Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Organic Society
Rome had its ‘corporations’, by which is meant guilds or syndicates of
craftsmen, not to be confused with the present wider usage of the term to
describe a business enterprise. (Hence when the Left refers to ‘corporatism’
as the capitalist form of political domination, it is another corruption and
befuddling of terminology). Each craft guild had its patron god. In the West,
culminating in the Gothic epoch, the guilds of craftsmen and burghers had
their patron saints. Religiosity infused the guilds as it did the rest of society.
We have been told since the Renaissance epoch, when the name ‘Gothic’ was
coined as a pejorative for the highest epoch of the West – that this was an era
of superstition, ignorance and repression, from which have been
‘progressively’ liberated by the Reformation, the Renaissance, Cromwell’s
parliamentarianism, 1776, Jacobinism, ‘The Declaration on the Rights of Man
and the Citizen’, 1848, The Communist Manifesto, ‘The Fourteen Points’, ‘The
Atlantic Charter’, the ‘United Nations Declaration on Human Rights’, and
other such excrescences, each of which has been a ‘progressive’ step away
from the traditional nexus that holds an organic society together, bringing us
closer to the creation of the global Homo economicus.
Guilds
In 1943 Father Denis Fahey, when he was a very influential theologian,
translated Professor G. Kurth’s (1847-1916) Workingmen’s Guilds of the
Middle Ages. Fahey was one of the last significant exponents of traditional
social doctrine in the Church, and will be recalled by some readers for his
authorship of what became an Old Right classic, The Rulers of Russia. Kurth,
a Belgian scholar of international repute for his works on Medieval life, wrote
in the introduction that every century in Christendom other than his own had
benefited from the Catholic institution of the guilds. ‘These magnificent
associations were the glory and the strength of the workers of humble means,
and flourished wonderfully throughout the Middle Ages’:
Every century has benefited by them, with the single exception of our own.
The nineteenth century alone has seen workingmen isolated from one another,
with no bond between them, reduced to the condition of grains of dust blown
about by the wind, and finally falling into an undeserved state of misery and
misfortune. What was the reason of this? Because the French Revolution in its
furious hatred of religion wanted to destroy everything that religion had
created, and the guilds were the first victims of that lust of destruction. All
workingmen ought to know and detest the Chapelier Law of June 14–27, 1791,
of which the first article runs as follows: ‘As one of the fundamental principles
of the French Constitution is the annihilation of every kind of guild for citizens
of the same status or profession, it is forbidden to re-establish them, under
any pretext or in any form whatsoever.’2
What the proletariat (itself a new class of the uprooted and alienated former
burghers, craftsmen and peasants, pushed into slums to work as factory
fodder) got instead was class struggle and trades unionism. As Spengler
stated, this Leftism was an attempt to seize capital from the new money class,
to become the next owners of capital, according to Marx’s historical dialectic;
not to transcend capital, which would have required a restoration of faith,
village, guild and craft. Any such restoration Marx regarded with
unrestrained outrage. He condemned such ‘reactionism’, in The Communist
Manifesto, as a movement that had arisen as an alliance among clergymen,
noblemen, and what remained of craftsmen who looked to a revival of the
guilds. It was ‘reactionism’ because it threw a spanner in Marx’s dialectical
‘wheel of history.’
The French Revolution had destroyed the social foundations of craft industry
and agriculture in the name of ‘the people’. Indeed, the Jacobin answer to the
peasant revolt in the Vendée region was one of annihilation. Trade unionism
the following century was a poor substitute, attempting to catch scraps from
the table of commerce, in conflict with the class that Jacobinism and other
revolts and reformations before and since, animated from the ruins of the
traditional order: the bourgeoisie. Behind the class conflict stood undetected
the plutocrats and oligarchs, who had more than any other been restrained by
the Church with its teachings against usury. Here again, the Reformation has
much for which to answer in the name of ‘freedom’: the Protestant states
tended to ‘liberate’ the usurer. Protestant theology on commerce and banking
undermined Catholic teaching not only against usury, but against the ‘just
price’, and the labourer being ‘worthy of his hire’. Protestant clergy defended
usury against the Church’s traditional teaching that ‘money should not beget
money’. This was an axiom of many traditional societies across time and
place.3
It may be truthfully said that that law constituted the most abominable crime
ever committed against the interests of the workingman during the nineteen
hundred years of Christianity. Nearly all the misfortunes of the modern
worker have arisen from the fact that, when large-scale industry took its rise,
he found himself deprived of the numberless resources with which guild
organization would have furnished him, to prevent economic decay.6
Kurth, writing of the guilds with the hope that they would be restored in the
modern era, stated:
Since the French Revolution, owing to the decay of the sense of solidarity in
the Mystical Body [of Christ] and the suppression of the guilds, men have
come to think of life as a battlefield where the weak are destined to become the
victims of the strong. They call this the struggle of existence. These sinister
notions have nowhere wrought such havoc as in the realm of industry.
Competition has there become the sole rule and every man tries to produce at
the cheapest in order to sell at the cheapest: for thus all his rivals are crushed.
Everybody now realizes that to achieve this happy result either the workers’
wages must be lowered or the public must be cheated in regard to the quality
of the goods. In the Middle Ages people thought differently. They believed
men were made for mutual assistance not for mutual cannibalism. Their first
concern was that the worker might be able to live honourably on the product
of his labour, and that the public might be loyally served for their money. To
this end every necessary means was adopted to prevent that unbridled
competition through which some become unduly rich by exploiting their
fellowmen, and reducing multitudes of them to misery.9
Other socialists towards the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th
centuries, recognized the inadequacy of the Left in regard to capitalism.
Sorelian Syndicalists found common ground with the Catholic-royalists of
Action Francaise in detesting the legacy of the 1789 Revolution, and both saw
in corporatism the means of establishing the organic society. Henri De Man,
the leader of the Belgian Labour party, and Marcel Déat, a leader of French
socialism, were among the leaders of the Left who joined with the Right in a
synthesis that aimed to transcend capitalism in all respects.11
The Right never was a manifestation of capitalism. In France the Left, led by
alienated bourgeois intelligentsia and funded by oligarchs, agitated mobs to
destroyed the remaining vestiges of the organic social order, and inaugurated
Free Trade as a constitutional principle. Only the Right has ever represented
a resistance to money-interests, and those on the Left who have realized this
have come to the Right to restore pre-capitalist organic social bonds. When
journalists, academics, and other mental defectives describe Liberal parties as
‘right-wing’ and even ‘extreme Right’, and governments enacting economic
privatization as being ‘Right-wing’ and ‘conservative’, this is pure bunk,
subverting, distorting and retarding the true Right – the only actual revolt
against materialism and decay.
Footnotes
3 K. R. Bolton, Opposing the Money Lenders (London: Black House Publishing, 2016), pp. 3–4.
4 https://web.archive.org/web/20170331171416/http:/thermidormag.com/engelbert-dolfuss-and-the-tragedy-of-
inter-war-austria/
5 Samule Gregg, Becoming Europe (New York: Encounter Books, 2013), p. 83.
11 Zeev Sternhell, Neither Left Nor Right: Fascist Ideology in France (Princeton University Press, 1986). Sternhell,
an Israeli scholar, provides an objective, detailed account of the crisis in Marxism in France and Belgium that saw a
convergence of Socialist revisionists and Rightists. Revolutionary syndicalists and traditional corporatists were
among those who found common ground in opposing liberalism and capitalism.
KERRY BOLTON
Kerry Bolton
Share This
Brian Thorn
6th October 2018 at 6:43 pm
Dr. Bolton,
An excellent article. Have you seen Peter Kolozi’s Conservatives against Capitalism?
Although the author writes from a leftist perspective, the book contains much of
interest to conservatives who oppose capitalism.
Thank you for your writings! B. Thorn
Reply
Kerry Bolton
7th October 2018 at 10:59 pm
Reply
Leave a Reply
The comment section of Arktos Journal will be regulated by standards consonant to the principles of the
project itself. Our general rules are as follows:
I. Comments will not be moderated on the basis of the opinions expressed (controversy is welcome),
but rather on their quality.
II. Contributors are requested to obey the rules of civility, without which all discourse is null, and to
avoid crude personal attacks. Wit is welcome, but argument, and not insult, will be the expected
means of refutation.
IV. Contributors are invited to check their contributions for general grammatical correctness
(allowances will obviously be made for second-language speakers) and logical cohesiveness.
As a general guideline, all contributors should imagine that they are speaking their minds aloud in a
public space, unhindered by political correctness but bound to the older standards of honour and
decency in speech.
Name * Email *
Website
Comment
Post Comment
Related Posts