Professional Documents
Culture Documents
V.
XVII.
What is the effect of preterition ? (1%)
(B) It annuls the institution of heir On March 30, 2000, Mariano died intestate and
was survived by his wife, Leonora, and children,
(C) It reduces the devise and legacy Danilo and Carlito. One of the properties he left
was a piece of land in Alabang where he built
(D) It partially annuls the institution of his residential house.
heir
1
I.
No, the contention of Carlito is not tenable. In
the case of Patricio v. Dario,2 with similar facts Alden and Stela were both former
Filipino citizens. They were married in the
to the case at bar, the court ruled that to
Philippines but they later migrated to the
qualify as beneficiary of the family home the
United States where they were naturalized as
person must be among those mentioned in American citizens. In their union they were
Article 154, he/she must be actually living in the able to accumulate several real properties
family home and must be dependent for legal both in the US and in the Philippines.
support upon the head of the family. While Unfortunately, they were not blessed with
Lucas, the son of Carlito satisfies the first and children. In the US, they executed a joint will
second requisites, he cannot however, directly instituting as their common heirs to divide
claim legal support from his grandmother, their combined estate in equal shares, the five
Leonora because the person primarily obliged siblingsand of Alden the seven siblings of
to give support to Lucas is his father, Carlito. Stela. Alden passed away in 2013 and a year
Thus, partition may be successfully claimed by later, Stela also died. The siblings of Alden
Leonora and Danilo. who were all citizens of the US instituted
probate proceedings in a US court impleading
the siblings of Stela who were all in the
Philippines.
a) Was the joint will executed by Alden
XXV.
and Stela who were both former
Filipinos valid? Explain with legal basis.
(3%)
Mario executed his last will and testament b) Can the joint will produce
where he acknowledges the child being legal effect in the Philippines
with respect to the
conceived by his live-in partner Josie as his own
propertiesand of Alden Stela
child; and that his house and lot in Baguio City found here? If so, how? (3%)
be given to his unborn conceived child. Are the
acknowledgment and the donation mortis causa c) Is the situation presented in
valid? Why? (4%) Item I an example of
depe9age? (2%)
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3
Jose, the legitime of his illegitimate child would
be impaired if Maria would be allowed to keep Maria can set up the defense that the action
the entire property. After taking into account has prescribed. An action for revocation of the
the value of the property, Maria can be made donation on the ground that it impaired the
to reconvey the property to the extent legitime of a compulsory heir may only be filed
necessary to satisfy the legitime of within ten (10) years from the time the cause
Jose’s illegitimate daughter provided that the of action accrues which is at the time of the
woman claiming to be Jose’s child can death of Jose. The facts are not clear as to
prove her filiation to the deceased. when Jose died but on the assumption that he
died ten years prior to the filing of the action,
the same has clearly prescribed.