Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Talia Hoggan Draft 2 Cra 965047 287193835 1
Talia Hoggan Draft 2 Cra 965047 287193835 1
Talia Hoggan
Vicki LeQuire
RC 2001-101
17 September, 2020
Over the past decade, the amount of American youths experiencing a mental illness has
risen significantly (American Psychological Association). This influx has led to an increase in
demand for greater acknowledgement, attention, and information on the subject of mental health.
There are various strategies that are advocated in hopes of helping the younger generation. Dr.
Kia Richmond, Ricki Ginsberg, and Haley Jacks are among those that argue for the
implementation of young adult books in schools, that include characters who experience
psychological problems. Kia Richmond, guest author of the article “Language and Symptoms of
Mental Illness in Young Adult Literature”, is the Director of the English Education program at
Northern Michigan University, teaching courses in English methods and young adult literature.
Ricki Ginsberg is an Assistant Professor of English Education at Colorado State University and
Haley Jacks was a CSU graduate student at the time their article, “ ‘You Consider Letting Go’:
Intersections of Mental Health and Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors in Popular Young
Adult Literature”, was written. Both articles were written by qualified authors. However, given
the subject is about young adults, the article authored by Kia Richmond utilizes rhetorical
strategies that are much more suited to a younger audience, allowing them to be more susceptible
and open to the idea of young adult literature being a helpful resource.
Hoggan 2
The purpose of both articles is to examine the benefits YA literature can have, such as
helping teens empathize with people who may suffer from mental health issues, and the negative
effects, like a potential contribution to the negative stigma surrounding the subject. The articles
cross-examine the pros and cons before ultimately emphasizing that the potential benefits
outweigh the opposition. Richmond’s article features simple language, quoting only brief phrases
or words from a plethora of modern young adult books. She writes no more than three pages,
with very few and clear sections. In contrast, Ginsberg and Jacks use much more formal and
scholarly language, writing 13 pages with a variety of complex sections and subsections. Though
the latter may seem more credible for these reasons, the first article is more likely to catch the
attention of the reader, who may be younger and therefore less educated, and persuade them in
One of the ways the authors attempted to connect with the reader was through young
adult literature itself, providing examples from various texts. This was meant to be a way to
evoke their emotions and see the relevance that YA characters can have. However, the two
articles go about this in very different ways. Richmond mentioned many novels briefly, stating
the problems the characters deal with and a few facts about the plot. She used bullet points to
describe the symptoms the characters experience, such as “being forgetful and disorganized,
racing or jumbled thoughts, increased irritability”. Many readers may be able to relate to these
symptoms, allowing them to further empathize with the characters. The opposing article chose to
discuss three novels in depth. They provided a relatively brief plot of all of the books and went
through all of the details and major plot points, an example being “At the end of the novel, when
This series of long summaries and analyses is more likely to lose the reader’s attention and
possibly upset them if they had been planning on reading one of the books mentioned.
Though it was established that Ginsberg and Jacks utilized scholarly language and facts
that may make them appear more credible, such as the use of the statistic they used to open the
article, there is a subtle subjectivity underlying certain claims they made. They stated these
claims as if they were facts, such as when they wrote that the book Go Ask Alice “portrayed
behavior’”. If the reader had actually read this book they would know that it is an actual diary
that was found after the owner had committed suicide. In this case, it was not written to portray
anything. It was written for personal use, and is thus unfair to make such a claim. If the reader
Richmond is able to draw a line between their factual research and their opinion:
“Research in psychology reports that there are many stereotypes about individuals with
mental illness; often, they are considered incompetent, dangerous, and responsible for their own
illnesses. If someone with a mental illness applies such beliefs to the self, that person can
develop lower self esteem, which can in turn affect how the individual behaves and feels.”
In this quote, we see Richmond’s line of thought as they state a fact, and then an opinion
based off of that fact that the reader is able to logically follow.
Though both of these articles were written by credible sources, the first article was
written in a style that is much more effective for its purpose. The simple language and structure
allows the reader to easily follow along with the author’s line of reasoning. The article by
Hoggan 4
Ginsberg and Jacks is less likely to persuade the audience, as they have a much more convoluted
structure, more complex language, and a slightly biased undertone at times that lessens their
credibility.
Hoggan 5
Works Cited
Ginsberg, Ricki, and Haley Jacks. “‘You Consider Letting Go:’ Intersections of Mental Health
and Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors in Popular Young Adult Literature.” The
eds.b.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=6&sid=e0e8f7e2-5e95-41e3-a3cc-ebd
e87f5af37%40pdc-v-sessmgr01.
Richmond, Kia. “Language and Symptoms of Mental Illness in Young Adult Literature.” DR.
www.yawednesday.com/blog/language-and-symptoms-of-mental-illness-in-young-adult-l
iterature.