Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• Likewise some texts predicted that the sudras would become acquirers
of wealth.....
• Destruction of livelihood
R.S Sharma put forward his theory of the Kali age crisis which involved:
sharp social conflict
weakening of traditional brahmanical order
varnasamkara or mixing of varnas
migration of people due to oppressive taxes
and overall political and social upheaval
Kunal Chakraborty gives the example of Bengal where the local cult
practicing population was assimilated into the dominant brahmanical
framework.
He talks about the Kaivartas who were Shiva worshipers.
The rulers realized that the Kaivartas could not be assimilated by only
using sheer military force so the practice of Shiva worship was adopted
and patronized.
B.D. Chattopadhyaya therefore states that the passage from pre-caste to
caste society actually was a journey from pre- state to state society.
THE SHUDRAS
While discussing peasantization, a great
emphasis should be given to the
differentiation within the Shudra
community.
There was a phenomenal proliferation of
untouchability during the early medieval
period.
As tribes were not absorbed as one caste or
varna, we see the prevalence of abhira
brahmanas, abhira kshatriya and abhira
vaishya.
OCCUPATIONAL GROUPS
THAT EMERGED AS CASTES
with regional variations
not limited to just upper caste
such as Brahamans and kshatriyas
jetthaka
or pamukkha
head of a guild, exercised power
18 jatis or shrenis mentioned in jatakas
The word used for these artisans is narua. Untouchables are referred to
as karua, which includes- shoemakers, oilman, dyer, bronzeworkers,
darzis (tailors), bhilla, dhivara (fishermen), etc.
Sharma has cited several inscriptional
pieces of evidence to show as to how
artisans, craftsmen were attached to there were various crafts where the
the land that was granted. people involved in those crafts emerged
Restrictions imposed on the mobility as new jatis in the mixed caste group.
of the craftsmen is a distinctive We do get references to crafts villages
feature in this period, which such as the Kumbharapadraka that
can be seen in some of the estates of belonged to the potters.
chiefs and religious beneficiaries in
the countryside
One very significant development was the
growth of the Kayasthas.
B.D Chattopadhaya
Name Name
Presentations are
Presentations are Presentations are
communication tools that can be
communication tools that can be communication tools that can be
used as demonstrations,
used as demonstrations, used as demonstrations,
lectures, speeches, reports, and lectures, speeches, reports, and lectures, speeches, reports, and
more. Most of the time, they’re more. Most of the time, they’re more. Most of the time, they’re
presented before an audience. presented before an audience. presented before an audience.
Relative Position of the Vaishyas and Shudras in the
Early Medieval, Post Gupta Period: The Debate
1. Subjection of the Shudra Peasantry: As a result of the practise of land grants and the
rise of feudatories. This view does not take into account the deterioration in the
ranks of the Vaishya Peasants, whose status seems to have declined as a result of the
decline of long distance trade.
2. Improvement in the ranks of the Shudra Peasants: This view holds that the cultivating
Shudras ('New Shudras'), having newly acquired improved agricultural skills, were no
longer recruited as forced workers and hence, saw an improvement in their social and
economic positions.
This debate can be resolved if we get away from the
Dharmashastric descriptions of the so-called Shudra varna.
Early medieval social environment evolved with two long economic trends:
1. Sedentary Farmers
2. Communication and transportation of mobile tribes.
A new society was promulgated, Dharma and Moral authority in the society was
upheld by kings, Brahmanas and local landed elites.
But the Medieval texts on Dharma do not insists that a king must be a Kshatriya.
Brahmanas provided guidance to the Kings on matters like:
Dharma and its realization
Local rights of lands
Dynastic and Moral support for Dharma.
Brahmanas along with dynastic lineage leaders moulded the new social system.
Thus 'BRAHMANAS' were imperative catalysts, as people climbed the social
strata by supporting and emulating Brahmanas
Population expansion simultaneously expanded the population and authority of high
caste landowners.
Individualistic traditions made the ethnic demarcation of lands.
The expansion of kingship was slow and violent. The victims of this violence included
Brahmanas.
In this context the Warrior clan/ Kshatriyas expanded their influence rapidly through
agricultural advancements and military skills.
The segmentary state model presents a dual mode of sovereignty: corresponding to
Ksatra and Rajdharma.
The issue of Proliferation with these two varnas ultimately depended upon the 'Rule of
Dharma'
The castes were further classified with land grants being the key factors in this process.
A new form of Proliferation was executed within the Kshatriya clan
including the 'Rajput identity'. Thus it can be stated that the Proliferation
within the Kshatriya varna was caused by a collective term of Rajputs.
Major clans which played a dominant political role included : Pratiharas,
Chahamansa, Gujuras.
The question of indigenous origins of Rajputs gained significance in the
nationalist classification
The Rajput phenomenon in the Early Medieval must be assimilated in
terms of a process. Their emergence can be associated with economic
evolution in company with new administrative features like: Land
Distribution. Territorial systems.
The Social changes in this period were equally responsible for the changes and
dynamism within Brahmana and Kshatriya clans.
VAISHYAS
Facebook
@reallygreatsite
Twitter
@reallygreatsite
Instagram
@reallygreatsite