Professional Documents
Culture Documents
66.1 Introduction
Fig. 66.1 Concept of hybrid renewable energy system for an off-grid island [1]
and compared 10-, 20-, and 30-min averaged experimental data. In this study, they
showed that turbine performance analyzed by using 10-min time-averaged data is in
good agreement with the result of the numerical simulation. However, there are very
few studies concerning the optimization of the blade of small vertical-axis wind
turbines to improve the performance using the RSM as a designing tool.
The main focus of our work is to optimize the blade shape of an H-Darrieus rotor
of a small vertical-axis wind turbine to attain the maximum power coefficient using
the Response Surface Method for conditions with wind speeds under 4 m/s and TSR
2.6 conditions. A 1.5 kW vertical-axis wind turbine was installed on the Deokjeok-do
Island test bed in South Korea and was used as a reference model. The optimization
of the blade was the central goal of the Response Surface Method. The maximum
thickness location and the chord length were chosen as design variables for the
blade optimization in order to enhance the turbine power generation performance.
The objective function is the power coefficient, which is a dimensionless perfor-
mance factor that represents the ratio of turbine power as compared to the theoreti-
cal maximum power. The numerical analysis of the URANS was introduced in
order to obtain the power coefficient. Consequently, this work showed the optimum
model successfully improved the performance as compared to that of the reference
model.
66.2 Methodology
In the present study, the wind turbine for optimization is a 1.5 kW vertical-axis wind
turbine of the H-Darrieus type installed on the Deokjeok-do Island test bed in South
Korea. Figure 66.3 shows the shape of the turbine rotor and its performance curve.
The design blade section profile is NACA0015, and the blade height and chord
length of the turbine rotor are 3 m and 0.2 m, respectively. The rotational diameter
of the turbine rotor is 2 m. The cut-in speed of the turbine is 3 m/s, whereas the rated
wind speed and rotational speed are 13.5 m/s and 300 rpm, respectively.
Figure 66.4 shows the turbine altitude and an overall view of the test bed. An
anemometer and anemoscope are installed at the height of 10 m above the ground.
Fig. 66.3 Shape of wind turbine rotor (left) and turbine performance curve (right)
804 C.-K. Kim et al.
Fig. 66.4 Altitude of the wind turbine (left) and an overall view of system (right)
Fig. 66.5 Wind rose (left) and Weibull PDF curve (right) at the Deokjeok-do Island test bed
Fig. 66.6 Tip speed ratio (TSR) frequency at the Deokjeok-do Island test bed
prism meshes. The commercial code, SC/Tetra v13, has been employed in the pres-
ent numerical simulation. The boundary conditions at the inlet and outlet were given
to have a velocity of 4 m/s and the atmospheric pressure. The wall surface of the
computational the domain was given a slip wall condition allowing the consider-
ation of free flow, whereas the wall surface of the wind turbine was given a no-slip
condition. The shear stress transport (SST) model was employed as the turbulence
model [12] as it is well known to accurately predict the turbulence in most rotational
flows.
The Response Surface Method (RSM) was used as the optimization method. The
RSM is one of the design of experiment (DOE) methods to optimize the response
(output variable), which is affected by several independent variables (input vari-
ables). The response surface designs are useful for modelling quadratic surfaces.
Designed response surface cases can identify points within a design area that have
806 C.-K. Kim et al.
Fig. 66.7 Computational domain (left) and grid system around the turbine rotor (right)
a minimum or maximum response. The optimum design points can also be esti-
mated within the design range through the response surface.
In the present study, the objective function of RSM is considered to be the power
coefficient, and the independent variables are considered to be the maximum thick-
ness location and the chord length of the blade. The maximum thickness location
can determine the optimal thickness position for the given wind speed condition,
and the chord length can determine the optimal length for the TSR condition.
According to the Sandia report [13], the maximum thickness location was reported
to increase the lift coefficient at a position of 22.9% greater than of a reference
model under low wind speed conditions. In the present study, the maximum thick-
ness locations were 20%, 30%, and 40%, and the chord lengths were 100 mm,
200 mm, and 300 mm. The blade section profiles were generated using QBlade [14],
an open source program distributed by the Berlin TU. The response surface designs
are also shown in Table 66.1 and a total of nine design cases were evaluated using
the statistical program, JMP 13 [15].
66 Blade Optimization of a Small Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine Using the Response… 807
Figure 66.8 shows the results of the numerical model, as compared to the experi-
mental data. The numerical model was compared using the 10-min average wind
turbine power [3] with respect to wind speed conditions. The numerical simulation
and the experimental data show comparatively good agreement when comparing the
results. Therefore, the validated numerical model is applied to the numerical analy-
sis of the response surface design cases.
Figure 66.9 shows the power coefficient with respect to design cases obtained by
numerical simulations. The values of the power coefficient for all nine cases gener-
ated by the response surface design were calculated by applying the same numerical
method and boundary conditions as the reference numerical model. Using the power
coefficient results for each case, a response surface can be created that has the qua-
dratic surface as shown in Fig. 66.10. Here, the optimal design point is the indepen-
dent variable value at the maximum point of the response surface. Therefore, the
optimal design point has a maximum thickness location of 24% and a chord length
of 210 mm, within the response surface of the design area.
Fig. 66.8 Verification
result of numerical model
808 C.-K. Kim et al.
Fig. 66.9 Power coefficient results of nine cases by response surface design
Fig. 66.10 Prediction fit curve of two independent variables (left) and response surface result
(right)
66.3.3 C
omparison of the Reference Model and Optimum
Model
The optimum model was analyzed once again by using design variables determined
by the Response Surface Method. Figure 66.11 shows the results of comparing the
power coefficient according to the rotational angles of the reference model and the
optimum model. The minimum power coefficient of the optimum model increased
by 34.9% compared to that of the reference model, where the maximum power
coefficient increased by only 18.8%. Overall, the average power coefficient of the
reference model was 0.3063; however, the optimum model was 0.3453 which is an
improvement of approximately 12.7%. The vertical-axis wind turbine of the opti-
mum design point had a dramatic improvement under TSR 2.6 and 4 m/s wind
66 Blade Optimization of a Small Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine Using the Response… 809
Fig. 66.11 Positions of rotation angle at the min. Power coefficient (1970°) and the max. Power
coefficient (2040°)
66.4 Conclusions
(b) Vorticity
Fig. 66.12 Comparison of velocity magnitude and vorticity at position of minimum power coef-
ficient. (a) Velocity magnitude and streamlines. (b) Vorticity
validated using the 10-min averaged power-speed experimental data and showed a
good agreement. The blade optimization under 4 m/s wind speed and TSR 2.6 con-
ditions has been performed to determine two independent variables of optimum
design by RSM that creates the response surface of the output variable. Consequently,
the present study can be summarized as follows:
• The maximum blade thickness (%) and chord length (mm) were shortlisted as
two independent design variables and considered three different values for each
variable. Therefore, a total nine design cases were analyzed at TSR 2.6, and the
optimum design point was found on the response surface to improve the perfor-
mance of small vertical-axis wind turbines.
• The optimum design point had the maximum thickness location of 24% and the
chord length of 210 mm as determined by the Response Surface Method. From
the simulation results and the Response Surface Method, it successfully improved
the power coefficient of wind turbine by 12.7% in comparison to that of the refer-
ence model.
66 Blade Optimization of a Small Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine Using the Response… 811
(b) Vorticity
Fig. 66.13 Comparison of velocity magnitude and vorticity at position of maximum power coef-
ficient. (a) Velocity magnitude and streamlines. (b) Vorticity
• Through a comparison of both, i.e., the power coefficient curves and the flow
patterns, the increase of the power coefficient of the optimum model was consis-
tent with the decreasing tendency of vorticity flow and wake flow around the
blade. The optimum model has increased the power coefficient of the wind tur-
bine due to the reduction of turbine loss due to vorticity.
Acknowledgments This work was supported by the New and Renewable Energy Core Technology
Program of the Korean Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and
granted financial resources from the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Republic of Korea
(No. 20153010130310).
References
1. Kim CK, Lee SM, Jeon SY, Jang CM (2017) Analysis on the performance of micro hydro
turbine used for hybrid renewable energy system. In: 7th Asia-Pacific Forum on Renewable
Energy (AFORE) 2017
812 C.-K. Kim et al.
2. Ali S, Lee SM, Jang CM (2018) Statistical analysis of wind characteristics using WEIBULL
and Rayleigh distribution in Deokjoek-do Island-Incheon, South Korea. Renew Energy
123:652–663
3. Jang CM, Kim CK, Lee SM, Ali S (2018) Performance evaluation of a vertical axis wind
turbine using real-time measuring wind data. In: Transition towards 100% renewable energy.
Springer, Berlin, pp 187–195
4. Danao LA, Eboibi O, Howell R (2013) An experimental investigation into the influence of
unsteady wind on the performance of a vertical axis wind turbine. Appl Energy 107:403–411
5. Danao LA, Edwards J, Eboibi O, Howell R (2014) A numerical investigation into the influence
of unsteady wind on the performance and aerodynamics of a vertical axis wind turbine. Appl
Energy 116:111–124
6. Jaohindy P, McTavish S, Garde F, Bastide A (2013) An analysis of the transient force acting on
Savonius rotors with different aspect ratios. Renew Energy 55:286–295
7. Bazilevs Y, Korobenko A, Deng X, Yan J, Kinzel M, Dabiri JO (2014) Fluid-structure
interaction modelling of vertical-axis wind turbines. J Appl Mech Trans ASME
81:081006-1–081006-8
8. Deaves D, Lines I (1997) On the fitting of low mean wind speed data to the Weibull distribu-
tion. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodynamics 66:169–178
9. Islam M, Saidur R, Rahim N (2011) Assessment of wind energy potentiality at Kudat and
Labuan, Malaysia using Weibull distribution function. Energy 36:985–992
10. Mohammadi K, Alavi O, Mostafaeipour A, Goudarzi N, Jalilvand M (2016) Assessing differ-
ent parameters estimation methods of Weibull distribution to compute wind power density.
Energy Convers Manag 108:322–335
11. KMA (2018). http://data.kma.go.kr/. Accessed 23 Mar 2018
12. Menter FR (1994) Two-equation Eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applica-
tions. AIAA J 32:1598–1605
13. Robert ES, Paul CK (1981) Aerodynamic characteristics of seven symmetrical airfoil sections
through 180-degree angle of attack for use in aerodynamic analysis of vertical axis wind tur-
bines. Sandia National Laboratories Energy Report, California
14. Marten D, Wendler J (2013) QBlade guidelines v0.6
15. SAS Institute Inc (2017) JMP 13 design of experiments guide, 2nd edn. SAS Institute, Cary,
NC