You are on page 1of 3

Article 1 Article 2 Article 3

Reference Ahmad, M., & Shah, S.K. (2019). «A Critical Rozanov, T. (2016). «Language and Identity Alqahtani, S. N. & Abdelhalim, S. M.
Discourse Analysis of Gender Representations Explored», Journal of Arts & Humanities, 5 (6): (2020). «Gender-based Study of Interactive
in the Content of 5th Grade English Language 1-8. DOI: 10.18533/journal.v5i6.948 Metadiscourse Markers in EFL Academic
Textbook», International and Multidisciplinary Writing», Theory and Practice in Language
Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 1-24. DOI: Studies, 10 (10): 1315-1325. DOI:
10.17583/rimcis.2019.3989 10.17507/tpls.1010.20
Structure Abstract; Introduction; Review of Related Abstract; Introduction; four sections of theory Abstract; Introduction (Purpose and
Literature; Research Methodology; Results; and research on the topic; Conclusion; Questions of the Study, Significance of the
Discussion; Conclusion; References; Author(s) References. Study); Literature Review; Methodology;
Bio data. Results and Discussion; Conclusion;
References; Author(s) Bio data.
Research Content selected for the study: book of English This is a theoretical overview of existing Research Design: a descriptive
method, language taught to the students of Grade-5 for research, theories, and opposing perspectives comparative study, consisting of a mixed
pros and the academic year 2017-18 in public and related to the relationship between language method approach (quantitative as well as
cons private schools in Punjab, Pakistan. and identity, and considers complications such qualitative), in which the data is collected
Data analysis: two types of analysis, (a) as historical russification, religious influence, qualitatively and analyzed quantitatively
content analysis, a systematic study of non- socioeconomic factors, and education with and qualitatively, using frequencies of the
living data forms, cultural products and texts; regards to the Ukrainian and post-Soviet metadiscourse markers. The study sample
and (b) critical discourse analysis (CDA), which context. included sixty (30 male and 30 female)
explores the relationship between linguistic The theoretical examination allowed exploring Saudi EFL undergraduates; joining the
choices within the texts and talks with regard the relationship between language and College of Languages and Translation, Al-
to particular socio-cultural contexts in which identity, discussing issues faced in linguistic Imam Mohammad bin Saud Islamic
these texts and talk function. research, presenting other cases in support of University.
Procedure for analysis: application of the such relationship, as well as illustrating the Data Collection and Research
eight-factor procedure, as adapted from significance of language and its effects on Instruments: The instrument for collecting
Amerian and Esmaili (2015), to examine the political and social change. data was an essay writing test. The data
content of the said textbook in a systematic Pros: listing previous studies in regards to consisted of (60) opinion essays, ranging
way i.e. inclusion/exclusion of males and language and identity in different contexts from (250) to (300) words, the corpus of
females, male and female societal role, male provided a variety of research methods: (a) the study altogether consisted of (17,000)
and female semantic role, male and female fieldwork data, by Bocale (2015) that the words. The interpersonal model of Hyland
titles, masculine generic construction, order of author deems as questionable as being based (2005) was employed as an instrument to
appearance, activities both genders involved in on self-assessment of language competences analyze interactive metadiscourse markers
and pictorial representation of both sexes. and attitudes by means of a survey; and (b) used in the students’ written texts.
Pros: By implementing CDA, detailed linguistic discourse analysis of hybrid form of an Data Analysis and the Study Procedure:
analysis is integrated with critical theory, to Ukrainian-Russian dialect known as Surzhyk, The sixty essays in two consecutive stages.
understand how institutional discourse serves by Zbyr (2015). The focus of stage one was on examining
to both reflect and construct unequal power Cons: the author agrees with the conclusions the possible similarities and differences
relations. This understanding is designed to and suggestions presented by Block (2013), between males and females in the usage
contribute to social change. which criticizes the way identity has been of the interactive metadiscourse markers,
Cons: CDA may fall short as a research understood and researched, by following a based on Hyland’s (2005) classification,
instrument because of its overly qualitative, poststructuralist approach as an individualistic electronically with the help of a
interpretative, or subjective character. or collectivistic phenomenon, a view that is computational linguistic tool called
Moreover, analysis of just ONE textbook may limited in scope. There comes the need to look ‘AntConc software’ and manually in which
not yield generalizations or at least, significant closer at demographic categories such as race, the essays were read word by word
findings transferable to other contexts. ethnicity, gender, social class, national identity carefully. Stage two focused on examining
and others. the type and frequency and of
metadiscourse markers then compare the
results of the two gender groups using the
concordance analysis tool AntConc
software. In the quantitative analysis,
three analytical procedures were used, the
frequency of occurrence per 1000 words,
the proportional percentages of
metadiscourse categories to the total use,
and the Chi-square test, to increase the
results’ accuracy.
Pros: by implementing mixed-methods,
applied linguist researchers are now
capable of addressing more complex
problems using more sophisticated
research designs drawing on and
integrating both quantitative and
qualitative methods.
Cons: the use of mixed method in a
research project in a particular could be
difficult to handle especially when one
researcher is involved in the study (in this
article there are two researchers). It is
complex; it is necessary to learn about
both qualitative and quantitative methods
and techniques in order to understand the
best way to mix them appropriately.
Major The research findings unveiled gender-biased The many complications to the relationship Results obtained from both quantitative
findings representations in the textbook analyzed. The between language and identity have been and qualitative analysis indicated
researchers found evidence that shows how unveiled by presenting relevant theories, significant gender variations between
the textbook appears to be systematically cases, and research. Saudi male and female EFL majors in
manipulated in favor of males, showing There is the need to approach language and interactive metadiscourse markers use.
females in comparatively dependent and identity from a psychological angle, oriented The major gender differences were
inferior positions. on individual thought patterns and processes, marked in the general usage of interactive
and as an addition to the predominant social markers.
focus. It has been proved that females are more
status-conscious than males. Accordingly,
they tend to use more standard precise
expressions such as metadiscourse
markers in their writings.
It was found that there was a significant
difference between the two genders in
terms of making use of interactive
metadiscourse markers namely transitions,
frame markers, code glosses.

You might also like