Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IN CHLORIDE ENVIRONMENTS
R . Viswanathan
Electric Power Research I n s t i t u t e , Pa10 Alto, Ca 94303
J . E. Wittig
Stanford University, Menlo Park, Ca 94305
a nd
B. C. Syrett
Electric Power Research I n s t i t u t e , Palo Alto, Ca 94303
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
DISCUSSION
The e f f e c t of temperi ng temperature on the corrosion fatigue behavior observed in
the study i s generally in line with t h e behavior of high strength s t e e l s and can
be rationalized in terms of differences in y i e l d strength. In t h e case of f a t i g u e
r e s i s t a n c e in a i r , t h e higher yield strength material (tempered a t 538•‹C) has
higher fatigue strength due to higher resistance t o crack nucleation. In
corrosion fatigue on the other hand, t h e high strength steel i s more s i g n i f i c a n t l y
degraded than t h e lower strength s t e e l tempered a t 650•‹C. Here, t h e crack
nucleation process i s f a c i l i t a t e d by t h e rapid i n i t i a t i o n and growth of p i t s and
corrosion fatigue behaviour i s controlled by the crack growth r a t e . The p i t s
provide local s t r e s s concentration and the occluded solution c e l l chemistry t h a t
favor corrosion fatigue crack propagation. Results of a companion study has
demonstrated that the p i t t i n g s u s c e p t i b i l i t y of the materials tempered a t 538 and
a t 650•‹C i s essential l y independent of tempering temperature i n several chl oride
environments including the 6 wt% FeC13 solution used in the present corrosion
f a t i g u e studies2. This supports the belief t h a t the differences in corrosion
f a t i g u e strength between the samples tempered a t 538 and 650•‹C can be a t t r i b u t e d
primarily t o differences in crack growth r a t e s . This i s consistent with the
r e s u l t s of Crooker, Bogar and cures4 which show that in precracked specimens t h e
r a t e of fatigue crack growth increases with increasing strength level in 17-4 PH
s t a i n l e s s steel in a i r and in seawater environments.
The e f f e c t s of shot peening on corrosion f a t i g u e are somewhat d i f f i c u l t t o
i n t e r p r e t . The f a c t t h a t adverse e f f e c t s of peening seem t o be present a t s t r e s s
1eve1 s be1 ow 280 MPa only in the samples tempered a t 650•‹C could be associated
with t h e presence of untempered martensi t e since only these samples would contai n
reformed austenite which woul d transform t o untempered martensite on peening.
Other potential e f f e c t s of peening, namely creation of surface compressive
s t r e s s e s and surface roughening would be expected t o be the same i n a1 1 samples
independent of tenperi ng temperature. However, t h e precise role of t h e untempered
martensite in the surface layers, on t h e corrosion fatigue i s d i f f i c u l t t o
understand especially in the l i g h t of t h e companion study on p i t t i n g i n which i t
was de~nonstrated t h a t t h e pitting resistance was independent of tempering
temperature f o r samples in e i t h e r the as tempered or shot peened conditions. A
f u r t h e r c m p l i c a t i o n in t h e i n t e r p r e t a t i o n of t h e e f f e c t s of shot peening i s t h a t
a t high s t r e s s l e v e l s shot peening seems t o be beneficial. I t i s possible t h a t
t h e observed e f f e c t s of peening a r e merely due t o s c a t t e r i n the d a t a . Additiona
t e s t s are needed before f i rm conc1usions can be drawn regarding the e f f e c t s of
shot peening.
I t seems appropriate t o discuss the relevence of the present r e s u l t s t o conditions
t h a t might actually e x i s t in low pressure turbines. While i t i s true t h a t a 6 wt%
FeC13 solution i s a r e l a t i v e l y aggressive environment, i t i s not t o t a l l y untypical
of turbine environments. Analysis of deposits from numerous 1ow pressure turbines
have shown t h a t the average concentration of chlorides can be 5% in turbines
connected to once-t hrough boilers5. Maximum concentrat ions of chlorides as hi gh
.
as 45% have also been observed 5 An interesting comparison can also be made
between the r e s u l t s in 6 w t % FeC13 and other r e s u l t s recently obtained by
Westinghouse investigators4 in 22% NaCl environments, as shown in Table 4. The
degradation of fatigue strength due t o the corrosive environment i s expressed in
the table as the r a t i o of the f a t i g u e strength i n t h e t e s t environment t o t h a t in
the reference environment. In the Westinghouse t e s t s , deionized water was chosen
as t h e innoccuous medium t h a t served as the reference condition. Although the
Westinghouse t e s t s were conducted a t a s l i g h t l y higher temperature ( a t 80•‹C) than
i n t h e present study, canparison of the r e s u l t s can s t i l l be made in terms of t h e
degradation f a c t o r . The degradation in fatigue strength i n f e r r i c chloride
observed in t h i s study i s comparable t o t h a t obtained in t h e 22% NaCl solution
under acidic conditions. Local ized conditions of high chloride ion concentrat ions
and low pH can e x i s t i n the dry-wet t r a n s i t i o n stages of low pressure turbines and
reductions in the fatigue strength of blades of t h e magnitudes discussed here a r e
not, therefore, u n r e a l i s t i c . Results described in Table 4 also suggest t h a t the
r o l e of the corrosive environment during corrosion fatigue may t o a large degree
be t h a t of i n i t i a t i n g a "notch" since fatigue strength degradation due t o a
mechanical notch (kt=2.5) i s comparable t o t h a t due t o corrosion.
CONCLUS I ONS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
Tempering Temperature
of Specimen Frequency, Hz Cycles to F a i l u r e
538•‹C P
Table 4 - Reduction in Fatigue Strength of 17-4 PH S t e e l , Tempered a t
650•‹C Due t o Various Chloride Environments
Deionized water,
80•‹C
22% NaCl, deaerated,
80•‹C pH=4
22% NaCl, aerated,
80•‹C pH-4
22% NaCl, deaerated,
80•‹C pH=7
22% NaCl , deaerated,
80•‹C pH=lO
Deionized water, 210*
80•‹C Notched Bar
770 A 620
2
V 650
V
Q)
0,
700 0 677
u
(I)
(I)
E
;j 630 -
560 -
490
1o4 105 106 107 I08
Number of Cycles to Failure
Figure 3. Fatigue (S-N) curves for 17-4 stainless steel samples tested in
air and in 6 wt% FeCI3.
magnification 20OX