Inherent Safety Several experts in the area of inherent safety were give some examples. The genesis of the requests is asked by the PSP editors to define inherent safety and the known confusion about a very important subject.
Ó 2006 American Institute of Chemical Engineers
DOI 10.1002/prs.10179 Published online 1 November 2006 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com).
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Definition of Inherent Safety eration. Alternatively, an inherently safer system
To the Editor: would make the hazard less likely to be realized According to the 1996 Edition of the concept and less intense if there is an accident. book Inherently Safer Chemical Processes—A Life IS includes four basic strategies for engineers to Cycle Approach, published by Center for Chemical apply for process safety and risk management of Process Safety (CCPS): chemical manufacturing plants: substitution, mini- mization, moderation, and simplification. These ‘‘Inherent Safety is a condition in which the hazards four strategies could be independent ideas or they associated with the materials and operations used may relate to one another, depending on the case in the process have been reduced or eliminated, by case situation. There is no defined and agreed and this reduction or elimination is permanent and upon way to consider them in a formal analysis inseparable.’’ methodology. Engineers are encouraged to con- ‘‘Inherently Safer Design is a way of thinking about sider them to the extent possible, but given the in- the design of chemical processes and plants that focuses on the elimination or reduction of the haz- numerable situations where they may be applied ards, rather than on management and control.’’ there cannot be a rule on what is an adequate con- sideration of IS. Inherent Safety (IS) is a well-recognized process The CCPS published the concept book Inherently safety concept; a collection of basic strategies Safer Chemical Processes—A Life Cycle Approach, focused on process safety improvement through which was written to clarify IS and to help provide the reduction of hazards. ‘‘Hazard’’ is defined as a examples. Today it remains one of the leading practi- physical or chemical characteristic that has the tioners’ guides to understanding and applying inher- potential for causing harm to people, the environ- ent safety concepts. It is the leading reference men- ment, or property. The IS concept is based on the tioned in various regulatory actions and proposed belief that if one can eliminate or moderate the actions. hazard, not only is the risk reduced, it may also be possible to remove the risk altogether from consid- David Moore, PE, CSP President and CEO Ó 2006 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AcuTech Consulting Group DOI 10.1002/prs.10168 Alexandria, VA 22311 Published online 30 October 2006 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). dmoore@acutech-consulting.com
Process Safety Progress (Vol. 25, No.4) December 2006 263