Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract. All articles must contain an abstract.The abstract text should be formatted using 10
point Times or Times New Roman and indented 25 mm from the left margin. Leave 10 mm space
after the abstract before you begin the main text of your article, starting on the same page as the
abstract. The abstract should give readers concise information about the content of the article and
indicate the main results obtained and conclusions drawn. The abstract is not part of the text and
should be complete in itself; no table numbers, figure numbers, references or displayed
mathematical expressions should be included. It should be suitable for direct inclusion in
abstracting services and should not normally exceed 200 words in a single paragraph. Since
contemporary information-retrieval systems rely heavily on the content of titles and abstracts to
identify relevant articles in literature searches, great care should be taken in constructing both.
Keywords: Metal Removal Rate (MMR), Analysis of variance (ANOVA), Response Surface
Methodology(RSM), Teaching Learning Based Optimization (TLBO), SS 316L
Introduction
The first paragraph of each section after a heading is not indented (Bodytext style).
Other paragraphs are indented (BodytextIndented style).
These guidelines, written in the style of a submission to J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., show the best layout for
your paper using Microsoft Word. If you don’t wish to use the Word template provided, please use the
following page setup measurements.
It is vital that you do not add any headers, footers or page numbers to your paper; these will
be added during the production process at IOP Publishing (this is why the Header and Footer margins are
set to 0 cm in table 1).
1.3.1. An example.In this example we can see that there are footnotes after each author name and
only 5 addresses; the 6th footnote might say, for example, ‘Author to whom any
correspondence should be addressed.’ In addition, acknowledgment of grants or funding,
temporary addresses etc might also be indicated by footnotes.
3.2. Numbering
Sections should be numbered with a dot following the number and then separated by a single space:
4. Footnotes
Footnotes should be avoided whenever possible. If required they should be used only for brief notes that
do not fit conveniently into the text.
5. Figures
Each figure should have a brief caption describing it and, if necessary, a key to interpret the various lines
and symbols on the figure.
5.6.1. Examples. The following examples show how to format a number of different figure/caption
combinations. Note that the table borders are shown as broken lines for guidance only.
6. Tables
Note that as a general principle, for large tables font sizes can be reduced to make the table fit on a page
or fit to the width of the text.
6.5. Examples
Because tables can take many forms, it is difficult to provide detailed guidelines; however, the following
examples demonstrate our preferred styles.
6.5.1. More complex tables. The following is a slightly more complex table with a caption that is
narrower than the table. Centre the caption across the width of the table. If it is difficult to
make a table fit the page, use a smaller font. Headings should normally be in Roman (i.e., not
bold or italic) type, have an initial capital and normally align left (but centred sometimes
looks better); it is up to the author to choose a layout that is most useful to the reader.
Columns of numbers normally align on the decimal point.
Table 4.A slightly more complex table with a narrow caption.
Wake Chi p Stage 1 Chi p Stage 2 Chi p
Sqr. (N=15, Sqr. (N=15, Sqr. (N=15,
df=1) df=1) df=1)
0.28 0.59
F3 1.143 5 0.286 3 0.286 0.593
0.28 0.79
Fz 1.143 5 0.067 6 0.067 0.796
0.10 0.43
C4 2.571 9 0.600 9 1.667 0.197
Table 5. A slightly more complex table with a caption that is the same width as
the table. Simply place the caption inside a row at the top of the table and
merge (combine) the cells together so that you have a single table cell the width
of the table. Justify the caption.
Wake Chi p Stage 1 Chi p Stage 2 Chi p
Sqr. (N=15, Sqr. (N=15, Sqr. (N=15,
df=1) df=1) df=1)
0.28 0.59
F3 1.143 5 0.286 3 0.286 0.593
0.28 0.79
Fz 1.143 5 0.067 6 0.067 0.796
0.28 0.78
Cz 1.143 5 0.077 2 0.286 0.593
7.2.1. Vectors. Bold italic characters is our preferred style but the author may use any standard
notation; for example, any of these styles for vectors is acceptable:
7.2.2. The solidus ( ‘/’ ).A two-line solidus should be avoided where possible; for example, use
1
1 S0
2
2
1 S
d
Ma 0 N
d 0
N
instead of M a
0
●
12
x2 y 2 x2 y2
x y x y .
● instead of
7.2.3. Roman and italic in mathematics. Variables should be in italic; however there are some cases
where it is better to use a Roman font:
● Use a Roman d for a differential d, for example, tan dy dx .
Use a Roman e for an exponential e; for example, y e .
x
●
● Use a Roman i for the square root of –1; e.g., i 1.
● Certain other common mathematical functions, such as cos, sin, det and ker, should appear in
Roman type.
● Subscripts and superscripts should be in Roman type if they are labels rather than variables or
characters that take values. For example in the equation
m g n Bm
m, the zcomponent of the nuclear spin, is italic because it can have different values whereas n is
Roman because it is a label meaning nuclear.
k (r) 2 exp ik r
23
(1)
A A A
32
( I 32 )
(2)
However, if equations will fit on one line, do so; for example, (5) may also be formatted as:
L
r 2 xdx r2 L
C 12 x x r 1 const 2 2 1 const 2 ln
L x r
L r (6)
7.3.2. Large display equations: examples. If an equation is almost the width of a line, place it flush
left against the margin to allow room for the equation number.
1
1 (h )2 [ E ( E v h )] 2
E
Y (h )
q [(h r )2 (h )2 ]2 ( 1 2 )2 (h )2
E EV 1
exp[( E E m ) kT ] 1
dE
[ E ( E v E )] 2
(7)
are preferred to e
i kx t z 2
should only be used with relatively simple expressions, e.g. 2 and a 2 b 2 , but in other cases
8. Appendices
Technical detail that it is necessary to include, but that interrupts the flow of the article, may be
consigned to an appendix. Any appendices should be included at the end of the main text of the paper,
after the acknowledgments section (if any) but before the reference list. If there are two or more
appendices they should be called appendix A, appendix B, etc. Numbered equations should be in the
form (A.1), (A.2), etc, figures should appear as figure A1, figure B1, etc and tables as table A1, table B1,
etc.
9. References
As part of the production system for Journal of Physics: Conference Series, online versions of all
reference lists will, wherever possible, be linked electronically using CrossRef. It isvitally important for
all the references to be accurate and to be carefully formatted using the guidelines below,
otherwise delays may be incurred and the references may not link through CrossRef.
A complete reference should provide the reader with enough information to locate the article concerned,
whether published in print or electronic form, and should, depending on the type of reference, consist of:
Points to note
● There should be a 5 mm gap between the reference number (e.g., ‘[8]’) and the start of the
reference text. Second and subsequent lines of individual references should be indented by
5 mm. For example:
[1] [1] Aderhold J, Davydov V Yu, Fedler F, Klausing H, Mistele D, Rotter T, Semchinova O,
Stemmer J and Graul J 2001 J. Cryst. Growth 222 701
● the authors should be in the form surname (with only the first letter capitalized) followed by the
initials with no periods after the initials. Authors should be separated by a comma except for the
last two which should be separated by ‘and’ with no comma preceding it.
● The article title (if given) should be in lower case letters, except for an initial capital, and should
follow the date.
● The journal title is in italic and is abbreviated. If a journal has several parts denoted by different
letters the part letter should be inserted after the journal in Roman type, e.g. Phys. Rev. A.Please
do not join the part letter to the volume number in bold type.
● Both the initial and final page numbers should be given where possible. The final page number
should be in the shortest possible form and separated from the initial page number by an en rule
‘– ‘, e.g. 1203–14, i.e. the numbers ‘12’ are not repeated.
● References to printed journal articles. A normal reference to a journal article contains three
changes of font (see table 6).
References
[2] A reference
This reference has two entries but the second one is not numbered (it uses the ‘Reference (no
number)’ style.
[3] Another reference
[4] More references
[ Sample ]
1. Introduction
Innovations and discoveries in metalworking have been vital, metalworking is the basic process of
shaping metal into different parts and assembling or creating metal structures. The demand for products
and production processes has been the driving factor behind developments in today’s cutting
technologies. The improved properties for the steel as greater corrosion resistance, high-temperature
strength and increased stiffness to serve specific purposes, have called for high importance on a suitable,
effective, and efficient machining process. The miniaturization of products and product components in
the submicron and nanometer level becoming a trend, while demands for micro and convoluted parts are
increasing, micromachining is becoming an important precision engineering technique.
In the non-traditional machining process, Electrochemical machining (ECM) has gained tremendous
versatility on its application. It will be one of the promising, successful and commercial utilized
machining processes in the recent manufacturing industries. A different process based on the
philosophical principle of electrochemical machining, which drives an important role in the
manufacturing of various parts, complex and large metallic pieces. It has a major advantage over other
machining processes such as no tool wear, stress-free machining, high MRR, bright surface finish and
the ability to machine complex shapes in hard material[8]. ECM is an anodic dissolution process where
anode and cathode, which are separated by an electrolyte.
1. Methodology
Changing parameters with respect to other functions results in a variety of choices for a given situation.
This function allows you to evaluate various choices to determine a better result. The main of
applications is a minimal cost, maximal profit, minimal error, optimal design and optimal management,
variational principles for all kind of algorithms especially evolutionary and particle swarm intelligence-
based algorithms needs controlling parameters like population size and several generations. In addition
to common control parameters, completely varying algorithms need their own algorithm and specific
control parameters. For illustration, Genetic Algorithm practices the mutation probability, the crossover
probability, the selection operator; PSO Depression uses weight, social and psychological factors;
Artificial Bee Colony algorithms use a wide variety of honeybees, used bees, scout bees and so on.
Similarly, the other algorithms like ACO, BBO, FPA, ALO, etc. need the turning of respective
algorithm-specific parameters. The exact setting of the algorithm-specific parameters is a crucial factor
which affects the performance of the above-mentioned algorithms. The improper setting of algorithm-
specific parameters either increases the computational effort or yields the local the optimum solution.
The teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm which does not require any algorithm-specific
parameters[1]. The teaching-learning- based optimization algorithmic program needs the common
controlling parameters such as population size and the number of generations for its operating. Teaching-
Learning Based Optimization Algorithmic Program Optimization has gained widespread recognition
among researchers
This optimization uses a population-based algorithm that replicates the teaching and learning process
of a specific region. This algorithm requires only the common control parameters like the population size
and therefore the number of generations and does not require any algorithm-specific control parameters.
The operating of Teaching Learning Based Optimization is categorized as one is the ‘Teacher phase’ and
second the ‘Learner phase’.
The stainless steel (316L) material is considered as the workpiece in this paper and it is used in marine
and medical applications[10]. Due to its various mechanical properties such as high antioxidant,
corrosion resistance and hardness, it plays a significant role in medical implants including pelvic screws,
screws and orthopedic implants such as total hip and knee replacement. There are many process
parameters that influence the machinability criteria of micro-ECM, this research deals with four main
processesparameter- voltage, Electrolyte concentration, Duty cycle and Temperature and output
parameters as Material Removal Rate.[3]. The Taguchi method was initially used to determine the
number of tests required for optimal process parameters and sample response functions. RSM has been
successfully used to correlate input process parameters and output responses of the selected object [5].
The mathematical model derived from the RSM was then used as an exercise function for TLBO
optimization. A schematic of the experiment was performed in a micro ECM machine as shown in below
picture and with a copper electrode and form tool of L shape and sodium chloride (NaCl) with glycerol
in distilled water as electrolyte for the experiment [6]&[9], the temperature of electrolyte is maintained at
constant temperature using temperature feedback system and machining is done on stainless steel
SS316L.
Figure 1: Micro-ECM step-up.
2. Design of Experiment
Taguchi method provides a simple, but well organized and structured approach to process optimal
parameters, which considerably reduces the number of tests required for model response functions [7]
and [8]. This is a method based on orthogonal array testing, which provides a much-reduced variation of
the test as a result of the optimal set of process control parameters. The major influencing parameters and
their levels are considered in the listed Table 1. The selection of the orthogonal array is based on the
number of process parameters and their levels. In this paper, the L9 orthogonal array is selected as given
in Table 2. The material removal rate has been calculated for each experiment. The formula to be
calculated for material removal rate are given below
Design of an appropriate orthogonal array matrix experiment and define the data analysis
In most RSM problems, the relationshipbetween the response and the independent variablesis
unidentified. Thus, the first step in RSM is to find asuitable approximation for the actual
relationshipbetween the response and the process parameters[4]. Thequantitative form of relationship
between the desiredresponse and independent input variables can berepresented as:
where y is the desired response, f is the response function (or response-surface), x1, x2, x3, …, xn are the
independent input variables, and is the fitting error. The appearance of the response function looks like a
surface curve while plotting the expected response. The identification of suitable approximation for f will
determine whether the application of RSM is successful. The necessary data for building the response
model is generally collected from the design of experiments. In the current research, the experimental
data were fitted into a two-factor interaction (2FI) regression model. The general form of 2FI model is:
where y,is the desired response, βirepresents the linear effect of xi, βij, represents the quadratic effect of
xi. They are cross-product terms that reveal a linear by-linear interaction between xiand yi. ε isa statistical
error term.Minitab software was used to obtain regression models for two responses separately:
MRR=-31.04-6.920*v+0.1364*e+2.959*t+1.907*d+0.2040*v*v-0.000275*e*e-0.03672*t*t-
0.02163*d*d;
Where,
The working of the TLBO algorithm, get us the metal removal rate. The objective function is to find
the values of a, b, c that increase the MRR function.
MRR=-31.04-6.920*v+0.1364*e+2.959*t+1.907*d+0.2040*v*v-0.000275*e*e-0.03672*t*t-
0.02163*d*d
Subject to,
18 < v <20
30 < e<50
35 < t <45
33 < d < 41
It’s time to signify the TLBO algorithm, by assuming a population size of nine experiment values in
table 2 (i.e., the total number of learners), and then four design variables v, e, t, d and one iteration as the
termination criterion. The randomly generated initial population is within the ranges of the variables and
the corresponding values of the objective function shown in Table 2. The mean values of v, e, t, and d
are also displayed in Table 3. Because this is a maximum function, the maximum value of the MRR is
considered the best learner (which is considered equivalent to the teacher). Now the teacher is trying to
improve the average end of class. Assuming random numbers are r 1 = 0.3 for a and r2 = 0.45 for b, r3=0.4
for c and r4=0.5 for d and Tf = 1, the difference mean values for a, b& c are determined as,
The value of difference means (v) is added to the entire values under the ‘V’ column and the value of
difference mean (e) is added to the entire values under the ‘E’ column and the value of differencemean
(t) is added to the entire values under the ‘T’ column and the value of difference mean (d) is added to the
entirevaluesunderthe‘D’columnoftable3andtable4displaysthenewvaluesofvoltage (v),electrolyte
concentration (e), temperature (t) and duty cycle (d) for the appropriate values of the objectivefunction.
Now, the initial population values of MRR are shown in Table 3 and the obtained values through
teachers phase in shown in Table 4 and the best values of MRR are examined which concludes the
teacher phase of the TLBO algorithm.
Table 4:New values of the variables and objective function based on fitness comparison.
Exp.N
V E T D MRR
o
1 18.3 30 37 35 13.947
6
2 18.3 40 42 39 16.635
2
3 18.3 50 45* 41* 17.398
0
4 19.3 30 42 41* 16.567
4
5 19.3 40 45* 35 15.453
2
6 19.3 50 37 39 18.211
5
7 20* 30 45* 39 16.275
3
8 20* 40 37 41* 18.506
9
9 20* 50 42 35 18.044
7
The learner phase starts and any one of the students can collaborate with any other student for transfer of
their knowledge. The correlations are made ina random manner the illustration, interactions between
learners 1 and 6, 2 and 4, 3 and 7, 4 and 6, 5 and 7, 6 and 2, 7
and6,8and3,and9and5aremeasured.Itmaybenotedthateverylearnermusthavetointeractwith
anyotherlearner.Forthisreason, inthisillustration, nine interactions were been considered (i.e., one
interaction for each learner). Table 5 shows the new values of v, e, t and d for the learners after the
interactions and considering the random numbers to be r1 = 0.2 for a, r2 = 0.45 for b, r3 = 0.35 for c and r4
=0.44for d.Inthiscase,thenewvaluesofv,e,t,dfor learner1arecalculatedasexplainedbelow.Asitisa
maximization function, the value of MRR is better for learner 5 as compared to that of learner 1 and
hencetheknowledgetransferisfromlearner5tolearner1.Hencethenewvaluesofv,e,t,dforlearner 1 is
calculatedas,
Now, the values of MRR of Tables 5 and 6 are compared and the best values of f(x) are consideredand
placed in Table 6. This completes the learner phase and one iteration of the TLBOalgorithm.It can be
noted that the maximum value of the objective function is shown in table 1 generated initial population
is 17.625 and it has been maximized to 19.1145 at the end of the first iteration. If we increase the
number of iterations and then the known value of the objective function can be obtained within the
next few iterations. By observing maximize function problems, the best value refers to the maximum
value of the objective function and the calculations in the teacher and learner phases have progressed
accordingly.
4. Results andDiscussion
Theexperimentisperformed,andoptimizationiscarriedoutofL9orthogonalandthemaximumMRR
isachievedfromTLBOis19.1145 from table 7.The effects of voltage, electrolyte concentration, and duty
cycle are plotted shows the significant increase in the MRR as shown in figure 3 (a, b d).
5. Conclusion
A new effort has been made to improve the interfering parameters in the micro ECM of stainless
steel316L using 485 μm copper electrode with L shape. It aims to get the best MRR possible. The
voltage, electrolyte concentration, temperature and duty cycle with three levels were the major
processing parameters in micro-ECM on SS316L. The mathematical model was obtained from RSM, and
the result of it was worn as a fitness function in TLBO. The results were exposed that the developed
mathematical models considerably improve the chosen objectives of obtaining better MRR. The use of
temperature maintaining is also given significant results, andbuffered electrolyte also gives a significant
increase in the MRR. The use of the L-shaped tool provides lots of possibilities to machine the SS316L
and that can be used in many medical types of equipment and aeronautical types of equipment.
Acknowledgment
This research was supported by the mechanical engineering department that was provided sona college
of technology, Salem.
References
[5] Rao RV 2016 Review of applications of the TLBO algorithm and a tutorial for beginners to
solvethe unconstrained and constrained optimization problems. Decision Science Letters 5 p130.
[6] BhattacharyyaB J and Munda 2003Experimental investigation into electrochemical
micromachining (EMM) processJournal of Materials Processing Technology 140 pp 287291.
[7] Mohan Sen HS and Shan 2005A review of electrochemical macro to microhole drilling
processesInternational Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture v 45 pp137152.
[8] Munda J Malapati M and Bhattacharyya B 2007 Control of micro-spark and stray-current effect
during EMM process Journal of Materials Processing Technology.
[9] Mukherjee R and Chakraborty S2012 Selection of the optimal electrochemical machining process
parameters using biogeography-based optimization algorithm’, The International Journal of
Advanced Manufacturing Technology Vol 64 No 5-8 pp 781-791.
[10] Thanigaivelan R Arunachalam RM and Drukpa P2010 Drilling of micro-holes on copper using
electrochemical micromachining International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Vol 61 Nos 9-12 pp 1185-1190.
[11] Senthilkumar C Ganesan G and Karthikeyan R 2013 Influence of input parameters on
characteristics of electro-chemical machining process International Journal of Applied Science and
Engineering Vol 11 No 1 pp 13-24.
[12] Chakradhar D Gopal AV Multi 2011 objective optimization of electrochemical machining of
EN31 steel by grey relational analysis Int. J. Model Optim 1 pp113-117.
[13] Hocheng HSunYHLinS.C and KaoPS2003 A Material Removal Analysis of Electrochemical
Machining Using Flatend Cathode Journal of Materials Processing Technology 140 pp 264-268.
[14] Periyakgounder Suresh Rajamanickam VenkatesanTamilperruvalathan Sekar Natarajan Elango
and Varatharajan Sathiyamoorthy Optimization of Intervening Variables in MicroEDM of SS
316L using a Genetic Algorithm and ResponseSurface Methodology.