Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ECON 370: Microeconomic Theory • We say a consumer Prefers bundle A to bundle B if:
– Assuming both are feasible
Summer 2004 – Rice University – And all else being equal (¡cēterīs paribus!)
Stanley Gilbert – She would choose bundle A instead of bundle B
1
Assumptions about Preferences Indifference Curves Cannot Intersect
Non-Satiation Convexity
x1 x1
Econ 370 - Consumer Preferences 7 Econ 370 - Consumer Preferences 8
2
Non-Convex Examples Comments about Assumptions
• Assumptions A1 & A2 are essential to our concept of
rationality
x2 • Preferences that also meet Assumptions A3 & A4 are
I1 I3 called Well Behaved.
– Non-Satiation
• This clearly does not apply in the real world
• We can usually get away with it because people will generally choose
a consumption bundle in the region where more is still better (Why?).
• Important exception: ‘Bads’
– Convexity
• There is no fundamental reason why preferences should meet this
I2 • Again, it is mathematically convenient
• It also turns out not to matter much if it is not met
x1
Econ 370 - Consumer Preferences 9 Econ 370 - Consumer Preferences 10
• Example
– Brand-Name v. Generic Flour
3
Perfect Complements Discrete Goods
• Tastes: • A commodity is infinitely divisible if it can be
– If consumer always consumes commodities 1 and 2 in fixed acquired in any quantity (water, cheese).
proportions,
– Then, commodities are Perfect Complements.
• A commodity is discrete if it comes in indivisible
– Only number of pairs of two commodities determines (cars, refrigerators).
preference rank-order of bundles.
• Indifference curves for discrete goods
• Indifference Curves: – Suppose commodity 1 is infinitely divisible (gas)
– “L-Shaped” Indifference curves – Suppose commodity 2 is discrete (cars)
• Example
– Coffee and sugar
x1 x1
Econ 370 - Consumer Preferences 15 Econ 370 - Consumer Preferences 16
4
MRS and Indifference Curves
• Two goods: IC has negative slope
– I.e., MRS < 0