Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3/30/2020
HIST 404C
manipulate men. Chronologically speaking, beginning with Plutarch’s work on Caesar, Plutarch
states that when Cleopatra was presented to Caesar, he was captivated by her, especially her
boldness.1 While this may have been the case, Plutarch spends a large portion of this description
detailing how Cleopatra devised her plan to be presented to the Roman. Plutarch does not focus
on the power or political prowess of Cleopatra at this time. Instead, when Caesar left Egypt,
Plutarch states that he left “Cleopatra on the throne (a little later she had a son by him whom the
Alexandrians called Caesarion)”.2 The author does not focus at all on the romantic relations
between Caesar and Cleopatra, or any political reason for being on the throne. Instead she is
presented as a seductress who used Caesar's power to be given political control over Egypt.
This portrayal is also shown in Plutarch’s work on Antony. In this case, Plutarch’s first
mention of Cleopatra VII is related to Fulvia (one of Antony’s wives) making Antony obedient
to women.3 Plutarch relates that Cleopatra should have been grateful to Fluvia for this, because
she now could have control over Antony.4 Again, Plutarch shows ways in which Cleopatra is a
manipulator, able to control a man and make him do what she wishes. Plutarch continues on to
state that the evil passions of Antony allowed him to be controlled by Cleopatra.5 Plutarch once
again removes any power from Cleopatra. There is no romance in Plutarch’s portrayal of any of
Cleopatra’s romantic interests. She is simply a manipulator, who uses the passions of man to her
advantage.
Plutarch also discredits the appearance of Cleopatra, stating that “her beauty, as we are
told, was not incomparable...but conversation with her had an irresistible charm”.6 This is an
1 Plutarch, Caesar, 49.1-49.4.
2 Plutarch, Caesar, 49.10.
3 Plutarch, Antony, 10.
4 Plutarch, Antony, 10.
5 Plutarch, Antony, 25.
6 Plutarch, Antony, 27.
important point for many reasons. Firstly, Plutarch discredits the appearance of Cleopatra, and
instead attributes her desirability to some kind of mysterious desire to converse with her. He’s
attributed boldness, passion, and persuasiveness to her charm, but never appearance.
Furthermore, the fact that Plutarch states that as far as he knows, based on other sources from
around that time, Cleopatra was not very visually appealing. This shows many things about the
Roman portrayal of Cleopatra. In fact, it may have not been shocking in that time period to state
that Cleopatra was not attractive. Instead this could have been an image of Cleopatra that had
been circulated since the days of the civil wars between Antony and Octavian. Julliette Harrison,
a PHD in Classics shares this view, stating that Octavian used the adulterous ways of Cleopatra
and Antony as propaganda.7 Harrison also attests to the emasculated appearance of Antony
throughout Roman history.8 Adam Lukaszewicz, a PHD in archaeology from the University of
Warsaw, also states that the image spread by Octavian portrayed her as a “depraved witch and
evil-doer”.9 Plutarch reaffirms this by stating that Romans pitied Antony because Cleopatra was
not nearly as beautiful or young as Octavia.10 Plutarch makes the point that all Romans held this
view of Antony and Cleopatra, especially those that had actually seen Cleopatra.11 This shows
that Romans widely held disdain for Cleopatra, and held negative views of her appearance
without having even seen her. This shows that the same could be said for any other aspects that
Plutarch continues his image of a manipulator by showing how concerned Cleopatra was
at maintaining control over Antony. Plutarch states that Cleopatra worried Octavia would gain
control over Antony, and in order to prevent this she became slimmer and worked harder to
willing to do anything to manipulate Antony. Plutarch even states that Cleopatra would pretend
to cry in order to keep him in Alexandria.13 Plutarch also shows this when he states that
Cleopatra “wiped off some of [Antony’s] blood upon her face, and called him master, husband,
and imperator; indeed, she almost forgot her own ills in her pity for his”.14 At this point Plutarch
seems to be making the point that she had become so invested in her acting, that she almost
Plutarch somewhat attests to Cleopatra’s intelligence, stating that “it was not easy to see
how Cleopatra was inferior in intelligence to anyone of the princes who took part in the
expedition, she who for a long time had governed so large a kingdom by herself, and by long
association with Antony had learned to manage large affairs”.15 In this case, it is important to
note that Cleopatra is not given credit for having a large intellect. Instead Plutarch states that he
finds difficulty that anyone could believe her intellect is below that of a prince. Furthermore,
Plutarch does not entirely credit her with obtaining her own knowledge. Instead part of her
Plutarch does not entirely credit Cleopatra VII for what she was in reality. Instead of a
Queen that protected Egypt from Roman conquest, or a significant other to some of Rome’s most
powerful leaders, she is portrayed as a seductress or a manipulator. She is given the image of an
adulterer, who gains control of Antony by any means beside her own beauty. Sally-Ann Ashton,
a PHD in Egyptian Archeology, states that “within Egypt Cleopatra VII was presented as
the image shown throughout Plutarch. A large part of this seems to be attributed to the Roman
image of Cleopatra created by Octavian. In reality, it seems that Plutarch perpetuated an image
of Cleopatra that had been popular to the Romans. That image being that Cleopatra was able to
manipulate men through a type of magic. She wasn’t credited for her intelligence or cunning.
Bibliography
Miles Margaret M., 21-36. University of California Press, 2011. Accessed March 30, 2020.
www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pnvmm.6.
and Triumph, edited by Cyrino Monica S., 155-68. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press,