Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I have not provided a stage/ separate time for the Romanian practice of “ascultare”. This practice is in fact discouraged as it
stands in the way of a good rapport (based on the principles of predictable behaviour, fairness and equal opportunity, among
other things), and because it is the worst type of assessment under the current circumstances. Since, as a rule, teachers in
Romanian state schools are expected to “produce” an established number of marks at a certain rate (I’ve heard some stories
about giving 3 marks per week at one class!!), many teachers do “ascultare” to keep their superiors happy. However, all
marking should be based on a thorough system of assessment for all four skills and all content that is taught over a certain
period of time (as, in fact, Programa scolara indicates). Each mark should be the result of an assessment based on a number
of criteria and, always, an assessment scale. Each marked assessment should be announced and prepared. If you only get to
give two marks per semester for each student, then those two marks should represent an accurate assessment of all four
skills and the content that is taught in that semester. (So not “Read this paragraph and translate…thank you, you’ve got an
8.”) Taking all this into consideration, formal assessment in view of marking should be planned as Assessment (See Type
of lesson in Information about the lesson), whether as part of a mixed lesson of Practice and Assessment, or just a lesson of
Assessment. And the same goes for any subject, not just English.