Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LEARNING ACTIVITY
1
Name : ______________________________ Grade / Score : _______________
Year level : ___________________ Course : _______________
Subject : _Consumer Behavior______ Date : __12/3/2020___________
Type of Activity (Check or choose from below)
Concept Notes Laboratory Report Formal Theme
Others:
Skills: Exercise / Drill Illustration Informal Theme
____________
Discussion:
Expectancy-Value models
Expectancy-value models are analytical processes that explain how consumers form and
change attitudes based on (1) the beliefs or knowledge they have about an object or action and
(2) their evaluation of these particular beliefs.
The expectancy-value model known as the theory of reasoned action (TORA) provides and
expanded picture of how, when, and why attitudes predict consumer behavior, particularly in
the US.
The TORA model proposes that behavior (B) is a function of a person’s behavioral intention (BI),
which in turns determined by (1) the person’s attitude toward the act and (2) the subjective
norms (SN) that operate in the situation. Consistent with most expectancy-value models,
attitude toward the act is determined by the consumer’s beliefs about the consequence of
engaging in the behavior and the consumer’s evaluation of these consequences. Subjective
norms are determined by the consumer’s normative beliefs – or what the consumer thinks
someone else wants him or her to do – and the consumer’s motivation to comply with this
person.
Here we explore how marketing communications can affect consumers’ cognitively based
attitudes when the processing effort is extensive.
Communication Source
Among consumers who process information extensively, those with attitudes based in
cognitions are likely to be influenced by believable information. This means that marketing
messages must be credible to generate support arguments, restrict counterarguments and
source derogations, and increase belief strength. Several factors, including source credibility
and company reputation, enhance the credibility of a message.
Source Credibility
The Message
Just as consumers evaluate whether or not the source is credible when their processing effort is
high, they also evaluate whether or not the message is credible. Three factors affect the
credibility of a message: the quality of its argument, whether it is a one-sided or two-sided
message, and whether it is a comparative message.
Argument Quality. One of the most critical factors affecting whether a message is credible
concerns whether it uses strong arguments. Strong arguments present the best features or
central merits of an offering in a convincing manner.
Comparative Messages
Comparative messages show how much better the offering is than a competitor’s. Two types of
comparative messages have been identified. The most common type is the indirect
comparative message, in which the offering is compared with those of unnamed competitors
(such as “other leading brands” or Brand X”). This strategy can improve consumers’ perceptions
of a moderate-share brand relative to other moderate-share brands (but not to the market
leader).
Marketers are interested not only in how attitudes are formed and can be changed but also in
knowing whether, when, and why attitudes will predict behavior. These are some of the factors
that affect whether a consumer’s attitudes will influence his or her behavior.
LEARNING ACTIVITY
2
Name : ______________________________ Grade / Score : _______________
Year Level : ___________________ Course : _______________
Subject : _Consumer Behavior______ Date : _5/28/2020________________
Type of Activity (Check or choose from below)
Concept Notes Laboratory Report Formal Theme Others:
Skills: Exercise / Drill Illustration Informal Theme ____________
Activity Title :
Learning Target :
References :
(Author, Title, Pages) :
Activity:
COMPILATION OF
LEARNING ACTIVITY
SHEET
Consumer behavior
PREPARED BY:
Prof. Edelita g. Lazaro