Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome resulting from structural or functional cardiac
disorders that impair the ability of the ventricles to fill or eject blood (Yancy, Jessup, Bozkurt,
et al., 2013). In the past, HF was often referred to as congestive heart failure (CHF),
because many patients experience pulmonary or peripheral congestion with edema.
Currently, HF is recognized as a clinical syndrome characterized by signs and symptoms of
fluid overload or inadequate tissue perfusion. Fluid overload and decreased tissue perfusion
result when the heart cannot generate cardiac output (CO) sufficient to meet the body’s
demands for oxygen and nutrients. The term heart failure indicates myocardial disease in
which impaired contraction of the heart (systolic dysfunction) or filling of the heart (diastolic
dysfunction) may cause pulmonary or systemic congestion. Some cases of HF are
reversible, depending on the cause. Most often, HF is a chronic, progressive condition that is
managed with lifestyle changes and medications to prevent episodes of acute
decompensated heart failure. These episodes are characterized by increased symptoms,
decreased CO, and low perfusion. These episodes are also associated with increased
hospitalizations, increased health care costs, and decreased quality of life.
HF may go undetected until the patient presents with signs and symptoms of
pulmonary and peripheral edema. Some of the physical signs that suggest HF may also
occur with other diseases, such as kidney injury and COPD; therefore, diagnostic testing is
essential to confirm a diagnosis of HF. Assessment of ventricular function is an essential
part of the initial diagnostic workup. An echocardiogram is usually performed to determine
the EF, identify anatomic features such as structural abnormalities and valve malfunction,
and confirm the diagnosis of HF. This information may also be obtained noninvasively by
radionuclide ventriculography or invasively by ventriculography as part of a cardiac
catheterization procedure. Differential identification of systolic and diastolic HF is important,
as treatment differs (Pinkerman et al., 2013). A chest x-ray and a 12-lead electrocardiogram
(ECG) are obtained to assist in the diagnosis. Laboratory studies usually performed during
the initial workup include serum electrolytes, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, liver
function tests, thyroid-stimulating hormone, complete blood count (CBC), BNP, and routine
urinalysis. The BNP level is a key diagnostic indicator of HF; high levels are a sign of high
cardiac filling pressure and can aid in both the diagnosis and management of HF. The
results of these laboratory studies assist in determining the underlying cause and can also
be used to establish a baseline to assess effects of treatment. Cardiac stress testing or
cardiac catheterization may be performed to determine whether coronary artery disease and
cardiac ischemia are causing the HF.
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers. Although the action of ARBs is different from that of
ACE inhibitors, they (e.g., valsartan [Diovan]) have similar hemodynamic effects and side
effects (Pinkerman et al., 2013). Whereas ACE inhibitors block the conversion of angiotensin
I to angiotensin II, ARBs block the vasoconstricting effects of angiotensin II at the
angiotensin II receptors. ARBs are prescribed for HF patients as an alternative to ACE
inhibitors
Beta-Blockers. Beta-blockers are also considered first-line therapy and are routinely
prescribed in addition to ACE inhibitors. These agents block the adverse effects of the
sympathetic nervous system. They relax blood vessels, lower blood pressure, decrease
afterload, and decrease cardiac workload. Betablockers, such as carvedilol (Coreg),
bisoprolol (Zebeta) and sustainedrelease metoprolol (Toprol XL), have been found to
improve functional status and reduce mortality and morbidity in patients with HF (Burchum &
Rosenthal, 2016). In addition, beta-blockers have been recommended for patients with
asymptomatic systolic dysfunction, such as those with a decreased EF, to prevent the onset
of symptoms of HF. The therapeutic effects of these drugs may not be seen for several
weeks or even months. Beta-blockers may produce a number of side effects, including
dizziness, hypotension, bradycardia, fatigue, and depression. Side effects are most common
in the initial few weeks of treatment. Because of the potential for side effects, beta-blockers
are started at a low dose. The dose is titrated up slowly (every few weeks), with close
monitoring after each dosage increase. Nurses educate patients about potential symptoms
during the early phase of treatment and stress that adjustment to the drug may take several
weeks. Nurses must also provide support to patients going through this symptom-provoking
phase of treatment. Because betablockade can cause bronchiole constriction, these drugs
are used with caution in patients with a history of bronchospastic diseases such as
uncontrolled asthma.
Digitalis. For many years, digitalis (digoxin) was considered an essential agent for the
treatment of HF, but with the advent of new medications, it is not prescribed as often.
Digoxin increases the force of myocardial contraction and slows conduction through the
atrioventricular node. It improves contractility, increasing left ventricular output. Although the
use of digoxin does not result in decreased mortality rates among patients with HF, it can be
effective in decreasing the symptoms of systolic HF and may help prevent hospitalization
(Pinkerman et al., 2013). Patients with renal dysfunction and older patients should receive
smaller doses of digoxin, as it is excreted through the kidneys. A key concern associated
with digoxin therapy is digitalis toxicity. Clinical manifestations of toxicity include anorexia,
nausea, visual disturbances, confusion, and bradycardia. The serum potassium level is
monitored because the effect of digoxin is enhanced in the presence of hypokalemia and
digoxin toxicity may occur. A serum digoxin level is obtained if the patient’s renal function
changes or there are symptoms of toxicity.
Intravenous Infusions. IV inotropes (milrinone [Primacor], dobutamine [Dobutrex])
increase the force of myocardial contraction; as such, they may be indicated for hospitalized
patients with acute decompensated HF. These agents are used for patients who do not
respond to routine pharmacologic therapy and are reserved for patients with severe
ventricular dysfunction. They are used with caution, as some studies have associated their
use with increased mortality (Ciuksza, Hebert, & Sokos, 2014). IV vasodilators such as
nitroprusside (Nipride), nitroglycerin, or nesiritide (Natrecor) may also be used in patients
with severe decompensated HF (Pinkerman et al., 2013). Patients usually require admission
to the intensive care unit (ICU) and may also have hemodynamic monitoring with a
pulmonary artery catheter or alternative technology (see Chapter 25). Hemodynamic data
are used to assess cardiac function and volume status and to guide therapy with inotropes,
vasodilators, and diuretics (Urden, Stacy, & Lough, 2014). Patients with end-stage HF who
cannot be weaned from IV inotropes may be candidates for continuous therapy at home
(Ciuksza et al., 2014).
Nutritional Therapy. Following a low-sodium (no more than 2 g/day) diet and avoiding
excessive fluid intake are usually recommended, although studies differ regarding the
effectiveness of sodium restriction (Yancy et al., 2013). Decreasing dietary sodium reduces
fluid retention and the symptoms of peripheral and pulmonary congestion. The purpose of
sodium restriction is to decrease the amount of circulating blood volume, which decreases
myocardial work. A balance needs to be achieved between the patient’s ability to comply
with the diet and the recommended dietary restriction. Any change in diet should consider
good nutrition as well as the patient’s likes, dislikes, and cultural food patterns. Patient
adherence is important because dietary indiscretions may result in severe exacerbations of
HF requiring hospitalization (Chung, Lennie, Mudd-Martin, et al., 2015). However, behavioral
changes in this area are difficult for many patients (see Chart 29-3).