Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ahmed Alhelaili
English 1201
Kari Carter
Introduction
There are two versions to the popular song ‘We Are The World’. The original was released
in 1985 as a charitable single for the famine in Africa. The video featured popular American
artists of the time and from previous eras coming together to perform the song in a video that
was shot intended to appear as a single live take. The primary message behind the video was to
signify unity among different artists from different backgrounds uniting for a good cause in order
to show their support for the issues in Africa. The initial title of the video established this quite
well when it displayed the ‘USA For Africa’ theme. The title of the collective itself (USA For
Africa) signifies solidarity for a good cause. The newer version of the song was known as ‘We
Are The World 25 for Haiti’. This newer version was released in 2010 commemorating the 25h
anniversary of the original version and to show support for another cause, this time for the issues
in Haiti. The video shows popular artists particularly young artists from the 21st century coming
together to show their support for Haiti, again symbolizing unity in diversity. Both the videos
follow a similar narrative and message while differing in terms of social context and how overtly
the message is being presented. For example, the original version had a very loosely organized,
ambitious visual display of unity in diversity, while the newer version had a highly organized
visual display of unity in diversity by having both younger and newer artists from different
The original 1985 version of the song ‘We Are The World’ seeks to show support for the
famine in Africa by displaying unified support from American artists. The 2010 version uses the
ANALYZING VISUAL TEXTS Alhelaili 3
same message but has an updated social context that is more visually demonstrative of racial,
The 1985 version of ‘We Are The World’ was a response effort to raising charts funds for
the starvation and famine in Ethiopia. Several popular musicians and figures in the entertainment
industry decided to put together er a collective of the most popular artists in the United States
under the name of United Support of Artists for Africa. The song included popular American
artists such as Stevie Wonder, Michael Jackson, Diana Ross and so on in order to highlight the
most popular entertainers for the time showing solidarity, support and unity for a collective
cause. The lyrical content of the song talks about unity, social equality, standing up for one
another in society, and environmental care. The theme of unity is presented in the music video by
presenting all of these popular artists standing together in one room and taking turns to perform
their parts in the song, and ultimately all singing together towards the end of the song. This a
symbolic reference to how unity can help solve crises such as the one Africa was facing, by
coming upward a solution to the problem together as one. This message targets the ‘pathos’
aspects of the audience by encouraging listeners to pay attention to the issues around them and to
realize the importance of unity in times of need. The visual narrative of the song has been laid
out quite clearly by showing the theme of unity, power in demonstration, and so on. The video
itself has been organized simply in order to highlight the simplicity of the message and how easy
it is to implement the message being conveyed in order to help society. The video also has
emphasis on showing the theme of equality in their visuals by making all the artists stand
ANALYZING VISUAL TEXTS Alhelaili 4
together in a shared space regardless of their personal characteristics, thereby prompting people
around the world to do the same in order to show support for the Ethiopian crisis. This appeals to
the ‘pathos’ aspect of the viewers. Another striking feature of the video is the introductory
symbol of a globe with the text ‘USA For Africa’ displayed over it, which again is a visual cue to
highlight equality, togetherness and other such factors appealing to the ‘pathos’ aspect of the
viewer. Such rhetorical cues are emphasizing the same message over and over in order to solidify
the image of it in the viewer’s minds. Another rather subtle aspect in the visual organization of
the video is the color scheme, which can be described as being ‘warm’ in order to strengthen the
The 2012 version follows a similar narrative of the original version. The basic theme of the
video is unity in diversity and showing artistic support. The cause and context that is being
depicted in the video however is entirely different. The context in this case is the earthquake that
hit Haiti. The video was recorded in order to provide charitable aid to the country. The narrative
shows popular artist from modern times coming together to depict unity and support for the
people of Haiti. Another important theme in this video that is absent from the first one is the
extent of visual focus on actual scenes from the area affected and a spoken intro narrative
explaining the crisis at hand. In this way, the makers of the video have extended their appeal to
both pathos, ethos and logos to a certain extent. The highlights from the disasters and its impact
appeal to the ethos aspect, the message and visual representation of the people who are suffering
has the appeal of pathos, and the spoken intro has the appeal of ‘logos’ to a certain extent. The
ANALYZING VISUAL TEXTS Alhelaili 5
narrative is similar to the original version but is different in the visual representation of the
message. The visual representation for actual scenes from the area of disaster is the main focus
of the rhetorical appeal of the video which targets an emotional response from the viewer in the
form of a ‘pathos’ appeal. The video shows the destruction caused by the earthquake, the loss of
life, the suffering of children and young adults on the streets, and the infrastructural damages to
property caused by the disaster. This is done while the song is playing and is alternated with
footage from the artists’ performance which helps set a contrast thereby highlighting the
Conclusion
The rhetorical appeal of the two videos is similar in terms of the message that they convey.
Both the videos use the factor of depicting togetherness by making the performers stand together
regardless of their personal background in order to symbolize unity. Both the videos call for
charitable action thereby making the intent behind the videos similar as well. Both the videos
seek to appeal to a wider range of audience by having. Multitude of performers and having quite
a universal theme and mode of expression that is not bound by sociological factors. However, the
videos are also starkly different as we have observed. The original version for the video solely
shows the artists who are performing, while the newer version shows the exact scenes from the
area that has been impacted in Haiti thereby having a more direct approach to the issue being
discussed. The newer version also has a spoken word intro to highlight the urgency and
importance of the issue, introducing the factor of being straightforward and direct with the point
being made. These are absent in the original version. In this way, the video search serves a
ANALYZING VISUAL TEXTS Alhelaili 6
different narrative and purpose and do a fine job of showing the message at hand visually and
rhetorically.
ANALYZING VISUAL TEXTS Alhelaili 7
References
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9BNoNFKCBI
We Are The World 25 for Haiti (2012). Artists for Haiti [Video]. YouTube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Glny4jSciVI