 Procedure 1 not determined otherwise, the peeling test fs processed in rormal cimate 25/50-2 acc. to DIN 50.014, ‘The outer texture of the seam (bead, form and evenness over total seam length) Is to be determined visually futher tothe test, Furthermore, the essential dimensions (sheet thickness, seam thickness and seam width) and the statin of the seam Considering the manufacturing direction ofthe sheets have to Be Getermined (see section 4.3 of DVS 2228-2), ‘This pubaton was prepared by 2 grup of agorarced speaks wong logan nan honorary capac, artis ecrimended tht shou be respect as hme sores ottrentoage The st mats ates cock he eae whch Me cates py ohio Me pec case and neta e eran ales {Shimer ai cent fo tobty ene pat fhe German Wading Socty eel hess parbaetng hha Nepusion ths cocoon We ud roup W astcs, Welding and Adhesive Bonding’ (Onars a: DVS-erlg) GmbH, 0. ox 101965, 40010 Dssekdor, Germany, Phone + 49(0)21/159-0, Tala: «49(}211/501-150Pago 2to DVS 2226-3 Alter opening of the sample edges non fused, overlapping and laying an top of each other, are clamped the way thatthe fusion spot is stuated vertical tothe lap crecton and in the midole ana Subject to wear by pooling (look Fig, 2). The lamolng langth ang the clamp distance have tobe respected acc. to Fig. 1 and Fig. 3 The test speed is 60 mmnin During the test the stress strain diagram (deformation measuring via vansverse convey) i registered. It has to get over the fraction resp. distincly over the segment limit to calch the deformation behavior. Figure 3. Clamping of sample. 4 Evaluation ‘The result is mainly designated to judge the deformation and {allure behavior of the fusion. Furthermore, the peeling resistance othe fusion "Ag" can be determined. 441. Types ot Faire Essentially the folowing types of failure may occur: = Peeling ofthe seam (2.9, even traction surace in the fusion ls vel, fraction surface wit tough fraction characteristics as white fraction, deeply fissured surface...) ~ Elongations andor traction in the basic material outside the ~ Elongations andior ration in the junction area = Elongations andor fraction in the welding filer on coated ‘Type of talure, especially kind of tracion or traction characteristics (ough, white or bitle traction) as well as the Selormation behavor (e.g, elongation, peeing) have to be recorded for each sample, 442 Strength of used jlnts ‘The peeling resistance is determined via stress strain diagram. n case of separation the average peeling resistance 18 to be ‘termined according to DIN 53959 and. the average {separation peeling existance has "Rs tobe calculated. It results as quotient from the average peeling strength and the width ofthe sample and has tobe stated in Nim, In case of elongation or traction of the sample the maximum stangth achieved is related to the width of the sampla and inicated in Ninn, In his ease the peeling resistance "Rg" has fo be provided wit the sign > 5 Inspection Record |Win reference to this guideline the inspection record must inclu ~ About iner Type, material, manufacturer and designation (eventually ana- Jog fo welding filer) |About fusion Fusion procedure, seam shape and designation ~ About sample ‘Shape and number, dimensions. = About test conditions| imate, speed, clamping length About result Visual judgment, soam dimensions, deformation behavior and type of falure, stength short-term fusion factor = Conditions difering from this guideline ~ Date of inspection and signature 6 Standards, Guidelines and Regulations ON 16726 DIN 50014 Plastic roo! lines, plastic sealing liners, tests CCimates and their technical applications, normal mates ‘Tosting of plastics ~tonsie test Evaluation of tensile, separation and peeling tests Fusion of PE liners for ground and wator consttucton — welding, vulcanization, ging DVS 2295-2 Fusion of PE liners for ground and water constuction ~ on site test DVS 2226-1 Tosts and fusions on PE liners ~ requirements DVS 2226-2 Test of fusions on PE liners lap shea test DVS 2226-4 Test of fusions on PE liners — tensile creep tet ON 53.455, DIN 53 539, vs 2225-1