Professional Documents
Culture Documents
y t =ϕ0 + ϕ1 y t −1+ ε t
|ϕ 1|<1, andt → ∞
We have
∞
ϕ
y t = 0 + ∑ ϕi1 ε t −1
1−ϕ1 i=0
ϕ0
E ( y t )=
1−ϕ 1
σ2
and V ( y t ) =
1−ϕ21
y t =ϕ0 + y t −1+ ε t
This model is known as Random walk with drift. Drift means intercept (ϕ 0)
In this case,
t−1
y t = y o +ϕ 0 t +∑ ε t −i
i=0
E ( y t )= y 0 +ϕ 0 t
V ( y t ) =σ 2 t
y t = y t−1 +ε t
In this case
t−1
y t = y o + ∑ ε t−i
i=0
E ( y t )= y 0 ⟹ no trend in mean
V ( y t ) =σ 2 t ⟹ trend in variance
⟹ y t is non stationary
In Random walk with drift, the series, y t , exhibits both deterministic and stochastic trend
In Random walk without drift, the series, y t , exhibits only stochastic trend
y t =ϕ0 + ϕ1 y t −1+ ε t
y t =ϕ0 + ϕ1 Ly t +ε t
y t ( 1−ϕ1 L ) =ϕ 0+ ε t
Now, set
1−ϕ1 L=0
Set
1
z=
L
Therefore, we have
z−ϕ 1=0
z=ϕ 1
z=1
or,
ϕ 1=1
Therefore, the presence of unit root in AR(1) implies that the series is nonstationary
exhibiting stochastic trend with or without deterministic trend.
Δ y t = y t − y t −1
y t = y t−1 +ε t
How it is generated?
To understand it, express AR(1) with unit root in the following form:
t−1
y t = y o + ∑ ε t−i
i=0
This expression states that the value of y in period t is obtained by accumulating the shocks
t−1
over time , ∑ ε t−i , with its initial value, y o.
i=0
Stochastic trend means accumulation of shocks over time. For this reason, presence of
stochastic trend in a series creates a lot of problem.
y t = y t−1 +ε t
For this reason, the random walk model follows difference stationary process (DSP):
the series is originally non stationary, but it becomes stationary after taking its difference.
y t =ϕ0 + ϕ1 L y t +ϕ 2 L2 yt +ε t
or,
Set
1−ϕ1 L−ϕ2 L2=0
Set
1
z= to get
L
ϕ1 ± √ϕ 21+ 4 ϕ 2
z=
2
Now,
if i) z1 = 1, z2 =1, there are 2 unit roots ⟹ y t is non stationary exhibiting stochastic trend
While yt both in (i) and (ii) are nonstationary, the nature of nonstationarity is different
because the nature of stochastic trend is different.
z 1+ z2 =ϕ1
z 1 × z2=−ϕ2
and
ϕ 2=−1
In the case of AR (2), maximum number of unit root = 2, and in this case the series to be
differenced twice to have stationary series and the series will be integrated of order 2.
If the AR(2) series has one unit root, then we have to take 1 st difference to make it stationary,
and in this case it will be integrated of order 1.
For AR (p) series:
¿
If ϕ ( z )=( z−1 ) ϕ ( z )=0
the AR(p) series contains 1 unit root, and the series is called integrated of order 1, I(1)
¿
Here, ϕ ( z ) is AR characteristic polynomial of order p-1
If
2
ϕ ( z )=( z−1 ) ϕ¿∗¿ z =0¿
( )
the AR(p) series contains 2 unit root, the series is called integrated of order 2.
In this way,
the AR(p) series contains d unit root, and the series is called integrated of order d.
In AR(p) series, the maximum number of unit roots is p, in that case the series is called
integrated of order p.
Δ y t =β
or,
y t − y t−1=β
y t = y 0 + βt
y t =α + βt + ε t
ε t N ( 0 ,σ 2 ), cov ( ε t , ε t −k ) =0
E ( y t )=α + βt
This is the popular trend model used to estimate growth rate. The trend in mean value is
completely predictable and is known as the deterministic trend.
2
V ( y t ) =E ( y t −E ( y t ) ) =σ 2
The variance of yt is time invariant and dose not exhibit any trend.
While variance and covariance are time invariant, the mean of yt is time variant. Thus, yt is
nonstationary time series exhibiting deterministic trend. Deterministic trend is a systematic
change of the mean level of a series over time.
After detrending the series it becomes stationary:
zt = yt – E(yt) = εt
Therefore, yt is originally non-stationary, but after de trending it becomes stationary. The data
generating process (DGP) of yt follows in this case is known as the trend stationary process
(TSP).
The issue whether a time series is of DSP or TSP is important because the dynamic properties
of the two processes are different. While the TSP is predictable, the DSP is not completely
predictable. For TSP, the effects of external shocks are temporary, while for DSP any random
shock to the series has a permanent effect. A TSP has a trend in the mean but no trend in the
variance, but a DSP has a trend in the variance with or without trend in the mean1.
TSP DSP
1. Non stationary 1. Non stationary
2. Stationary by detrending 2. Stationary by taking difference
3. Trend in mean – deterministic trend 3. Trend in mean – deterministic
4. No trend in variance or covariance trend, or no trend in mean (without
– no stochastic trend deterministic trend)
5. Effect of shock is transitory, it dies 4. Trend in variance or covariance –
out shortly stochastic trend. The stochastic
trend incorporates all the random
shocks (ε1 to εt) that have permanent
effects on the level of yt.
5. Effect of shock is permanent, it
persists for long period
Plot ACF
Many statistical tests for unit roots are available now for detecting unit root.
Before carrying out test we need to estimate the model by applying OLS.
H 0 :|ϕ1|=1
H 1 :|ϕ1|<1
H1⟹ stationary
H 1 :|ϕ1|<1 , β ≠ 0
Here, H0 ⟹ DSP
H1⟹ TSP
Model selection is very much crucial for testing unit root. If the observed series does not
exhibit an increasing or decreasing trend, then the appropriate model will be either (1) or, (2).
To control for serial correlation, the Dickey–Fuller test estimates a model of the following
form:
∆ y t =ρ y t−1 + ε t (4)
∆ y t =ϕ 0+ ρ y t −1+ ε t (5)
∆ y t =ϕ 0+ ρ y t −1+ βt + ε t (6)
H 0 :|ρ|=0
H 1 :| ρ|<0
H 1 :| ρ|<0 , β ≠ 0
Test statistics for Dickey–Fuller test
ϕ^ 1−1 ^ρ
t= = (7)
SE ( ϕ^ 1 ) SE ( ^ρ )
∑ y t−1 y t
ϕ^ 1= t =1T (8)
2
∑y t −1
t=1
or,
T T
∑ y t−1 y t ∑ εt y t −1
t =1
ϕ^ 1= T
=ϕ1 + t =1T
∑ y 2t −1 ∑ y 2t−1
t=1 t=1
Therefore,
E ( ϕ^ 1) =ϕ1 (9)
and
2
σ2 σ2 σ2 1−ϕ1
V ( ϕ^ 1 ) = T
= T
= 2
=
σ T
∑y 2
t−1 T ∑ y 2t −1 T 2
(10)
t =1 t=1 1−ϕ1
T
We know that, for very large T, the t distribution will be standard normal in asymptotic sense,
t A N (0 , 1)
→
If ε t N ( 0 ,σ 2 ), then it can be shown that
1−ϕ21
(
ϕ^ 1 N ϕ 1 ,
T )
Under the null hypothesis of unit root, the t statistic is not asymptotically normally
Said and Dickey (1984) extended the basic autoregressive unit root test.
The ADF test also the null hypothesis that a time series yt is I(1) is tested against the
If a time series follows autoregressive process of higher order we need to incorporate some
For AR(3)
Δ y t =ϕ 0+ ¿
If yt follows AR(p) process, we have to incorporate (p-1) augmented terms into the model to
make it AR(1):
p−1
Δ y t =ϕ 0+ ρ y t−1+ ∑ β j Δ y t− j+ ε t (15)
j=1
If we include trend component into the AR(p) model, the ADF formulation will be
p−1
Δ y t =ϕ 0+ ρ y t−1+ ∑ β j Δ y t− j+ βt + ε t (16)
j=1
AR(p) process will be ADF (p-1)
The value of p is set in such a way that the error εt is not serially correlated.
If the roots of θ(L) are outside the unit circle, we can write the following sequence:
ϕ ( L ) θ ( L )−1 y t =ε t
∞
Δ y t =ρ y t −1 + ∑ β j Δ y t− j + ε t (17)
j=1
The infinite order of AR or ADF cannot be estimated with finite data set.
It is shown by Ng and Perron (1995) that if p is chosen on the basis of some information
criteria (IC).
The method of selecting lag length on the basis of information criteria considers a trade-off
between the size distortions because of the inclusion of too few lags and the power losses
Here,σ^ 2p is the OLS residuals from the pth order ADF regression; CT is a penalty function
In this procedure, we have to set an upper bound pmax for p and estimate the ADF regression
with p = pmax. If the coefficients for last lagged differences are not statistically significant, we
need to reduce the lag length one by one and repeat the process. A useful rule of thumb for