Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HL and SL: I hour, 15 minutes to hand write one essay and upload to exam.net.
Select one of the following texts and write an essay analyzing it.
TEXT ONE: “If violence isn’t the way to end racism in America, then what is?” opinion piece
by Arwa Mahdawi, July 2020
TEXT TWO: “Tub,” a PSA by Colenso BBDO for Pedigree, 2017
Additional instructions:
● Be sure to write and sign the honor pledge on page one of your written work:
○ On my honor, I pledge that I will neither give nor receive improper assistance
in completing this task.
● Write your name and teacher’s name on page one.
● Number all your pages.
TEXT ONE: “If violence isn’t the way to end racism in America, then what is?” opinion piece by
Arwa Mahdawi, July 2020
But if violent unrest isn’t the answer then what is? How exactly do you go about ending police
brutality and systemic racism in America? Should protesters go home and write sternly
worded letters to their representative? Should they emulate Madonna and post videos of
their kids dancing in protest? Should they peacefully take a knee? Should Americans simply
vote Trump out and vote Joe Biden in instead? You know, the guy whose 1994 crime bill
significantly contributed to mass incarceration in America? Should people patiently wait for
incremental change?
“A riot is the language of the unheard,” Martin Luther King Jr said in a 1967 speech that is
currently reverberating through social media for obvious reasons. “And what is it that
America has failed to hear? It has failed to hear that … the promises of freedom and justice
have not been met. And it has failed to hear that large segments of white society are more
concerned about tranquility and the status quo than about justice, equality and humanity.”
That speech was 53 years ago and America still isn’t listening. The uncomfortable truth is
that, sometimes, violence is the only answer left. We like to pretend otherwise, which is why
civil rights movements are often conveniently sanitized. The women’s suffrage movement, for
example, is often celebrated as “non-violent”. It wasn’t: if went through a very militant phase.
“If men use explosives and bombs for their own purpose they call it war,” the British
suffragette Christabel Pankhurst wrote in 1913, “and the throwing of a bomb that destroys
other people is then described as a glorious and heroic deed. Why should a woman not make
use of the same weapons as men?”
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not glorifying violence – that’s what the president of the United
States is doing. And I’m certainly not calling for violence. I’m simply saying we must
interrogate what we call “violence” and what we call “policy.” Many of the people yelling
“violence is not the answer” about the riots in Minneapolis are the same people who
wholeheartedly support America’s endless wars. Many of the people condemning the looters
in Minneapolis are the same people who venerate billionaires. Loot a TV and you’re a
dangerous criminal; loot a country and you’re an enterprising capitalist.
America has no problem with riots or looting as long as it’s the “right” people doing it. And
we’re all forced to pay for this worldview: American taxpayers have paid an average of
$8,000 each and over $2tn in total for the Iraq war alone, according to a January report from
the Brown University Costs of War project. Which raises the question: if violence is never the
answer, then why does America spend so much money on it?
TEXT TWO: “Tub,” a PSA by Colenso BBDO for Pedigree, 2017
How does the creator use specific authorial choices (specific devices and language) in this visual text to
deliver a particular message?
GRADING, based on Paper 1 rubric
below expectations (0-3) A: Understanding and exceeds expectations (5)
interpretation
D: Language