. 17.

Under the current monitoring emphasis is laid only on the initial or current
expenses. After five years, little is done or monitored. Secondly, when money
has been allocated for a particular activity in a particular area, it is assumed that
the work in question has been done, and that it was sufficient. This ignores the
fact that either of the above assumptions could be wrong.

. 17. Under the current monitoring emphasis is laid only on the initial or current
expenses. After five years, little is done or monitored. Secondly, when money
has been allocated for a particular activity in a particular area, it is assumed that
the work in question has been done, and that it was sufficient. This ignores the
fact that either of the above assumptions could be wrong.

. 17. Under the current monitoring emphasis is laid only on the initial or current
expenses. After five years, little is done or monitored. Secondly, when money
has been allocated for a particular activity in a particular area, it is assumed that
the work in question has been done, and that it was sufficient. This ignores the
fact that either of the above assumptions could be wrong.

. 17. Under the current monitoring emphasis is laid only on the initial or current
expenses. After five years, little is done or monitored. Secondly, when money
has been allocated for a particular activity in a particular area, it is assumed that
the work in question has been done, and that it was sufficient. This ignores the
fact that either of the above assumptions could be wrong.

. 17. Under the current monitoring emphasis is laid only on the initial or current
expenses. After five years, little is done or monitored. Secondly, when money
has been allocated for a particular activity in a particular area, it is assumed that
the work in question has been done, and that it was sufficient. This ignores the
fact that either of the above assumptions could be wrong.
. 17. Under the current monitoring emphasis is laid only on the initial or current
expenses. After five years, little is done or monitored. Secondly, when money
has been allocated for a particular activity in a particular area, it is assumed that
the work in question has been done, and that it was sufficient. This ignores the
fact that either of the above assumptions could be wrong.

. 17. Under the current monitoring emphasis is laid only on the initial or current
expenses. After five years, little is done or monitored. Secondly, when money
has been allocated for a particular activity in a particular area, it is assumed that
the work in question has been done, and that it was sufficient. This ignores the
fact that either of the above assumptions could be wrong.

. 17. Under the current monitoring emphasis is laid only on the initial or current
expenses. After five years, little is done or monitored. Secondly, when money
has been allocated for a particular activity in a particular area, it is assumed that
the work in question has been done, and that it was sufficient. This ignores the
fact that either of the above assumptions could be wrong.

. 17. Under the current monitoring emphasis is laid only on the initial or current
expenses. After five years, little is done or monitored. Secondly, when money
has been allocated for a particular activity in a particular area, it is assumed that
the work in question has been done, and that it was sufficient. This ignores the
fact that either of the above assumptions could be wrong.

. 17. Under the current monitoring emphasis is laid only on the initial or current
expenses. After five years, little is done or monitored. Secondly, when money
has been allocated for a particular activity in a particular area, it is assumed that
the work in question has been done, and that it was sufficient. This ignores the
fact that either of the above assumptions could be wrong.

. 17. Under the current monitoring emphasis is laid only on the initial or current
expenses. After five years, little is done or monitored. Secondly, when money
has been allocated for a particular activity in a particular area, it is assumed that
the work in question has been done, and that it was sufficient. This ignores the
fact that either of the above assumptions could be wrong.

. 17. Under the current monitoring emphasis is laid only on the initial or current
expenses. After five years, little is done or monitored. Secondly, when money
has been allocated for a particular activity in a particular area, it is assumed that
the work in question has been done, and that it was sufficient. This ignores the
fact that either of the above assumptions could be wrong.

. 17. Under the current monitoring emphasis is laid only on the initial or current
expenses. After five years, little is done or monitored. Secondly, when money
has been allocated for a particular activity in a particular area, it is assumed that
the work in question has been done, and that it was sufficient. This ignores the
fact that either of the above assumptions could be wrong.

. 17. Under the current monitoring emphasis is laid only on the initial or current
expenses. After five years, little is done or monitored. Secondly, when money
has been allocated for a particular activity in a particular area, it is assumed that
the work in question has been done, and that it was sufficient. This ignores the
fact that either of the above assumptions could be wrong.
. 17. Under the current monitoring emphasis is laid only on the initial or current
expenses. After five years, little is done or monitored. Secondly, when money
has been allocated for a particular activity in a particular area, it is assumed that
the work in question has been done, and that it was sufficient. This ignores the
fact that either of the above assumptions could be wrong.

. 17. Under the current monitoring emphasis is laid only on the initial or current
expenses. After five years, little is done or monitored. Secondly, when money
has been allocated for a particular activity in a particular area, it is assumed that
the work in question has been done, and that it was sufficient. This ignores the
fact that either of the above assumptions could be wrong.
. 17. Under the current monitoring emphasis is laid only on the initial or current
expenses. After five years, little is done or monitored. Secondly, when money
has been allocated for a particular activity in a particular area, it is assumed that
the work in question has been done, and that it was sufficient. This ignores the
fact that either of the above assumptions could be wrong.
. 17. Under the current monitoring emphasis is laid only on the initial or current
expenses. After five years, little is done or monitored. Secondly, when money
has been allocated for a particular activity in a particular area, it is assumed that
the work in question has been done, and that it was sufficient. This ignores the
fact that either of the above assumptions could be wrong.
. 17. Under the current monitoring emphasis is laid only on the initial or current
expenses. After five years, little is done or monitored. Secondly, when money
has been allocated for a particular activity in a particular area, it is assumed that
the work in question has been done, and that it was sufficient. This ignores the
fact that either of the above assumptions could be wrong.
. 17. Under the current monitoring emphasis is laid only on the initial or current
expenses. After five years, little is done or monitored. Secondly, when money
has been allocated for a particular activity in a particular area, it is assumed that
the work in question has been done, and that it was sufficient. This ignores the
fact that either of the above assumptions could be wrong.

. 17. Under the current monitoring emphasis is laid only on the initial or current
expenses. After five years, little is done or monitored. Secondly, when money
has been allocated for a particular activity in a particular area, it is assumed that
the work in question has been done, and that it was sufficient. This ignores the
fact that either of the above assumptions could be wrong.

. 17. Under the current monitoring emphasis is laid only on the initial or current
expenses. After five years, little is done or monitored. Secondly, when money
has been allocated for a particular activity in a particular area, it is assumed that
the work in question has been done, and that it was sufficient. This ignores the
fact that either of the above assumptions could be wrong.
. 17. Under the current monitoring emphasis is laid only on the initial or current
expenses. After five years, little is done or monitored. Secondly, when money
has been allocated for a particular activity in a particular area, it is assumed that
the work in question has been done, and that it was sufficient. This ignores the
fact that either of the above assumptions could be wrong.

. 17. Under the current monitoring emphasis is laid only on the initial or current
expenses. After five years, little is done or monitored. Secondly, when money
has been allocated for a particular activity in a particular area, it is assumed that
the work in question has been done, and that it was sufficient. This ignores the
fact that either of the above assumptions could be wrong.

. 17. Under the current monitoring emphasis is laid only on the initial or current
expenses. After five years, little is done or monitored. Secondly, when money
has been allocated for a particular activity in a particular area, it is assumed that
the work in question has been done, and that it was sufficient. This ignores the
fact that either of the above assumptions could be wrong.