J.

Contempt (R-71)
l. Kinds : direct (S- l ); indirect (S-3)
2. Procedure (S-4 to 9)
3. Judgment and Review (S-11)
Cases:
1. Yasay vs. Recto, 313 SCRA
2. Sison vs. Caoibes, Jr., 429 SCRA 258
3. Espanol vs. Formoso. 525 SCRA
4. Marantan vs. Diokno. 716 SCRA 164. 212014
5. Capitol Hills Golf and Count,y Club vs. Sanchez, 717 SCRA
6. Tormis vs. Paredes, 749 SCRA 505, Feb. 4, 2015
7. Oca vs. Custodio, 832 SCRA (2017)
8. Causing vs. De la Rosa, 85 7 SCRA (201 7)
9. Sps. Bayani & Myrna Partoza vs. Lilian Montano & Amelia
Solomon, 866 SCRA 35 (2018)

III. SPECIAL PROCEEDIN GS (Rules 72 to 109)

A. Settlement of Estate
1. Venue vs Jurisdiction (R-73)
2. Kinds of settlement
a. Extrajudicial
( 1) By Agreement
(2) By self-adjudication
b. Judicial
( l) Summary (R-74)
(2) By Petition (R-75 to 90)
a. 1ntestate
b. Testate
(3) By partition (R-69)
3. The Administrator or Executor
(a) Special vs Regular (R-80)
(b) Bonds (R-8 I)
(c) Powers and Duties (R-84)
(d) Accountability (R-85)
4. Claims Against the Estate (R-86)
5. Actions by and against Executor and Administrator (R-87)
6. Distribution and Partition (R-90)

Cases:
1. San Luis vs. San Luis, 514 SCRA, Februa,y 2007
2. Garcia-Quia:on vs. Belen, 702 SCRA , 7131113
3. Agtarap vs. Agtarap, 651 SCRA, June 2011
4. Suntay III vs. Cojuangco-Suntay, 683 SCRA , October 2012
5. Lee vs. RTC of Q. C. , 423 SCRA, February 2004
6. Heirs of Hilario Rui: vs. Edmond Rui:, 252 SCRA, January 1996
7. Unionbank vs. Santibanez, 452 SCRA, February 2005 (R-86)

26
 8. Heirs oj)vlaglasang vs. A1BC. 706 SCRA 235
9. Pi/apt/vs. Heirs of M. Briones, 514 SCRA, Februmy 2007
/0. Sabidong vs. Solas, 699 SCRA, June 2013
11. Aranas vs. lvlercado, 7 I 3 SCRA
12. Silverio Sr. vs. Silverio Jr .. 733 SCRA 183, (8113114)
13. Butiong vs. Pla::o, 765 SCRA 22 7

B. Esch eats (R-91)

1. Definition
2. Historical background and Jegal basis
3. Actions for Revisions (S-5)
Cases:
!. Alvarico vs Sola, 382 SCRA
2. Maltos vs. Heirs of Eusebio Borromeo. 770 SCRA 397

C. Guardians and Guardian.ship (R-92 to 97) as amended by

A.M. No. 03-02-05-SC, May 1, 2003

1. Venue vs Jurisdiction (S-92)

2. Appointment, kinds, Qualifications (S-93)
3. Requirement (S-94)
4. Power and Duties (S-96)
5. Tem1ination (S-97)
Cases:
!. Goyena vs. Ledesma Gusti/a, Jan. 13, 2003
2. Caniza vs. CA. Feb. 24, 1997
3. Neri vs. Heirs of Had.Ji Yusop Uy, 683 SCRA
4. Oropesa vs. Oropesa, 671 SCRA (4/2012)
5. Abad vs. Biawn. 687 SCRA (/2/2012)

D. Trustees (R-98)
I. Parties
2. Kinds/Classes
Cases:
/. Advent Capital and Finance Corp. vs. Alcantara. 664 SCRA
2. Land Bank of the Phil. vs. Pere::, 672 SCRA

E. Adoption and Custody of Minors (R-99-100)

I. The Domestic Adoption Act of 1998 (RA 8552)
2. Inter Country Adoption Act of 1995 (RA 8043)
3. Rule of Adoption (A.M. No. 02-6-02-SC dated July 31 , 2002
effective Aug. 22, 2002) '
a. Who may adopt (S-4)
b. Who may be adopted ( S-5)
c. Venue and Jurisdiction S.20)

27
Cases:
l. Cang vs CA - 296 SCRA I 28
2. Vda de Jacob vs CA _ 31 2 SCRA 772
3. Republic of the Phil. Vs Hon JoS'e R f'J ,.J

4. Republic vs CA - 255 SCRA ·99 ' · iernanue-- .. 253 SCRA 509

5. Reyes vs. Maundo, 636 SCRA
6. in the At/atter O r Steph · N h
.. .
7· Peht10n '.! ante at y Astorga-Garcia 454 SCRA
for Adoption 0 -r M· h II nd . ·
8· Nety vs. Sampana. 734'.! SCRAic e e a Michael Um , 588 SCRA 98 (200 7)
9. Castro vs. Gregorio, 738 SC RA
10. Bartolome vs. SSS, 740 SCRA

F. Habeas Corpuz (R-102)

4. Definition and Nature or Scope (S -1 )
5. Requisites for Appli cation (S-3)
6. Disallowance or Discharge of Writ (S-4)
7. Preliminary citation vs writ (S-6)
8. The return : when evidence; when plea (S-10, 12, 13)
Cases:
1. !lusorio vs Bildner, 332 SCRA 169
2. Serapio vs Sandiganbayan- 396 SCRA 443
3. Lacson vs. Pere::;, 357 SCRA 756
4. Sangca vs. City Prosecutor of Cebu, 524 SCRA 610
5. Mangila vs. Pangilinan, 701 SCRA 355
6. Tujan-Militante vs. Cada-Deapera, July 28, 2014
7. Datukan Malang Saliba vs. The Warden, 755 SCRA 296

H. Change of Name vs. Correction/Cancellation of Entries, as amended

RA. 9048 and 10172 (Rule 103 vs. Rule 108)

1. Venue vs Jurisdiction
2. Contents of Petition/Grounds
3. Hearing
4. Judgment
5. RA. 9048 and its Implementing Rules
Cases:
1. Eleosida vs Civil Registrar of Q.C. - May 9, 2002
2. Republic vs. Kho - 526 SCRA
3. Petition for Change on Name of Julian Lim
Carulasan /Vang - -15-1 SCRA
4. Bra:a vs. Civil Registrar of Neg 0cc. - 60 7 SCRA (]009)
5. Republic vs. Silverio - 53 7 SCRA
6. Republic vs. Cagandahan - 565 SCRA
7. Republic vs. Uy - 703 SCRA (A ugust l 2. 2013)
8. Minoru Fujiki vs. lvlarinay, June 26, 20 13
9. People vs, Merlinda O/aybar, February 10. 20 1-1
JO. Onde vs. CR of Las Pinas. 734 SCRA, Sept. 201-1

28
Prerogall\ e \\ rJL<,

\ . Wn1 of Amparo

ca~cs
1 Taru:: ,·~ I >el Rowrrn. 55./ S< RA
: ( ·w1/a, ,.,_ \ap,w I fome ,m 11l!r5 A.uo, 55./ SC R11
3. ( \1\////o \'\ ( -flC 605 .V R 1
.J. Ru-::un \'\. luglfl\ r;or, V PA
5 Ro.\,_1, n r,\l,t. r;:o _\(R, 1
6. lfon.!n, n / Sf _ron . -;5 VRA.1-rhruar; 2{) J.I

f3 Wnt of I laht'a<; Data

Case~
I Caram 1•.1 .'icg1n. 1ugust 5. 2() J.f
/'n:urcs er ii is. St Therese College. Sept 2J. ~(J/J
3. \fcralco rs lun. 63 :: SCR-4
-l. Lee ,·s. Ilagan, -33 SCRA 59

C Wnt of KaJikasan

Cases:
I. D0/01 rs. Pa;e. -03 SCRA (contmumg ,\fandamusr
:l. Pa;e vs. Cosmo. 7°./9 SCRA 39 (Wn r of Kalilwsan)
3. Angon. S-..i ifl. iJ5 SCRA /{}]
./. Resident ,\far me .\fammals of the Protected Seascape
Tanon Stroll rs. _.{ngelo Reyes er.,.//.. -56 SCR I 5 J3,
.1pnl ll. 2()/5
5. lf'est Tower Condommium vs. Phil. Ind. Corp. . -58 SCRA